International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 135–142 | Cite as

Motivational Outcomes and Predictors of Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity and Sedentary Time for Adolescents in the Sigue La Huella Intervention

  • Berta Murillo Pardo
  • Enrique García Bengoechea
  • José Antonio Julián Clemente
  • Eduardo Generelo Lanaspa
Article

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the multicomponent Sigue la Huella intervention on selected motivational outcomes and whether any of these outcomes, in addition to relevant socio-demographic, biological, and behavioral factors, served as predictors of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and sedentary time among participants through the intervention.

Method

This quasi-experimental, cohort study took place in four secondary schools in Huesca (Spain) during three academic years (students aged 12–15 years). Two schools were assigned to the experimental condition (n = 368) and two schools to the control condition (n = 314). Outcome variables were assessed objectively.

Results

A total of 553 participants met study inclusion criteria. Compared to the control group, participants in the experimental group reported greater enjoyment of physical activity, intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in physical education, perceived autonomy in physical education, perceived competence in physical education, and perceived importance of physical education over time. Participants in this group reported also lower amotivation in physical education over time. In subsequent analyses, gender, organized physical activity out of school, sedentary time, and perceived importance of physical education predicted moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Type of school (public vs. private), moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, and perceived autonomy in physical education emerged as predictors of sedentary time.

Conclusion

Sigue la Huella had a positive effect on motivational outcomes relevant to moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, sedentary time, and, particularly, student engagement in physical education. The analyses identified shared and unique determinants of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and sedentary time, suggesting that specific intervention strategies may be required to address each outcome.

Keywords

Adolescence Motivation School Physical education Social ecology Self-determination theory 

Supplementary material

12529_2015_9528_MOESM1_ESM.docx (486 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 486 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Kohl HW, Craig CL, Lambert EV, Inoue S, Alkandari JR, y Kahlmeier LG. The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet. 2012;380:294–305.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mitchell JA, Byun W. Sedentary behavior and health outcomes in children and adolescents. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2013. doi:10.1177/1559827613498700.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Van der Horst K, Paw MJ, Twisk JW, et al. A brief review on correlates of physical activity and sedentariness in Routh. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2007;39:1241–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tremblay MS, LeBlanc AG, Kho ME, et al. Systematic review of sedentary behavior and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pearson N, Braithwaite RE, Biddle SJH et al. Associations between sedentary behavior and physical activity in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2014. doi: 10.11111/obr.12188.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    British Heart Foundation National Centre, 2014. Physical activity for children and young people. http://www.bhfactive.org.uk. Accessed 17 Feb 2014.
  7. 7.
    Murillo B, García Bengoechea E, Generelo E et al. Effects of the three-year Sigue la Huella intervention on sedentary time in secondary school students. Eur J Pub Health.2014; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku194
  8. 8.
    Kipping RR, Howe LD, Jago R et al. Effect of intervention aimed at increasing physical activity, reducing sedentary behavior, and increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children: active for life year 5 (AFLY5) school based cluster randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2014;doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3256.
  9. 9.
    Metcalf B, Henley W, Wilkin T. Effectiveness of intervention on physical activity of children: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials with objectively measured outcomes. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47:226. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2013-e5888rep.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Sluijs EMF, Kriemler S, McMinn AM. The effect of community and family interventions on young people’s physical activity levels: a review of reviews and updated systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45:914–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deci EL, Ryan RM. Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester: University of Rochester Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav. 2004;31:143–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Markland D, et al. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Murillo B, García Bengoechea E, Julián JA, et al. Empowering adolescents to be physically active: three-year results of the Sigue la Huella intervention. Prev Med. 2014;66:6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chatzisarantis NLD, Hagger MS. Effects of an intervention based on self-determination theory on self-reported leisure-time physical activity participation. Psychol Health. 2009;24:29–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilson DK, Van Horn ML, Kitzman-Ulrich H, et al. The results of the “active by choice today” trial for increasing physical activity in underserved adolescents. Psychol Health. 2011;30:463–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Okely A, Cotton W, Lubans D, Morgan PL, Puglisi L, Miller J, et al. A school-based intervention to promote physical activity among adolescent girls: rationale, design, and baseline data from the Girls in Sport group randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:658–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Spence JC, Lee RE. Toward a comprehensive model of physical activity. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2003;4:7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Murillo B, García Bengoechea E, Generelo E, et al. Promising school-based strategies and intervention guidelines to increase physical activity of adolescents. Health Educ Res. 2013;28:523–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Grummer-Strawn LM et al. CDC growth charts: United States. 2000; 314: 1–28Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Boyce W, Torsheim T, Currie C, et al. The family affluence scale as a measure of national wealth: validation of an adolescent self-report measure. Soc Indic Res. 2006;78:473–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fox KR, Corbin CB. The physical self-perception profile: development and preliminary validation. J Sports Exerc Psychol. 1989;11:408–30.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Goñi A, Ruiz de Azúa S, Rodriguez S. Cuestionario de Autoconcepto Físico (CAF). Madrid: Manual EOS; 2006.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Motl R, Dishman R, Saunders R, et al. Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in adolescent girls. Am J Prev Med. 2001;21:110–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moreno JA, González-Cutre D, Martínez Galindo C, et al. Propiedades psicométricas de la Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) en el contexto español. Estud Psicol. 2008;29:173–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brière NM, Vallerand RJ, Blais MR, et al. Dévelopment et validation d’une mesure de motivation intrinsèque, extrinsèque et d’amotivation en context sportif: l’échelle de motivation dans les sports (EMS). Int J Sport Psychol. 1995;26:465–89.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Núñez JL, Martín-Albo J, Navarro JG, et al. Preliminary validation of a Spanish version of the Sport Motivation Scale. Percept Mot Skills. 2006;102:919–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ilardi B, Leone D, Kasser T, et al. Employee and supervisor ratings of motivation: main effects and discrepancies associated with job satisfaction and adjustment in a factory setting. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1993;23:1789–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Moreno JA, Llamas LS, Ruiz LM. Perfiles motivacionales y su relación con la importancia concedida a la Educación Física. Psicología Educativa. 2006;12:49–63.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Moreno JA, González-Cutre D, Ruiz LM. Self-determined motivation and physical education importance. Mot Eur J Hum Mov. 2009;10:1–7.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Trost SG, Loprinzi PD, Moore R, et al. Comparison of accelerometer cut-points for predicting activity intensity in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:1360–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kristensen PL, Korsholm L, Moller NC, et al. Sources of variation in habitual physical activity of children and adolescents: the European youth heart study. Scand J Med Sci Sport. 2008;18:298–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Trost SG, McIver KL, Pate RR. Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:531–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rowlands AV, Pilgrim EL, Eston RG. Patterns of habitual activity across weekdays and weekend days in 9–11-year-old children. Prev Med. 2008;46:317–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shek DTL, Ma CMS. Longitudinal data analyses using linear mixed models in SPSS: concepts, procedures and illustrations. Sci World J. 2011;11:42–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Ann Rev Public Health. 2006;27:297–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Berta Murillo Pardo
    • 1
  • Enrique García Bengoechea
    • 2
  • José Antonio Julián Clemente
    • 3
  • Eduardo Generelo Lanaspa
    • 3
  1. 1.Facultad de Ciencias de la SaludUniversidad San JorgeVillanueva de GállegoSpain
  2. 2.School of Science and HealthUniversity of Western SydneyPenrithAustralia
  3. 3.Departamento de Expresión Musical, Plástica y CorporalUniversidad de ZaragozaHuescaSpain

Personalised recommendations