Technological advances in electronic markets, particularly product digitization, have transformed customer-product interactions. For example, altered ownership perceptions in the digital domain affect product acquisition, usage and disposition. This study’s goal is to explore how consumers conceptualize ownership of digital possessions in order to help marketers develop tailored positioning and commercialization strategies. Comparing physical books and e-books, we contribute to the literature on electronic markets, which neglects a consumer-focused perspective on digital possessions. Using focus groups with U.S. consumers, we identify six themes surrounding perceptions of psychological digital ownership, which mainly portray a constricted sense of ownership, limiting usage experience, and value perceptions. However, we also find that ease of disposition favors e-book usage. Typical assumptions about younger consumers’ preference for digital products were not supported. Based on our findings, we offer two managerial approaches: (1) enhancing the digital product experience or (2) emancipating digital products from their physical correlates.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Addis, M., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). On the conceptual link between mass customisation and experiential consumption: an explosion of subjectivity. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 1(1), 50–66.
Akins, C. J. (2010). Conversion of digital property: Protecting consumers in the age of technology. Loyola Consumer Law Review, 23, 215–251.
Amazon. (2017). Lend or borrow kindle books. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html/ref=hp_rel_topic?ie=UTF8&nodeId=200549320&ref=cssoc_FM_RE_KLN
Antόn, C., Camarero, C., & Rodríguez, J. (2017). Pleasure in the use of new technologies: the case of e-book readers. Online Information Review, 41(2), 219–234.
Atasoy, O., & Morewedge, C. K. (2018). Digital goods are valued less than physical goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(6), 1343-1357.
Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access-based consumption: the case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 1–18.
Bardhi, F., Eckhardt, G. M., & Arnould, E. J. (2012). Liquid relationship to possessions. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 510–529.
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.
Belk, R. (2013). Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 477–500.
Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595–1600.
Bockstedt, J. C., Kauffman, R. J., & Riggins, F. J. (2006). The move to artist-led on-line music distribution: a theory-based assessment and prospects for structural changes in the digital music market. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(3), 7–38.
Camerer, C. (1988) Gifts as Economic Signals and Social Symbols. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 180-214.
Daily Mail. (2017). One in ten people do not own a single book. Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4145350/One-ten-people-not-single-book.html
Daniel, D., & Woody, W. (2013). E-textbooks at what cost? Performance and use of electronic v. Print texts. Computers & Education, 62, 18–23.
Denegri-Knott, J., Watkins, R. & Wood, J. (2012). Transforming Digital Virtual Goods into Meaningful Possessions. In M. Molesworth & J. Denegri-Knott (Eds.). Digital Virtual Consumption (76-91). Oxford: Routledge.
Dittmar, H. (1992). The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be. New York: St. Martin Press.
Edmondson, D. R., & Ward, C. (2016). Students’ attitudes towards textbook types: are students really ready for e-textbooks? Atlantic Marketing Journal, 5(3), 1–13.
Etzioni, A. (1991). The socio-economics of property. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6(6), 465–468.
Furby, L. (1978). Possession in humans: an exploratory study of its meaning and motivation. Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 49–65.
Goulding, C. (2005). Grounded theory, ethnography and phenomenology: a comparative analysis of three qualitative strategies for marketing research. European Journal of Marketing, 39(3/4), 294–308.
Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112.
Harris, M. H. (1999). History of libraries of the western world (4th ed.). Landham, ME and London: Scarecrow Press.
Healy, M., & Perry, C. (2000). Comprehensive criteria to judge validity and reliability of qualitative research within the realism paradigm. Qualitative Market Research, 3(3), 118–126.
Helberger, N. (2011). Standardizing consumers’ expectations in digital content. The Journal of Policy, Regulation and Strategy for Telecommunications, Information and Media, 13(6), 69–79.
Hennion, A. (2001). Music lovers: Taste as performance. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(5), 1–22.
Hess, T., Lang, K. R., & Xu, S. X. (2011). Social embeddedness and online consumer behavior. Electronic Markets, 21(3), 157–159.
Hines, T. (2000). An evaluation of two qualitative methods (focus group interviews and cognitive maps) for conducting research into entrepreneurial decision making. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 3(1), 7–16.
Hodges, D., Preston, C., & Hamilton, M. J. (2010). Resolving the challenge of e-books. Collection Management, 35(3–4), 196–200.
Hogan, H. S. (2014). A legal perspective on ‘possessions and the extended self’ in the digital age. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 22(2), 139–140.
Hunt, D., Radford, S., & Evans, K. (2013). Individual differences in consumer value for mass customized products. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 12(4), 327–336.
Jenkins, R., Molesworth, M., & Scullion, R. (2014). The messy social lives of objects: Interpersonal borrowing and the ambiguity of possession and ownership. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13(2), 131–139.
Jiménez, F. R., Voss, K., & Frankwick, G. L. (2013). A classification schema of co-production of goods: an open-systems perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 47(11), 1841–1858.
Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or digital natives: is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers and Education, 54(3), 722–732.
Jussila, I., Tarkiainen, A. Sarstedt, M. & Hair, J. (2015). Individual Psychological Ownership: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications for Research in Marketing. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23(2), 121–139.
Kelle, U. (2004). Computer-assisted analysis of qualitative data. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), Companion to qualitative research (pp. 276–283). London: Sage.
Kilian, T., Hennigs, R., & Langner, S. (2012). Do millennials read books or blogs? Introducing a media usage typology of the internet generation. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(2), 114–124.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research (3 rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Leimeister, J. M., Österle, H., & Alter, S. (2014). Digital services for consumers. Electronic Markets, 24(4), 255–258.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Littman, J., & Silipigni Connaway, L. (2004). A circulation analysis of print books and e-books in an academic research library. Library Resources & Technical Services, 48(4), 256–262.
Liu, Z., & Huang, X. (2008). Gender differences in the online reading environment. Journal of Documentation, 64(4), 616–626.
Lusch, R., & Vargo, S. (2011). The service dominant logic: a necessary step. European Journal of Marketing, 45(7/8), 1298–1309.
Magaudda, P. (2011). When materiality ‘bites back’: digital music consumption practices in the age of dematerialization. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1), 15–36.
McCourt, T. (2005). Collecting music in the digital realm. Popular Music and Society, 28(2), 249–252.
Mittal, B. (2006). I, me, and mine-how products become consumers’ extended selves. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 5(6), 550–562.
Moeller, S., & Wittkowski, K. (2010). The burdens of ownership: reasons for preferring renting. Managing Service Quality, 20(2), 176–191.
O’Shaughnessy, J., & O’Shaughnessy, N. J. (2002). Marketing, the consumer society and hedonism. European Journal of Marketing, 36(5/6), 524–547.
Odom, W., Zimmerman, J., & Forlizzi, J. (2011). Teenagers and their virtual possessions: design opportunities and issues. Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Vancouver, BC, 1491–1500.
Page, T. (2014). Skeuomorphism or flat design: future directions in mobile device user Interface (UI) design education. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 8(2), 130–142.
Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (2009). The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 434–447.
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298–310.
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 84–107.
Reb, J., & Connolly, T. (2007). Possession, feelings of ownership and the endowment effect. Judgment and Decision making, 2(2), 107–114.
Sanders, A. C. (2010). Restraining Amazon.com’s Orwellian potential: the computer fraud and abuse act as consumer rights legislation. Federal Communication Law Journal, 63, 535–552.
Siddiqui, S., & Turley, D. (2006). Consumables in the CME: towards a typology of products. European Advances in Consumer Research, 7(1), 72–78.
Sinclair, G., & Tinson, J. (2017). Psychological ownership and music streaming consumption. Journal of Business Research, 71, 1–9.
Singh, S., Jackson, M., Waycott, J., & Beekhuyzen, J. (2006). Downloading vs purchase: music industry vs consumers. Digital Rights Management. Technologies, Issues, Challenges and Systems. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 52–65.
Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491–503.
Stefik, M. (1997). Shifting the possible: how trusted systems and digital property rights challenge us to rethink digital publishing. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 12(1), 137–159.
Stini, M., Mauve, M., & Fitzek, F. (2006). Digital ownership: from content consumers to owners and traders. IEEE Multimedia, 13(4), 1–6.
Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: the history of America's future, 1584 to 2069. New York: William Morrow and Company Inc..
Swilley, E., Cowart, K., & Flynn, L. (2014). An examination of re-gifting. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 13(4), 251-261.
Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(1), 39–60.
Thompson, C. J. (1997). Interpreting consumers: a hermeneutical framework for deriving marketing insights from the texts of consumers’ consumption stories. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(4), 438–455.
Thorne McCarty, L. (2002). Ownership: a case study in the representation of legal concepts. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 10(1–3), 135–161.
Threlfall, K. D. (1999). Using focus groups as a consumer research tool. Journal of Marketing Practice: Applied Marketing Science, 5(4), 102–105.
Wang, Q., Song, P., & Yang, S. (2013). Understanding the substitution effect between online and traditional channels: evidence from product attributes perspective. Electronic Markets, 23(3), 227–239.
Watkins, R. D., Denegri-Knott, J., & Molesworth, M. (2015). The relationship between ownership and possession: observations from the context of digital virtual goods. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(1–2), 44–70.
Wattanasuwan, K. (2005). The self and symbolic consumption. Journal of American Academy of Business, 6(1), 179–184.
Wiegand, W. A. (1999). Tunnel vision and blind spots: what the past tells us about the present; reflections on the twentieth-century history of American librarianship. The Library Quarterly, 69(1), 1–32.
Woody, W., Daniel, D., & Baker, C. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & Education, 55(3), 945–948.
Responsible Editor: Ulrike Baumöl
About this article
Cite this article
Helm, S.V., Ligon, V., Stovall, T. et al. Consumer interpretations of digital ownership in the book market. Electron Markets 28, 177–189 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-018-0293-6
- Psychological ownership
- Digital ownership
- Digital possessions
- Digital products
- Focus group research