A comparison of lecture-based, active, and flipped classroom teaching approaches in higher education
- 484 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to compare community college students’ learning experiences and performance for lecture-based, active learning, and flipped classroom teaching approaches. Participants were second-semester computer programming students (n = 103) at a mid-sized college of applied arts and technology. Garrison’s (2011) Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework informed our analysis of students’ learning experiences within each approach. Overall, active learning resulted in the highest mean scores for teaching, social, and cognitive presence. In particular, students rated teaching presence significantly higher for the active-learning approach than the lecture-based approach. Students rated social presence significantly higher for the active-learning and flipped classroom approaches compared to the lecture-based. There were no significant differences among the three approaches with respect to cognitive presence or learning performance. Student comments indicated that all three approaches had distinct benefits and challenges regarding teaching, social and cognitive presence. Regardless of the teaching approach employed in this study, five desired learning characteristics emerged based on student feedback including clarity, flexibility, opportunities for application, timely guidance and feedback, and cognitive engagement.
KeywordsLecture Active learning Flipped classroom Attitudes Learning
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bligh, D. (2000). What’s the use of lectures? (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Brown, S., & Race, P. (2005). Lecturing: A practical guide. Sterling, VA: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Butt, A. (2014). Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: Evidence from Australia. Business Education and Accreditation, 6(1), 33–44.Google Scholar
- Cashin, W. E. (1985). Improving lectures (Idea Paper No. 14). Manhattan, NY: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development. Retrieved October 1, 2018 from http://ctl.byu.edu/sites/default/files/improving_lectures.pdf.
- Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Findlay-Thompson, S., & Mombourquette, P. (2014). Evaluation of a flipped classroom in an undergraduate business course. Business Education and Accreditation, 6(1), 63–71.Google Scholar
- Flipped Learning Network (FLN). (2014). The four pillars of F-L-I-P™. Retrieved October 1, 2018 from https://flippedlearning.org/definition-of-flipped-learning.
- Frydenberg, M. (2013). Flipping Excel. Information Systems Education Journal, 11(1), 63.Google Scholar
- Grant, C. (2013). First inversion: A rationale for implementing the ‘flipped approach’ in tertiary music courses. Australian Journal of Music Education, 2013(1), 3–12. Retrieved from http://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/handle/10072/57265/91663_1.pdf.
- Guerrero, S., Baumgartel, D., & Zobott, M. (2013). The use of screencasting to transform traditional pedagogy in a preservice mathematics content course. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 32(2), 173–193.Google Scholar
- Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lambert, C. (2012). Twilight of the lecture. Harvard Magazine, March–April. Retrieved October 1, 2018 from http://harvardmagazine.com/2012/03/twilight-of-the-lecture.
- Larson, S., & Yamamoto, J. (2013). Flipping the college spreadsheet skills classroom: Initial empirical results. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 4(10), 751–758.Google Scholar
- Lucke, T., Keyssner, U., and Dunn, P. (2013). The use of a classroom response system to more effectively flip the classroom. In Frontiers in education conference, 2013 IEEE (pp. 491–495). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.2013.6684872.
- McLaughlin, J. E., Roth, M. T., Glatt, D. M., Gharkholonarehe, N., Davidson, C. A., Griffin, L. M., et al. (2014). The flipped classroom: A course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Academic Medicine, 89(2), 236–243. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Murphree, D. S. (2014). “Writing wasn’t really stressed, accurate historical analysis was stressed”: Student perceptions of in-class writing in the inverted, general education, university history survey course. History Teacher, 47(2), 209–219.Google Scholar
- Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. Retrieved October 1, 2018 from http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Papers/Prince_AL.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Race, P. (2007). The lecturer’s toolkit: A practical guide to assessment, learning and teaching (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Slomanson, W. R. (2014). Blended learning: A flipped classroom experiment. Journal of Legal Education, 64(1), 93.Google Scholar
- Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 7(17), 137–146.Google Scholar