Associations of Dispositional Mindfulness with Obesity and Central Adiposity: the New England Family Study
- 713 Downloads
To evaluate whether dispositional mindfulness (defined as the ability to attend nonjudgmentally to one’s own physical and mental processes) is associated with obesity and central adiposity.
Study participants (n = 394) were from the New England Family Study, a prospective birth cohort, with median age 47 years. Dispositional mindfulness was assessed using the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). Central adiposity was assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans with primary outcomes android fat mass and android/gynoid ratio. Obesity was defined as body mass index ≥30 kg/m2.
Multivariable-adjusted regression analyses demonstrated that participants with low vs. high MAAS scores were more likely to be obese (prevalence ratio for obesity = 1.34 (95 % confidence limit (CL): 1.02, 1.77)), adjusted for age, gender, race/ethnicity, birth weight, childhood socioeconomic status, and childhood intelligence. Furthermore, participants with low vs. high MAAS level had a 448 (95 % CL 39, 857) g higher android fat mass and a 0.056 (95 % CL 0.003, 0.110) greater android/gynoid fat mass ratio. Prospective analyses demonstrated that participants who were not obese in childhood and became obese in adulthood (n = 154) had −0.21 (95 % CL −0.41, −0.01; p = 0.04) lower MAAS scores than participants who were not obese in childhood or adulthood (n = 203).
Dispositional mindfulness may be inversely associated with obesity and adiposity. Replication studies are needed to adequately establish whether low dispositional mindfulness is a risk factor for obesity and adiposity.
KeywordsMindfulness Obesity Adiposity Epidemiology Prevention
Funding for this study was provided by NIH/NIA grant 1RC2AG036666 and NIH/NCCIH/OBBSR grant UH2AT009145.
Compliance of Ethical Standard
Conflict of Interest
Eric B. Loucks, Willoughby B. Britton, Chanelle J. Howe, Roee Gutman, Stephen E. Gilman, Judson Brewer, Charles B. Eaton, and Stephen L. Buka declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- 1.Wormser D, Kaptoge S, Emerging Risk Factors C, et al. Separate and combined associations of body-mass index and abdominal adiposity with cardiovascular disease: collaborative analysis of 58 prospective studies. Lancet. 2011;377(9771):1085–95. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60105-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Loucks EB, Britton WB, Howe CJ, Eaton CB, Buka SL. Positive associations of dispositional mindfulness with cardiovascular health: The New England Family Study. Int J Behav Med. 2014:DOI 10.1007/s12529-014-9448-9.
- 22.Niswander K, Gordon M. The women and their pregnancies: the collaborative perinatal study of the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke. National Institutes of Health: Washington D.C; 1972.Google Scholar
- 24.Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2004.Google Scholar
- 25.Falkner F. Office measurement of physical growth. Pediatr Clin NA. 1961;8:13–8.Google Scholar
- 26.Ogden CL, Flegal KM. Changes in terminology for childhood overweight and obesity. National Health Stat Rep. 2010;25:1–5.Google Scholar
- 27.Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Guo SS, et al. CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital and health statistics. Ser 11, Data National Health Surv. 2000;2002(246):1–190.Google Scholar
- 28.Wechsler D. Wechsler intelligence scale for children; manual. New York: Psychological Corp; 1949.Google Scholar
- 38.Raghunathan TE, Lepkowski JM, Van Hoewyk J, Solenberger P. A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Surv Methodol. 2001;27(1):85–95.Google Scholar
- 48.Visted E, Jollestad J, Nielsen MB, Nielsen GH. The impact of group-based mindfulness training on self-reported mindfulness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mindfulness. February 2014:DOI: 10.1007/s12671-014-0283-5.