Atkinson, D. (2002). Toward a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 86, 525–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00159
Baceviciute, S., Cordoba, A., Wismer, P., Jensen, T., Klausen, M., & Makransky, G. (2022). Investigating the value of immersive VR tools for organizational training: An applied international study in the biotech industry. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning., 38(1), 470–487.
Bellini, J. L., & Rumrill, P. D., Jr. (2009). Research in rehabilitation counseling: A guide to design, methodology, and utilization (2nd ed.). Charles C. Thomas.
Borgh, K., & Dickson, W. P. (1992). The effects on children’s writing of adding speech synthesis to a word processor. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24(4), 533–544.
Brünken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2004). Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning with dual-task Methodology: Auditory load and modality effects. Instructional Science, 32, 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021812.96911.c5
Burgstahler, S. E., & Cory, R. C. (2008). Universal design in higher education from principles to practice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Education Press.
Cheah, C. S., & Leong, L. M. (2019). Investigating the Redundancy Effect in the Learning of C++ Computer Programming Using Screen casting. International Journal of Modern Education & Computer Science, 11(6), 19–25.
Cheon, J., Crooks, S., & Chung, S. (2014). Does segmenting principle counteract modality principle in instructional animation? British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 56–64.
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. Pfeiffer.
Craig, S. D., Gholson, B., & Driscoll, D. (2002). Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia educational environments: Effects of agent properties, picture features, and redundancy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 428–434.
Goldenberg, L. B., Heinze, J., & Ba, H. (2004). What middle grade students say about learning science with multimedia? Education Development Center, Inc., 18.
Harskamp, E. G., Mayer, R. E., & Suhre, C. (2007). Does the modality principle for multimedia learning apply to science classrooms? Learning and Instruction, 17, 465–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.010
Jamet, E., & Le Bohec, O. (2007). The effect of redundant text in multimedia instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 588–598.
Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance
analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47, 583–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441.
Kutbay, E., & Akpinar, Y. (2020). Investigating modality, redundancy and signaling principles with abstract and concrete representation. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 8(2), 131–145.
Leahy, W., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). When auditory presentations should and should not be a component of multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 401–418.
Liu, Y. (2019). Multimedia input modes, the modality principle, and the redundancy principle for university ESL students’ learning. Dissertations–ALL. p.1128.
Liu, T. C., Lin, Y. C., Wang, T. N., Yeh, S. C., & Kalyuga, S. (2021). Studying the effect of redundancy in a virtual reality classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 1183–1200.
Liu, Y., Jang, B. G., & Roy-Campbell, Z. (2018). Optimum input mode in the modality and redundancy principles for university ESL students’ multimedia learning. Computers and Education., 217, 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.025
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 43–71). Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2014a). Multimedia Instruction. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications & Technology, 385–399.
Mayer, R. E. (2014b). Research-based principles for designing multimedia instruction. In V. A. Benassi, C. E. Overson, & C. M. Hakala (Eds.), Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum.
Mayer, R. E. (2014c). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., Dow, G., & Mayer, S. (2003). Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent-based microworlds? Journal of Educational Psychology., 95, 806–812.
Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0622.214.171.124
Mayer, R. E., Lee, H., & Peebles, A. (2014). Multimedia learning in a second language: A cognitive load perspective. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(5), 653–660.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312–320.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 43–52.
Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, H. A., & Lester, J. C. (2001). The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction, 19(2), pp. 177–213. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3233816
Moreno, G. P., Burgos, D., Martinez-Ortiz, I., Sierra, J., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2008). Educational game design for online education. Computers in Human Behavior., 24, 2530–2540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.03.012
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358–368.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 156–163.
Moulton, S. (2010, July 13). How lightning works [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bY-8ozney8
O’Neil, H., Mayer, R., Herl, H. E., Niemi, C., Olin, K., & Thurman, R. A. (2000). Instructional strategies for virtual aviation training environments. Aircrew Training and Assessment, 105, 130.
Rose, D., Harbour, W., Johnston, C., Daley, S., & Abarbanell, L. (2006). Universal design for learning in postsecondary education: reflections on Principles and Their Application. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 19, 135–151.
Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal Design for Learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Shuell, T. J., & Farber, S. L. (2001). Students’ Perceptions of Technology Use in College Courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.2190/YWPN-H3DP-15LQ-QNK8
Sweller, J. (2014). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 27–42). Cambridge University Press.
Tarchi, C., Zaccoletti, S., & Mason, L. (2021). Learning from text, video, or subtitles: A comparative analysis. Computer and Education, 160, 104034.
Van der Zee, T., Admiraal, W., Paas, F., Saab, N., & Gisbers, B. (2017). Effects of subtitles, complexity, and language proficiency on learning from online education videos. Journal of Media Psychology, 29, 18–30.
Wagner, E. (2010). The effect of the use of video texts on ESL listening test-taker performance. Language Testing, 27(4), 493–513.
Winke, P., Gass, S., & Sydorenko, T. (2010). The effects of captioning videos used for foreign language listening activities. Language Learning & Technology: A Refereed Journal for Second and Foreign Language Educators, 14(1), 65–86.
Zheng, Y., Ye, X., & Hsiao, J. H. (2022). Does adding video and subtitles to an audio lesson facilitate its comprehension? Learning and Instruction, 77, 101542.