Skip to main content

A value frequency model of knowledge sharing: an exploratory study on knowledge sharability in cross-organizational collaboration

Abstract

Collaborators on cross-disciplinary, cross-organizational teams must decide what knowledge is sharable. The sharability of a set of private knowledge is defined as the degree to which one feels willing to reveal that knowledge to people who are not members of one’s own organizational unit. This paper proposes a Value Frequency Model of Knowledge Sharing (VFMKS) to explain knowledge sharability attitudes and knowledge sharing behaviors. It reports qualitative findings from an exploratory field study of the degree to which constructs and relationships proposed by the model were consistent with the attitudes, opinions, and reported actions of professional Chief Knowledge Officers (CKO) from 16 organizations in France. CKO’s were consistent with most aspects of the model, suggesting quantitative investigation of the model may be useful. Critical incidents and utterances of the CKO’s did not address two constructs in the model during this study. Further investigation may show whether these effects manifest in other contexts, or whether they are extraneous to the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1973). Attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of specific behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(1), 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anand, V., Manz, C. C., & Glick, W. H. (1998). An organization memory approach to information management. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 796–809.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Argote, L., Ingram, P., Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (2000). Knowledge transfer in organizations. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Argote, L., Gruenfeld, D., & Naquin, C. (2001). Group learning in organizations. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at Work: Theory and Research. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing knowledge in organizations: an integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49(4), 571–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Benson, R., Stacie, F., & Richard, B. (2007). Overcoming barriers to knowledge sharing in virtual teams. Organizational Dynamics, 36(3), 259–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boughzala, I. (2002). Methodology for designing interenterprise cooperative information system, SCI'2002: the 6th World Multi Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, July 14-18, 2002, Orlando, USA.

  9. Boughzala, I. (2007). Ingenierie de la collaboration: theories, technologies et pratiques, Paris: Hermes-Lavoisier, 2007.

  10. Boughzala, I., Briggs, R. O. (2011). Knowledge sharability in cross-organizational collaboration: an exploratory field study, Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 44), IEEE Computer Society, January 4–7, 2011, Kauai, Hawaii.

  11. Briggs, R. O. (2006). The value frequency model: toward a theoretical understanding of organizational change. In S. Seifert and and C. Weinhardt (eds.), Proceedings of the 2006 Group decision and Negotiation International conference (GDN 2006), Karlsruhe, Germany, June 25–28, 2006, 36–39.

  12. Cabrera, A., & Cabrera, E. F. (2002). Knowledge-sharing dilemmas. Organization Studies, 23(5), 687–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dyer, J. H., & Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 345–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ermine, J-L., Boughzala, I., & Tounkara, T. (2005). Using Cartography to sustain Inter-Generation Knowledge Transfer: The M3C Methodology, ICICKM 2005: 2nd International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning, Dubai: UAE, November 21–22, 2005.

  15. Ermine, J.-L., Boughzala, I., & Tounkara, T. (2006). Critical knowledge map as a decision tool for knowledge transfer actions. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(2), 129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gardenswartz, L., & Rowe, A. (1994). Diverse teams at work: Capitalizing on the power of diversity. New York: McGrawHill.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1993). The common knowledge effect: information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 959–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design Science in Information Systems Research, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28 No. 1/March.

  20. Hsiao, R.-L. (2008). Knowledge Sharing in a Global Professional Service Firm, MIS Quarterly executive, 7(3).

  21. Kern, T., & Willcocks, L. P. (2000). Exploring information technology outsourcing relationships: theory and practice. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(4), 321–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kitzinger, J. (1995). Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311, 299–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kluge, J., Stein, W. & Licht, T. (2001). Knowledge unplugged: the McKinsey & Co. global survey on knowledge management. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  24. Koh, C., Ang, S., & Straub, D. W. (2004). IT outsourcing success: a psychological contract perspective. Information System Research, 15(4), 356–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Matzler, K., Renzl, B., Muller, J., Herting, S., & Mooradian, T. A. (2008). Personality traits and knowledge sharing. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nanda, A. (1996). Resources, capabilities and competencies. In B. Moingeon & A. Edmonson (Eds.), Organizational learning and competitive advantage (pp. 93–120). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nonaka, I. (1998). The concept of “Ba”: building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3).

  28. Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. S. (2000). Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organization Science, 11(5), 538–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of Growth of the Firm. London: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Romano, N. C., Jr., Pick, J. B., & Roztocki, N. (2010). A motivational model for technology-supported cross-organizational and cross-border collaboration. European Journal of Information System, 19(2), 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rosenberg, M. J. (1956). Cognitive structure and attitudinal affect. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53(3), 367–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Skjoett-Larsent, T., Thernoe, C., & Andersen, C. (2003). Supply chain collaboration. Theoretical perspective and empirical evidence. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 33(6), 531–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Spender, J. C. (1996a). Competitive advantage from tacit knowledge? In B. Moingeon & A. Edmonson (Eds.), Organizational Learning and Competitive Advantage (pp. 56–73). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Spender, J. C. (1996b). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Webster.com, (2010). http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attitude. Accessed 9/3/2010.

  37. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Westaby, J. D. (2002). Identifying specific factors underlying attitudes toward change: using multiple methods to compare expectancy-value theory to reasons theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(5), 1083–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Imed Boughzala.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Nicholas C. Romano

Appendix

Appendix

Table 3 Expert focus group characteristics
Table 4 Knowledge sharability grid: an instrument for evaluating the knowledge sharability

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boughzala, I., Briggs, R.O. A value frequency model of knowledge sharing: an exploratory study on knowledge sharability in cross-organizational collaboration. Electron Markets 22, 9–19 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-011-0080-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Knowledge sharing
  • Knowledge management
  • Sharability
  • Cross-organizational collaboration
  • Value frequency model
  • Focus group
  • Exploratory field study

JEL classification

  • D8