Resurrection of the sixgill shark Hexanchus vitulus Springer & Waller, 1969 (Hexanchiformes, Hexanchidae), with comments on its distribution in the northwest Atlantic Ocean

Abstract

The sixgill sharks of the genus Hexanchus (Hexanchiformes, Hexanchidae) are large, rarely encountered deep-sea sharks, thought to comprise just two species: the bluntnose sixgill Hexanchus griseus (Bonaterre, 1788) and the bigeye sixgill Hexanchus nakamurai (Teng, 1962). Their distribution is putatively worldwide in tropical and temperate waters, but many verified records for these species are lacking, and misidentification is common. Taxonomic uncertainty has long surrounded H. nakamurai in particular, with debate as to whether individuals from the Atlantic constitute a separate species. Using 1,310 base pairs of two mitochondrial genes, COI and ND2, we confirm that bigeye sixgill sharks from the Atlantic Ocean (Belize, Gulf of Mexico, and Bahamas) diverge from those in the Pacific and Indian Oceans (Japan, La Reunion, and Madagascar) with 7.037% sequence divergence. This difference is similar to the genetic distance between both Atlantic and Indo-Pacific bigeye sixgill sharks and the bluntnose sixgill shark (7.965% and 8.200%, respectively), and between the entire genus Hexanchus and its sister genus Heptranchias (8.308%). Such variation far exceeds previous measures of species-level genetic divergence in elasmobranchs, even among slowly-evolving deep-water taxa. Given the high degree of morphological similarity within Hexanchus, and the fact that cryptic diversity is common even among frequently observed shark species, we conclude that these results support the resurrection of the name Hexanchus vitulus Springer and Waller, 1969 for bigeye sixgill sharks in the northwest Atlantic Ocean. We propose the common name “Atlantic sixgill shark” for H. vitulus, and provide new locality records from Belize, as well as comments on its overall distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Barnett A, Braccini JM, Awruch CA, Ebert DA (2012) An overview on the role of Hexanchiformes in marine ecosystems: biology, ecology and conservation status of a primitive order of modern sharks. J Fish Biol 80:966–990

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brooks EJ et al (2015) First description of deep-water elasmobranch assemblages in the Exuma sound, the Bahamas. Deep-Sea Res II Top Stud Oceanogr 115:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown WM, George M Jr, Wilson AC (1979) Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:1967–1971

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Castro JI (2010) The sharks of North America. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  5. Clark E, Kristof E (1990) Deep-sea elasmobranchs observed from submersibles off Bermuda, Grand Cayman, and Freeport, Bahamas. In: Pratt Jr HL, Gruber SH, Taniuchi T (eds) Elasmobranchs as living resources: advances in biology, ecology, systematics and the status of the fisheries. NOAA Technical Report 90. NOAA Fisheries,Silver Spring, pp 269–284

  6. Compagno LJV (1984) Sharks of the world: an annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. Part 1: Hexanchiformes to Lamniformes vol 4. FAO species catalogue. FAO Fisheries Synopsis (125) vol 4. FAO, Rome

  7. Cotton CF, Grubbs RD (2015) Biology of deep-water chondrichthyans: introduction. Deep-Sea Res II Top Stud Oceanogr 115:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Daly-Engel TS, Grubbs RD, Feldheim KA, Bowen BW, Toonen RJ (2010) Is multiple mating beneficial or unavoidable? Low multiple paternity and genetic diversity in the shortspine spurdog (Squalus mitsukurii). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 403:255–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ebert DA (1990) The taxonomy, biogeography and biology of cow and frilled sharks (Chondrichthyes: Hexanchiformes). Dissertation. Rhodes University, Grahamstown

  10. Ebert DA, White WT, Ho H-C (2013) Redescription of Hexanchus nakamurai Teng 1962, (Chondrichthyes: Hexanchiformes: Hexanchidae), with designation of a neotype. Zootaxa 3752:20–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ebert DA, Fowler SL, Compagno LJV (2016) Sharks of the world: a fully illustrated guide. Wild Nature Press, Plymouth

  12. Enzenauer MP, Deacy BM, Carlson JK (2015) Characterization of the shark bottom longline fishery, 2014. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Panama City Laboratory, Panama City

  13. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 3:294–299

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Guindon S, Dufayard J-F, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 59:307–321

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gulak SJB, Enzenauer MP, Carlson JK (2013) Characterization of the shark and reef fish bottom longline fisheries: 2012. NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC 652:42

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hale LF, Hollensead LD, Carlson JK (2007) Characterization of the shark bottom longline fishery, 2007. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-564. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Panama City Laboratory, Panama City

  17. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Katoh K, Misawa K, Ki K, Miyata T (2002) MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30:3059–3066

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kearse M et al (2012) Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Martin AP, Naylor GJP, Palumbi SR (1992) Rates of mitochondrial DNA evolution in sharks are slow compared with mammals. Nature 357:153–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McLaughlin DM, Morrissey JF (2004) New records of elasmobranchs from the Cayman trench, Jamaica. Bull Mar Sci 75:481–485

    Google Scholar 

  22. Morgan A, Cooper PW, Curtis T, Burgess GH (2009) Overview of the US east coast bottom longline shark fishery, 1994–2003. Mar Fish Rev 71:23–38

    Google Scholar 

  23. Musick JA, Harbin MM, Compagno LJV (2004) Historical zoogeography of the Selachii. In: Carrier JC, Musick JA, Heithaus MR (eds) Biology of sharks and their relatives, vol 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  24. Naylor GJP, Caira JN, Jensen K, Rosana KAM, White WT, Last PR (2012) A DNA sequence–based approach to the identification of shark and ray species and its implications for global elasmobranch diversity and parasitology. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 1–262. doi:https://doi.org/10.1206/754.1

  25. O’Brien SM, Gallucci VF, Hauser L (2013) Effects of species biology on the historical demography of sharks and their implications for likely consequences of contemporary climate change. Conserv Genet 14:125–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pfleger MO, Grubbs RD, Daly-Engel TS (in press, 2018) Squalus clarkae sp. nov., a new dogfish shark from the Northwest Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico, with comments on the Squalus mitsukurii species complex. Zootaxa

  27. Posada D (2008) jModelTest: Phylogenetic Model Averaging. Mol Biol Evol 25:1253–1256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574. https://www2.stat.duke.edu/~scs/Projects/Trees/Phylogenetic/MrBayes_manual.pdf

  29. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP, van der Mark P (2005) MrBayes 3.1 manual, pp 1–69

  30. Seutin G, White BN, Boag PT (1991) Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses. Can J Zool 69:82–90

  31. Scott-Denton E et al (2011) Descriptions of the US Gulf of Mexico reef fish bottom longline and vertical line fisheries based on observer data. Mar Fish Rev 73:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sorenson L, Santini F, Alfaro ME (2014) The effect of habitat on modern shark diversification. J Evol Biol 27:1536–1548

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Springer S, Waller RA (1969) Hexanchus vitulus, a new sixgill shark from the Bahamas. Bull Mar Sci 19:159–174

    Google Scholar 

  34. Taniuchi T, Tachikawa H (1991) Hexanchus nakamurai, a senior synonym of H. vitulus (Elasmobranchii), with notes on its occurrence in Japan. Jap J Ichthyol 38:57–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Teng HT (1962) Studies on classification and distribution of chondrichthyan fishes of Taiwan. Photo dissertation, Kyoto University, Kyoto

  36. Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PDN (2005) DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 360:1847–1857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ward RD, Holmes BH, Zemlak TS, Smith PJ (2007) Part 12—DNA barcoding discriminates spurdogs of the genus Squalus. In: Last PR, White WT, Pogonoski JJ (eds) Descriptions of new dogfishes of the genus Squalus (Squaloidea: Squalidae). CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Hobart, pp 117–130

  38. White WT, Corrigan S, Yang L, Henderson AC, Bazinet AL, Swofford DL, Naylor GJP (2017) Phylogeny of the manta and devilrays (Chondrichthyes: Mobulidae), with an updated taxonomic arrangement for the family. Zool J Linnean Soc 82:65–73

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Save Our Seas Foundation, the Summit Foundation, the International Union for Conservation of Nature, the Rufford Foundation, the University of West Florida, Florida Institute of Technology, and the Deep-C Consortium through the Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative who provided financial support for this project. I.E.B. and R.T.G. thank the Belize Fisheries Department and the fishers and captains in Belize, especially D. Castellanos, R. Lima, E. Muschamp, M. Alamina, E. Cuevas, and D. Garbutt. R.D.G. thanks E. and A Brooks, S. Williams, D, Chapman, L, Howey-Jordan, D, Abercrombie and L. Jordan for assistance in collecting samples in the Bahamas, and J. Imhoff and C. Peterson for assistance in collecting samples from the Gulf of Mexico. T.D.E. thanks J. Eble, M. Pfleger, C. Hitchcock, and A. Koch for help with genetic analyses, M. Boudreau and C. Meyer for logistical support, and J. Kiszka for H. nakamurai tissue from La Reunion. Thanks also to J. Carlson, who oversaw the bottom longline observer program and implemented program-wide biological sampling. S.J.B.G. and M.P.E. thank the observers, C. Aguero, P. Bear, J. Combs, M. Lee and J. Patterson, and port sampler D. Fable for collecting the samples. Sixgill sharks were captured in Belize under Fisheries Permit 9-16 and in the USA under NOAA Fisheries Highly Migratory Species Division Exempted Fishing Permits and the US Federal Register (HMS-EFP-07-01, HMS-EFP-08-01, HMS-EFP-09-01, FR Doc. E9-20489).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toby S. Daly-Engel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed by the authors.

Sampling and field studies

All necessary permits for sampling and observational field studies have been obtained by the authors from the competent authorities and are mentioned in the acknowledgements, if applicable.

Additional information

Communicated by R. Thiel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daly-Engel, T.S., Baremore, I.E., Grubbs, R.D. et al. Resurrection of the sixgill shark Hexanchus vitulus Springer & Waller, 1969 (Hexanchiformes, Hexanchidae), with comments on its distribution in the northwest Atlantic Ocean. Mar Biodiv 49, 759–768 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-018-0849-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Systematics
  • Mitochondrial DNA
  • Phylogenetics
  • Speciation
  • Elasmobranchs