Marine Biodiversity

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 413–424 | Cite as

Macrobenthos of the nearshore Aleutian Archipelago, with emphasis on invertebrates associated with Clathromorphum nereostratum (Rhodophyta, Corallinaceae)

  • Heloise Chenelot
  • Stephen C. Jewett
  • Max K. Hoberg
Marine Biodiversity under Change


In the Aleutian Islands, Alaska, crustose coralline algae can be widespread in the low intertidal and shallow subtidal regions, and cover most available hard substrates. The longevity and slow growth-rate of coralline algae make them vulnerable to major disturbances, including anthropogenic disturbances and ocean acidification. Subtidal habitats dominated by crustose coralline algae are often associated with sea urchin-barren grounds and regarded as supporting limited invertebrate communities, especially compared with the adjacent kelp forests. Clathromorphum nereostratum is one of the most abundant crustose coralline algae found in the Aleutian Islands. Although the surface of this crustose alga exhibits little structural complexity, it can develop into crusts half-a-meter thick (2-10 cm in this study) that provide microhabitats for a variety of cryptic invertebrates. Despite the omnipresence of this alga throughout the nearshore Aleutians, very little is known about its associated faunal community. In the summers of 2006 and 2007, a benthic survey was conducted at 50 sites throughout the shallow (<20 m), nearshore Aleutian Islands as part of the Alaska Monitoring and Assessment Program. The habitat encountered at each site was categorized as soft sediment, macroalgae-dominated, or crustose coralline-dominated. At each site, scuba divers sampled three 0.06-m2 quadrats. Invertebrate communities associated with thick crustose coralline algae were compared with soft-sediment and macroalgae-dominated communities based on faunal abundance and diversity. Despite the depauperate appearance of crustose habitats, this study revealed that crustose environments support faunal communities as diverse and abundant as those found in rich macroalgal habitats.


Crustose coralline algae Kelp holdfast Soft sediment Urchin barren Ocean acidification Biodiversity 

Supplementary material

12526_2010_71_MOESM1_ESM.doc (694 kb)
Supplementary Table 1(DOC 694 kb)


  1. Anderson MJ, Diebel CE, Blom WM, Landers TJ (2005) Consistency and variation in kelp holdfast assemblages: spatial patterns of biodiversity for the major phyla at different taxonomic resolutions. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 320:35–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes JR, Gonor JJ (1973) The larval settling response of the lined chiton Tonicella lineata. Mar Biol 20:259–264Google Scholar
  3. Bates NR, Mathis JT, Cooper LW (2009) Ocean acidification and biologically induced seasonality of carbonate mineral saturation states in the western Arctic Ocean. J Geophys Res 114:C11007. doi:10.1029/2008JC004862 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blake JA (1969) Systematics and ecology of shell-boring polychaetes from New England. Am Zool 9:813–820Google Scholar
  5. Blake JA (1996) Family Spionidae Grube, 1850. Including a review of the genera and species from California and a revision of the genus Polydora Bosc, 1802. In: Blake JA, Hilbig B, Scott PH (eds) Taxonomic atlas of the benthic fauna of the Santa Marina Basin and Western Santa Barbara Channel, vol 6. The Annelida, Part 3—Polychaeta: Orbiniidae to Cossuridea. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, pp 81–223Google Scholar
  6. Blake JA, Evans JW (1973) Polydora and related genera as borers in mollusk shells and other calcareous substrates (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Veliger 15:235–249Google Scholar
  7. Bodkin JL (1988) Effects of kelp forest removal on associated fish assemblages in central California. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 117:227–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chenelot H, Jewett S, Hoberg M (2008) Invertebrate communities associated with various substrates in the nearshore Eastern Aleutian Islands, with emphasis on thick crustose coralline algae. In: Brueggeman P, Pollock NW (eds) Diving for science 2008. Proc Am Acad Underwater Sci 27th Annual Diving Symp, Dauphin Island, Ala., pp 13-36Google Scholar
  9. Coleman FC, Williams SL (2002) Overexploitating marine ecosystem engineers: potential consequences for biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol 17:40–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duggins DO, Simenstad CA, Estes JA (1989) Magnification of secondary production by kelp detritus in coastal marine ecosystems. Science 245:170–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ebeling AW, Laur DR (1985) The influence of surfperch abundance at an offshore temperate reef. Environ Biol Fish 12:169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Estes JA, Tinker MT, Bodkin JL (2010) Using ecological function to develop recovery criteria for depleted species: sea otters and kelp forests in the Aleutian archipelago. Conserv Biol 24:852–860PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feder HM, Turner CH, Limbaugh CL (1974) Observations on fishes associated with kelp beds in southern California. Calif Fish Game Fish Bull 160:1–144Google Scholar
  14. Foster MS (2001) Rhodoliths: between rocks and soft places. J Phycol 37:659–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foster MS, Shiel DR (1985) The ecology of giant kelp forests in California: a community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services. Biol Rep 85:1–152Google Scholar
  16. Frantz BR, Foster MS, Riosmena-Rodriguez R (2005) Clathromorphum nereostratum (Corallinales, Rhodophyta): the oldest Alga? J Phycol 41:770–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ghelardi RJ (1971) “Species” structure of the animal community that lives in Macrocystis pyrifera holdfasts. In: North WJ (ed) The biology of the giant kelp beds (Macrocystis) in California. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia, Heft 32, Lehre, pp 381–420Google Scholar
  18. Graham MH (2004) Effects of local deforestation on the diversity and the structure of southern California giant kelp forest food webs. Ecosystems 7:341–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Groombridge B, Jenkins MD (2002) World atlas of biodiversity. Prepared by the UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Center. University of California Press, BerkleyGoogle Scholar
  20. Halfar J, Steneck R, Schöne BR, Moore GWK, Joachimski M, Konz A, Fietzke J, Estes J (2007) Coralline alga reveals first marine record of subarctic North Pacific climate change. Geophys Res Lett 34:L07702. doi:10.1029/2006GL028811 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hetzinger S, Halfar J, Krnoz A, Steneck RS, Adey W, Lebednik PA, Schöne BR (2009) High-resolution Mg/Ca ratios in a coralline red alga as a proxy for Bering Sea temperature variations from 1902 to 1967. Palaios 24:406–412. doi:12.2110/palo.2088.p08-116r CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hicks GRF (1980) Structure of phytal harpacticoid copepod assemblages and the influence of habitat complexity and turbidity. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 44:157–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hutchings PA (1986) Biological destruction of coral reefs. A review. Coral Reefs 4:239–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jewett SC, Brewer R, Chenelot H, Clark R, Dasher D, Harper S, Hoberg M (2008) Scuba techniques for the Alaska Monitoring and Assessment Program (AKMAP) of the Aleutian Islands, Alaska. In: Brueggeman P, Pollock NW (eds) Diving for science 2008. Proc Am Acad Underwater Sci 27th Annual Diving Symp, Dauphin Island, Ala., pp 71-89Google Scholar
  25. Jumars PA, Fauchald K (1977) Between-community contrasts in successful polychaete feeding strategies. In: Coull BC (ed) Ecology of Marine Benthos. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  26. Kamenos NA, Moore PG, Hall-Spencer JM (2004a) Nursery-area function of maerl grounds for juvenile queen scallops Aequipecten opercularis and other invertebrates. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 274:183–189Google Scholar
  27. Kamenos NA, Moore PG, Hall-Spencer JM (2004b) Small-scale distribution of juvenile gadoids in shallow inshore waters; what role does maerl play? ICES J Mar Sci 61:422–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kamenos NA, Cusack M, Moore PG (2008) Coralline algae are global palaeothermometers with bi-weekly resolution. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 72:771–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Knowlton N (2001) Coral reef biodiversity—habitat size matters. Science 292:1493–1495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuffner LB, Andersson AJ, Jokiel PL, Rodgers KS, Mackenzie FT (2007) Decreased abundance of crustose coralline algae due to cean acidification. Nat Geosci 1:114–117. doi:10.1038/ngeo100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lambert DM, Harris LG (2000) Larval settlement of the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, in the southern Gulf of Maine. Invertebr Biol 119:403–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lawrence JM (1975) On the relationships between marine plants and sea urchins. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 13:213–286Google Scholar
  33. Lebednik PA (1976) The Corallinaceae of northwestern North America. I. Clathromorphum Foslie emend. Adey. Syesis 9:59–112Google Scholar
  34. Lewis DB, Eby LA (2002) Spatially heterogeneous refugia and predation risk in intertidal salt marshes. Oikos 96:119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Littler MM, Littler DS (1980) The evolution of the thallus form and survival strategies in benthic macroalgae: fields and laboratory tests of a functional form model. Am Nat 116:25–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu P-J, Hsieh H-L (2000) Burrow architecture of the spionid polychaete Polydora villosa in the corals Montipora and Porites. Zool Stud 39:47–54Google Scholar
  37. Martin S, Rodolfo-Metalpa R, Ransome E, Rowley S, Buia MC, Gattuso JP, Hall-Spencer JM (2008) Effects of naturally acidified seawater on seagrass calcareous epibionts. Biol Lett 4:689–692PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCoy ED, Bell SS (1991) Habitat structure: the evolution and diversification of a complex topic. In: McCoy ED, Mushinsky HR (eds) Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 3–27Google Scholar
  39. Menge BA (1976) Organization of the New England rocky intertidal community: role of predation, competition, and environmental heterogeneity. Ecol Monogr 46:355–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morse DE, Hooker N, Duncan H, Jensen L (1979) γ-aminobutyric acid, a neurotransmitter, induces planktonic abalone larvae to settle and begin metamorphosis. Science 204:407–410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nelson WA (2009) Calcified macroalgae-critical to coastal ecosystems and vulnerable to change: a review. Mar Freshw Res 60:787–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. North WJ (1971) The biology of the giant kelp beds (Macrocystis) in California. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia, Heft 32, LehreGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Clair RM, Lindstrom SC (2000) North Pacific seaweeds. Plant Press, Auke BayGoogle Scholar
  44. Ojeda FP, Dearborn JH (1989) Community structure of macroinvertebrates inhabiting the rocky subtidal zone in the Gulf of Maine: seasonal and bathymetric distribution. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 57:147–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Paine RT, Vadas RL (1969) The effect of grazing by sea urchins, Strongylocentrotus spp., on the benthic algal populations. Limnol Oceanogr 14:710–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pearce CM, Schiebling RE (1988) Larval settlement in the green sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. Am Zool 28:365Google Scholar
  47. Roberts CM, McClean CJ, Veron JEN, Hawkins JP, Allen GR, McAllister DE, Mittermeier CG, Schueler FW, Spalding M, Wells F, Vynne C, Werner TB (2002) Marine biodiversity hotspots and conservation priorities for tropical reefs. Science 295:1280–1284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rowley RJ (1989) Settlement and recruitment of sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus spp.) in a sea-urchin barren ground and a kelp bed: are populations regulated by settlement or post-settlement processes. Mar Biol 100:485–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sato-Okoshi W (1999) Polydorid species (Polychaeta: Spionidae) in Japan, with descriptions of morphology, ecology and burrow structure. 1. Boring species. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 79:831–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith GM (1944) Marine algae of the Monterey Peninsula California. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith SDA, Simpson RD, Cairns SC (1996) The macrofaunal community of Ecklonia radiata holdfasts: description of the faunal assemblage and variation associated with differences in holdfast volume. Aust J Ecol 21:81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Steller DL, Riosmena-Rodriguez R, Foster MS, Roberts CA (2003) Rhodolith bed diversity in the Gulf of California: the importance of rhodolith structure and consequences of disturbance. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 13:S5–S20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Steneck RS (1982) A limpet coralline alga association: adaptations and defenses between a selective herbivore and its prey. Ecology 63:507–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Steneck RS, Walting L (1982) Feeding capabilities and limitations of herbivorous mollusks: a functional group approach. Mar Biol 68:299–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Steneck RS (1986) The ecology of coralline algal crusts: convergent patterns and adaptative strategies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:273–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Steneck RS, Dethier MN (1994) A functional group approach to the structure of algal-dominated communities. Oikos 69:476–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Taylor RJ (1984) Prey refugia. In: Taylor RJ (ed) Predation. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 69–81Google Scholar
  58. University of Alaska Fairbanks (2009) Increased ocean acidification in Alaska waters, new findings show. Sciencedaily. Accessed 28 September 2010

Copyright information

© Senckenberg, Gesellschaft für Naturforschung and Springer 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heloise Chenelot
    • 1
  • Stephen C. Jewett
    • 1
  • Max K. Hoberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Marine ScienceUniversity of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksUSA

Personalised recommendations