Abstract
Lynagh, Sanson-Fisher and Bonevski’s article entitled “What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Guiding principles for the use of financial incentives in health behaviour change” (Int J Behav Med 20:114–120, 2012) reviews evidence for the use of financial incentives for encouraging health behaviour change. Their discussion of the practical and moral issues involved is a timely contribution which will encourage consideration of the implications of such interventions. In this response to their paper, I suggest that there are also broader aspects that we must consider before developing principles for public policy intervention. First, we must include good theories that explain in a great deal more depth what we mean by health-related behaviours, and secondly, we need to understand the location of these behaviours in social life and within structural inequalities. To ignore these fundamental aspects of health is to risk increasing social injustice and worsening health inequalities, a facet of the morality of health promotion activities which is not touched upon by the Lynagh et al. paper.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Lynagh MC, Sanson-Fisher RW, Bonevski B. (2013). What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. Guiding principles for the use of financial incentives in health behaviour change. Int J Behav Med, 20:114–20.
Radley A. Making sense of illness: the social psychology of health and disease. London: Sage; 1994.
McPhail D, Chapman GE, Beagan BL. “Too much of that stuff can’t be good”: Canadian teens, morality, and fast food consumption. So Sci Med. 2011;73(2):301–7. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.05.022.
Glanz K (2012) Modifying social and physical environments to improve health: at the intersection of health psychology and population health. Keynote presentation to the British Psychological Society Division of Health Psychology Annual Conference, Liverpool, UK. September 5–7, 2012.
Chamberlain K, O’Neill D. Understanding social class differences in health: a qualitative analysis of smokers’ health beliefs. Psychol Heal. 1998;13(6):1105–19.
Ingall G, Cropley M. Exploring the barriers of quitting smoking during pregnancy: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Women Birth: J Aust Coll Midwives. 2010;23(2):45–52.
Stead M, MacAskill S, MacKintosh A, Reece J, Eadie D. “It’s as if you’re locked in”: qualitative explanations for area effects on smoking in disadvantaged communities. Health & Place. 2001;7:333–43.
Crossley ML. Rethinking health psychology. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2000.
Sallis JF, Owen N. Ecological models of health behavior. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research and practice. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bas; 200. p. 62–484.
Crossley ML. Making sense of ‘barebacking’: gay men’s narratives, unsafe sex and the ‘resistance habitus’. Br J Soc Psychol. 2004;43:225–44.
Farmer P. AIDS-talk and the constitution of cultural models. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:801–9.
Hiscock R, Bauld L, Amos A, Fidler JA, Munafò M. Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review. Ann New York Acad Sci. 2012;1248:107–23.
Townsend P, Davidson N. Inequalities in health: the Black report. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1982.
Commission on Social Determinants of Health (2008) Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health Final report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Marmot M. The status syndrome: how social standing affects our health and longevity. New York: Henry Holt; 2004.
Marmot M, Siegrist J. Health inequalities and the psychosocial environment. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(8):1463–73.
Wilkinson RG. The impact of inequality: how to make sick societies healthier. London: Routledge; 2005.
Wilkinson RG, Pickett KE. Income inequality and population health: a review and explanation of the evidence. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(7):1768–84.
Lynch JW, Davey Smith G, Kaplan GA, House JS. Income inequality and mortality: importance to health of individual income, psychosocial environment, or material conditions. Br Med J. 2000;320:1200–4.
Petersen A, Lupton D. The new public health: health and self in the age of risk. London: Sage Publications; 1996.
Becker MH. A medical sociologist looks at health promotion. J Health Soc Behav. 1993;34(1):1–6.
Crawford R. Healthism and the medicalisation of everyday life. Int J Heal Serv. 1980;10(3):365–88.
Richards H, Reid M, Watt G. Victim-blaming revisited: a qualitative study of beliefs about illness causation, and responses to chest pain. Fam Pract. 2003;20(6):711–6. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmg615.
Williams G. Social inequalities in health: notes in the margins. Soc Theory Health. 2013;11:117–32. doi:10.1057/sth.2013.2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stephens, C. Paying the Piper: Additional Considerations of the Theoretical, Ethical and Moral Basis of Financial Incentives for Health Behaviour Change. Int.J. Behav. Med. 21, 202–205 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-013-9323-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-013-9323-0