Taking a Risk Perception Approach to Improving Beach Swimming Safety

Abstract

Background

Beach swimming is generally associated with a healthy lifestyle, yet the risk of drowning is universally significant.

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to investigate the factors associated with safe swimming behavior using protection motivation theory as a guiding theoretical framework.

Method

This cross-sectional study surveyed a sample of beachgoers (N = 3371) aged ≥16 years who completed an anonymous, self-report questionnaire to assess the associations between perceptions of the risk of drowning and safe swimming behavior.

Results

Compared with males, females perceived greater severity, vulnerability, response efficacy, and concern regarding their risk of drowning. Males, Maori, and 16 to 29 year olds reported higher self-efficacy scores compared to females, other ethnic groups, and older participants, respectively. After controlling for confounding variables, people perceiving a greater threat (severity) of experiencing difficulty while swimming as well as those reporting higher response efficacy (beliefs about the effectiveness of drowning prevention measures) were more likely to report safe swimming behavior.

Conclusion

The effectiveness of water safety education programs could be strengthened by enhancing risk appraisal and coping skills and counter-acting the tendency of males and younger adults to overestimate their swimming ability and underestimate their risk with regard to drowning.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. 1.

    Water Safety New Zealand. Water safety—profile. Wellington: Water Safety New Zealand; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sport and Recreation Council [SPARC]. (2002). How do we participate in sport and active leisure? Retrieved 21 January 2003 from http://www.pushplay.org.nz

  3. 3.

    Langley JD, Warner M, Smith G, Wright C. Drowning-related deaths in New Zealand, 1980–1994. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001;25(5):451–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Cummings P, Quan L. Trends in unintentional drowning: the role of alcohol and medical care. J Am Med Assoc. 1999;281(23):2198–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Mackie IJ. Patterns of drowning in Australia, 1992–1997. Med J Aust. 1999;171:587–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Surf Life Saving New Zealand. The lifesaving report. Wellington: Surf Life Saving New Zealand; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Moran K. New Zealand Youth Water Safety Survey 2003. Wellington: Water Safety New Zealand; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gulliver P, Begg D. Usual water-related behavior and ‘near-drowning’ incidents in young adults. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2005;29(3):238–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Langley JD, Smeijers J. Injury mortality among children and teenagers in New Zealand compared with the United States. Inj Prev. 1997;3:195–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Moran K. Re-thinking drowning risk: the role of water safety knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours in the aquatic recreation of New Zealand youth. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Palmerston North: Massey University; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bell NS, Amoroso PJ, Yore MM, Senier L, Williams JO, Smith GS, et al. Alcohol and other risk factors among male active duty U.S. Army soldiers. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2001;72:1086–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Smith GS, Keyl P, Hadley JA, Bartley CL, Foss RD, Tolbert WG, et al. Drinking and recreational boating fatalities: a population-based case control study. J Am Med Assoc. 2001;286(23):2974–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Driscoll TR, Harrison JA, Steenkamp M. Review of the role of alcohol in drowning associated with recreational aquatic activity. Inj Prev. 2004;10(2):107–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Quan L, Cummings P. Characteristics of drowning by different age groups. Inj Prev. 2003;9(2):163–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Smith GS, Brenner R. The changing risks of drowning for adolescents in the U.S. and effective control strategies. Adolescent Medicine: The State of the Art Reviews. 1995;6(2):153–69.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Howland J, Hingson R, Mangione TW, Bell N, Bak S. Why are most drowning victims men? Sex differences in aquatic skills and behaviors. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:93–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Baker SP, O'Neil B, Ginsburg MJ, Li G. The injury fact book. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Schuman SH, Rowe JR, Glazer HM, Redding JS. Risk of drowning: an iceberg phenomenon. JACEP. 1977;6:139–43.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    McCool J, Moran K, Robinson E, Ameratunga S. New Zealand beachgoers' swimming behaviors, abilities and perception of drowning risk. International Journal of Aquatic Education and Research. 2008;2(1):7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Millstein SG. Halpern-Felsher BL Perceptions of risk and vulnerability. J Adolesc Health. 2002;31S:10–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Rogers R. Cognitive and physiological processes in fear-based attitude change: a revised theory of protection motivation. In: Caccioppo J, Petty R, editors. Social psychophysiology: a source-book. New York: Guilford; 1983. p. 153–76.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Floyd DL, Prentice-Dunn S, Rogers RW. A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2000;30(2):407–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    McClendon BT, Prentice-Dunn S. Reducing skin cancer: an intervention based on protection motivation theory. J Health Psychol. 2001;6(3):321–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Cameron LD. Illness risk representations and motivations to engage in protective behavior: the case of skin cancer risk. Psychology and Health. 2008;23:91–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Robertson LS. The validity of self-reported behavioral risk factors. J Trauma. 1992;32:58–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Azjen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50:179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support of the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC), the advice of the drowning prevention experts who commented on the draft questionnaire, and the participants who contributed their valuable leisure time completing the questionnaire.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. McCool.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCool, J., Ameratunga, S., Moran, K. et al. Taking a Risk Perception Approach to Improving Beach Swimming Safety. Int.J. Behav. Med. 16, 360 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-009-9042-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Recreational swimming
  • Drowning prevention
  • Risk perception
  • Water safety