There is a need for further research to understand the potential uses of asynchronous electronic discussions in higher education courses. Electronic discussion boards were conducted with two different graduate speech-language pathology student cohorts to supplement in-class instruction regarding assistive technology. One year’s discussions were done as a single large group while the second year’s were done in multiple-small groups. These discussion boards were analyzed for emerging themes. Students’ opinions of the discussion board, along with their suggestions for improvement, were also requested and analyzed. Results indicated that the discussion boards were a successful tool in maximizing the potential for knowledge acquisition outside the classroom and that several enhancements could be added to improve the overall experience. In particular, instructor involvement was more easily incorporated into large groups and small groups had fewer students reporting about redundancy of posts. Practical applications and future research directions are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Blackboard (version 6) is an Internet-based course management system to facilitate communication between instructors and students in classes by making important documents and announcements available to students.
Minspeak® is a language representation system consisting of a set of icons with multiple meanings designed to allow fast access to words and messages through short, sequenced combinations of those icons.
Aitken, J., & Shedletsky, L. (2002). Using electronic discussion to teach communication courses. Communication Education, 51(3), 325.
Althaus, S. L. (1997). Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom: An experiment with online discussions. Communication Education, 46(3), 158–174.
Bender, T. (2003). Discussion-based online teaching to enhance student learning: Theory, practice and assessment. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2005). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children & adults with complex communication needs (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Blackboard, Inc. (1997–2006). Blackboard Academic Suite 126.96.36.1995 ® (Computer software). (http://www.blackboard.com/us/index.aspx).
Blignaut, S., & Trollip, S. R. (2003). Developing a taxonomy of faculty preparation in asynchronous environments: An exploratory investigation. Computer and Education, 41, 149–171.
Burke, R., Beukelman, D. R., Ball, L., & Horn, C. (2002). Augmentative and alternative communication technology learning part 2: Pre-professional students. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(4), 242–250.
Christopher, M., Thomas, J., & Tallent-Runnels, M. (2004). Raising the bar: Encouraging high level thinking in online discussion forums. Roeper Review, 26(3), 166–171.
Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e-learning: Online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 657–663.
Figallo, C. (1998). Hosting web communities: Building relationships, increasing customer loyalty, and maintaining a competitive edge. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28(2), 115–152.
Haythornwaite, C., Kazmer, M. M., Robbins, J., & Shoemaker, S. (2000). Community development among distance learners: Temporal and technological dimensions. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 6(1), 1–24.
Kay, R. H. (2006). Developing a comprehensive metric for assessing discussion board effectiveness. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 761–783.
Lebel, T., Olshtain, E., & Weiss, P. L. (2005). Teaching teachers about augmentative and alternative communication: Opportunities and challenges of a web-based course. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(4), 264–277.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
MacDonald, L., & Caverly, D. (2001). Techtalk: Expanding the online discussion. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(2), 38.
Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2003). Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. Computers Education, 40, 237–253.
McNaughton, D., Light, J., & Arnold, K. B. (2002). “Getting your wheel in the door”: Successful full-time employment experiences of individuals with cerebral palsy who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(2), 59–76.
Moller, L. (1998). Designing communities of learners for asynchronous distance education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(4), 115–122.
Offerman, D., Pearce, K., & Tassava, C. (2006). Assessing the relationship between learner satisfaction and faculty participation in online courses. In S. L. Howell & M. Hricko (Eds.), Online assessment and measurement: Case studies from higher education, K-12, and corporate (pp. 27–41). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
Resnik, D. (2005). Using electronic discussion boards to teach responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(4), 617–630.
Rocco, S. (2007). Online assessment and evaluation. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 113, 75–86.
Romeo, L. (2001). Asynchronous environments for teaching and learning: Literacy trends and issues online. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 6(3), 24–28.
Rovai, A. P. (2000). Online and traditional assessments: What is the difference? The Internet and Higher Education, 3, 141–151.
Smith, S. B., Smith, S. J., & Boone, R. (2000). Increasing access to teacher preparation: The effectiveness of traditional instructional methods in an online learning environment. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(2), 37–46.
Thomas, M. (2002). Learning within incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 351–366.
Waldeck, J., Kearney, P., & Plax, P. (2001). Teacher e-mail message strategies and students’ willingness to communicate. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 12, 54–70.
Wickersham, L., & Dooley, K. (2006). A content analysis of critical thinking skills as an indicator of quality of online discussion in virtual learning communities. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(2), 185–193.
About this article
Cite this article
McCarthy, J.W., Smith, J.L. & DeLuca, D. Using online discussion boards with large and small groups to enhance learning of assistive technology. J Comput High Educ 22, 95–113 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-010-9031-6
- Discussion boards
- Assistive technology
- Augmentative and alternative communication