Can simulator immersion change cognitive style? Results from a cross-sectional study of field-dependence–independence in air traffic control students
- 296 Downloads
Air traffic control (ATC) operations are critical to the U.S. aviation infrastructure, making ATC training a critical area of study. Because ATC performance is heavily dependent on visual processing, it is important to understand how to screen for or promote relevant visual processing abilities. While conventional wisdom has maintained that such abilities are largely innate and stable (i.e., not impacted by training or experience), recent research has begun to question this assumption. For example, intelligence has been thought to be stable, yet intelligence scores on the Ravens Progressive matrices (RPM) change over time. Because the RPM, like ATC, relies on visual pattern recognition, one hypothesized reason for these changes is the increased exposure to visually intensive technologies like videogames. Other constructs such as field-dependence/independence (FD-I) which, like the RPM, rely on visual pattern detection and are thought to be stable, might therefore also be affected by visual technology exposure. Two studies sought to examine the role of videogame play on FD-I and ATC simulation performance by ATC students at a Midwestern university. No benefits of videogame play were found. However, more fourth-year ATC students were field-independent (FI) than were first-year students and the general population. Findings suggest that exposure to the ATC training program over 4 years may result in more FI students, and that FD-I may not be stable. Possible explanations and implications are discussed.
KeywordsGames Videogames Cognitive style Field-independence Field-dependence Air traffic control
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Carretta, T. R. (1987). Field dependence–independence and its relationship to flight training performance (Technical Report). Brooks Air Force Base, TX: Air Force Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
- Clark, D. B., Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Killingsworth, S. (2014). Digital games, design, and learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- EA Games. (2002). Medal of Honor: Allied Assault, (software). Redwood City, CA: Electronic Arts.Google Scholar
- Edwards, C., & Poole, R. W. Jr. (2010). Airports and air traffic control. Washington, D.C.: The CATO Institute. Available from http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/transportation/airports-atc.
- Hays, R. T. (2005). The effectiveness of instructional games: A literature review and discussion. Technical Report 2005-004. Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division. http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA441935.
- Hopkin, V. (1980). The measurement of the air traffic controller. Human Factors, 22(5), 547–560.Google Scholar
- Johnson, S. (2006). Everything bad is good for you. New York: Riverhead.Google Scholar
- Maliko-Abraham, H. (2004). A study of field independence and United States military air traffic controllers. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, September 20– 24, 2004, 1213–1217.Google Scholar
- Panek, P. E., Funk, L. G., & Nelson, P. K. (1980). Reliability and validity of the group embedded figures test across the life span. Perceptual Motor Skills, 50 (3, part 2), 1171–1174.Google Scholar
- Raven J. C. (1936). Mental tests used in genetic studies: The performance of related individuals on tests mainly educative and mainly reproductive. MSc Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
- Tobias, S., Fletcher, J. D., Dai, D. Y., & Wind, A. P. (2011). Review of research on computer games. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 127–221). Charlotte, NC: IAP.Google Scholar
- Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. A., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (2002). Group embedded figures test manual. Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden.Google Scholar