Using online discussion boards with large and small groups to enhance learning of assistive technology
- 349 Downloads
- 4 Citations
Abstract
There is a need for further research to understand the potential uses of asynchronous electronic discussions in higher education courses. Electronic discussion boards were conducted with two different graduate speech-language pathology student cohorts to supplement in-class instruction regarding assistive technology. One year’s discussions were done as a single large group while the second year’s were done in multiple-small groups. These discussion boards were analyzed for emerging themes. Students’ opinions of the discussion board, along with their suggestions for improvement, were also requested and analyzed. Results indicated that the discussion boards were a successful tool in maximizing the potential for knowledge acquisition outside the classroom and that several enhancements could be added to improve the overall experience. In particular, instructor involvement was more easily incorporated into large groups and small groups had fewer students reporting about redundancy of posts. Practical applications and future research directions are discussed.
Keywords
Questionnaire Graduate Online Discussion boards Assistive technology Augmentative and alternative communicationReferences
- Aitken, J., & Shedletsky, L. (2002). Using electronic discussion to teach communication courses. Communication Education, 51(3), 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Althaus, S. L. (1997). Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom: An experiment with online discussions. Communication Education, 46(3), 158–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bender, T. (2003). Discussion-based online teaching to enhance student learning: Theory, practice and assessment. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.Google Scholar
- Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2005). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children & adults with complex communication needs (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
- Blackboard, Inc. (1997–2006). Blackboard Academic Suite 6.3.1.505 ® (Computer software). (http://www.blackboard.com/us/index.aspx).
- Blignaut, S., & Trollip, S. R. (2003). Developing a taxonomy of faculty preparation in asynchronous environments: An exploratory investigation. Computer and Education, 41, 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Burke, R., Beukelman, D. R., Ball, L., & Horn, C. (2002). Augmentative and alternative communication technology learning part 2: Pre-professional students. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(4), 242–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Christopher, M., Thomas, J., & Tallent-Runnels, M. (2004). Raising the bar: Encouraging high level thinking in online discussion forums. Roeper Review, 26(3), 166–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e-learning: Online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 657–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Figallo, C. (1998). Hosting web communities: Building relationships, increasing customer loyalty, and maintaining a competitive edge. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28(2), 115–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Haythornwaite, C., Kazmer, M. M., Robbins, J., & Shoemaker, S. (2000). Community development among distance learners: Temporal and technological dimensions. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 6(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
- Kay, R. H. (2006). Developing a comprehensive metric for assessing discussion board effectiveness. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 761–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lebel, T., Olshtain, E., & Weiss, P. L. (2005). Teaching teachers about augmentative and alternative communication: Opportunities and challenges of a web-based course. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(4), 264–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- MacDonald, L., & Caverly, D. (2001). Techtalk: Expanding the online discussion. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(2), 38.Google Scholar
- Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2003). Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. Computers Education, 40, 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McNaughton, D., Light, J., & Arnold, K. B. (2002). “Getting your wheel in the door”: Successful full-time employment experiences of individuals with cerebral palsy who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(2), 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moller, L. (1998). Designing communities of learners for asynchronous distance education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(4), 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Offerman, D., Pearce, K., & Tassava, C. (2006). Assessing the relationship between learner satisfaction and faculty participation in online courses. In S. L. Howell & M. Hricko (Eds.), Online assessment and measurement: Case studies from higher education, K-12, and corporate (pp. 27–41). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.Google Scholar
- Resnik, D. (2005). Using electronic discussion boards to teach responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(4), 617–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rocco, S. (2007). Online assessment and evaluation. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 113, 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Romeo, L. (2001). Asynchronous environments for teaching and learning: Literacy trends and issues online. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 6(3), 24–28.Google Scholar
- Rovai, A. P. (2000). Online and traditional assessments: What is the difference? The Internet and Higher Education, 3, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smith, S. B., Smith, S. J., & Boone, R. (2000). Increasing access to teacher preparation: The effectiveness of traditional instructional methods in an online learning environment. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(2), 37–46.Google Scholar
- Thomas, M. (2002). Learning within incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Waldeck, J., Kearney, P., & Plax, P. (2001). Teacher e-mail message strategies and students’ willingness to communicate. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 12, 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wickersham, L., & Dooley, K. (2006). A content analysis of critical thinking skills as an indicator of quality of online discussion in virtual learning communities. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(2), 185–193.Google Scholar