Skip to main content

Multilayered-quality education ecosystem (MQEE): an intelligent education modal for sustainable quality education

A Correction to this article was published on 20 August 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Sustainable quality education is a big challenge even for the developed countries. In response to this, education 4.0 is gradually expanding as a new era of education. This work intends to unfold some hidden parameters that are affecting the quality education ecosystem (QEE). Academic loafing, unawareness, non-participation, dissatisfaction, and incomprehensibility are the main parameters under this study. A set of hypothesis and surveys are exhibited to study the behavior of these parameters on quality education at the institution level. The bidirectional weighted sum method is deployed for precise and accurate results regarding boundary value analysis of the survey. The association between parameters understudy and quality education is illustrated with correlation and scatter diagrams. Academic loafing, the hidden and unintended rudiment that affects the QEE is also defined, intended and explored in this work. The study exhibits that the average percentage association between quality education and all the parameters under study is 93.32%, whereas awareness has the least association (82.63%) and academic loafing has the highest association (99.35%) with quality education. The paper proposes a cognitive-IoT (internet of things) based multilayered QEE as a remedial solution for sustainable quality education. The emerging demand of real-time data processing for the education 4.0 environment, makes MQEE suitable for education 4.0 environment. The IoT enabled heterogeneous-data preprocessing, integration, and analysis to foster the proposed model with robustness, scalability, and flexibility. The proposed abstraction mechanism, public/private reporting, and IoT-based data preprocessing system are rich enough to handle data management issues under education 4.0 environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Change history

Notes

  1. 1.

    AISHE under section Related Work refers to Auditing Instrument for Sustainability in Higher Education tool. AISHE is specifically marked as AISHE* under this section, in rest of the paper AISHE refers to All India Survey on Higher Education.

References

  1. “AISHE Report 2018–19.Pdf.”

  2. Ajiboye, R. O. (2019). Self-efficacy, collectivism and social loafing of university workers in Southwest Nigeria: Implications for staff-students. Social Interactions, 4(4), 327–336.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ali, M., & Asim, M. (2018). How internet-of-things (IoT) making the university campuses smart? 646–648.

  4. Altbach, P. G. (2014). India’s higher education challenges. Asia Pacific Education Review, 15(4), 503–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aniskina, N. N., & Lunina, E.V. (2017). Integration of quality assurance models for education on the basis of comparative analysis. In Proceedings of the 2017 international conference “quality management, transport and information security, information technologies, IT and QM and IS 2017 (pp. 616–620).

  6. Antunes, M., Gomes, D., & Aguiar, R. L. (2018). Towards IoT data classification through semantic features. Future Generation Computer Systems, 86, 792–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.11.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Araujo, T., Helberger, N., Kruikemeier, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2020). In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence. AI and Society, 35(3), 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00931-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Assahli, S., Berrada, M., & Chenouni, D. (2017). Data preprocessing from internet of things: Comparative study. In 2017 International conference on wireless technologies, embedded and intelligent systems, WITS 2017 (Fig. 1).

  9. Bagchi, U. (2010). Delivering student satisfaction in higher education: A QFD approach. In 2010 7th International conference on service systems and service management, proceedings of ICSSSM’ (Vol. 10, pp. 1049–1052).

  10. Caeiro, S., Azeiteiro, U. M., Filho, W. L., & Jabbour, C. (2013). Sustainability assessment tools in higher education institutions: mapping trends and good practices around the world. In Sustainability assessment tools in higher education institutions: Mapping trends and good practices around the world (pp. 1–417).

  11. Chakrabarty, K. C. (2011). Indian education system—Issues and challenges. RBI Monthly Bulletin 1–10.

  12. Ciolacu, M. I., et al. (2019). Education 4.0-jump to innovation with IoT in higher education. In SIITME 2019—2019 IEEE 25th international symposium for design and technology in electronic packaging, proceedings (pp. 135–141).

  13. Ciolacu, M., Tehrani, A. F., Beer, R., & Popp, H. (2017). Education 4.0-fostering student’s performance with machine learning methods. In 2017 IEEE 23rd international symposium for design and technology in electronic packaging, SIITME 2017-proceedings 2018-Janua (pp. 438–443).

  14. Cohen, P. A. (1980). Effectiveness of student-rating feedback for improving college instruction: A meta-analysis of findings. Research in Higher Education, 13(4), 321–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Countries Arranged by Number of Universities in Top Ranks | Ranking Web of Universities: More than 28000 Institutions Ranked. https://www.webometrics.info/en/node/54 (2020).

  16. de Fine Licht, K., & de Fine Licht, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence, transparency, and public decision-making: Why explanations are key when trying to produce perceived legitimacy. AI and Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00960-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. El-Latif, A. A. A., Abd-El-Atty, B., Venegas-Andraca, S. E., & Mazurczyk, W. (2019). Efficient quantum-based security protocols for information sharing and data protection in 5G networks. Future Generation Computer Systems, 100, 893–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.05.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Farhan, M., et al. (2018). A real-time data mining approach for interaction analytics assessment: IoT based student interaction framework. International Journal of Parallel Programming, 46(5), 886–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10766-017-0553-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fronza, I., & Wang, X. (2017). Towards an approach to prevent social loafing in software development teams. In International symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement (pp. 241–46).

  20. Glavič, P. (2020). Identifying key issues of education for sustainable development. Sustainability (switzerland), 12(16), 6500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gupta, S. K., Ashwin, T. S., & Guddeti, R. M. R. (2019). Students’ affective content analysis in smart classroom environment using deep learning techniques. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78(18), 25321–25348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hassaan, S. M., et al. (2021). Incremental affine abstraction of nonlinear systems. IEEE Control Systems Letters, 5(2), 653–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hernandez-de-Menendez, M., Escobar Díaz, C. A., & Morales-Menendez, R. (2020). Engineering education for smart 4.0 technology: A review. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 14(3), 789–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-020-00672-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Iqbal, M. M., et al. (2019). Multimedia based IoT-centric smart framework for elearning paradigm. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78(3), 3087–3106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kassab, M., Defranco, J. F., & Voas, J. (2018). Smarter education. IT Professional, 20(5), 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ke, F., Pachman, M., & Dai, Z. (2020). Investigating educational affordances of virtual reality for simulation-based teaching training with graduate teaching assistants. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32(3), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-020-09249-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kormos, E., & Julio, L. (2020). Student attitudes toward instructor assessment in higher education: Does the delivery method matter? Education and Information Technologies, 25, 4287–4296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kuper, H. (2020). Industry 4.0: Changes in work organization and qualification requirements—Challenges for academic and vocational education. Entrepreneurship Education, 3(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41959-020-00029-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Li, W., Meng, W., Liu, Z., & Au, M. H. (2020). Towards blockchain-based software-defined networking. Security, 2, 196–203.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Li, W., Meng, W., Tan, Z., & Xiang, Y. (2019). Design of multi-view based email classification for IoT systems via semi-supervised learning. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 128(2018), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2018.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li, X., & Zhao, G. (2020). Democratic involvement in higher education: A study of chinese student E-participation in university governance. Higher Education Policy, 33(1), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-018-0094-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Maddineni, S., Kim, J., El-Khamra, Y., & Jha, S. (2012). Distributed application runtime environment (DARE): A standards-based middleware framework for science-gateways. Journal of Grid Computing, 10(4), 647–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Madeira, A. C., Carravilla, M. A., Oliveira, J. F., & Costa, C. A. V. (2011). A methodology for sustainability evaluation and reporting in higher education institutions. Higher Education Policy, 24(4), 459–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Madhavi Devi, K., Krishna Gupta, M., & Muralidharan, V. (2013). Empowering IT education in rural India. In 2013 12th International conference on information technology based higher education and training, ITHET 2013.

  35. Mazurczyk, W., Wendzel, S., Chourib, M., & Keller, J. (2019). Countering adaptive network covert communication with dynamic wardens. Future Generation Computer Systems, 94, 712–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.12.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mezghani, E., Exposito, E., & Drira, K. (2017). A model-driven methodology for the design of autonomic and cognitive IoT-based systems: Application to healthcare. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 1(3), 224–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mihelič, K. K., & Culiberg, B. (2019). Reaping the fruits of another’s labor: The role of moral meaningfulness, mindfulness, and motivation in social loafing. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(3), 713–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3933-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mishra, N., Lin, C. C., & Chang, H. T. (2014). A cognitive oriented framework for IoT big-data management prospective. In 2014 IEEE international conference on communication problem-solving, ICCP 2014 (pp. 124–127).

  39. More than Half of South Asian Youth Are Not on Track to Have the Education and Skills Necessary for Employment in 2030. https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/more-half-south-asian-youth-are-not-track-have-education-and-skills-necessary. March 31, 2020.

  40. NAAC-Home. http://www.naac.gov.in/. March 31, 2020.

  41. Pang, S., et al. (2019). A behavior based trustworthy service composition discovery approach in cloud environment. IEEE Access, 7, 56492–56503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Park, J. H., et al. (2019). CIoT-Net: A scalable cognitive IoT based smart city network architecture. Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-019-0190-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Patil, V. L. (2012). Historical perspectives and unbalanced growth of engineering education infrastructure in India. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering, TALE, 2012, 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  44. QS World University Rankings 2020: Top Global Universities | Top Universities.” https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2020. January 16, 2020.

  45. Rajashree. (2014). Indian education system—A historical journey. International Journal for Research in Education 3(3): 46–49.

  46. Rekh, S., & Chandy, A. (2020). Implementation of academia 4.0 for engineering college education. Procedia Computer Science, 172(2019), 673–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sakala, L. C., & Chigona, W. (2020). How lecturers neutralize resistance to the implementation of learning management systems in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32(2), 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09238-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Schönig, S., Ackermann, L., Jablonski, S., & Ermer, A. (2020). IoT meets BPM: A bidirectional communication architecture for IoT-aware process execution. Software and Systems Modeling, 19(6), 1443–1459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-020-00785-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Shanchen, P., et al. (2020). A text similarity measurement based on semantic fingerprint of characteristic phrases. Chinese Journal of Electronics, 29(2), 233–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Shunmugaraj, S. Social Loafing.

  51. Silaeva, V. V., & Semenov, V. P. (2018). Internal education quality assurance through standardization of educational organization management system. In Proceedings of the 2018 international conference “‘quality management, transport and information security, information technologies’”, IT and QM and IS 2018 (pp. 70–73).

  52. Slade, C., & Downer, T. (2020). Students’ conceptual understanding and attitudes towards technology and user experience before and after use of an EPortfolio. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32(3), 529–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09245-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Spokoiny, A., & Shahar, Y. (2007). An Active database architecture for knowledge-based incremental abstraction of complex concepts from continuously arriving time-oriented raw data. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 28(3), 199–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Umashankar, V., & Dutta, K. (2007). Balanced scorecards in managing higher education institutions: An Indian perspective. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(1), 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Varghese, M. A. (2011). Development of collegiums of quality assessors for the Indian National Assessment & Accreditation Council (NAAC). In 2011 international workshop on institutional and programme accreditation: Connections and opportunities-proceedings, IWIPA 2011.

  56. Wang, M. (2019). Research on construction of the internal quality assurance system of assessment-based diagnosis and reformation in higher vocational colleges. In 2019 IEEE Eurasia conference on IOT, communication and engineering, ECICE 2019 (Vol. 9, pp. 518–521).

  57. Wook, M., et al. (2020). Opinion mining technique for developing student feedback analysis system using lexicon-based approach (OMFeedback). Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2549–2560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. World | Ranking Web of Universities: More than 28000 Institutions Ranked. https://www.webometrics.info/en/world. January 16, 2020.

  59. Zhang, Y., Peng, L., Sun, Yi., & Huimin, Lu. (2018). Editorial: intelligent industrial IoT integration with cognitive computing. Mobile Networks and Applications, 23(2), 185–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhoc, K. C. H., King, R. B., Chung, T. S. H., & Chen, J. (2020). Emotionally intelligent students are more engaged and successful: Examining the role of emotional intelligence in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aman Singh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Verma, A., Singh, A., Lughofer, E. et al. Multilayered-quality education ecosystem (MQEE): an intelligent education modal for sustainable quality education. J Comput High Educ (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09291-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Data preprocessing
  • Higher education
  • Intelligent modal
  • Education ecosystem
  • Academic loafing