International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 114–120 | Cite as

What’s Good for the Goose is Good for the Gander. Guiding Principles for the Use of Financial Incentives in Health Behaviour Change

  • Marita C. Lynagh
  • Rob W. Sanson-Fisher
  • Billie Bonevski
Article

Abstract

Background

The use of financial incentives or pay-for-performance programs for health care providers has triggered emerging interest in the use of financial incentives for encouraging health behaviour change.

Purpose

This paper aims to identify key conditions under which the use of financial incentives for improvements in public health outcomes is most likely to be effective and appropriate.

Methods

We review recent systematic reviews on their effectiveness in changing health behaviour and identify existing moral concerns concerning personal financial incentives.

Results

Current evidence indicates that incentives can be effective in driving health behaviour change under certain provisos, while a number of misgivings continue to be deliberated on. We outline a number of key principles for consideration in decisions about the potential use of incentives in leading to public health improvements.

Conclusion

These key principles can assist policy makers in making decisions on the use of financial incentives directed at achieving improvements in public health.

Keywords

Financial incentives Health behaviour Rewards Contingency management 

References

  1. 1.
    Volpp KG, Pauly MV, Loewenstein G, Bangsberg D. P4P4P: an agenda for research on pay-for-performance for patients. Health Aff. 2009;28(1):206–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Petry NM. A comprehensive guide to the application of contingency management procedures in clinical settings. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000;58:9–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Prendergast M, Podus D, Finney J, Greenwell L, Roll J. Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 2007;101:1546–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Greene J. Medicaid efforts to incentivize healthy behaviours. New Jersey: Center for Health Care Systems; 2007.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fernald L, Gertler P, Neufeld L. Role of cash in conditional cash transfer programmes for child health, growth and development: an analysis of Mexico’s Oportunidades. Lancet. 2008;371:828–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Report of the Expert Panel for the Children’ Fitness Tax Credit. Ottawa, Ontario: Department of Finance Canada; 2006.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP). Immunisation position paper. Melbourne, Vic.: RACGP; 2003.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gray M, Qu L, Weston R. Fertility and family policy in Australia. Canberra, Australia: Australian Instititute of Family Studies; 2006.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lussier JP, Heil SH, Mongeon JA, Badger GJ, Higgins ST. A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction. 2006;101(2):192–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    National Preventative Health Taskforce. Tobacco control in Australia: making smoking history; 2009.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marteau TM, Ashcroft RE, Oliver A. Using financial incentives to achieve healthy behaviour. BMJ. 2009;338:1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cahill K, Perera R. Competitions and incentives for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; 2008(Issue 3).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leeks KD, Hopkins D, Soler R, Aten A, Chattopadhyay S. Worksite-based incentives and competitions to reduce tobacco use. A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2010;38:S263–S74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jochelson K. Kicking bad habits. Paying the patient. Improving health using financial incentives. London, UK.: King’s Fund; 2007.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sutherland K, Leatherman S, Christianson J. Paying the patient: does it work? A review of patient-targeted incentives. London: QQUIP. Quest of Quality and Improved Performance. The Health Foundation; 2008.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scott A, Schurer S. Financial incentives, personal responsibility and prevention. Canberra: Discussion paper commissioned by the National Health and Hospitals Reform, Australian Government; 2008.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lagarde M, Haines A, Palner N. Conditional cash transfers for improving uptake of health interventions in low- and middle-income countries. JAMA. 2007;298(16):1900–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fiszbein A, Schady N. Conditional cash transfers. Reducing present and future poverty. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Paul-Ebhohimhen V, Avenell A. Systematic review of the use of financial incentives in treatments for obesity and overweight. Obesity Reviews. 2008;9:355–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Volpp KG, Troxel AB, Pauly MV, Glick HA, Puig A, Asch DA, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:699–709.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heil S, Higgins S, Bernstein I, Soloman L, Rogers R, Thomas C, et al. Effects of voucher-based incentives on abstinence from cigarette smoking and feral growth among pregnant women. Addiction. 2008;103:1009–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Volpp KG, John L, Troxel A, Norton L, Fassbender J, Lowenstein G. Financial incentive-based approaches for weight loss. A randomised trial. JAMA. 2008;300:2631–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Higgins S, Heil S, Soloman L, Plebani Lussier J, Abel R, Lynch M, et al. A pilot study on voucher-based incentives to promote abstinence from cigarette smoking during pregnancy and postpartum. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2004;6:1015–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Preston K, Umbricht A, Epstein D. Abstinence reinforcement maintenance contingency and one-year follow-up. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2002;67:125–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Roll J, Huber A, Sodano R, Chudzynski J, Moynier E, Shoptaw S. A comparison of five reinforcement schedules for use in contingency management-based treatment of methamphetamine abuse. The Psychological Record. 2006;56:67–81.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Camberwell, Australia: Penguin Books; 2009.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Marteau TM, Oliver A, Ashcroft RE. Changing behaviour through state intervention. When does an acceptable nudge become an unacceptable shove? BMJ. 2009;338:121–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 1979;47:263–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vlaev I, Dolan P. From changing cognitions to changing the context: a dual-route model of behaviour change/. London: Imperial College London Business School; 2009.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dolan P, Hallsworth M, Halpern D, King D, Vlaev I. MINDSPACE. Influencing behaviour through public policy. United Kingdom.: Institute for Government,; 2010; Available from: www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk
  31. 31.
    Klein E, Karlawish J. Challenges and opportunities for developing and implementing incentives to improve health-related behaviours in older adults. Journal of American Geriatrics Society. 2010;58:1758–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin. 1999;125:627–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Frey B, Jegen R. Motivation crowding theory. Journal of Economic Surveillance. 2001;15:590–611.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ryan R, Deci E. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist. 2000;55:68–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lee W, Reeve J, Xue Y, Xiong J. Similarities and differences in the neural activities of intrinsic motivation and incentive motivation. NeuroImage. 2009;47(Supplement 1):S39–41.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    McDonald R, Harrison S, Checkland K, Campbell S, Roland M. Impact on financial incentives on clinical autonomy and internal motivation in primary care: ethnographic study. BMJ. 2007;334(7608):1357–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dworkin G. Taking risks, assessing responsbility. The Hastings Center Report. 1981;11:26–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wikler D. Who should be blamed for being sick? Health Education Quarterly. 1987;14:11–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Long JA, Helweg-Larsen M, Volpp KG. Patient opinions regarding ‘pay for peformance for patients’. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(10):1647–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lynagh M, Bonevski B, Symonds I, Sanson-Fisher RW. Paying pregnant women to quit smoking during pregnancy? Acceptability among pregnant women. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2011:(in press).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Malotte CK, Rhodes F, Mais KE. Tuberculosis screening and compliance with return for skin test reading among active drug users. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:792–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ghitza U, Epstein D, Schmittner J, Vahabzadeh M, Lin JL, Preston K. Effect of reinforcement probabilty and prize size on cocaine and heroin abstinence in prize-based contingency management. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis. 2008;41:539–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Higgins S, Badger G, Budney A. Initial abstinence and success in achieving longer-term cocaine abstinence. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000;8:377–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Petry N, Casarella T. Excessive discounting of delayed rewards in substance abusers with gambling problems. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 1999;56:25–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marita C. Lynagh
    • 1
  • Rob W. Sanson-Fisher
    • 1
  • Billie Bonevski
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Medicine and Public HealthUniversity of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Health Research & Psycho-oncology (CHeRP)University of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia

Personalised recommendations