Electronic Markets

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 63–68

Are open standards good business?

Position Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s12525-011-0078-7

Cite this article as:
Aggarwal, N., Dai, Q. & Walden, E.A. Electron Markets (2012) 22: 63. doi:10.1007/s12525-011-0078-7


The debate about the relative merits of open vs. proprietary standards is long and ongoing. Proponents of open standards argue that they are good for society as they encourage adoption, have lower risk, and increase interoperability between technologies. On the other hand, proponents of proprietary standards maintain that monopolistic returns are justified given huge upfront and ongoing investments. While there are merits to both sides of this debate, we take a more objective approach in evaluating whether it makes sense to develop or invest in open standards. We collect investors’ reactions to Extensible Markup Language (XML) schema announcements and compare these with estimated returns for the same stock to determine whether the returns were above or below normal. We find that investors prefer proprietary XML schemas to open XML schemas by as much as 28,000%. We also find that this preference has been stable over time except in 2001 – the period of the dot com bubble burst - when investors temporarily preferred open standards. We attribute these results to two things. First, expected returns from monopoly control of proprietary standards, even though uncertain, are often worth more than those expected from open standards. Second, it seems that the markets are still unsure of the monetary benefits of open standards to the firm. Thus, companies that embrace open standards will have to better communicate to the investors the value proposition of open standards if they want to generate positive reactions on their open standardization efforts.


Open standards Proprietary standards Event Study 

JEL classification

L15 D80 G14 

Copyright information

© Institute of Information Management, University of St. Gallen 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MIS, College of BusinessSan Jose State UniversitySan JoseUSA
  2. 2.Department of Management, LeBow College of BusinessDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Department of ISQS, Rawls College of BusinessTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA

Personalised recommendations