Skip to main content

A Preliminary Investigation into Whether Attentional Bias Influences Mood Outcomes Following Emotional Disclosure

International Journal of Behavioral Medicine volume 17, pages 195–206 (2010)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

There is considerable interest in factors which may influence the efficacy of emotional disclosure. To date, a range of demographic and psychological variables have been considered. However, consideration has not yet been given to cognitive factors known to influence emotional processing such as attentional bias (AB).

Purpose

We present the results from an exploratory study examining the role of AB in influencing mood outcomes following emotional disclosure.

Method

Individuals with negative and avoidant ABs (i.e., individuals vigilant for and individuals avoidant of negative emotional material, respectively) were identified by asking 105 individuals to complete a standardized AB task. Individuals in the bottom quartile of AB scores were categorized as having a negative AB and individuals in the top quartile were categorized as having an avoidant AB. These participants (n = 38) completed the emotional disclosure intervention and mood was assessed at 1, 4, and 8 weeks post-intervention.

Results

Negative AB individuals showed greater improvements in depression, anger, fatigue, and total mood disturbance. These results were unrelated to alexithymia.

Conclusion

These results provide preliminary support for the proposal that AB may influence the effects of emotional disclosure on mood.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Fig. 1

References

  1. Qing Y. Pharmacogenomics in drug discovery and development. Totowa: Humana; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pennebaker JW. Confession, inhibition and disease. In: Berkowitz L, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Springer; 1989. p. 211–44.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lutgendorf SK, Antoni MH. Emotional and cognitive processing in a disclosure paradigm. Cogn Ther Res. 1999;23:423–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pennebaker JW, Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Glaser R. Disclosure of traumas and immune function: health implications for psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988;56:239–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Greenberg MA, Stone AA. Emotional disclosure about traumas and its relation to health: effects of a previous disclosure through writing or speaking modulates latent Epstein–Barr virus antibody titers. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992;63:75–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenberg MA, Wortman CB, Stone AA. Emotional expression and physical health: revising traumatic memories or fostering self-regulation? J Rheumatol. 1996;20:1863–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pennebaker JW, Beall S. Confronting a traumatic event: toward an understanding of inhibition and disease. J Abnorm Psychol. 1986;29:274–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Petrie KJ, Fontanilla I, Thomas MG, Booth RJ, Pennebaker JW. Effects of written emotional expression on immune function in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection: a randomized trial. Psychosom Med. 2004;66:272–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Smyth JM, Stone AA, Hurewitz A, Kaell A. Effects of writing about stressful experiences on symptom reduction in patients with asthma or rheumatoid arthritis—a randomized trial. J Am Med Assoc. 1999;281:1304–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stanton AL, Danoff-Burg S, Sworowski LA, Collins CA, Branstetter AD, Rodriguez-Hanley A, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of written emotional expression and benefit finding in breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:4160–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vedhara K, Moss Morris R, Booth R, Horgan M, Lawrence M, Birchall N. Changes in mood predict disease activity and quality of life in patients with psoriasis following emotional disclosure. J Psychosom Res. 2007;62:611–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wetherell MA, Byrne-Davis L, Dieppe P, Horne R, Weinman J, Donovan J, et al. The effects of emotional disclosure on psychological and physiological outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an exploratory home based study. J Health Psychol. 2005;10:277–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Frisina PG, Borod JC, Lepore SJ. A meta-analysis of the effects of written emotional disclosure on the health outcomes of clinical populations. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2004;192:629–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Meads C, Nouwen A. Does emotional disclosure have any effects? A systematic review of the literature with meta-analyses. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21:153–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller GE, Cohen S. Psychological interventions and the immune system: a meta-analytic review and critique. Health Psychol. 2001;20:47–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smyth JM. Written emotional expression: effect sizes, outcome types and moderating variables. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998;66:174–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Frattaroli J. Experimental disclosure and its moderators: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2006;132:823–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pennebaker JW, Mayne T, Francis M. Linguistic predictors of adaptive bereavement. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;72:863–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cameron LD, Nicholls G. Expression of stressful experiences through writing: effects of a self-regulation manipulation for pessimists and optimists. Health Psychol. 1998;17:84–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lumley MA. Alexithymia, emotional disclosure, and health: a program of research. J Pers. 2004;72:1271–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Norman SA, Lumley MA, Dooley JA, Diamond MP. For whom does it work? Moderators of the effects of written emotional disclosure in a randomized controlled trial among women with chronic pelvic pain. Psychosom Med. 2004;66:174–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sheese BE, Brown EL, Graziano WG. Emotional expression in cyberspace: searching for moderators of the Pennebaker disclosure effect via email. Health Psychol. 2004;23:457–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stroebe M, Schut H, Stroebe W. Who benefits from disclosure? Exploration of attachment style differences in the effects of expressing emotions. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006;26:66–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Paez D, Velasco C, Gonzalez JL. Expressive writing and the role of alexithymia as a dispositional deficit in self-disclosure and psychological health. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;77:630–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Solano L, Donati V, Pecci F, Perischetti S, Colaci A. Postoperative course after papilloma resection: effects of written disclosure of the experience in subjects with different alexithymia levels. Psychosom Med. 2003;65:477–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Williams JM, Watts FN, MacLeod C, Mathews A. Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Macleod C, Rutherford EM. Anxiety and the selective processing of emotional information: mediating roles of awareness, trait and state variable and personal relevance of stimulus variables. Behav Res Ther. 1992;30:479–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mattia JI, Heimberg RG, Hope DA. The revised Stroop color-naming task in social phobics. Behav Res Ther. 1993;31:305–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. MacLeod C, Mathews A. Anxiety and the allocation of attention to threat. Q J Exp Psychol. 1988;40:653–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tata P, Liebowitz J, Prunty MJ, Cameron M, Pickering AD. Attentional bias in obsessional disorder. Behav Res Ther. 1996;34:53–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bar-Haim Y, Lamy D, Pergamin L, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van Ijzendoorn MH. Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and non-anxious individuals: a meta-analytic study. Psychol Bull. 2007;133:1–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mathews A, Mackintosh B. A cognitive model of selective processing in anxiety. Cogn Ther Res. 1998;22(6):539–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mogg K, Bradley BP. A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety. Behav Res Ther. 1998;36:809–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. MacLeod C, Rutherford E, Campbell L, Ebsworthy G, Holker L. Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. J Abnorm Psychol. 2002;111(1):107–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mathews A, MacLeod C. Induced processing biases have causal effects on anxiety. Cogn Emot. 2002;16(2):331–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Guastella AJ, Dadds MR. Cognitive-behavioural models of emotional writing: a validation study. Cogn Ther Res. 2006;30:397–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. van Middendorp H, Sorbi MJ, van Doornen LJP, Bijlsma JWJ, Geenen R. Feasibility and induced cognitive-emotional change of an emotional disclosure intervention for home application. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;66:177–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Baikie KA. Who does expressive writing work for? Examination of alexithymia, splitting, and repressive coping style as moderators of the expressive writing paradigm. Br J Health Psychol. 2008;13:61–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kenrady J, Tan LJ. The role of avoidance in the disclosure of trauma. Behav Change. 2006;23:42–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Younger JW, Lawler-Row KA, Moe KA, Kratz AL, Keenum AJ. Effects of naltrexone on repressive coping and disclosure of emotional material: a test of the opioid-peptide hypothesis of repression and hypertension. Psychosom Med. 2006;68:734–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Jansson B, Lundh L, Oldenburg C. Is defensiveness associated with cognitive bias away from emotional information? Personality Individ Differ. 2005;39:1373–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Koster EHW, Crombez G, Verschuere B, De Houwer J. Attention to threat in anxiety-prone individuals: mechanisms underlying attentional bias. Cogn Ther Res. 2006;30:635–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lundh L-G, Simonsson-Sarnecki M. Alexithymia and cognitive bias for emotional information. Personality Individ Differ. 2002;32:1063–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mogg K, Bradley BP, Dixon C, Fisher S, Twelftree H, McWilliams A. Trait anxiety, defensiveness and selective processing of threat: an investigation using two measures of attentional bias. Personality Individ Differ. 2000;28:1063–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Newman LS, McKinney LC. Repressive coping and threat-avoidance: an idiopathic Stroop study. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2002;28:409–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Curran SL, Andrykowski MA, Studts JL. Short form of the profile of mood states (POMS-SF) psychometric information. Psychol Assess. 1995;7:80–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Speilberger CD. Manual for the state–trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Miller SM. Monitoring and blunting: validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987;52:345–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Parker JDA, Bagby RM, Taylor GJ, Endler NS, Schmitz P. Factorial validity of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. Eur J Pers. 1993;7:221–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Schneider W, Eschman A, Zoccolotto A. E-prime user's guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc.; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Pincus T, Morley S. Cognitive processing bias in chronic pain: a review and integration. Psychol Bull. 2001;127:599–617.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Baayen RH, Piepenbrock R, van Rijn H. The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  53. McClelland GH. Optimal design in psychological research. Psychol Methods. 1997;2:3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Pennebaker JW, Booth RJ, Francis ME. Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2007. Austin: LIWC; 2007. http://www.liwc.net.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MRC HSRC, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Clifton, Bristol, BS8 2PR, UK

    H. Brant, E. Adamopoulos & L. Byrne-Davis

  2. MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK

    B. Mackintosh & L. Hoppitt

  3. School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

    B. Mackintosh & L. Hoppitt

  4. Department of Psychology, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    M. Tovee

  5. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA

    J. Miles

  6. Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA

    J. W. Pennebaker

  7. University of Nottingham, Institute of Work, Health and Organisations, International House, Jubilee Campus, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG8 1BB, UK

    K. Vedhara

Authors
  1. K. Vedhara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Brant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. Adamopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. L. Byrne-Davis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. B. Mackintosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. L. Hoppitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M. Tovee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. J. Miles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. J. W. Pennebaker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Vedhara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vedhara, K., Brant, H., Adamopoulos, E. et al. A Preliminary Investigation into Whether Attentional Bias Influences Mood Outcomes Following Emotional Disclosure. Int.J. Behav. Med. 17, 195–206 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-009-9072-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-009-9072-2

Keywords

  • Attentional bias
  • Mood outcomes
  • Emotional disclosure
  • Negative AB
  • Avoidant AB