Skip to main content
Log in

Leader delegation in global software teams: occurrence and effects

  • Special Theme
  • Published:
Electronic Markets Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Global teams are an important work structure in software development projects. Managing such complex global software projects presents many challenges to traditional leadership wisdom, in particular, how, why and when the leaders should delegate responsibility and authority. Delegation is considered an important leadership component to motivate and grow subordinates. Cultural differences, skill level disparity and potential competition between different software development sites creates a management context which is much different from where traditional leadership theories were developed. This study investigates leader delegation behaviors in global software teams and explores the reasons and impact of delegation strategies on global team performance. Semi-structured interviews and a survey was used to collect data from global software team managers and members from four countries of a Fortune 100 IT service company. The results of this study include in-depth analysis of hows and whys of leader delegation in global teams and a theoretical model for analyzing global team leader delegation occurrence and effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brez, M., & Arad, R. (1986). Participative goal setting; social, motivational, and cognitive actions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 591–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte, V. A., & Novello, D. (2008). Assessing leadership in a Chinese company: A case study. The Journal of Management Development, 27(10), 1002–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. C. (1942). The fundamentals of top management. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, D. L., & Snyder, N. T. (2001). Mastering virtual teams (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guimaraes, T., & Igbaria, M. (1992). Determinants of turnover intentions: Comparingic and IS personnel. Information Systems Research, 3(3), 273–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through design of work. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 16(5), 250–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, F. (2003). Participation and power: A critical assessment. Applied Psychology, 52(1), 144–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1988). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15(1), 69–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, F. (1968). Work and the nature of man. London: Granada Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H., & Ocker, R. (2006). Preliminary insights into the in-group/out-group effect in partially distributed teams: An analysis of participant reflections, Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMIS CPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research, Claremont, CA, U.S.A.

  • Janz, B. D., Colquitt, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (1997). Knowledge worker team effectiveness: The role of autonomy, interdependence, team development, contextual support variables. Personnel Psychology, 50(4), 877–905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E., & Gibson, C. B. (2004). The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K., Ziegert, J., Knight, A., & Xiao, Y. (2006). Dynamic delegation: Shared, hierarchical, and deindividualized leadership in extreme action teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(4), 590–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L., Muller, K. E., & Nizam, A. (1998). Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove: Duxbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leana, C. (1986). Predictors and consequences of delegation. Academy of Management Journal, 29(4), 754–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leana, C. (1987). Power relinquishment versus power sharing: A theoretical classification and empirical comparison of delegation and participation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(2), 228–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, R. A. (1969). The management process in 3-D. Harvard Business Review, 47(6), 80–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Jarvis, C. B. (2005). The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 710–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinsons, M. G., & Davison, R. M. (2007). Strategic decision making and support systems: Comparing American. Japanese and Chinese Management, Decision Support Systems, 43, 284–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, C. J. (1996). Globework: Creating technology with international teams Ph.D. thesis. Boston: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milewski, A., & Lewis, S. H. (1997). Delegating to software agents. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 46(4), 485–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohrman, S. A., Cohen, S. G., & Mohrman, A. M. (1995). Designing team-based organizations: New forms for knowledge work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. E. (2000). One road to turnover: An examination of work exhaustion in technology professionals. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 141–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paré, G., & Dubé, L. (1999). Virtual teams: An exploratory study of key challenges and strategies, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Systems, Association for Information Systems, Charlotte, NC, U.S.A.

  • Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2003). Trust and the unintended effects of behavior control in virtual teams. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 365–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriesheim, C., Neider, L., & Scandura, T. (1998). Delegation and leader-member exchange: Main effects and Moderators. The Academy of Management Journal, 41(3), 298-318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. K. (2010). Benchmarking leadership styles for organizational learning in Indian context. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 17(1), 95–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, R., & Schmidt, W. H. (1958). How to choose a leadership pattern. Harvard Business Review, 36(2), 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, A. M., DeMarie, S. M., & Hendrickson, A. R. (1998). Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future. The Academy of Management Executive, 12(3), 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treinen, J. J., & Miller-Frost, S. L., (2006). Following the sun: Case studies in global software development. IBM Systems Journal, 45(4), accessed online at http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj/454/treinref.html

  • Urwick, L. F. (1952). Notes of the theory of organization. New York: American Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. A., & Fu, P. (1999). Determinants of delegation and consultation by manager. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(2), 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S., Tremaine, M., Milewski, A., Kobler, F. (2008). Delegation in global software teams: Leading or managing, poster of 2009 IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering.

  • Zhang, S., Tremaine, M., Milewski, A., Fjermestad, J., & O’Sullivan, P. (2009). Occurrence and effects of leader delegation in virtual software teams. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 5(1), 47–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suling Zhang.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Nicholas C. Romano

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, S., Tremaine, M., Milewski, A.E. et al. Leader delegation in global software teams: occurrence and effects. Electron Markets 22, 37–48 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-011-0082-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-011-0082-y

Keywords

JEL

Navigation