The German PASS-20 in Patients with Low Back Pain: New Aspects of Convergent, Divergent, and Criterion-Related Validity
- 355 Downloads
The PASS-20 (McCracken and Dhingra, Pain Res Manag 7:45−50, 2002) is a shortened version of the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS), a self-report measure of pain anxiety. The PASS-20 demonstrates good psychometric characteristics but has not yet been validated in a German population.
The aims of the present study were to (1) examine the factor structure and psychometric characteristics of the German PASS-20; (2) investigate its construct validity with respect to depression, fear-avoidance, and endurance; and (3) determine its criterion-related validity with a special emphasis on pain, disability, and quality of life.
A principal component analysis was performed on a sample (N = 195) of patients with acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain. Reliability was examined with Cronbach’s α. Validity was assessed by correlating the PASS-20 to measures of depression, anxiety, disability, quality of life, and avoidance-endurance-related behavioral pain responses.
The original four-factor structure proposed for the PASS-20 was replicated using the original subscale labels. The reliability of the total score and the subscales was satisfactory to excellent, and both convergent and divergent validity were moderate to high in the expected directions, showing positive correlations with anxiety, fear, depression, and fear-avoidance and negative correlations with endurance and quality of life. The PASS-20 showed unique predictive ability and advantages over the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia.
The results for the German PASS-20 support the original factor structure and provide evidence of satisfactory psychometric characteristics and usefulness in patients with low back pain.
KeywordsPain anxiety Avoidance Endurance Back pain Assessment Disability Quality of life
This study was supported by a research grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG: HA 1684) awarded to MIH.
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
Authors Kreddig, Burkhardt, Rusu, and Hasenbring declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 23.Kori SH, Miller RP, Todd DD. Kinesiophobia: a new view of chronic pain behavior. Pain Manag. 1990;3:35–43.Google Scholar
- 24.Rusu AC, Kreddig N, Hallner D, Hülsebusch J, Hasenbring MI. Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain: validation of a German version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia with special focus on fear-avoidance and endurance. Manuscript submitted for publicationGoogle Scholar
- 34.Kammer D. Eine Untersuchung der psychometrischen Eigenschaften des deutschen Beck-Depressionsinventars (BDI). Diagnostica. 1983;29:48–60.Google Scholar
- 36.Hautzinger M, Bailer M. Allgemeine Depressions Skala. Manual. Göttingen: Beltz Test GmbH; 1993.Google Scholar
- 37.Tabachnik BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon; 2001.Google Scholar
- 38.Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. PARE. 2005;10(7):1–9.Google Scholar
- 39.Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.Google Scholar
- 42.Barlow DH, Chorpita BF, Turovsky J. Fear, panic, anxiety and disorders of emotion. Neb Symp Motiv. 1996;43:251–328.Google Scholar
- 46.Kline P. The handbook of psychological testing. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 1999.Google Scholar
- 47.Loewenthal KM. An introduction to psychological tests and scales. 2nd ed. London: Psychology Press; 2001.Google Scholar