What’s Good for the Goose is Good for the Gander. Guiding Principles for the Use of Financial Incentives in Health Behaviour Change
- 1.2k Downloads
The use of financial incentives or pay-for-performance programs for health care providers has triggered emerging interest in the use of financial incentives for encouraging health behaviour change.
This paper aims to identify key conditions under which the use of financial incentives for improvements in public health outcomes is most likely to be effective and appropriate.
We review recent systematic reviews on their effectiveness in changing health behaviour and identify existing moral concerns concerning personal financial incentives.
Current evidence indicates that incentives can be effective in driving health behaviour change under certain provisos, while a number of misgivings continue to be deliberated on. We outline a number of key principles for consideration in decisions about the potential use of incentives in leading to public health improvements.
These key principles can assist policy makers in making decisions on the use of financial incentives directed at achieving improvements in public health.
KeywordsFinancial incentives Health behaviour Rewards Contingency management
- 4.Greene J. Medicaid efforts to incentivize healthy behaviours. New Jersey: Center for Health Care Systems; 2007.Google Scholar
- 6.Report of the Expert Panel for the Children’ Fitness Tax Credit. Ottawa, Ontario: Department of Finance Canada; 2006.Google Scholar
- 7.The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP). Immunisation position paper. Melbourne, Vic.: RACGP; 2003.Google Scholar
- 8.Gray M, Qu L, Weston R. Fertility and family policy in Australia. Canberra, Australia: Australian Instititute of Family Studies; 2006.Google Scholar
- 10.National Preventative Health Taskforce. Tobacco control in Australia: making smoking history; 2009.Google Scholar
- 12.Cahill K, Perera R. Competitions and incentives for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; 2008(Issue 3).Google Scholar
- 14.Jochelson K. Kicking bad habits. Paying the patient. Improving health using financial incentives. London, UK.: King’s Fund; 2007.Google Scholar
- 15.Sutherland K, Leatherman S, Christianson J. Paying the patient: does it work? A review of patient-targeted incentives. London: QQUIP. Quest of Quality and Improved Performance. The Health Foundation; 2008.Google Scholar
- 16.Scott A, Schurer S. Financial incentives, personal responsibility and prevention. Canberra: Discussion paper commissioned by the National Health and Hospitals Reform, Australian Government; 2008.Google Scholar
- 25.Roll J, Huber A, Sodano R, Chudzynski J, Moynier E, Shoptaw S. A comparison of five reinforcement schedules for use in contingency management-based treatment of methamphetamine abuse. The Psychological Record. 2006;56:67–81.Google Scholar
- 26.Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Camberwell, Australia: Penguin Books; 2009.Google Scholar
- 29.Vlaev I, Dolan P. From changing cognitions to changing the context: a dual-route model of behaviour change/. London: Imperial College London Business School; 2009.Google Scholar
- 30.Dolan P, Hallsworth M, Halpern D, King D, Vlaev I. MINDSPACE. Influencing behaviour through public policy. United Kingdom.: Institute for Government,; 2010; Available from: www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk
- 33.Frey B, Jegen R. Motivation crowding theory. Journal of Economic Surveillance. 2001;15:590–611.Google Scholar
- 35.Lee W, Reeve J, Xue Y, Xiong J. Similarities and differences in the neural activities of intrinsic motivation and incentive motivation. NeuroImage. 2009;47(Supplement 1):S39–41.Google Scholar
- 40.Lynagh M, Bonevski B, Symonds I, Sanson-Fisher RW. Paying pregnant women to quit smoking during pregnancy? Acceptability among pregnant women. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2011:(in press).Google Scholar