Advertisement

Marine Biodiversity

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 783–794 | Cite as

Sinelobus stromatoliticus sp. nov. (Peracarida: Tanaidacea) found within extant peritidal stromatolites

  • Gavin M. RishworthEmail author
  • Renzo Perissinotto
  • Magdalena Błażewicz
Original Paper

Abstract

Living coastal stromatolites, layered structures formed by the microbially mediated precipitation of calcium carbonate, are scarce because of grazing and burrowing disruption by metazoans, amongst other reasons. This paper describes Sinelobus stromatoliticus sp. nov., a tanaidacean living within laminated stromatolites along the South African coastline. S. stromatoliticus is the sixth geographically isolated species now recognised within what was once considered to be a single globally cosmopolitan species, S. stanfordi Richardson, 1901. A revised, sex-specific dichotomous key to all the species currently recognised within this genus is provided. Sinelobus stromatoliticus is a prominent and abundant metazoan within the living stromatolite habitats, yet despite being a burrowing and grazing species, stromatolite layering is not hampered by its presence. Future work should determine the relationship between other populations (cf. S. stanfordi) in South Africa (previously identified as Tanais philetaerus Stebbing, 1904) and those of the stromatolite-dwelling S. stromatoliticus. However, given South Africa’s clear biogeographic zonation in other taxa, it is unlikely that this genus that features no pelagic larval stage would be morphologically similar across biogeographic regions.

Keywords

Brood larvae Extant microbialite Microbial mat Sinelobus South Africa Tanaididae 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa from a South African Research Chairs Initiative (SARChI) grant given to RP (Unique Grant No. 84375). The funders played no role in study design, and the views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors, and not necessarily those of the funders. The Claude Leon Foundation is thanked for the postdoctoral fellowship given to GMR. MB was funded by the National Science Centre 2014/13/B/MZ8/04702. Specimen collection permits were obtained from the Department of Environmental Affairs and the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of South Africa (RES2014/06 and RES2015/31). The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments that helped to improve the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Research Foundation of South Africa (grant number 84375) and the National Science Centre of Poland (grant number 2014/13/B/MZ8/04702).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

GMR received a Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Claude Leon Foundation. RP received research grants from the National Research Foundation of South Africa. MB received research grants from the National Science Centre of Poland.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed by the authors.

Sampling and field studies

All necessary permits for sampling and observational field studies have been obtained by the authors from the competent authorities and are mentioned in the acknowledgements, if applicable.

References

  1. Ambrosio ES, Ferreira AC, Rodrigues Capitulo A (2014) The potential use of Sinelobus stanfordi (Richardson, 1901) (Crustacea, Tanaidacea) as a biological indicator of water quality in a temperate estuary of South America. Limnetica 33:139–152Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson LJ, Field JG, Hutchings L (2011) Effects of demersal trawling along the west coast of southern Africa: multivariate analysis of benthic assemblages. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 430:241–255.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08956 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bamber RN (1990) A new species of Zeuxo (Crustacea: Tanaidacea) from the French Atlantic coast. J Nat Hist 24:1587–1596.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00222939000770911 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bamber RN (2006) Shallow water tanaidaceans (Crustacea: Peracarida: Tanaidacea) from New Caledonia and the Loyalty Islands. Zootaxa 1108:1–21.  https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1108.1.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bamber RN (2008) Tanaidaceans (Crustacea: Peracarida: Tanaidacea) from Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia. In: Davie PJF, Phillips JA (eds) Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Marine Biological Workshop, The Marine Fauna and Flora of Moreton Bay, Queensland., Brisbane. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum - Nature, pp 143–217Google Scholar
  6. Bamber RN (2011) The marine fauna and flora of the Isles of Scilly. Tanaidacea (Crustacea: Peracarida). J Nat Hist 45:1801–1815.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2011.560968 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bamber RN (2012a) Littoral Tanaidacea (Crustacea: Peracarida) from Macaronesia: allopatry and provenance in recent habitats. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 92:1095–1116.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315412000252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bamber RN (2012b) A re-assessment of Hexapleomera Dudich, 1931 (Crustacea: Tanaidacea: Tanaidae), with designation of three new species. Zootaxa 3583:51–70.  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.283096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bamber RN (2014) Two new species of Sinelobus Sieg, 1980 (Crustacea: Tanaidacea: Tanaididae), and a correction to the higher taxonomic nomenclature. J Nat Hist 48:2049–2068.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2014.897767 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bamber RN, Chatterjee T (2010) The new and the old: littoral tanaidomorph Tanaidacea (Crustacea: Peracarida) from the Andaman Islands, Indian Ocean. Zootaxa 2558:17–32.  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.196949 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barnard KH (1940) Contribution to the Crustacean fauna of South Africa. 12. Further additions to the Tanaidacea, Isopoda, and Amphipoda, together with keys for the identification of the hitherto recorded marine and fresh-water species. Ann S Afr Mus 32:381–543Google Scholar
  12. Bird GJ (2008) Untying the Gordian Knot: on Tanais novaezealandiae Thomson (Crustacea, Tanaidacea, Tanaidae) from New Zealand, with descriptions of two new Zeuxoides species. Zootaxa 1877:1–36.  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.184126 Google Scholar
  13. Błażewicz-Paszkowycz M, Bamber R, Anderson G (2012) Diversity of Tanaidacea (Crustacea: Peracarida) in the world’s oceans—how far have we come?. PLoS One 7:e33068.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Błażewicz-Paszkowycz M, Jennings RM, Jeskulke K, Brix S (2014) Discovery of swimming males of Paratanaoidea (Tanaidacea). Pol Polar Res 35:415–453.  https://doi.org/10.2478/popore-2014-0022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Błażewicz-Paszkowycz M, Kobyłecka E, Jennings RN (2015) Redescription of wood-associated tanaidacean Protanais birsteini (Kudinova-Pasternak, 1970) and its relationship within the Tanaididae. Deep Sea Res Part II Top Stud Oceanogr 111:333–342.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Branch GM, Day JA (1984) Ecology of southern African estuaries: part XII. The Palmiet River estuary in the south-western cape. S Afr J Zool 19:63–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brown AC (1958) Report on the Tanaidacean Crustacea of Langebaan Lagoon and Saldanha Bay, on the West Coast of South Africa. Ann Mag Nat Hist 1:453–458.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00222935808650968 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cole VJ, McQuaid CD (2011) Broad-scale spatial factors outweigh the influence of habitat structure on the fauna associated with a bioengineer. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 442:101–109.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cowen RK, Gawarkiewicz G, Pineda J, Thorrold SR, Werner FE (2007) Population connectivity in marine systems: an overview. Oceanography 20:14–21.  https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2007.26 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Day JH (1974) A guide to marine life of South African shores. A.A. Balkema, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  21. Dudich E (1931) Systematische und biologische Untersuchungen über die Kalkeinlagerungen des Crustaceenpanzers im polarisierten Lichte. Zoologica 80:1–154Google Scholar
  22. Edgar GJ (2008) Shallow water Tanaidae (Crustacea: Tanaidacea) of Australia. Zootaxa 1836:1–92Google Scholar
  23. Esquete P, Bamber R, Aldea C (2012) On some shallow-water Tanaidomorpha (Crustacea: Peracarida: Tanaidacea) of Chilean fjords, with description of a new species of Zeuxoides Sieg, 1980. Zootaxa 3257:38–55.  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.208970 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ferreira AC, Ambrosio ES, Rodrigues Capitulo A (2015) Population ecology of Sinelobus stanfordi (Crustacea: Tanaidacea) in a temperate southern microtidal estuary. NZ J Mar Freshwater Res 49:462–471.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.2015.1089914 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gingras M, Hagadorn JW, Seilacher A, Lalonde SV, Pecoits E, Petrash D, Konhauser KO (2011) Possible evolution of mobile animals in association with microbial mats. Nat Geosci 4:372–375.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Griffiths CL, Robinson TB, Lange L, Mead A (2010) Marine biodiversity in South Africa: an evaluation of current states of knowledge. PLoS One 5:e12008.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Henschel JR, Cook PA, Branch GM (1990) The colonization of artificial substrata by marine sessile organisms in False Bay. 1. Community development. S Afr J Mar Sci 9:289–297.  https://doi.org/10.2989/025776190784378664 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kudinova-Pasternak RK (1970) Tanaidacea kurilo-kamciatkogo jeloba. Trudy Instituta Okeanologii 86:341–381Google Scholar
  29. Lang K (1958) Protogynie bei zwei Tanaidaceen-Arten. Arch Zool 11:535–540Google Scholar
  30. Larsen K (2003) Proposed new standardized anatomical terminology for the Tanaidacea (Peracarida). J Crustacean Biol 23:644–661.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1549892 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Larsen K, Tuya F, Froufe E (2014) Genetic divergence of tanaidaceans (Crustacea: Peracarida) with low dispersal ability. Sci Mar 78:81–90.  https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.03878.19A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Latreille PA (1831) Hétéropodes (Heteropoda). In: PA Latreille (ed.), Cours d´Entomologie, ou de l´Histoire Naturelle des Crustacés, des Arachnides, des Myriapodes et des Insects; a l´Usage des Élèves de l´Ecole du Muséum d´Histoire Naturelle. Librairie de Roret, ParisGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller MA (1940) The isopod Crustacea of the Hawaiian Islands (Chelifera and Valvifera. Occ P Bernice P Bishop Mus, Honolulu 15:295–321Google Scholar
  34. Morales-Vela B, Suárez-Morales E, Padilla-Saldívar J, Heard RW (2008) The tanaid Hexapleomera robusta (Crustacea: Peracarida) from the Caribbean manatee, with comments on other crustacean epibionts. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 88:591–596. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315408000672
  35. Nutman AP, Bennett VC, Friend CRL, Kranendonk MJV, Chivas AR (2016) Rapid emergence of life shown by discovery of 3,700-million-year-old microbial structures. Nature 537:535–538.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Perissinotto R et al (2014) Tufa stromatolite ecosystems on the South African south coast. S Afr J Sci 110:89–96.  https://doi.org/10.1590/sajs.2014/20140011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Procheş Ş, Warren M, McGeoch MA, Marshall DJ (2010) Spatial scaling and transition in pneumatophore arthropod communities. Ecography 33:128–136.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06035.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Richardson H (1901) Papers from the Hopkins Stanford Galapagos Expedition, 1898–1899. VI. The isopods. Pr Washington Acad Sci 3:565–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Riding R (2011) The nature of stromatolites: 3,500 million years of history and a century of research. In: Reitner J, Quéric N-V, Arp G (eds) Advances in Stromatolite Geobiology, vol 131. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences. Springer, Berlin, pp 29–74.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10415-2_3 Google Scholar
  40. Riding R, Liang L (2005) Geobiology of microbial carbonates: metazoan and seawater saturation state influences on secular trends during the Phanerozoic. Palaeogeog Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 219:101–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2004.11.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Riehl T, Lins L, Brandt A (2017) The effects of depth, distance, and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge on genetic differentiation of abyssal and hadal isopods (Macrostylidae). Deep Sea Res Part II Top Stud Oceanogr.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2017.10.005
  42. Rishworth GM, Perissinotto R, Bird MS (2016a) Coexisting living stromatolites and infaunal metazoans. Oecologia 182:539–545.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-016-3683-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rishworth GM, van Elden S, Perissinotto R, Miranda NAF, Steyn P-P, Bornman TG (2016b) Environmental influences on living marine stromatolites: insights from benthic microalgal communities. Environ Microbiol 18:503–513.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rishworth GM, Perissinotto R, Bird MS, Strydom NA, Peer N, Miranda NAF, Raw JL (2017a) Non-reliance of metazoans on stromatolite-forming microbial mats as a food resource. Sci Rep 7:42614.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42614 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rishworth GM, Perissinotto R, Bornman TG, Lemley DA (2017b) Peritidal stromatolites at the convergence of groundwater seepage and marine incursion: patterns of salinity, temperature and nutrient variability. J Mar Sys 167:68–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2016.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rishworth GM, Strydom NA, Perissinotto R (2017c) Fishes associated with living stromatolite communities in peritidal pools: predators, recruits and ecological traps. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 580:153–167.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12300 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rishworth GM, Perissinotto R, Bird MS (2017d) Patterns and drivers of benthic macrofaunal communities dwelling within extant peritidal stromatolites. Limnol Oceanogr 62:2227–2242.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10563 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rishworth GM, Perissinotto R, Bird MS, Pelletier N (2018) Grazer responses to variable macroalgal resource conditions facilitate habitat structuring. R Soc Open Sci 5:171428.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rumbold CE, Obenat SM, Spivak ED (2015) Comparison of life history traits of Tanais dulongii (Tanaidacea: Tanaididae) in natural and artificial marine environments of the south-western Atlantic. Helgol Mar Res 69:231–242.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10152-015-0432-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sieg J (1980) Taxonomische Monographie der Tanaidae Dana 1849 (Crustacea: Tanaidacea). Abh Senckenb Naturforsch Ges 537:1–267Google Scholar
  51. Smith JLB (1959) Gobioid fishes of the families Gobiidae, Periophthalmidae, Trypauchenidae, Taenioididae and Kraemeriidae of the western Indian Ocean. Ichthyological B JLB Smith Instit Ichthyology 13:185–225Google Scholar
  52. Stebbing TRR (1904) Gregarious Crustacea from Ceylon. Spolia Zeylanica 2:1–29Google Scholar
  53. Stebbing TRR (1918) Some Crustacea of Natal. Durban Mus 2:47–75Google Scholar
  54. Suosaari EP et al (2016) New multi-scale perspectives on the stromatolites of Shark Bay, Western Australia. Sci Rep 6:20557.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20557 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tanabe Y, Hayashi R, Tomioka S, Kakui K (2017) Hexapleomera urashima sp. nov. (Crustacea: Tanaidacea), a tanaidid epibiotic on loggerhead sea turtles at Yakushima Island, Japan. Zootaxa 4353:146–160.  https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4353.1.9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tarhan LG, Planavsky NJ, Laumer CE, Stolz JF, Reid RP (2013) Microbial mat controls on infaunal abundance and diversity in modern marine microbialites. Geobiology 11:485–497.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gbi.12049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. van Haaren T, Soors J (2009) Sinelobus stanfordi (Richardson, 1901): a new crustacean invader in Europe. Aquat Invasions 4:703–711.  https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2009.4.4.20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Verhoeff KW (1901) Beiträge zur Kenntniss paläarktischer Myriopoden. XX. Aufsatz: Diplopoden des östlichen Mittelmeergebietes. Archiv für Naturgeschichte 67:241–270Google Scholar
  59. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Method Ecol Evol 1:3–14.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2009.00001.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DST/NRF Research Chair: Shallow Water EcosystemsNelson Mandela UniversityPort ElizabethSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Polar Biology and OceanobiologyUniversity of ŁódźŁódźPoland

Personalised recommendations