Skip to main content
Log in

How does hotel attribute importance vary among different travelers? An exploratory case study based on a conjoint analysis

  • Special Theme
  • Published:
Electronic Markets Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Travel review websites, along with online travel agencies and hotel websites, are salient components of a travel sector positioned at the top echelon of e-commerce categories. This study investigates the comparative salience of six hotel attributes (value, service, rooms, sleep quality, location, and cleanliness) in accordance with (1) an overall travelers group, (2) five different trip-purpose groups (business, families, friends, couples, and solo), and (3) two different country-of-residence groups (domestic and foreign travelers). A conjoint analysis was applied to a total of 405 reviews on one particular hotel from the website of TripAdvisor. The results of the study indicate that “value” and “rooms” are the most important attributes that contribute to a high overall rating for the hotel. In addition, large differences in hotel attribute importance are revealed among various types of traveler groups. Three major and ten minor propositions are postulated from the discussion of the study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ananth, M., DeMicco, F. J., Moreo, P. J., & Howey, R. M. (1992). Marketplace lodging needs of mature travelers. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 33(4), 12–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au, N., Buhalis, D., & Law, R. (2009). Complaints on the online environment—the case of Hong Kong hotels. Paper presented at the Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2009, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

  • Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulchand-Gidumal, J., Melián-González, S., & Lopez-Valcarcel, B. G. (2013). A social media analysis of the contribution of destinations to client satisfaction with hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 35, 44–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, K., Sparks, B., & O’Callaghan, F. (2003). Beyond core service. Psychology & Marketing, 20(3), 187–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callan, R. J., & Bowman, L. (2000). Selecting a hotel and determining salient quality attributes: a preliminary study of mature British travellers. International Journal of Tourism Research, 2(2), 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T. Y., & Chu, R. (2001). Determinants of hotel guests’ satisfaction and repeat patronage in the Hong Kong hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 20(3), 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, M. Y., & Lee, S.-Y. T. (2008). A conjoint analysis of online information privacy concerns: a case in Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 18(3), 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, R. K., & Choi, T. (2000). An importance-performance analysis of hotel selection factors in the Hong Kong hotel industry: a comparison of business and leisure travellers. Tourism Management, 21(4), 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clow, K. E., Garretson, J. A., & Kurtz, D. L. (1994). An exploratory study into the purchase decision process used by leisure travelers in hotel selection. Journal of Hospitality & Leisure Marketing, 2(4), 53–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, P. J. (1997). Using conjoint analysis to determine the relative importance of service attributes measured in customer satisfaction surveys. Journal of Retailing, 73(2), 235–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolnicar, S. (2002). Business travellers’ hotel expectations and disappointments: a different perspective to hotel attribute importance investigation. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 7(1), 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolnicar, S., & Otter, T. (2003). Which hotel attributes matter? A review of previous and a framework for future research. Paper presented at the The 9th Annual Conference of the Asia Pacific Tourism Association, Sydney, Australia.

  • Green, P. E., & Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(2), 103–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillet, B. D., & Law, R. (2010). Analyzing hotel star ratings on third-party distribution websites. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 22(6), 797–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henley, J. A., Jr., Cotter, M. J., & Herrington, J. D. (2004). Quality and pricing in the hotel industry: the Mobil “star” and hotel pricing behavior. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 5(4), 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heung, V. C. (2000). Satisfaction levels of mainland Chinese travelers with Hong Kong hotel services. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 12(5), 308–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y.-C. (2009). Fuzzy multiple-criteria decision making in the determination of critical criteria for assessing service quality of travel websites. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 6439–6445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, C., & Hiemstra, S. J. (1996). Hybrid conjoint analysis as a research technique to measure meeting planners' preferences in hotel selection. Journal of Travel Research, 35(2), 62–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huertas‐Garcia, R., García, M. L., & Consolación, C. (2014). Conjoint analysis of tourist choice of hotel attributes presented in travel agent brochures. International Journal of Tourism Research, 16(1), 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israeli, A. A. (2002). Star rating and corporate affiliation: their influence on room price and performance of hotels in Israel. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 21(4), 405–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeacle, I., & Carter, C. (2011). In TripAdvisor we trust: rankings, calculative regimes and abstract systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(4), 293–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., & Okamoto, N. (2006). Importance analysis on hotel components from a manager's perspective: using conjoint analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 11(3), 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.-Y., Suh, E.-K., & Suh, K.-S. (2008). Effects of perceived similarity between consumers and product reviewers on consumer behaviors. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 18(3), 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S., & Loebbecke, C. (2003). Emerging pricing strategies on the web: lessons from the airline industry. Electronic Markets, 13(1), 46–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Lee, J.-N., & Tan, B. C. Y. (2013). The contrasting attitudes of reviewer and seller in electronic word-of-mouth: a communicative action theory perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 23(3), 105–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. C. (1984a). The basis of hotel selection. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 25(1), 54–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. C. (1984b). Isolating differences in hotel attributes. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 25(3), 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., Law, R., Rong, J., Li, G., & Hall, J. (2013). Analyzing changes in hotel customers’ expectations by trip mode. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 34, 359–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockyer, T. (2002). Business guests’ accommodation selection: the view from both sides. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 14(6), 294–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockyer, T. (2003). Hotel cleanliness—how do guests view it? let us get specific. A New Zealand study. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 22(3), 297–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockyer, T. (2005). The perceived importance of price as one hotel selection dimension. Tourism Management, 26(4), 529–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchiori, E., Eynard, D., Inversini, A., Cantoni, L., & Cerretti, F. (2011). Paper presented at the information and communications technologies in tourism 2011. Innsbruck: Austria. Harvesting online contents: an analysis of hotel reviews websites.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, H. (1999). Service quality, customer satisfaction, and customer value: a holistic perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 18(1), 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C. K., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., & Booth, R. J. (2007). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. Austin: LIWC.net.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qu, H., Ryan, B., & Chu, R. (2000). The importance of hotel attributes in contributing to travelers’ satisfaction in the Hong Kong Hotel Industry. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 1(3), 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleh, F., & Ryan, C. (1992). Client perceptions of hotels: a multi-attribute approach. Tourism Management, 13(2), 163–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, K. J., & Hyman, M. R. (2007). An exploratory study of desired hotel attributes for American tourists vacationing in China and Ireland. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 13(2), 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanka, T., & Taylor, R. (2004). An investigation into the perceived importance of service and facility attributes to hotel satisfaction. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 4(3–4), 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sridhar, S., & Srinivasan, R. (2012). Social influence effects in online product ratings. Journal of Marketing, 76(5), 70–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringam, B. B., Gerdes, J., Jr., & Vanleeuwen, D. M. (2010). Assessing the importance and relationships of ratings on user-generated traveler reviews. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 11(2), 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsaur, S.-H., & Tzeng, G.-H. (1996). Multiattribute decision making analysis for customer preference of tourist hotels. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 4(4), 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T., Hu, M. Y., & Hao, A. W. (2010). Name-Your-Own-Price seller’s information revelation strategy with the presence of list-price channel. Electronic Markets, 20(2), 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, P. A., & Oh, H. C. (1993). Do American business travellers have different hotel service requirements? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 5(3), 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wind, J., Green, P. E., Shifflet, D., & Scarbrough, M. (1989). Courtyard by Marriott: designing a hotel facility with consumer-based marketing models. Interfaces, 19(1), 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung-Byung Yang.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Chulmo Koo

http://www.aeaweb.org/econlit/jelCodes.php

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 Summary of literature on hotel ratings
Table 6 Data summary
Table 7 Part-worth values of hotel attributes (full table)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rhee, H.T., Yang, SB. How does hotel attribute importance vary among different travelers? An exploratory case study based on a conjoint analysis. Electron Markets 25, 211–226 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-014-0161-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-014-0161-y

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation