Towards global distribution maps of unicellular organisms such as calcareous dinophytes based on DNA sequence information
- 159 Downloads
Despite recent fruitful attempts to elucidate microbial biogeography in more detail, knowledge of distribution still lags behind for dinophytes. Evolutionary phenomena, such as cryptic speciation and modification due to the environment, hamper reliable conclusions about the distribution of this important plankton group. We combined newly collected samples from the Black Sea (ten new strains from three localities) with occurrence data, which have been gathered extensively over the past decade, in order to provide the first global distribution maps of four specific ribotypes assigned to the Scrippsiella lineage (Thoracosphaeraceae, Peridiniales) collected at a total of 39 sites. They showed a wide, partly overlapping distribution and shared the presence primarily at the coastal localities. Differences in abundance of specific ribotypes were observed, but the ribotype corresponding to the globally most frequently encountered species Scrippsiella acuminata has not yet been found in the Black Sea. We discuss the significance of DNA-based records for distribution maps particularly of unicellular organisms such as dinophytes. Based on a collective approach as exemplified in our study, we may start to understand in detail the ecological basis and the dynamics of the individual colonisation/invasion events, species establishment and consequent distribution in the microbiome, all of which have been changing drastically due to the ongoing climate change.
KeywordsBiogeography Black Sea Dinoflagellates Dispersal Niche
We are thankful to all colleagues who have contributed to the global collection of dinophytes over the past years. We thank Nina Simanovic for improving the English version of the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Sampling and field studies
The study was performed in compliance with the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD).
- Cuvelier ML, Allen AE, Monier A, McCrow JP, Messie M, Tringe SG, Woyke T, Welsh RM, Ishoey T, Lee JH, Binder BJ, DuPont CL, Latasa M, Guigand C, Buck KR, Hilton J, Thiagarajan M, Caler E, Read B, Lasken RS, Chavez FP, Worden AZ (2010) Targeted metagenomics and ecology of globally important uncultured eukaryotic phytoplankton. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:14679–14684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fensome RA, Taylor FJR, Norris G, Sarjeant WAS, Wharton DI, Williams GL (1993) A classification of living and fossil dinoflagellates. Micropaleontol Spec Publ:1–245Google Scholar
- Finlay BJ (2002) Global dispersal of free-living microbial eukaryote species. Environ Microbiol 296:1061–1063Google Scholar
- Foissner W (2007) Dispersal and biogeography of protists: recent advances. Jpn J Protozool 40:1–16Google Scholar
- Gottschling M (2008) Aktuelle Herausforderungen für Diversitätserfassung und Systematik: Blütenpflanzen, Kalkige Dinoflagellaten und Papillomviren im Vergleich. FU Berlin, Berlin (Habilitation thesis; www.sysbot.biologie.uni-muenchen.de/en/people/gottschling/gottschling_habil.pdf ), 33p
- Gottschling M, Kirsch M (2009) Annotated list of Scandinavian calcareous dinoflagellates collected in fall 2003. Berl Paläobiol Abh 10:193–198Google Scholar
- Hall TA (2011) BioEdit: an important software for molecular biology. GERF Bull Biosci 2:60–61Google Scholar
- Kosmala S, Karnkowska-Ishikawa A, Milanowski R, Kwiatowski J, Zakrys B (2009) Phylogeny and systematics of Euglena (Euglenaceae) species with axial, stellate chloroplasts based on morphological and molecular data-new taxa, emended diagnoses, and epitypifications. J Phycol 45:464–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kremp A, Tahvanainen P, Litaker W, Krock B, Suikkanen S, Leaw CP, Tomas C, De Clerck O (2014) Phylogenetic relationships, morphological variation, and toxin patterns in the Alexandrium ostenfeldii (Dinophyceae) complex: implications for species boundaries and identities. J Phycol 50:81–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krupnick GA, Kress WJ (2005) Plant conservation: a natural history approach. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Lewis J (1991) Cyst-theca relationships in Scrippsiella (Dinophyceae) and related orthoperidinoid genera. Bot Mar 34:91–106Google Scholar
- Matsuoka K, Cho HJ (2000) Morphological variation in cysts of the gymnodinialean dinoflagellate Polykrikos. Micropaleontology 46:360–364Google Scholar
- Mullins J, Garofolo G, Van Ert M, Fasanella A, Lukhnova L, Hugh-Jones M, Blackburn J (2013) Ecological niche modeling of Bacillus anthracis on three continents: evidence for genetic-ecological divergence? PloS ONE 8: e72451Google Scholar
- Murray JW, Stewart K, Kassakian S, Krynytzky M, DiJulio D (2006) Oxic, suboxic and anoxic conditions in the Black Sea. In: Gilbert A, Yanko-Hombach V, Panin N (eds) Climate change and coastline migration as factors in human adaptation to the circum-pontic region: from past to forecast. Kluwer, New York, pp 437–452Google Scholar
- Terenko L (2005) New dinoflagellate (Dinoflagellata) species from the Odessa Bay of the Black Sea. Oceanol Hydrobiol Stud 34 (Suppl 3):205–216Google Scholar
- Tsarenko PM, Vasser SP, Nevo E (2006) Algae of Ukraine: diversity, nomenclature, taxonomy, ecology and geography. Vol. 1. Cyanoprocaryota, Euglenophyta, Chrysophyta, Xanthophyta, Raphidophyta, Phaeophyta, Dinophyta, Cryptophyta, Glaucocystophyta, and Rhodophyta. Gantner, RuggelGoogle Scholar
- Wu L, Sun Q, Sugawara H, Yang S, Zhou Y, McCluskey K, Vasilenko A, Suzuki K, Ohkuma M, Lee Y, Robert V, Ingsriswang S, Guissart F, Philippe D, Ma J (2013) Global catalogue of microorganisms (GCM): a comprehensive database and information retrieval, analysis, and visualization system for microbial resources. BMC Genomics 14:933CrossRefGoogle Scholar