Students’ conceptual understanding and attitudes towards technology and user experience before and after use of an ePortfolio

A Correction to this article was published on 17 January 2020

This article has been updated


EPortfolio use meets institutional reporting requirements and provides an opportunity for students to demonstrate learning, showcase their strengths to future employers, and develop lifelong reflective practice. At the same time, ePortfolio use offers students repeated opportunities to develop the skills necessary for academic progress and participation in contemporary online professional environments. To ensure that any ePortfolio implementation is making a positive impact across these areas it is important to be informed about the users’ attitudes, conceptual understanding and achievements when using this pedagogical and professional tool. We report student ePortfolio use at an Australian regional university. The paper compares students’ conceptual understanding and attitudes towards technology and user experience before and after use of an ePortfolio. It provides an overview of pertinent literature, outlines the research context and methodology, followed by the comparison results. Its contribution to ePortfolio research and practice, and implications for educators and institutional decision makers are also discussed. These results highlight the importance of adopting innovative ways to reinforce the value of ePortfolio for students through external motivation until they adopt their career persona and become intrinsically motivated to embrace strategies and tools that facilitate their progression.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Change history

  • 17 January 2020

    The original published version of this article unfortunately omitted data in Appendices 1 and 2.


  1. Beetham, H. (2005). E-Portfolios in post-16 learning in the UK: Developments, issues and opportunities. A report prepared for the JISC e-Learning and Pedagogy strand of the JISC e-Learning Programme. Retrieved February 5, 2019 from

  2. Birks, M., Hartin, P., Woods, C., Emmanuel, E., & Hitchins, M. (2016). Students’ perceptions of the use of eportfolios in nursing and midwifery education. Nurse Education in Practice, 18(May), 46–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blom, D., Rowley, J., Bennett, D., Hitchcock, M., & Dunbar-Hall, P. (2014). Knowledge sharing: Exploring institutional policy and educator practice through ePortfolios in music and writing. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 12(2), 138–148.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bryant, L. H., & Chittum, J. R. (2013). ePortfolio effectiveness: A (n Ill-fated) search for empirical support. International Journal of ePortfolio, 3(2), 189–198.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Butler, P. (2006). A review of the literature on portfolios and electronic portfolios. A report for the eCDF ePortfolio Project, Massey University College of Education, Palmerston North, New Zealand. Retrieved on February 16, 2019 from

  6. Chang, E., & Daly, J. (2016). Transitions in nursing: Preparing for professional practice. Chatswood: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chatham-Carpenter, A., Seawel, L., & Raschig, J. (2010). Avoiding the pitfalls: Current practices and recommendations for ePortfolios in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 38(4), 437–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chau, J., & Cheng, G. (2010). Towards understanding the potential of e-portfolios for independent learning: A qualitative study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(7), 932–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Clark, J. E. (2010). The digital imperative: Making the case for a 21st century pedagogy. Computers and Composition, 27(1), 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Conole, G., de Laat, M., Dillon, T., & Darby, J. (2008). ‘Disruptive technologies’, ‘pedagogical innovation’: What’s new? Findings from an in-depth study of students’ use and perception of technology. Computers & Education, 50(2), 511–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dagley, V., & Berrington, B. (2005). Learning from an evaluation of an electronic portfolio to support general practitioners’ personal development planning, appraisal, and revalidation. Education for Primary Care, 16(5), 567–574.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dalziel, C. (2013). Learning through technology. HRD, 105, 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Downer, T., & Slade, C. (2019). Starting early: Using ePortfolios to prepare first year midwifery students for professional practice. In K. Trimmer, T. Newman, & F. Padró (Eds.), Ensuring quality in professional education volume I. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Endacott, R., Gray, M. A., Jasper, M. A., McMullan, M., Miller, C., Scholes, J., et al. (2004). Using portfolios in the assessment of learning and competence: The impact of four models. Nurse Education in Practice, 4(4), 250–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gerbic, P., Lewis, L., & Amin, N. (2011). Student perspectives of ePortfolios: Change over four semesters. In Proceedings from ASCILITE 2011 Changing demands, changing directions, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, 4–7 December 2011.

  16. Hartnell-Young, E. (2006). E-portfolios for knowledge and learning. In A. Jafari & C. Kaufman (Eds.), Handbook of research on ePortfolios (pp. 125–134). Hershey: Idea Group Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hsieh, P., Lee, C., & Chen, W. (2015). Students’ perspectives on e-portfolio development and implementation: A case study in Taiwanese higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(6), 641–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. JISC (2008). Effective practice with e-Portfolios. Retrieved on February 5, 2019 from

  19. Joyce, P. A. (2005). Framework for portfolio development in postgraduate nursing practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14(4), 456–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin, Q. (2008). Pre-service teachers’ learning experiences of constructing ePortfolios online. Internet and Higher Education, 11(3), 194–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lopez-Fernandez, O., & Rodriguz-Illera, J. L. (2009). Investigating university students’ adaptation to a digital learner course portfolio. Computers & Education, 52(3), 608–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McDonald, B. (2012). Portfolio assessment: Direct from the classroom. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(3), 335–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Meyer, E., Abrami, P. C., Wade, C. A., Aslan, O., & Deault, L. (2010). Improving literacy and metacognition with electronic portfolios: Teaching and learning with ePEARL. Computers and Education, 55(1), 84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Morbarhan, R., Rahman, A. A., & Majidi, M. (2015). Electronic portfolio motivational factors from students’ perspective: A qualitative study. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 7(2), 265–279.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Peacock, S., & Murray, S. (2009). Learners’ initial expectations and experiences of ePortfolios: A pilot study. Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching, 2(4). Retrieved from

  26. Reardon, R., Lumsdon, J., & Meyer, K. (2005). Developing an E-Portfolio program: Providing a comprehensive tool for student development, reflection, and integration. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice (NASPA), 42(3), 368–380.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ring, G., & Foti, S. (2006). Using ePortfolios to facilitate professional development among pre-service teachers. In A. Jafari & C. Kaufman (Eds.), Handbook of research on ePortfolios (pp. 340–457). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ritzhaupt, A., Singh, O., & Seyferth, T. (2008). Development of the electronic portfolio student perspective instrument: An ePortfolio integration initiative. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 19(2), 47–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shroff, R., Deneen, C., & Lim, C. P. (2014). Student ownership of learning using e-portfolio for career development. Journal of Information Systems Technology & Planning, 7(18), 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Slade, C. (2015). Early student aspirations of using ePortfolios. In Paper presented at the Tertiary Education Management Conference (TEMC): Leading Locally Competing Globally, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

  31. Slade, C., Murfin, K., & Readman, K. (2013). Evaluating processes and platforms for potential ePortfolio use: the role of the middle agent. International Journal of ePortfolio, 3(2), 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tosh, D., Light, T., Fleming, K., & Hayward, J. (2005). Engagement with electronic portfolios: Challenges from the student perspective. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(3). Retrieved from

  33. Tsai, M. J., Liang, J. C., Hou, H. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). University students’ online information searching strategies in different search contexts. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5), 881–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tzeng, J. (2011). Perceived values and prospective users’ acceptance of prospective technology: The case of a career ePortfolio system. Computers & Education, 56(1), 157–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wade, A., Abrami, P. C., & Sclater, J. (2005). An electronic portfolio to support learning. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(3). Retrieved from

  36. Watson, C. E., Kuh, G. D., Rhodes, T., Penny Light, T., & Chen, H. (2016). Editorial: ePortfolios—The eleventh high impact practice. International Journal of ePortfolio, 6(2), 65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wetzel, K., & Strudler, N. (2006). Costs and benefits of electronic portfolios in teacher education: Student voices. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 22(3), 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Whetstone, L., & Carr-Chellman, A. (2001). Preparing preservice teachers to use technology. TechTrends, 45, 11–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wuetherick, B., & Dickinson, J. (2015). Why ePortfolios? Student perceptions of ePortfolio use in continuing education learning environments. International Journal of ePortfolio, 5(1), 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Xuesong, Z., Olfman, L., & Firpo, D. (2011). An information system design theory for collaborative ePortfolio systems. In 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1e10). Retrieved February 16, 2019 from

  41. Yancey, N. (2009). Electronic portfolios a decade into the twenty-first century: What we know, what we need to know. Peer Review, 11(1), 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Yu, T. (2012). E-portfolio, a valuable job search tool for college students. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 29(1), 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study received no funding.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Slade.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest in this study.

Ethical approval

Human ethics approval was given by the University of the Sunshine Coast.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Participation was voluntary.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised to correct the truncated Appendices 1 and 2.


Appendix 1: pre-use student survey

Student survey of initial expectations of ePortfolios at University of the Sunshine Coast


Appendix 2: post-use student survey

Student survey post ePortfolio use at University of the Sunshine Coast


Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Slade, C., Downer, T. Students’ conceptual understanding and attitudes towards technology and user experience before and after use of an ePortfolio. J Comput High Educ 32, 529–552 (2020).

Download citation


  • ePortfolio
  • Student perspectives
  • Pre-use and post-use surveys
  • Pedagogy
  • Professional development
  • Motivation