Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An analysis of learning analytics in personalised learning

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of learning analytics practices which aimed to achieve personalised learning. It addresses the need for a systematic analysis of the increasing amount of practices of learning analytics which are targeted at personalised learning. The paper summarises and highlights the characteristics and trends in relevant learning analytics practices, and illustrates their relationship with personalised learning. The analysis covers 144 related articles published between 2012 and 2019 collected from Scopus. The learning analytics practices were analysed from the dimensions of what (learning context, learning environment, and data collected), who (stakeholder), why (objective of learning analytics, and personalised learning goal), and how (learning analytics method), as well as their outcomes and limitations. The results show the diversified contexts of learning analytics, with the major ones being tertiary education and online learning. The types of data for learning analytics, which have been increasingly collected from online and emerging learning environments, are mainly related to the learning activities, academic performance, educational background and learning outcomes. The most frequent types of learning analytics objectives and personalised learning goals are enhancing learning experience, providing personal recommendations and satisfying personal learning needs. The learning analytics methods have commonly involved the use of statistical tests, classification, clustering and visualisation techniques. The findings also suggest the areas for future work to address the limitations revealed in the practices, such as investigating more cost-effective ways of offering personalised support, and the transforming role of teachers in personalised learning practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Table 3
Fig. 5
Table 4
Table 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, K. E., & Pistilli, M. D. (2012). Course signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 267–270). ACM

  • Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. Learning analytics (pp. 61–75). New York: Springer

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beemer, J., Spoon, K., Fan, J., Stronach, J., Frazee, J. P., Bohonak, A. J., & Levine, R. A. (2018). Assessing instructional modalities: Individualized treatment effects for personalized learning. Journal of Statistics Education, 26(1), 31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berge, Z. L. (2011). If you think socialisation in mLearning is difficult, try personalisation. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 5(3/4), 231–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, A. J., Bang, A., Pan, Y., & Graves, K. E. (2019). Education Leadership Data Analytics (ELDA): A White Paper Report on the 2018 ELDA Summit. New York: Columbia University

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulger, M. (2016). Personalized learning: The conversations we’re not having. Retrieved from https://datasociety.net/pubs/ecl/PersonalizedLearning_primer_2016.pdf

  • Charitopoulos, A., Rangoussi, M., & Koulouriotis, D. (2020). On the use of soft computing methods in educational data mining and learning analytics research: A review of years 2010–2018. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(3), 371–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatti, M. A., Dyckhoff, A. L., Schroeder, U., & Thüs, H. (2013). A reference model for learning analytics. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5–6), 318–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, S. K. S., Wang, F. L., Kwok, L. F., & Poulova, P. (2021). In search of the good practices of personalized learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(2),179–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S. P. M., Lam, S. S., Li, K. C., & Wong, B. T. M. (2018). Learning analytics at low-cost: At-risk student prediction with clicker data and systematic proactive interventions. Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 273–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C. Y., Tseng, S. F., Chih, W. C., Chen, Z. H., Chao, P. Y., Lai, K. R. … Lin, Y. L. (2015). Open student models of core competencies at the curriculum level: Using learning analytics for student reflection. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 5(1), 32–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colvin, C., Rogers, T., Corin, L., Fisher, J. A., Wade, A., Dawson, S. … Kennedy, G. (2016). Student retention and learning analytics: A snapshot of Australian practices and a framework for advancement. Retrieved from http://he-analytics.com/wp-content/uploads/SP13-3249_-Master17Aug2015-web.pdf

  • de Freitas, S., Gibson, D., Du Plessis, C., Halloran, P., Williams, E., Ambrose, M. … Arnab, S. (2015). Foundations of dynamic learning analytics: Using university student data to increase retention. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1175–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiqri, M., & Nurjanah, D. (2017). Graph-based domain model for adaptive learning path recommendation. In Proceedings of 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (pp. 375–380). IEEE

  • Gabarre, S., Gabarre, C., & Din, R. (2018). Personalizing learning: A critical review of language learning with mobile phones and social networking sites. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 10(2), 1782–1786

    Google Scholar 

  • Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Pardo, A. (2016). How do we start? State and directions of learning analytics adoption. Retrieved from https://www.icde.org/s/dragan_la_report-cc-licence.pdf

  • Godwin-Jones, R. (2017). Scaling up and zooming in: Big data and personalization in language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 21(1), 4–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Hlaoui, Y. B., Hajjej, F., & Ayed, L. J. B. (2016). Learning analytics for the development of adapted e-assessment workflow system. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 24(6), 951–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D. A., Keyek-Franssen, D., Patria, P., & Sakai, E. (2017). Effectively applying data and predictive analytics to improve student success and completion. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2017/1/top-10-it-issues-2017-foundations-for-student-success

  • Kalz, M. (2014). Lifelong learning and its support with new technologies. In N. J. Smelser, & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 93–99). Pergamon: Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, M., & Ebner, M. (2015). Learning analytics: Principles and constraints. In Proceedings of EdMedia 2015 – World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 1789–1799). Montreal, Canada

  • Kitto, K., Lupton, M., Bruza, P., Mallett, D., Banks, J., Dawson, S. … Siemens, G. (2020). Learning analytics beyond the LMS: Enabling connected learning via Open Source Analytics in “the wild”. Retrieved from https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/152210

  • Kravčík, M., Ullrich, C., & Igel, C. (2018). The potential of the internet of things for supporting learning and training in the digital age. In Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, et al. (Eds.), Positive Learning in the Age of Information (pp. 399–412). Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumm, A., Means, B., & Bienkowski, M. (2018). Learning analytics goes to school: A collaborative approach to improving education. New York: Routledge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lan, A. S., Waters, A. E., Studer, C., & Baraniuk, R. G. (2014). Sparse factor analysis for learning and content analytics. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15(1), 1959–2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. K., Cheung, S. K. S., & Kwok, L. F. (2020). Learning analytics: current trends and innovative practices. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(1), 1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, P., Khalil, M., & Ebner, M. (2017). Learning analytics in higher education — a literature review. In A. Peña-Ayala (Ed.), Learning analytics: Fundaments, applications, and trends (pp. 1–23). Cham: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, K. C., & Wong, B. T. M. (2020a). Trends of learning analytics in STE(A)M education: A review of case studies. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17(3), 323–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, K. C., & Wong, B. T. M. (2020b). The use of student response systems with learning analytics: A review of case studies (2008–2017). International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 14(1), 63–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, K. C., & Wong, B. T. M. (2020c). Personalising learning with learning analytics: A review of the literature. In Cheung, et al. (Ed.), Blended learning: Education in a smart learning environment (pp. 39–48). Springer

  • Li, K. C., & Wong, B. T. M. (2021). Features and trends of personalised learning: A review of journal publications from 2001 to 2018. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(2), 182–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, K. C., Wong, B. T. M., & Ye, C. J. (2018a). Implementing learning analytics in higher education: The case of Asia. International Journal of Services and Standards, 12(3/4), 293–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, K. C., Ye, C. J., & Wong, B. T. M. (2018b). Status of learning analytics in Asia: Perspectives of higher education stakeholders. Technology in Education: Innovative Solutions and Practices (pp. 267–275). Springer

  • Liu, D. Y. T., Bartimote-Aufflick, K., Pardo, A., & Bridgeman, A. J. (2017). Data-driven personalization of student learning support in higher education. Learning analytics: Fundaments, applications, and trends (pp. 143–169). Springer

  • Patrick, S., Kennedy, K., & Powell, A. (2013). Mean what you say: Defining and integrating personalized, blended and competency education. Vienna: International Association for K-12 Online Learning (iNACOL). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED561301.pdf

  • Piety, P. J. (2019). Components, infrastructures, and capacity: The quest for the impact of actionable data use on P-20 educator practice. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 394–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piety, P. J., & Pea, R. D. (2018). Understanding learning analytics across practices. In Niemi, et al. (Ed.), Learning Analytics in Education (pp. 215–232). Charlotte, N.C.: Information Age Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Pishtari, G., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Sarmiento-Márquez, E. M., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Ruiz-Calleja, A., Santos, P. … Väljataga, T. (2020). Learning design and learning analytics in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1078–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poitras, E. G., Doleck, T., & Lajoie, S. P. (2018). Towards detection of learner misconceptions in a medical learning environment: A subgroup discovery approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(1), 129–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjeeth, S., Latchoumi, T. P., & Paul, P. V. (2020). A survey on predictive models of learning analytics. Procedia Computer Science, 167(2020), 37–46

  • Santos, O. C., Kravčík, M., & Boticario, J. G. (2016). Preface to special issue on user modelling to support personalization in enhanced educational settings. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(3), 809–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, E., Soria, A., & Campo, M. (2017). Adaptive 3D virtual learning environments – A review of the literature. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(3), 262–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shivanagowda, G. M., Goudar, R. H., & Kulkarni, U. P. (2017). CRETAL: A personalized learning environment in conventional setup. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM India Compute Conference on ZZZ (pp. 143–148). ACM

  • Siemens, G., & Gašević, D. (2012). Special issue on learning and knowledge analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabaa, Y., & Medouri, A. (2013). LASyM: A learning analytics system for MOOCs. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 4(5). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2013.040516

  • van der Merwe, A., du Toit, T., & Kruger, H. (2018). A prescriptive specialized learning management system for academic feedback towards improved learning. Journal of Computer Science, 14(10), 1329–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whale, S., Valenzuela, F. R., & Fisher, J. (2013). Implementing timely interventions to improve students’ learning experience. In ASCILITE-Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference (pp. 908–912). Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education

  • Wong, B. T. M. (2017). Learning analytics in higher education: An analysis of case studies. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 12(1), 21–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, B. T. M. (2019). The benefits of learning analytics in open and distance education: A review of the evidence. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Emerging trends in learning analytics: Leveraging the power of education data (pp. 65–81). Brill

  • Wong, B. T. M., & Li, K. C. (2020). A review of learning analytics intervention in higher education (2011–2018). Journal of Computers in Education, 7(1), 7–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, B. T. M., Li, K. C., & Choi, S. P. M. (2018). Trends in learning analytics practices: A review of higher education institutions. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 15(2), 132–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2017). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xing, W., & Du, D. (2019). Dropout prediction in MOOCs: Using deep learning for personalized intervention. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(3), 547–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong, China

    Billy Tak-ming Wong, Kam Cheong Li & Simon K.S. Cheung

Authors
  1. Billy Tak-ming Wong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kam Cheong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Simon K.S. Cheung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon K.S. Cheung.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6 Examples of categories of codes for coding of data
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wong, B.Tm., Li, K.C. & Cheung, S.K. An analysis of learning analytics in personalised learning. J Comput High Educ 35, 371–390 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09324-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09324-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation