Translating Dental Flossing Intentions into Behavior: a Longitudinal Investigation of the Mediating Effect of Planning and Self-Efficacy on Young Adults
- 608 Downloads
Although poor oral hygiene practices can have serious health consequences, a large number of adults brush or floss their teeth less than the recommended time or not at all. This study examined the mediating effect of two key self-regulatory processes, self-efficacy and planning, as the mechanisms that translate dental flossing intentions into behavior.
Participants (N = 629) comprised young adults attending a major university in Queensland, Australia. A longitudinal design guided by sound theory was adopted to investigate the sequential mediation chain for the effect of dental flossing intentions (time 1) on behavior (time 3) via self-efficacy and planning (time 2).
A latent variable structural equation model with standardized parameter estimates revealed the model was a good fit to the data. Controlling for baseline flossing, the effect of intentions on behavior was mediated via self-efficacy and planning, with 64 % of the flossing variance accounted for by this set of predictors. Controlling for age and sex did not change the results.
The results extend previous research to further elucidate the mechanisms that help to translate oral hygiene intentions into behavior and make a significant contribution to the cumulative empirical evidence about self-regulatory components in health behavior change.
KeywordsSelf-efficacy Planning Dental flossing Oral hygiene
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- 1.World Health Organisation. Oral health [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2015 26 March]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs318/en/.
- 5.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s health 2014. Canberra: AIHW; 2014. Australia’s health series no 14.Google Scholar
- 6.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Oral health and dental care in Australia: key facts and figures trends 2014. Canberra: AIHW; 2014.Google Scholar
- 8.Sambunjak D, Nickerson J, Poklepovic T, Johnson T, Imai P, Tugwell P, et al. Flossing for the management of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;12:Cd008829.Google Scholar
- 10.American Dental Association. Mouth Healthy. Flossing [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 30 November]. Available from: http://www.mouthhealthy.org/en/az-topics/f/flossing.
- 11.Australian Dental Association. Tooth decay—Australia’s most prevalent health condition [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2016]. Available from: http://www.ada.org.au/app_cmslib/media/lib/1207/m422161_v1_tooth_decay-australias_most_prevalent_health_condition.pdf.
- 17.Scheerman JFM, Loveren C, van Meijel B, Dusseldorp E, Wartewig E, Verrips GHW, et al. Psychosocial correlates of oral hygiene behaviour in people aged 9 to 19—a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Community Density and Oral Epidemiology. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12224.
- 18.Ellershaw A, Spencer A. Dental attendance patterns and oral health status. Canberra; AIHW; 2011. Dental statistics and research series no. 57 Cat. No. DEN 208.Google Scholar
- 20.Schwarzer R. Modeling health behavior change: how to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psychol Int Rev. 2008;57:1–29.Google Scholar
- 21.Schwarzer R, Luszczynska A. Health action process approach. In Conner M, Norman P, editors: Predicting and changing health behavior: research and practice with social cognition models. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2015.Google Scholar
- 42.Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman; 1997.Google Scholar
- 44.Hayes A. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press; 2013.Google Scholar
- 45.Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus user’s guide. 7th ed. Muthén & Muthén: Los Angeles, CA; 2015.Google Scholar
- 49.Doran GT. There’s a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management’s goals and objectives. Manage Rev (AMA FORUM). 1981;70:35–6.Google Scholar
- 51.Goodwin CJ. Research in psychology: methods and design. USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.Google Scholar
- 54.Young AF, Powers JR, Bell SL. Attrition in longitudinal studies: who do you lose? ANZJPH. 2006;30:353–61.Google Scholar
- 55.McGinley S, Zhang L, Hanks L, O’Neill J. Reducing longitudinal attrition through Facebook. J Hosp Mark Manage. 2015;24:894–900.Google Scholar