Risk Compensation Following Medical Male Circumcision: Results from a 1-Year Prospective Cohort Study of Young School-Going Men in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Abstract

Purpose

This study sought to assess risk compensation following voluntary medical male circumcision of young school-going men. Risk compensation is defined as an inadvertent increase in sexual risk behaviors and a corresponding decrease in self-perceived risk for contracting HIV following the application of a risk reduction technology.

Methods

This study documented the sexual practices of circumcised (n = 485) and uncircumcised (n = 496) young men in 42 secondary schools at three time points (baseline and 6 and 12 months) in a sub-district of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Study participants were aged from 16 to 24 years old.

Results

At the end of the study period, there was no significant difference between the two cohorts concerning learners’ perceptions of being at risk of contracting HIV (interaction effect: b = −0.12, p = 0.40). There was also no significant difference in the number of sexual partners in the previous month (interaction effect: b = −0.23, p = 0.15). The proportion of learners who have never used a condom decreased significantly over time (time effect: b = −0.27, p = 0.01), and there was no difference between the circumcised and uncircumcised learners (interaction effect: b = −0.09, p = 0.91).

Conclusions

Risk compensation, as evidenced in this study over a 1-year period, was not associated with undergoing voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) in our sample of young school-going men. However, it is of concern that at the end of this study, less than half of the sexually active sample in a high-HIV-prevalence community used condoms consistently in the previous month (39% for both study cohorts). The latter underscores the need to view VMMC as a potential entry point for planned HIV and sexuality education interventions targeting young men in this community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB, Agot K, Maclean I, Krieger JN, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369(9562):643–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Gray RH, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, Makumbi F, Watya S, Nalugoda F, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2007;369(9562):657–66. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60313-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Sitta R, Puren A. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 trial. PLoS Med. 2005;2(11):e298. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020298.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Joint strategic action framework to accelerate the scale-up of voluntary medical male circumcision for HIV prevention in Eastern and Southern Africa. 2011.

  5. 5.

    Govender K, George G, Mucheuki C, Strauss M. Voluntary medical male circumcision in South Africa: challenges and opportunities. S Afr Health Rev. 2013/2014;

  6. 6.

    Njeuhmeli E, Hatzold K, Gold E, Mahler H, Kripke K, Seifert-Ahanda K, et al. Lessons learned from scale-up of voluntary medical male circumcision focusing on adolescents: benefits, challenges, and potential opportunities for linkages with adolescent HIV, sexual, and reproductive health services. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;66:S193–S9. doi:10.1097/qai.0000000000000179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kaufman MR, Smelyanskaya M, Van Lith LM, Mallalieu EC, Waxman A, Hatzhold K, et al. Adolescent sexual and reproductive health services and implications for the provision of voluntary medical male circumcision: results of a systematic literature review. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0149892. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149892.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kharsany AB, Mlotshwa M, Frohlich JA, Zuma NY, Samsunder N, Karim SSA, et al. HIV prevalence among high school learners—opportunities for schools-based HIV testing programmes and sexual reproductive health services. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):231.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Eaton LA, Kalichman SC. Risk compensation in HIV prevention: implications for vaccines, microbicides, and other biomedical HIV prevention technologies. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2007;4(4):165–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Maughan-Brown B, Venkataramani AS. Learning that circumcision is protective against HIV: risk compensation among men and women in Cape Town, South Africa. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):1–9. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Grund JM, Hennink MM. A qualitative study of sexual behavior change and risk compensation following adult male circumcision in urban Swaziland. AIDS Care. 2012;24(2):245–51. doi:10.1080/09540121.2011.596516.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ombere SO, Nyambedha EO, Bukachi SA. Wimbo: implications for risk of HIV infection among circumcised fishermen in western Kenya. Cult Health Sex. 2015:1–8. doi:10.1080/13691058.2015.1018949.

  13. 13.

    Cassell MM, Halperin DT, Shelton JD, Stanton D. Risk compensation: the Achilles' heel of innovations in HIV prevention? BMJ : Br Med J. 2006;332(7541):605–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Eaton L, Kalichman S. Behavioral aspects of male circumcision for the prevention of HIV infection. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2009;6(4):187–93. doi:10.1007/s11904-009-0025-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Maughan-Brown B, Godlonton S, Thornton R, Venkataramani AS. What do people actually learn from public health campaigns? Incorrect inferences about male circumcision and female HIV infection risk among men and women in Malawi. AIDS Behav. 2014; doi:10.1007/s10461-014-0882-0.

  16. 16.

    Layer EH, Beckham SW, Momburi RB, Kennedy CE. Understanding the partial protection of male circumcision for HIV prevention among women in Iringa region, Tanzania: an ethnomedical model. AIDS Care. 2013;25(8):1045–50. doi:10.1080/09540121.2012.748874.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Andersson N, Cockcroft A. Male circumcision, attitudes to HIV prevention and HIV status: a cross-sectional study in Botswana, Namibia and Swaziland. AIDS Care. 2012;24(3):301–9. doi:10.1080/09540121.2011.608793.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Boyle GJ, Hill G. Sub-Saharan African randomised clinical trials into male circumcision and HIV transmission: methodological, ethical and legal concerns. J Law Med. 2011;19(2):316.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Westercamp N, Agot K, Jaoko W, Bailey R. Risk compensation following male circumcision: results from a two-year prospective cohort study of recently circumcised and uncircumcised men in Nyanza Province, Kenya. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(9):1764–75. doi:10.1007/s10461-014-0846-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mukuka L, Slonim-Nevo V. AIDS-related knowledge, attitude, and behavior among adolescents in Zambia. Ethn Dis. 2006;16:488–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hatzold K, Mavhu W, Jasi P, Chatora K, Cowan FM, Taruberekera N, et al. Barriers and motivators to voluntary medical male circumcision uptake among different age groups of men in Zimbabwe: results from a mixed methods study. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e85051.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Eaton LA, Cain DN, Agrawal A, Jooste S, Udemans N, Kalichman SC. The influence of male circumcision for HIV prevention on sexual behaviour among traditionally circumcised men in Cape Town, South Africa. Int J STD AIDS. 2011;22(11):674–9. doi:10.1258/ijsa.2011.011006.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mattson CL, Campbell RT, Bailey RC, Agot K, Ndinya-Achola JO, Moses S. Risk compensation is not associated with male circumcision in Kisumu, Kenya: a multi-faceted assessment of men enrolled in a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2008;3(6):1–9. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Gray R, Kigozi G, Kong X, Ssempiija V, Makumbi F, Wattya S, et al. The effectiveness of male circumcision for HIV prevention and effects on risk behaviors in a posttrial follow-up study. AIDS. 2012;26(5):609–15. doi:10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283504a3f.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kong X, Kigozi G, Nalugoda F, Musoke R, Kagaayi J, Latkin C, et al. Assessment of changes in risk behaviors during 3 years of posttrial follow-up of male circumcision trial participants uncircumcised at trial closure in Rakai, Uganda. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;176(10):875–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Agot KE, Kiarie JN, Nguyen HQ, Odhiambo JO, Onyango TM, Weiss NS. Male circumcision in Siaya and Bondo districts, Kenya: prospective cohort study to assess behavioral disinhibition following circumcision. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;44(1):66–70. doi:10.1097/01.qai.0000242455.05274.20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kalichman S, Eaton L, Pinkerton S. Circumcision for HIV prevention: failure to fully account for behavioral risk compensation. PLoS Med. 2007;4(3):e138. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040138.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Marcus JL, Glidden DV, Mayer KH, Liu AY, Buchbinder SP, Amico KR, et al. No evidence of sexual risk compensation in the iPrEx trial of daily oral HIV preexposure prophylaxis. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e81997. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081997.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Frohlich JA, Mkhize N, Dellar RC, Mahlase G, Montague CT, Karim QA. Meeting the sexual and reproductive health needs of high-school students in South Africa: experiences from rural KwaZulu-Natal. S Afr Med J. 2014;104(10):687–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Montague C, Ngcobo N, Mahlase G, Frohlich J, Pillay C, Yende-Zuma N, et al. Implementation of adolescent-friendly voluntary medical male circumcision using a school based recruitment program in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):1–7. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    IBM SPSS. Statistics for Windows. 23rd ed. Armonk, NY: IBM corporation; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics: Sage; 2013.

  33. 33.

    Shisana O, Rehle, T, Simbayi LC, Zuma, K, Jooste, S, Zungu N, Labadarios, D, Onoya, D. South African national HIV prevalence, incidence and behaviour survey. 2012. Cape Town 2014.

  34. 34.

    George G, Strauss M, Chirawu P, Rhodes B, Frohlich J, Montague C, et al. Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) among adolescent boys in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Afr J AIDS Res. 2014;13(2):179–87. doi:10.2989/16085906.2014.943253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency for funding the study (grant number 51040023-01). We would also like to thank all the participants and fieldworkers without whom this study would have not been possible.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Beckett.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Permission to publicize the study and elicit learner participation in the selected schools was sought from the headmaster/headmistress of the school. A waiver of parental/guardian informed consent for learners who were aged from 16 to 18 years was sought and obtained from the University of KwaZulu-Natal Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (BF128/11).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Govender, K., George, G., Beckett, S. et al. Risk Compensation Following Medical Male Circumcision: Results from a 1-Year Prospective Cohort Study of Young School-Going Men in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa . Int.J. Behav. Med. 25, 123–130 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-017-9673-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Youth
  • Voluntary medical male circumcision
  • Risk compensation
  • HIV
  • HIV prevention