An Intervention to Reduce Alcohol Consumption in Undergraduate Students Using Implementation Intentions and Mental Simulations: A Cross-National Study

  • Martin S. Hagger
  • Adam Lonsdale
  • Andre Koka
  • Vello Hein
  • Heidi Pasi
  • Taru Lintunen
  • Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis
Article

Abstract

Background

Excessive alcohol consumption has been linked to deleterious health consequences among undergraduate students. There is a need to develop theory-based and cost-effective brief interventions to attenuate alcohol consumption in this population.

Purpose

The present study tested the effectiveness of an integrated theory-based intervention in reducing undergraduates' alcohol consumption in excess of guideline limits in national samples from Estonia, Finland, and the UK.

Method

A 2 (volitional: implementation intention vs. no implementation intention) × 2 (motivation: mental simulation vs. no mental simulation) × 3 (nationality: Estonia vs. Finland vs. UK) randomized-controlled design was adopted. Participants completed baseline psychological measures and self-reported number of alcohol units consumed and binge-drinking frequency followed by the intervention manipulation. One month later, participants completed follow-up measures of the psychological variables and alcohol consumption.

Results

Results revealed main effects for implementation intention and nationality on units of alcohol consumed at follow-up and an implementation intention × nationality interaction. Alcohol consumption was significantly reduced in the implementation intention condition for the Estonian and UK samples. There was a significant main effect for nationality and an implementation intention × nationality interaction on binge-drinking frequency. Follow-up tests revealed significant reductions in binge-drinking occasions in the implementation intention group for the UK sample only.

Conclusion

Results support the implementation intention component of the intervention in reducing alcohol drinking in excess of guideline limits among Estonian and UK undergraduates. There was no support for the motivational intervention or the interaction between the strategies. Results are discussed with respect to intervention design based on motivational and volitional approaches.

Keywords

Binge drinking Implementation intention Mental simulations Planned behavior 

References

  1. 1.
    Bailer J, Stubinger C, Dressing H, Gass P, Rist F, Kuhner C. Increased prevalence of problematic alcohol consumption in university students. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2009;59:376–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gill JS. Reported levels of alcohol consumption and binge drinking within the UK undergraduate student population over the last 25 years. Alcohol Alcohol. 2002;37:109–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hibell B, Andersson B, Bjarnason T, Ahlström S, Balakireva O, Kokkevi A, et al. The ESPAD report 2003: alcohol and other drug use among students in 35 European countries. Stockholm, Sweden: Pompidou Group at the Council of Europe; 2004.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Plant MA, Plant ML, Miller P, Gmel G, Kuntsche S. The social consequences of binge drinking: a comparison of young adults in six European countries. J Addict Dis. 2009;28:294–308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nelson TF, Xuan ZM, Lee H, Weitzman ER, Wechsler H. Persistence of heavy drinking and ensuing consequences at heavy drinking colleges. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009;70:726–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mundt MP, Zakletskaia LI, Fleming MF. Extreme college drinking and alcohol-related injury risk. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2009;33:1532–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cimini MD, Martens MP, Larimer ME, Kilmer JR, Neighbors C, Monserrat JM. Assessing the effectiveness of peer-facilitatied interventions addressing high-risk drinking among judicially mandated college students. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009;16:57–66.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thombs DL, Olds RS, Bondy SJ, Winchell J, Baliunas D, Rehm J. Undergraduate drinking and academic performance: a prospective investigation with objective measures. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009;70:776–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martinez JA, Sher KJ, Wood PK. Is heavy drinking really associated with attrition from college? The alcohol-attrition paradox. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008;22:450–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Department of Health. Safe. Sensible. Social. The next steps in the National Alcohol Strategy. London: Home Office; 2009.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Health Challenge Wales and National Union of Students Wales. Don't let your drinking define you. [updated 2009 October 19, 2009; cited 2009 November 1]; Available from: http://www.nus.org.uk/en/News/News/Alcohol-and-the-Student-Experience/;2009.
  12. 12.
    StudentHealth Ltd. Alcohol and drinking - current daily guidelines for sensible drinking. [updated 2005 August 1, 2005; cited 2009 September 1]; Available from: http://www.studenthealth.co.uk/advice/advice.asp?adviceID=28;2005.
  13. 13.
    Moore MJ, Soderquist J, Werch C. Feasibility and efficacy of a binge drinking prevention intervention for college students delivered via the Internet versus postal mail. J Am Coll Health. 2005;54:38–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Coleman L, Ramm J, Cooke R. The effectiveness of an innovative intervention aimed at reducing binge-drinking among young people: results from a pilot study. Drugs Educ Prev Pol. 2010;17:413–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Walters ST, Bennett ME, Miller JH. Reducing alcohol use in college students: a controlled trial of two brief interventions. J Drug Educ. 2000;30:361–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bewick BM, Trusler K, Mulhern B, Barkham M, Hill AJ. The feasibility and effectiveness of a web-based personalised feedback and social norms alcohol intervention in UK university students: a randomised control trial. Addict Behav. 2008;33:1192–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kypri K, Hallett J, Howat P, McManus A, Maycock B, Bowe S, et al. Randomized controlled trial of Proactive web-based alcohol screening and brief intervention for university students. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1508–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Butler LH, Correia CJ. Brief alcohol intervention with college student drinkers: face-to-face versus computerized feedback. Psychol Addict Behav. 2009;23:163–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:26–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Abraham C, Michie S. A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychol. 2008;27:379–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heckhausen H, Gollwitzer PM. Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational and volitional states of mind. Motiv Emot. 1987;11:101–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J, editors. Action-control: from cognition to behavior. Heidelberg: Springer; 1985. p. 11–39.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Webb TL, Sheeran P. Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychol Bull. 2006;132:249–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Armitage CJ, Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol. 2001;40:471–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gollwitzer PM. Implementation intentions: strong effects of simple plans. Am Psychol. 1999;54:493–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Aarts H, Dijksterhuis A, Midden C. To plan or not to plan? Goal achievement or interrupting the performance of mundane behaviors. Eur J Soc Psychol. 1999;29:971–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brandstätter V, Lengfelder A, Gollwitzer PM. Implementation intentions and efficient action initiation. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2001;81:946–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hardeman W, Johnston M, Johnston DW, Bonetti D, Wareham NJ, Kinmonth AL. Application of the theory of planned behaviour change interventions: a systematic review. Psychol Health. 2002;17:123–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chatzisarantis NLD, Hagger MS. Effects of a brief intervention based on the theory of planned behavior on leisure time physical activity participation. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2005;27:470–87.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2006;38:69–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sheeran P, Milne S, Webb TL, Gollwitzer PM. Implementation intentions and health behaviours. In: Conner M, Norman P, editors. Predicting health behaviour: research and practice with social cognition models. 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2005. p. 276–323.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Arbour KP, Martin Ginis KA. A randomised controlled trial of the effects of implementation intentions on women's walking behaviour. Psychol Health. 2009;24:49–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Luszczynska A. An implementation intentions intervention, the use of a planning strategy, and physical activity after myocardial infarction. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:900–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Prestwich A, Lawton R, Conner M. The use of implementation intentions and the decision balance sheet in promoting exercise behaviour. Psychol Health. 2003;18:707–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Armitage CJ. Effects of an implementation intention-based intervention on fruit consumption. Psychol Health. 2007;22:917–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chapman J, Armitage CJ, Norman P. Comparing implementation intention interventions in relation to young adults' intake of fruit and vegetables. Psychol Health. 2009;24:317–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Prestwich A, Ayres K, Lawton R. Crossing two types of implementation intentions with a protection motivation intervention for the reduction of saturated fat intake: a randomized trial. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:1550–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Prestwich A, Conner M, Lawton R, Bailey W, Litman J, Molyneaux V. Individual and collaborative implementation intentions and the promotion of breast self-examination. Psychol Health. 2005;20:743–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sheeran P, Orbell S. Using implementation intentions to increase attendance for cervical cancer screening. Health Psychol. 2000;19:283–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Orbell S, Hodgkins S, Sheeran P. Implementation intentions and the theory of planned behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1997;23:945–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Murgraff V, Abraham C, McDermott M. Reducing Friday alcohol consumption among moderate, women drinkers: evaluation of a brief evidence-based intervention. Alcohol Alcohol. 2007;42:37–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Armitage CJ. Effectiveness of experimenter-provided and self-generated implementation intentions to reduce alcohol consumption in a sample of the general population: a randomized exploratory trial. Health Psychol. 2009;28:545–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rogers RW. A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. J Psychol. 1975;91:93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Janis IL, Mann L. Decision making: a psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press; 1977.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Milne SE, Orbell S, Sheeran P. Combining motivational and volitional interventions to promote exercise participation: protection motivation theory and implementation intentions. Br J Health Psychol. 2002;7:163–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Michie S, Rothman A, Sheeran P. Current issues and new directions in psychology and health: advancing the science of behavior change. Psychol Health. 2007;22:249–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ajzen I, Manstead ASR. Changing health-related behaviors: an approach based on the theory of planned behavior. In: van den Bos K, Hewstone M, de Wit J, Schut H, Stroebe M, editors. The scope of social psychology: theory and applications. New York: Psychology Press; 2007. p. 43–63.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Armitage CJ, Reidy JG. Use of mental simulations to change theory of planned behaviour variables. Br J Health Psychol. 2008;13:513–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pham LB, Taylor SE. From thought to action: effects of process- versus outcome-based mental simulations on performance. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1999;26:250–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Taylor SE, Pham LB, Rivkin I, Armor DA. Harnessing the imagination: mental simulation and self-regulation of behavior. Am Psychol. 1998;53:429–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Escalas JE, Luce MF. Process versus outcome thought focus and advertising. J Consum Psychol. 2003;13:246–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Elliot AJ, Shell MM, Henry KB, Maier MA. Achievement goals, performance contingencies, and performance attainment: an experimental test. J Educ Psychol. 2005;97:630–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Vasquez NA, Buehler R. Seeing future success: does imagery perspective influence achievement motivation? Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007;33:1392–405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hagger MS. Theoretical integration in health psychology: unifying ideas and complimentary explanations. Br J Health Psychol. 2009;14:189–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD, Barkoukis V, Wang CKJ, Baranowski J. Perceived autonomy support in physical education and leisure-time physical activity: a cross-cultural evaluation of the trans-contextual model. J Educ Psychol. 2005;97:376–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Anderson P, Baumberg B. Alcohol in Europe. London: Institute of Alcohol Studies; 2006.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Rehn N, Room R, Edwards G. Alcohol in the European region. Copenhagen: World Health Organisation; 2001.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Markus HR, Kitayama S. Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychol Rev. 1991;98:224–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Urbaniak GC, Plous S, Lestik M. Research randomiser. [updated 2007 January 1, 1997; cited 2008 March 1]; Available from: www.randomizer.org;2007.
  60. 60.
    Jackson KM. Heavy episodic drinking: determining the predictive utility of five or more drinks. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008;22:68–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Drinkaware. Binge drinking: the facts. [updated 2010; cited 2010 November 1]; Available from: http://www.drinkaware.co.uk/facts/binge-drinking;2010.
  62. 62.
    Hodgson RJ, Alwyn T, John B, Thom B, Smith A. The fast alcohol screening test. Alcohol Alcohol. 2002;37:61–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Schulte MT, Ramo D, Brown SA. Gender differences in factors influencing alcohol use and drinking progression among adolescents. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009;29:535–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Larimer ME, Lee CM, Kilmer JR, Fabiano PM, Stark CB, Geisner IM, et al. Personalized mailed feedback for college drinking prevention: a randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007;75:285–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Hardeman W, Michie S, Fanshawe T, Prevost T, Mcloughlin K, Kinmonth AL. Fidelity of delivery of a physical activity intervention: predictors and consequences. Psychol Health. 2007;23:11–24.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    De Vet E, Oenema A, Sheeran P, Brug J. Should implementation intentions interventions be implemented in obesity prevention: the impact of if-then plans on daily physical activity in Dutch adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activ. 2009;6:11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Godin G, Sheeran P, Conner M, Germain M. Asking questions changes behavior: mere measurement effects on frequency of blood donation. Health Psychol. 2008;27:179–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    O'Sullivan I, Orbell S, Rakow T, Parker R. Prospective research in health service settings: health psychology, science and the ‘Hawthorne’ effect. J Health Psychol. 2004;9:355–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    McCambridge J, Day M. Randomized controlled trial of the effects of completing the alcohol use disorders identification test questionnaire on self-reported hazardous drinking. Addiction. 2008;103:241–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, Funder DC. Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007;2:396–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Cooke R, Sniehotta F, Schuz B. Predicting binge-drinking behaviour using an extended TPB: examining the impact of anticipated regret and descriptive norms. Alcohol Alcohol. 2007;42:84–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Murgraff V, McDermott MR, Walsh J. Exploring attitude and belief correlates of adhering to the new guidelines and low-risk single-occasion drinking: an application of the theory of planned behaviour. Alcohol Alcohol. 2001;36:135–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Litten RZ, Allen JP, editors. Measuring alcohol consumption: psychosocial and biochemical methods. Totowa: Humana Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Chatzisarantis NLD, Hagger MS. Effects of an intervention based on self-determination theory on self-reported leisure-time physical activity participation. Psychology and Health. 2009;24(1):29–48.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin S. Hagger
    • 1
  • Adam Lonsdale
    • 2
  • Andre Koka
    • 3
  • Vello Hein
    • 3
  • Heidi Pasi
    • 4
  • Taru Lintunen
    • 4
  • Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis
    • 5
  1. 1.Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia
  2. 2.University of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  3. 3.University of TartuTartuEstonia
  4. 4.University of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland
  5. 5.National Institute of EducationNanyangSingapore

Personalised recommendations