Skip to main content

Digital literacy: a review in the South Pacific


In this era of exponential prominence and adoption of technology, one needs to have the ability to find, evaluate, utilize, share and create ideas, responsibly and ethically, using Information Communication Technology (ICT) tools and technologies combined with the Internet. This emerging human attribute is known as digital literacy. Today, digital literacy is an essential component of everyone's personal and professional lives to survive and thrive in the digital world. The notion of advocating digital literacy around the world is leveraged on the shoulders of higher education institutes. The institutes are playing a pivotal role in mentoring the younger generation to be digitally literate so that they can contribute effectively towards an individual, societal and national development and progression. This same now applies to the South Pacific region as well, with its recent progressive growth of ICT and the dynamic use of digital technology. It can also be added that digital literacy and, by extension, digital fluency is more needed in developing countries, including the South Pacific region, as these countries rely heavily on ICTs for their economic survival, competition and progression. However, there is a dearth of baseline research on digital literacy in the South Pacific since the concept is still new and an emerging one in the region. A few works have been done on the components of digital literacy highlighted in this integrative literature review paper. The anecdotal research will elaborate on the concept of digital literacy, discuss its importance and impacts with major emphasis on the South Pacific, and provide a comprehensive review of digital literacy, its importance and its impact on higher education in the South Pacific.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Adopted from Craig et al., 2016)


  1. Alsalem, M. (2016). Redefining literacy: The realities of digital literacy for students with disabilities in K-12. Journal of Education and Practice., 7, 205

    Google Scholar 

  2. Analysis of the B.A.T.M.A.N. Protocol. Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 244 (2017): 53–65.

  3. Asian Development Bank. (2018). ICT for Better Education in the Pacific.

  4. Anzak, S., & Sultana, A. (2020). Social and economic empowerment of women in the age of digital literacy: A case study of Pakistan, Islamabad, Rawalpindi. Global Social Sciences Review, 1, 102–111

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aristizába, L., Cano, S., Collazoc, C., Benavides, F., Moreira, F., & Fardoun, H. (2019). Digital transformation to support literacy teaching to deaf Children: From storytelling to digital interactive storytelling. Telematics and Informatics, 38, 87–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ata, R., & Yildirim, K. (2019). Exploring Turkish pre-service teachers’ perceptions and views of digital literacy. Education Sciences, 9, 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Atikson, S. (2017). ICT as a driver for achieving the sustainable development goals. Retrieved from

  8. Bekker, T., Bakker, S., Douma, S., Poel, J., & Scheltennar, K. (2015). Teaching children digital literacy through design-based learning with digits in schools. International Journal of Child Computer Interaction, 5, 29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bronfman, S., & Pelegrín, O. (2018). The digital revolution in management education. Retrieved from

  10. Buckingham, D. (2016). Defining digital literacy: What do young people need to know about digital media? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10, 21–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Burnett, C. (2009). Personal digital literacies versus classroom literacies: Investigating pre-service teachers’ digital lives in and beyond the classroom. In V. Carrington & M. Robinson (Eds.), Digital literacies: Social learning and classroom practices. (pp. 115–120). SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Cave, D. (2012, November 21). Digital islands: how the Pacific ICT revolution is transforming the region. Retrieved from

  13. Chan, B., Churchill, D., & Chiu, T. (2017). Digital literacy learning in higher education through digital storytelling approach. Journal of International Education Research, 13, 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chaudhary, K, Fehnker, A., & Mehta, V. (2017). Modelling, verification, and comparative performance.

  15. Chief, I., Naqiolevu, E., & Tuitoga, A. (2014). Pacific Island students paddling in the information digital literacy Canoe: A study of University of the South Pacific Students. Retrieved from

  16. Commonwealth of learning. (2012). Digital health literacy in commonwealth Pacific Nations.

  17. Council of Regional Organisations in the Pacific. (2018). Pacific Regional Education Framework (PacREF) Framework (PacREF): Moving Towards Education 2030.

  18. Craig, A., Kool, J., & Nilles, E. (2016). The Pacific experience: Supporting small island countries and territories to meet their 2012 International Health Regulations (2005) commitments: Short title: The Pacific experience: 2012 International Health Regulations (2005) commitments. Western Pac Surveill Response Journal, 4, 14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. CTA. (2019). Blockchain for agriculture: Making it happen. Retrieved from

  20. Cunningham, M. (2019). Economic inequality: Differences in developed and developing nations. Retrieved from

  21. Davis, C., McMaster, J., & Nowak, J. (2002). IT-enabled services as development drivers in low-income countries: The case of Fiji. The Electronic Journal of Information System in Developing Countries, 9, 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Delponte, L., Grigolini, M., Moroni, A., & Vignetti, S. (2015). ICT in the developing world.

  23. Dennis, D., Holmes, K., & Smith, E. (2015). Exploring digital literacy practices in an inclusive classroom.

  24. Dneprovskaya, N., Bayaskalanova, T., Ruposov, V., & Shevtsova, I. (2018). Study of digitization of russian higher education as a basis for smart education. In 2018 IEEE International conference "quality management, transport and information security, information technologies, (pp. 607–611).

  25. Dutta, A. (2017). Evolution of digital literacy project in rural India. In 2017 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC) (pp. 182–185). Princeton, NJ: IEEE.

  26. Dutta, S., & Mathur, R. (2014). EPICS high: Digital literacy project in India. In IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference. IEEE. Retrieved 12 December 2019, from

  27. Erstad, O. (2016). Educating the digital generation: Exploring media literacy for the 21st century. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10, 85–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Eshet, Y. (2002). Digital literacy: A new terminology framework and its application to the design of meaningful technology-based learning environments. EdMedia + Innovate Learning (pp. 1–15). Denver: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC.

  29. Eshet, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13, 93–106

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fairbairn, T. (2020). Pacific Islands economies: Trade patterns and some observations on trade policy issues. Retrieved from

  31. Flewitt, r, Messer, D., & Kucirkova, N. (2015). New directions for early literacy in a digital age: The iPad. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 15, 289–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Frank, T. (2017). From digital literacies to digital problem solving: Expanding technology-rich learning opportunities for adults. Journal of Research and Practice for Adult Literacy, Secondary, and Basic Education, 6, 66–70

    Google Scholar 

  33. Goodfellow, R. (2011). Literacy, literacies and the digital in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 16, 1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. GSMA. (2019). GSMA Report Reveals the Pacific Islands on the Cusp of a Digital Revolution. Retrieved from

  35. Hargittai, E. (2005). Survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. (pp. 371–379). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Harvey, L. (2000). New realities: The relationship between higher education and employment. Tertiary Education and Management, 6, 3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Heick, T. (2019). The Definition Of Digital Literacy. Retrieved from

  38. Hongthong, T., & Temdee, P. (2018). Personalized mobile learning for digital literacy enhancement of thai youth. In IEEE, 1–4.

  39. Institute for Teacher Education (ITE). (2018). American Samoa TTTAP: BEd elementary. Retrieved from Institute for Teacher Education (ITE):

  40. ITU. (2020). Digital Literacy Initiatives. Retrieved from

  41. Jayasundara, C. (2014). Enhancing Students' Skills Through Technology (ESST): A one-to-one computer solution at Fiji National University. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1–26.

  42. Jones, B., & Flannigan, S. (2008). Connecting the digital dots: Literacy of the 21st Century.

  43. Jurmo, P. (2017). Tech Tools for Literacy in Tonga. Retrieved from:

  44. Kala, S. (2013). ICT education in Fiji, issues and challenges faced by tertiary education sector: An empirical survey. Education Journal, 2, 91–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kalolo, J. (2019). Digital revolution and its impact on education systems in developing countries. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 345–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ken, D. (2018). Role of information and communication technology in open and distance learning. The Research Journal of Social Sciences, 9, 55–59

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kim, M., & Choi, D. (2018). Development of youth digital citizenship scale and implication for educational setting. Educational Technology and Society, 21, 155–171

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kumar R., Sharma K., Assaf M., Sharma B., Naidu S. (2019) Development of an Assistive Tongue Drive System for Disabled Individuals. In: Nayak, A., Sharma, A. (eds.), PRICAI 2019: Trends in artificial intelligence. PRICAI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11672. Springer.

  49. Kusumastuti, A., & Nuryani, A. (2020). Digital Literacy Levels in ASEAN (Comparative Study on ASEAN Countries). Retrieved from

  50. Kuzminska, O., Mazorchuk, M., Morze, N., Pavlenko, V., & Prokhorov, A. (2018). Digital competency of the students and teachers in ukraine: Measurement, analysis, development prospects. CEUR, 1–14.

  51. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2015). digital literacy and digital literacies: policy, pedagogy and research considerations for education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10, 8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Lumelume, S. (2016). Vanuatu Literacy Education Programme (VANLEP), Vanuatu. Retrieved from

  53. Lynch, W. (2017, October 23). What is digital literacy? Retrieved from

  54. Madge, O., & Ronu, I. (2020). Implementing information literacy programs in Romanian Medical Schools: Still a major challenge. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 9, 143–153

    Google Scholar 

  55. Mangubhai, F. (1987). Literacy in Fiji: Its origins and its development. Retrieved from

  56. Martin, A., & Grudziecki, J. (2015). DigEuLit: Concepts and tools for digital literacy development. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Science, 5, 249–267

    Google Scholar 

  57. Meyers, E., Erickson, I., & Small, R. (2013). Digital literacy and informal learning environments: An introduction. Learning, Media and Technology, 38, 355–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Ministry of Economy. (2017). 5-Year & 20-Year National Development Plan: Transforming Fiji.

  59. Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development. (2016). ICT for better education. Retrieved from

  60. Ministry of Health. (2019). Shaping Fiji's Health. Retrieved from Ministry of Health & Medical Services:

  61. Miniwatts Marketing Group. (2018). Internet World Stats. Retrieved from

  62. Nand, R., & Sharma, B. (2019). Meta-heuristic approaches to tackle skill based group allocation of students in project-based learning courses. In IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), (pp. 1782–1789).

  63. Network Strategies. (2010). Review of Pacific Regional digital strategy.

  64. NauruNews. (2018). The cohort in Project Management first for Nauru. Retrieved from

  65. Nawaz, A., & Kundi, G. (2010). Digital literacy: An analysis of contemporary paradigms. Journal of Science and Technology Education Research, 1, 19–29

    Google Scholar 

  66. Newman, D. (2017). Top 6 digital transformation trends in education. Retrieved from

  67. Nikou, S., & Aavakare, M. (2021). An assessment of the interplay between literacy and digital technology in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 6, 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  68. Nisha, S., & Farik, M. (2016). Recent cybercrimes in Fiji. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 1–16.

  69. Pacific Community. (2017). Women's economic empowerment in the Pacific- regional overview.

  70. Pacific Community. (2018). Pacific Islands 2016 population projections. Retrieved from

  71. Pacific Community. (2018). Pacific Islands literacy and numeracy assessment 2018.

  72. Pacific Island Forum Secretariat. (2018). Pacific-Regional-Education-Framework-PacREF-2018–2030. Retrieved from

  73. Pangrazio, L. (2016). Reconceptualising critical digital literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37, 163–174

    Google Scholar 

  74. Papoutsaki, E., & Sharp, S. (2005). Island Nations in the South Pacific and their communication needs: From a journalism education perspective. In 14th AMIC Conference, (pp. 2–20).

  75. Park, J. (2018). UNESCO's Support for ICT-enabled Lifelong Learning for All. Retrieved from

  76. Park, Y. (2011). Digital literacy and privacy behavior online. Communication Research, 40, 215–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Perdana, R., Jumadi, J., & Rosana, D. (2016). Measuring digital literacy skill: Development, reliability, and validity of the open-ended test. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 1–13.


  79. PFIP. (2019). Retrieved from

  80. Polizzi, G. (2020). Digital literacy and the national curriculum for England: Learning from how the experts engage with and evaluate online content. Computers & Education, 152, 103859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Premuzic, T., & Frankiewicz, B. (2019). Does higher education still prepare people for jobs? Retrieved from

  82. PRIF. (2015). Economic and social impact of ICT in the Pacific.

  83. Raturi, S. (2018). Understanding learners preferences for learning environments in higher education. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 6, 84–100

    Google Scholar 

  84. Ravindra, S., Chandra, R., & Virallikattur, D. (2015). A study of the management of electronic medical records in Fijian Hospitals.

  85. Reddy, E., Reddy, P. S., & Reddy, K. (2016). Student Readiness and perception of the use of smart phones for higher education. In: 2016 3rd Asia-Pacific World Congress on Computer Science and Engineering, (pp. 258–264).

  86. Reddy, P., Chaudhary, K., Sharma, B., & Chand, R. (2020). The two perfect scorers for technology acceptance. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 1505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Reddy, P., & Hussein, S. (2017). Tablet Learning and its perceived usage at a higher education Institution in Fiji. Journal of Fijian Studies, 15, 131–142

    Google Scholar 

  88. Reddy, P., Sharma, B., & Chandra, S. (2020). Student readiness and perception of tablet leaning in HE in the Pacific: A case study of Fiji and Tuvalu. Journal of Cases on Information Technology (JCIT), 22, 52–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Reddy, P., Sharma, B., & Chaudhary, K. (2020). Digital literacy: A review of literature. International Journal of Technoethics (IJT), 11, 65–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Reddy, P., Sharma, B., & Chaudhary, K. (2020d). Measuring the digital competency of freshmen at a higher. In: PACIS 2020 Proceedings (pp. 1–13). AIS Electronic Library (AISeL).

  91. RNZ. (2019). PNG police act on FB defamation. Retrieved from

  92. Sharma, A. (2012). Retrieved from

  93. Sharma, B., Jokhan, A., Kumar, R., Finiasi, R., Chand, S., & Rao, V. (2015). Use of short message service for learning and student support in the Pacific Region. In Y. Zang (Ed.), Handbook of mobile teaching and learning. (pp. 199–220). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  94. Sharma, B., & Reddy, P. (2015). Effectiveness of tablet learning in online courses at the University of the South Pacific. In 2nd Asia-Pacific World Congress on Computer Science and Engineering (pp. 1–9). Suva, Fiji: IEEE.

  95. Sharma, B., Lauano, F., Narayan, S., Anzeg, A., Kumar, B., & Raj, J. (2018). Science teachers accelerated programme model: A joint partnership in the Pacific region. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 46, 38–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Sharma, B., Nand, R., Naseem, M., Reddy, E., S, N., & K, R. (2018). Smart learning in the Pacific: Design of new pedagogical tools. In IEEE TALE conference Wollongong, Australia, (pp. 573–580).

  97. Sharma, B., Reddy, E., Mohammed, N., & Nand, R. (2019a). Effectiveness of online presence in a blended higher learning environment in the Pacific. Studies in Higher Education, 45, 1547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Sharma, B., Reddy, P., Reddy, E., Narayan, S., Singh, V., & Kumar, R. (2019b). Use of mobile devices for learning and student support in the Pacific Region. In Y. Zang & D. Cristol (Eds.), Handbook of mobile teaching and learning. (pp. 109–134). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  99. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Stričević, I. (2018). Literacies in the DIGITAL AGE: New teaching paradigms and solutions for academic libraries. In 5h International symposium on emerging trends and technologies in libraries and information services, (pp. 169–173).

  101. Tanaka, E. (2012). The evolution of distance learning and factors promoting ICT use in the pacific islands: Focusing on the possibility of e-learning opportunities for higher education. Keio Communication Review, 34, 37

    Google Scholar 

  102. Techataweewan, W., & Prasertin, U. (2017). Development of digital literacy indicators for Thai undergraduate students using mixed methods research. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39, 215–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Thompson, I. (2016). Learning in the Pacific Region. (P. Reddy, Interviewer).

  104. UNESCO. (2018). A Global Framework of reference on digital literacy skills for indicator 4.4.2. UNESCO Institute for Statistics.

  105. Unicef. (2017). Access to the Internet and Digital Literacy.

  106. United Nations. (2018). Realizing the Sustainable Development Goals by, for and with persons with disabilities.

  107. USP. (2013). University Hosts Its First ACODE Workshop. Retrieved from

  108. USP. (2017). Two Pacific TAFE cohorts launched at Lautoka Campus. Retrieved from

  109. USP. (2018). Annualreport2018.

  110. USP . (2019). mLearning Projects. Retrieved from

  111. USP. (2019). USP Pacific TAFE SKILL ME UP App. Retrieved from

  112. Vaa, L. (2015). A Baseline Study on Technology-Enabled Learning in the Commonwealth Pacific Island Countries. Samoa.

  113. Vakasukaawaqa, A. (2015). New plan to boost digital literacy. Retrieved from

  114. Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2013). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digitally networked world of the 21st century. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 403–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Vula, M. (2019, April 19). Report reveals Pacific on the Cusp of a digital revolution. Retrieved from

  116. Wardhani, B. D., & Saad, M. (2018). On the digital divide: Role of the University of the South Pacific in enhancing education in the Pacific countries. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 16, 36

    Google Scholar 

  117. Whelan, R. (2008). Use of ICT in education in the South Pacific: Findings of the Pacific eLearning observatory. Distance Education, 29, 53–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Yusuf, J. (2009). Flexible delivery issues: The case of the University of the South Pacific. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 6, 65–71

    Google Scholar 

  119. Zhang, H., & Zhu, C. (2016). A study of digital media literacy of the 5th and 6th Grade. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25, 579–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Zoubi, R. (2021). The impact of media and information literacy on acquiring the critical thinking skill by the educational faculty’s students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100782

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pritika Reddy.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reddy, P., Sharma, B. & Chaudhary, K. Digital literacy: a review in the South Pacific. J Comput High Educ (2021).

Download citation


  • Digital literacy
  • South Pacific
  • ICT
  • Digital technology
  • Higher education