Skip to main content

The emergence and evolution of a disruptive platform ecosystem: evidence from the Indian mobile services industry

Abstract

The successful emergence of a disruptive platform in a contested industry is fraught with many challenges. The extant literature focuses on the challenges faced by the established platforms or the growth and inception of regular platforms, highlighting the need for understanding the dilemmas faced by a entrant disruptive platform. Our study sheds light on this phenomenon in an exploratory in-depth case study analysing the emergence of Jio Platform, an India based green-field platform providing mobile and digital services. Our analysis charts the disruptor's actions to navigate challenges posed by the incumbents and its own advanced technology. We demonstrate that the disruptive entrant initiated three strategic actions to overcome its ‘disruptor’s dilemma’: active market development for complement products, using strong complementors as force multipliers and effective usage of framing to secure legitimacy and support. The analysis also highlights how the strategy adopted by Jio evolved over time, as well as the difficulties of mapping this onto the existing understanding of the literature. By focusing on the intersection of the platform and disruptive innovation literature we identify managerial implications and a source of propositions for researchers, investigating the growth of the disruptive platform and its impact on the ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Source: TRAI (2016a)

Fig. 3

Source: TRAI (2020)

References

  1. Alt, R., & Zimmermann, H.-D. (2019). Electronic Markets on platform competition. Electronic Markets, 29(2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00353-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ansari, S., Garud, R., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2016). The disruptor’s dilemma: TiVo and the US television ecosystem. Strategic Management Journal, 37(9), 1829–1853. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ansari, S. S., & Krop, P. (2012). Incumbent performance in the face of a radical innovation: Towards a framework for incumbent challenger dynamics. Research Policy, 41(8), 1357–1374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Banerjee, P. (2018). How Chinese mobile phones took over the Indian market. Mint. Retrieved from https://www.livemint.com/Technology/KsUB8dksllxzBqcUCFfySJ/How-Chinese-mobile-phones-took-over-the-Indian-market.html

  5. Barry, C. A. (1998). Choosing qualitative data analysis software: Atlas/ti and Nudist compared. Sociological Research Online, 3(3), 16–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Basole, R. C. (2009). Visualization of interfirm relations in a converging mobile ecosystem. Journal of Information Technology, 24(2), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2008.34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhargava, H. K. (2014). Platform technologies and network goods: Insights on product launch and management. Information Technology and Management, 15(3), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-014-0188-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. BGR.in. (2020). What is Jio Platforms and why investors are pouring money in it. Retrieved from https://www.bgr.in

  9. BSE Equity. (2019). Live Reports, 14 January. BSE. Retrieved from https://www.bseindia.com

  10. Burgelman, R. A. (2011). Bridging history and reductionism: A key role for longitudinal qualitative research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 591–601. https://IO.I057/jibs.20l 1.12

  11. Burla, L., Knierim, B., Barth, J., Liewald, K., Duetz, M., & Abel, T. (2008). From text to codings: Intercoder reliability assessment in qualitative content analysis. Nursing Research, 57(2), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NNR.0000313482.33917.7d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boudreau, K. J., & Jeppesen, L. B. (2015). Unpaid crowd complementors: The platform network effect mirage. Strategic Management Journal, 36(12), 1761–1777. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Business Standard. (2018a). Jio, SBI deepen digital partnership; integrate SBI YONO app, MyJio platform. Retrieved from https://www.business-standard.com

  14. Business Today. (2018). Reliance Jio Monsoon Hungama lets you exchange your feature phone for a new JioPhone for Rs 501. Retrieved from https://www.businesstoday.in

  15. Business Standard. (2018b). Reliance Jio remains top vendor of feature phones in India in Q2 2018. Retrieved from https://www.business-standard.com

  16. Castells, P., Pedros, X., & Mayuran S. (2019). The mobile tax bill: how mobile is impacted by sector-specific taxes. 30th European Conference of the International Telecommunications Society, "Towards a Connected and Automated Society", 16th – 19th June, Helsinki, Finland

  17. Cenamor, J., & Frishammar, J. (2021). Openness in platform ecosystems: Innovation strategies for complementary products. Research Policy, 50(1), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104148

  18. Cennamo, C., & Santalo, J. (2013). Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Management Journal, 34(11), 1331–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press

  21. Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 173–208. https://doi.org/10.2307/4131471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Curwen, P. (2018). Reliance Jio forces the Indian mobile market to restructure. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 20(1), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-07-2017-0043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Curwen, P., Whalley, J., & Vialle, P. (2019). Disruptive activity in a regulated industry – The case of telecommunications. Emerald Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Cusumano, M. A., Gawer, A., & Yoffie, D. B. (2019). The business of platforms: Strategy in the age of digital competition, innovation, and power. Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  25. de Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., & Basole, R. C. (2018a). The digital platform: A research agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 33(2), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. de Reuver, M., Nederstigt, B., & Janssen, M. (2018b). Launch strategies for multi-sided data analytics platforms. 26th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS ’18). Portsmouth, UK

  27. Dranove, D., & Gandal, N. (2003). The DVD‐vs.‐DIVX standard war: Empirical evidence of network effects and preannouncement effects. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 12(3), 363–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.2003.00363.x

  28. Eaton, B., Elaluf-Calderwood, S., Sørensen, C., & Yoo, Y. (2015). Distributed tuning of boundary resources. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 217–244. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.10

  29. Economic Times. (2017). Trai cuts interconnect charges to 6 paise a minute from Oct 1; Jio gains, incumbents lose. Retrieved from https://tech.economictimes.indiatimes.com/

  30. Economic Times (2018). After investing $37 billion in Reliance Jio, Mukesh Ambani's Reliance Industries Limited looks to raise $3 billion. Retrieved from https://tech.economictimes.indiatimes.com/

  31. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Evans, D. S. (2009). How catalysts ignite: the economics of platform-based start-ups. In: Gawer, A. (Ed.), Platforms, Markets and Innovations. Edward Elgar

  35. Gadgets 360. (2015). Reliance to Launch 4G Smartphones Under “Lyf” Brand. Retrieved from https://gadgets.ndtv.com

  36. Garud, R., Schildt, H. A., & Lant, T. K. (2014). Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy. Organization Science, 25, 1479–1492. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2014). Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Aldine Transaction.

  41. GSMA. (2014). Mobile taxes and fees. Available at www.gsma.com

  42. Gurses, K., & Ozcan, P. (2015). Entrepreneurship in regulated markets: Framing contests and collective action to introduce pay TV in the US. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1709–1739. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Guo, L., Zhang, M. Y., Dodgson, M., Gann, D., & Cai, H. (2018). Seizing windows of opportunity by using technology-building and market-seeking strategies in tandem: Huawei’s sustained catch-up in the global market. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9580-1

  44. Habtay, S. R. (2012). A firm-level analysis on the relative difference between technology-driven and market-driven disruptive business model innovations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(3), 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2012.00628.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hagiu, A. (2009). Multi-sided platforms: From microfoundations to design and expansion strategies. Harvard Business School Strategy Unit Working Paper, 09–115. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.955584

  46. Hannah, D. P., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2018). How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(12), 3163–3192. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hein, A., Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2019). The emergence of native multi-sided platforms and their influence on incumbents. Electronic Markets, 29(4), 631–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00350-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hein, A., Schreieck, M., Riasanow, T., Setzke, D. S., Wiesche, M., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2020). Digital platform ecosystems. Electronic Markets, 30(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00377-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004a). Creating value in your business ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 3, 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004b). The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. American Economic Review, 75, 424–440. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1814809

  52. Kapoor, R. (2018). Ecosystems: Broadening the locus of value creation. Journal of Organization Design, 7(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-018-0035-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kapoor, R., & Lee, J. M. (2013). Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 274–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Karhu, K., & Ritala, P. (2020). Slicing the cake without baking it: Opportunistic platform entry strategies in digital markets. Long Range Planning, 101988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2020.101988

  55. Khanagha, S., Ansari, S., Paroutis, S., & Oviedo, L. (2020). Mutualism and the dynamics of new platform creation: A study of Cisco and fog computing. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Kim, M.-K., Park, M.-C., & Jeong, D.-H. (2004). The effects of customer satisfaction and switching barrier on customer loyalty in Korean mobile telecommunication services. Telecommunications Policy, 28(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2003.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Kumaraswamy, A., Garud, R., & Ansari, S. (2018). Perspectives on disruptive innovations. Journal of Management Studies, 55(7), 1025–1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kurup, R. (2019). Three years after launch, Reliance Jio is ready with more disruptions. Business Line. Retrieved from https://www.thehindubusinessline.com

  59. Kyprianou, C. (2018). Creating value from the outside in or the inside out: How nascent intermediaries build peer-to-peer marketplaces. Academy of Management Discoveries, 4(3), 336–370. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2017.0081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Locke, K. D. (2000). Grounded theory in management research. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Lounsbury, M. G., & Glynn, M. A. (2001). Cultural Entrepreneurship: Stories, Legitimacy, and the Acquisition of Resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 5454564. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Majumdar, R. (2018). Jio witnesses highest user engagement of up to 30% among all telcos. Business Standard. Retrieved from https://www.business-standard.com

  63. McDowell, S. D., & Lee, J. (2003). India’s experiments in mobile licensing. Telecommunications Policy, 27(5–6), 371–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Mint. (2017). IUC cut to benefit only new entrant, say Airtel, Vodafone. Retrieved from https://www.livemint.com/

  65. Mint. (2018). For Reliance Jio subscribers, RIL will produce short films, serials. Retrieved from https://www.livemint.com/

  66. Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Moneycontrol. (2019). Top Companies in India by Net Profit. Retrieved from https://www.moneycontrol.com

  68. Mundy, S. (2018). Reliance Jio’s superfast mobile shift is too fast for rivals’ liking. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/

  69. Mukhopadhyay, S., & Bouwman, H. (2018). Multi-actor collaboration in platform-based ecosystem: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 20(2), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2018.1479160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Mukhopadhyay, S., & Bouwman, H. (2019). Orchestration and governance in digital platform ecosystems: A literature review and trends. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-11-2018-0067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Mukhopadhyay, S., de Reuver, M., & Bouwman, H. (2016). Effectiveness of control mechanisms in mobile platform ecosystem. Telematics and Informatics, 33(3), 848–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Mukhopadhyay, S., Bouwman, H., & Jaiswal, M. P. (2019). An open platform centric approach for scalable government service delivery to the poor: The Aadhaar case. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Nikayin, F., De Reuver, M., & Itälä, T. (2013). Collective action for a common service platform for independent living services. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(10), 922–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Ondrus, J., Gannamaneni, A., & Lyytinen, K. (2015). The impact of openness on the market potential of multi-sided platforms: A case study of mobile payment platforms. Journal of Information Technology, 30(3), 260–275. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Ozalp, H., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Disruption in platform-based ecosystems. Journal of Management Studies, 55(7), 1203–1241. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Pai, S. (2020). Early notes on Jio-Facebook deal: Implications and the second-order effects. CNBC TV18. Retrieved from https://www.cnbctv18.com

  77. Pandey, N. (2018). Airtel vs Reliance Jio to play out next in regional content. Mint. Retrieved from https://www.livemint.com

  78. Pandey, N., & Sharma, D. (2020). 3 years after launch, Jio becomes No.1 telco by user base, revenue. Mint. Retrieved from https://www.livemint.com

  79. Parbat, K. (2018). Trai order on predatory pricing favours Reliance Jio: Vittorio Colao. Economic Times. Retrieved from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com

  80. Phartiyal, S. (2020). Reliance Jio-Google smartphone deal threatens Chinese phone makers. Mint. Retrieved from https://www.livemint.com

  81. Rong, K., Lin, Y., Shi, Y., & Yu, J. (2013). Linking business ecosystem lifecycle with platform strategy: A triple view of technology, application and organisation. International Journal of Technology Management, 62(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2013.053042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990–1029. https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603322493212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Schilling, M. A. (2002). Technology success and failure in winner-take-all markets: The impact of learning orientation, timing, and network externalities. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Schirrmacher, N. B., Ondrus, J., & Kude, T. (2017). Launch strategies of digital platforms: Platforms with switching and non-switching users. Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Guimarães, Portugal, June 5-10, 2017 (pp. 658–673)

  85. Schmidt, A. L., Petzold, N., Lahme-Hütig, N., & Tiemann, F. (2021). Growing with others: A longitudinal study of an evolving multi-sided disruptive platform. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30(1), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Singh, M. (2020). Google invests $4.5 billion in India’s Reliance Jio Platforms. Techcrunch. Retrieved from http://techcrunch.com

  87. Snihur, Y., Thomas, L. D., & Burgelman, R. A. (2018). An ecosystem-level process model of business model disruption: The disruptor’s gambit. Journal of Management Studies, 55(7), 1278–1316. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Stacey, S. (2018). RCom abandons mobile business merger with rival Aircel. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/

  89. Staykova, K. S., & Damsgaard, J. (2016). Adoption of mobile payment platforms: Managing reach and range. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 11(3), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762016000300006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153

    Book  Google Scholar 

  91. The Hindu. (2016). With 220mn users, India is now world’s second-biggest smartphone market. Retrieved from https://www.thehindu.com

  92. Trabucchi, D., Talenti, L., & Buganza, T. (2019). How do big bang disruptors look like? A business model perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Tiwana, A. (2013). Platform ecosystems: Aligning architecture, governance, and strategy. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2012-0-06625-2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  94. Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. A. (2010). Research commentary—Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. TRAI (2016a) Press Release on Telecom Subscription Data as on 30th June, 2016. Retrieved from http://main.trai.gov.in

  96. TRAI (2016b) The Indian Telecom Services Performance Indicators October - December, 2015. Retrieved from http://main.trai.gov.in

  97. TRAI (2017) Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Yearly Performance Indicators of Indian Telecom Sector (First Edition) 2016. Retrieved from http://main.trai.gov.in

  98. TRAI (2020) Telecom Subscription Data as on 31st January, 2020. Retrieved from http://main.trai.gov.in

  99. TRAI (2019) Wireless Data Service in India- An Analytical Report. Retrieved from http://main.trai.gov.in

  100. Usmani, A. (2018). Billionaire Mukesh Ambani Has Shrunk The TV. Bloomberg Quint. Retrieved from https://www.bloombergquint.com

  101. Veisdal, J. (2020). The dynamics of entry for digital platforms in two-sided markets: A multi-case study. Electronic Markets, 30(3), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00409-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Vogel, B., & Barasia, S. (2011). How global telcos can profit from India’s wireless experience. Bain & Company

  103. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Yoffie, D. B., Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2019). A study of more than 250 platforms a reveal why most fail. Harvard Business Review.

  105. Yu, D., & Hang, C. C. (2010). A reflective review of disruptive innovation theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00272.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewers whose valuable advice helped improve the quality of this article. All errors are the responsibility of the authors.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandip Mukhopadhyay.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible Editor: Jianwei Hou

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mukhopadhyay, S., Whalley, J. The emergence and evolution of a disruptive platform ecosystem: evidence from the Indian mobile services industry. Electron Markets (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00495-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Disruptive platform
  • Ecosystem
  • Complementors
  • Force multiplier
  • Framing
  • Digital services
  • India

JEL classification

  • L86
  • D4
  • O3