Skip to main content

The governance strategies for public emergencies on social media and their effects: a case study based on the microblog data

Abstract

Since the 1980s, the development of information and communication technologies (ICTs) has greatly changed people’s modes of production and lifestyle, and it has also had a significant influence on traditional social structures. Microblogs – a type of social media application such as Twitter or Weibo – have served as an important platform for network governance in some local governments in China. This study makes an attempt to answer the following questions: What types of strategies should governments implement on social media platforms during public emergencies? What are the effects of these strategies? Based on the case of the Shifang Incident, which was a large-scale environmental protest that occurred in Shifang, China in 2012, we analyze all the messages posted during the incident on the official microblog of the Shifang government and examine the public feedback by using an online big data analysis tool. In line with the time sequence and the extent of the conflict, we divide the Shifang Incident into three phases: the fermentation period, the confrontation period, and the digestion period. In addition, we classify government strategies on social media into five categories: introducing, appealing, explaining, rumor-refuting, and decision-making. The analysis results show that different government strategies are applied to different phases of the incident and that the responses of the public also vary during different periods.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. 1.

    PKUVIS is also called WeiboEvents.

  2. 2.

    The China Media Project is a project of the Journalism and Media Studies Centre at The University of Hong Kong. Working directly with editors, writers and producers from various media in China, the project documents and analyzes the process of media reform in China and the formal and informal factors that influence it.

References

  1. Bamman, D., O'Connor, B., & Smith, N. (2012). Censorship and deletion practices in Chinese social media. First Monday, 17(3).

  2. Barlow, J. P. (1996). A declaration of the independence of cyberspace. Retrieved 01/08, 2015, from https://projects.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html.

  3. BBC. (2011). China protest closes toxic chemical plant in Dalian. Retrieved 05/03, 2015, from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-14520438.

  4. Bellamy, C., & Taylor, J. A. (1998). Governing in the information age. Open University Press.

  5. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Hansen, D. (2012). The impact of polices on government social media usage: issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 30–40. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bjarnason, T., Gudmundsson, B., & Olafsson, K. (2011). Towards a digital adolescent society? The social structure of the Icelandic adolescent blogosphere. New Media & Society, 13(4), 645–662. doi:10.1177/1461444810377918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blanchard, B. (2012). China pollution protest ends, but suspicion of government high. Retrieved 05/03, 2015, from http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/08/us-china-pollution-idUSBRE8670HP20120708.

  9. Cai, Y. (2010). Collective resistance in China: Why popular protests succeed or fail. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell, D. A., Lambright, K. T., & Wells, C. J. (2014). Looking for friends, fans, and followers? Social media use in public and nonprofit human services. Public Administration Review, 74(5), 655–663. doi:10.1111/puar.12261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Center for Technology in Government. (2009). Exploratory social media project.

  12. Chen, H., Chiang, R. H. L., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1165–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Crowe, A. (2013). Leadership in the open: A new paradigm in emergency management. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Global Times. (2012, 07/03/2012). Construction halted in Shifang over health concerns, Global Times. Retrieved from http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/718726.shtml.

  15. Gonzalez, A. (2008). Digital citizenship: the Internet, society, and participation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2189–2190. doi:10.1002/asi.20906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hondula, D. M., & Krishnamurthy, R. (2014). Emergency management in the era of social media. Public Administration Review, 74(2), 274–277. doi:10.1111/puar.12184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hood, C. C. (1983). The tools of government. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.

  18. Hughes, O. E. (2003). Public management and administration, third edition: An introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.

  19. Jacobs, A. (2011). China shuts solar panel factory after antipollution protests. Retrieved 05/03, 2015, from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/world/asia/china-shuts-solar-panel-factory-after-anti-pollution-protests.html?_r=0.

  20. Joseph, R. C., & Johnson, N. A. (2013). Big data and transformational government. IT Professional, 15(6), 43–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kavanaugh, A. L., Fox, E. A., Sheetz, S. D., Yang, S., Li, L. T., Shoemaker, D. J., & Xie, L. (2012). Social media use by government: from the routine to the critical. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 480–491. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lash, S. (1990). Sociology of postmodernism. Routledge.

  24. Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Loader, B. D. (2003). The governance of cyberspace: Politics, technology and global restructuring. Taylor & Francis.

  26. Ma, L. (2012). Diffusion and assimilation of government microblogging: evidence from chinese cities. Public Management Review, 16(2), 274–295. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.725763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mergel, I. (2013). A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 327–334. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mergel, I., & Bretschneider, S. I. (2013). A Three-stage adoption process for social media use in government. Public Administration Review, 73(3), 390–400. doi:10.1111/puar.12021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Neo, B. S., & Chen, G. (2007). Dynamic governance: Embedding culture, capabilities and change in singapore. World Scientific.

  30. Noesselt, N. (2014). Microblogs and the adaptation of the Chinese party-state’s governance strategy. Governance, 27(3), 449–468. doi:10.1111/gove.12045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Palen, L. (2008). Online social media in crisis events. Educause Quarterly, 3, 76–78.

    Google Scholar 

  32. PDPOMO. (2011). 2011 report on sina government microblogs.

  33. PDPOMO. (2015). 2014 report on government microblogs.

  34. Pomfret, J. (2009). Hundreds in south China oppose waste incinerator. Retrieved 05/03, 2015, from http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/11/23/us-china-environment-incinerator-idUSTRE5AM0JS20091123.

  35. Qian, G. (2012). China’s malformed media sphere. Retrieved 04/06, 2015, from http://cmp.hku.hk/2012/07/11/25293/.

  36. Qu, Y, Huang, C, Zhang, P, & Zhang, J. (2011). Microblogging after a major disaster in China: A case study of the 2010 Yushu earthquake. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, Hangzhou, China.

  37. Ren, D., Zhang, X., Wang, Z., Li, J., & Yuan, X. (2014). WeiboEvents: A crowd sourcing Weibo visual analytic system. Paper presented at the 2014 IEEE.

  38. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.

  39. Savas, E. S. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. CQ Press.

  40. Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1990). Behavioral Assumptions of Policy Tools. The Journal of Politics, 52(2), 510–529.

  41. Snellen, I. T. M., & van de Donk, W. B. H. J. (1998). Public administration in an information age: A Handbook. IOS Press.

  42. Sobkowicz, P., Kaschesky, M., & Bouchard, G. (2012). Opinion mining in social media: modeling, simulating, and forecasting political opinions in the web. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 470–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Republic.com 2.0: Princeton University Press.

  44. Sutton, J., Palen, L., & Shklovski, I. (2008). Backchannels on the front lines: Emergent uses of social media in the 2007 Southern California Wildfires. Paper presented at the The 5th International ISCRAM Conference Washington, DC, USA.

  45. Trend, D. (2001). Reading digital culture. Wiley.

  46. Zhang, N., Guo, X., Chen, G., & Chau, P. Y. K. (2009). Impact of perceived fit on E-government user evaluation: a study with a Chinese cultural context. Journal of Global Information Management, 17(1), 49–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zheng, L., & Zheng, T. (2014). Innovation through social media in the public sector: Information and interactions. Government Information Quarterly, 31(Supplement 1), S106–S117. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partly supported by Tsinghua University Institute for Data Science, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71473143/71490721/71102010), the National Social Science Foundation of China (15ZDA039), the Beijing Social Science Foundation (15JGA008), and the Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program (20131089260).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nan Zhang.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Marijn Janssen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meng, Q., Zhang, N., Zhao, X. et al. The governance strategies for public emergencies on social media and their effects: a case study based on the microblog data. Electron Markets 26, 15–29 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0202-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Social media
  • Public emergency
  • Governance strategies
  • Mass incidents
  • Microblog
  • Big data

JEL Classification

  • Case Study
  • E-Government
  • Social Networking
  • Virtual Communities
  • Web 2.0