Given large numbers of buyers and sellers, with access to a wide variety of information, economic theory suggests that online auction markets should provide an efficient mechanism for establishing equilibrium prices. Previous research on online auction prices, however, is far from conclusive, having produced mixed findings. The seemingly inconsistent and sometimes contradictory results make it very difficult to integrate empirical findings into a coherent body of knowledge. The purpose of this paper is to present a framework that can reconcile previous findings and provide direction for future research. Accordingly, we propose a simple theoretical framework with two dimensions—market structure (thick vs. thin) and quality uncertainty (high vs. low). By examining the literature in the context of market structure and quality uncertainty we find that previous studies are not necessarily at odds, but that there is actually a fairly consistent pattern of results.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Anand, B. N. & Shachar, R. (2004a). Advertising, the matchmaker. Working paper, Harvard Business School.
Anand, B. N., & Shachar, R. (2004b). Brands as beacons: a new source of loyalty to multiproduct firms. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 135–150.
Anderson, S., Friedman, D., Milam, G., & Singh, N. (2008). Buy it now: a hybrid internet market institution. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 9(2), 137–153.
Ariely, D., & Simonson, I. (2003). Buying, bidding, playing, or competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(1&2), 113–123.
Axarloglou, K. (2007). Thick markets, market competition and pricing dynamics: evidence from retailers. Managerial and Decision Economics, 28(7), 669–677.
Ba, S., & Pavlou, P. (2002). Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 243–268.
Bagwell, K., & Riordan, M. H. (1991). High and declining prices signal product quality. American Economic Review, 81(1), 224–239.
Bajari, P., & Hortacsu, A. (2003). The winner’s curse, reserve prices, and endogenous entry: empirical insights from eBay auctions. Rand Journal of Economics, 34(2), 329–355.
Bajari, P., & Hortacsu, A. (2004). Economic insights from internet auctions. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(2), 457–486.
Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 187–217.
Biais, B. (1993). Price formatioin and equilibrium liquidity in fragmented and centralized markets. Journal of Finance, 48(1), 157–185.
Borle, S., Boatwright, P., & Kadane, J. B. (2006). The timing of bid placement and extent of multiple bidding: an empirical investigation using ebay online auctions. Statistical Science, 21(2), 194–205.
Boulding, W., & Kirmani, A. (1993). A consumer-side experimental examination of signaling theory: do consumers perceive warranties as signals of quality? Journal of Consumer Research, 20(1), 111–123.
Brint, A. (2003). Investigating buyer and seller strategies in online auctions. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(11), 1177–1188.
Budish, E. B., & Takeyama, L. N. (2001). Buy prices in online auctions: irrationality on the internet? Economic Letters, 72(3), 325–333.
Carlton, D. W. (1986). The rigidity of prices. American Economic Review, 76(4), 637–658.
Che, Y.-K. (1996). Customer return policies for experience goods. Journal of Industrial Economics, 44(1), 17–24.
Cheema, A., Peter, T. L., Leszczyc, P., Bagchi, R., Bagozzi, R. P., Cox, J. C., et al. (2005). Economics, psychology, and social dynamics of consumer bidding in auctions. Marketing Letters, 16(3/4), 401–413.
Cox, J., Dinkin, S., & Swarthout, J. T. (2001). Endogenous entry and exit in common value auctions. Experimental Economics, 4(2), 163–181.
Dewally, M., & Ederington, L. (2006). Reputation, certification, warranties, and information as remedies for seller-buyer information asymmetries: lessons from the on-line comic book market. Journal of Business, 79(2), 693–729.
Dewan, S. & Hsu, V. (2001). Trust in electronic markets: price discovery in generalist versus specialty online auctions. Working paper, University of Washington.
Dewan, S., & Hsu, V. (2004). Adverse selection in electronic markets: evidence from online stamp auctions. Journal of Industrial Economics, 52(4), 497–516.
Dholakia, U. M., Basuroy, S., & Soltysinski, K. (2002). Auction or agent (or both)? A study of moderators of the herding bias in digital auctions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19(2), 115–130.
Dholakia, U., & Soltysinski, K. (2001). Coveted or overlooked? The psychology of bidding for comparable listings in digital auctions. Marketing Letters, 12(3), 225–237.
Dodonova, A., & Khoroshilov, Y. (2004). Anchoring and transaction utility: evidence from online auctions. Applied Economic Letters, 11(5), 307–310.
Domberger, S., & Fiebig, D. G. (1993). The distribution of price changes in oligopoly. Journal of Industrial Economics, 41(3), 295–313.
Dranove, D., & Satterthwaite, M. A. (1992). Monopolistic competition when price and quality are imperfectly observable. Rand Journal of Economics, 23(4), 518–534.
Easley, D., Kiefer, N. M., O’Hara, M., & Paperman, J. B. (1996). Liquidity, information, and infrequently traded stocks. Journal of Finance, 51(4), 1405–1436.
Easley, D., & O’Hara, M. (1987). Price, trade size and information in securities markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 19(1), 69–90.
Eaton, D. H. (2005). Valuing information: evidence from guitar auctions on eBay. Journal of Applied Economics and Policy, 24(1), 1–19.
Fischhoff, B. (1991). Value elicitation: is there anything in there? American Psychologist, 46(8), 835–847.
Fung, J. K. W., Mok, H. M. K., & Wong, K. C. K. (2004). Pricing efficiency in a thin market with competitive market makers: box spread strategies in the Hang Seng index options market. Financial Review, 39(3), 435–454.
Gilkeson, J. H., & Reynolds, K. (2003). Determinants of internet auction success and closing price: an exploratory study. Psychology & Marketing, 20(6), 537–566.
Häubl, G. & Popkowski Leszczyc, P. T. L. (2003). Minimum prices and product valuations in auctions. Marketing Science Institute Reports, Issue 3, No. 03-117, 115–141.
Heyman, J. E., Orhun, Y., & Ariely, D. (2004). Auction fever: the effect of opponents and quasi-endowment on product valuations. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(4), 7–21.
Houser, D., & Wooders, J. (2006). Reputation in auctions: theory and evidence from eBay. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 15(2), 353–369.
Huston, J. H., & Spencer, R. W. (2002). Quality, uncertainty and the internet: the market for the cyber lemons. The American Economist, 46(1), 50–60.
Kagel, J. H., & Levin, D. (1986). The winner’s curse and public information in common value auctions. The American Economic Review, 76(3), 894–920.
Kamins, M. A., Dreze, X., & Folkes, V. S. (2004). Effects of seller-supplied prices on buyers’ product evaluations: reference prices in an internet auction context. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(4), 622–628.
Katkar, R. & Reiley, D. H. (2006). Public versus secret reserve prices in eBay auctions: results from a pokemon field experiment. Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy, 6(2), Article 7.
Kauffman, R. J., & Wood, C. A. (2006). Doing their bidding: an empirical examination of factors that affect a buyer’s utility in internet auctions. Information Technology Management, 7(3), 171–190.
Kazumori, E., & McMillan, J. (2005). Selling online versus live. Journal of Industrial Economics, 53(4), 543–569.
Klemperer, P. (1999). Auction theory: a guide to the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 13(3), 227–286.
Ku, G., Malhotra, D., & Keith Murnighan, J. (2005). Toward a competitive arousal model of decision-making: a study of auction fever in live and internet auctions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision, 96(2), 89–103.
Ku, G., Galinsky, A. D., & Keith Murnighan, J. (2006). Starting low but ending high: a reversal of the anchoring effect in auctions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(6), 975–986.
Landsburg, S. (2001). Price theory and applications, 5th edition, South-Western Pub.
Li, S., Srinivasan, K., & Sun, B. (2004). The role of quality indicators in internet auctions: an empirical study. Working paper, Rutgers University and Carnegie Mellon University.
Livingston, J. (2005). How valuable is a good reputation? A sample selection model of internet auctions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(3), 453–465.
Lucking-Reiley, D., Bryan, D., Prasd, N., & Reeves, D. (2007). Pennies from eBay: the determinants of price in online auctions. Journal of Industrial Economics, 55(2), 223–233.
Malhotra, D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2000). Milked for all their worth: competitive arousal and escalation in the Chicago cow auctions. Working paper, Northwestern University.
McAfee, R. P., & McMillan, J. (1987). Auctions and bidding. Journal of Economic Literature, 25(2), 699–738.
McDonald, G. C., & Slawson, C. S., Jr. (2002). Reputation in an internet auction market. Economic Inquiry, 40(4), 633–650.
Melnik, M. I., & Alm, J. (2002). Does a seller’s ecommerce reputation matter? Evidence from eBay auctions. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(3), 337–349.
Melnik, M. I., & Alm, J. (2005). Reputation, information signals, and prices for heterogeneous coins on eBay. Southern Economic Journal, 72(2), 305–328.
Milgrom, P., & Weber, R. J. (1982). A theory of auction and competitive bidding. Econometrica, 50(5), 1089–1122.
Resnick, P. & Zeckhauser, R. (2002). Trust among strangers in internet transactions: empirical analysis of eBay’s reputation system. The Economics of the Internet and E-Commerce. M. R. Baye (ed.), Volume 11 of Advances in Applied Microeconomics. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, 127–157.
Reynolds, S. S. & Wooders, J. (2003). Auctions with buy price. Working paper, University of Arizona.
Riley, J. G., & Samuelson, W. F. (1981). Optimal auctions. American Economic Review, 71(3), 381–392.
Roth, A. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2002). Last-minute bidding and the rules for ending second-price auctions: evidence from eBay and Amazon auctions on the internet. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1093–1103.
Shimp, T. A., & Bearden, W. O. (1982). Warranty and other extrinsic cue effects on consumers’ risk perception. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 38–46.
Simonsohn, U., & Ariely, D. (2008). When rational sellers face nonrational buyers: evidence from herding on eBay. Management Science, 54(9), 1624–1637.
Soberman, D. A. (2003). Simultaneous signaling and screening with warranties. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(2), 176–192.
Standifird, S. S. (2001). Reputation and e-Commerce: eBay auctions and the asymmetrical impact of positive and negative ratings. Journal of Management, 27(3), 279–295.
Standifird, S. S., Roelofs, M. R., & Durham, Y. (2005). The impact of eBay’s buy-it-now function on bidder behavior. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9(2), 167–176.
Suter, T. A., & Hardesty, D. M. (2005). Maximizing earnings and price fairness perceptions in online consumer-to-consumer auctions. Journal of Retailing, 81(4), 307–317.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
Wiener, J. L. (1985). Are warranties accurate signals of product reliability? Journal of Consumer Research, 12(2), 245–250.
Wilcox, R. T. (2000). Experts and amateurs: the role of experience in internet auctions. Marketing Letters, 11(4), 363–374.
Wilson, R. (1980). The nature of equilibrium in markets with adverse selection. Bell Journal of Economics, 11(1), 108–130.
Yin, P. -L. (2005). Information dispersion and auction prices. Working Paper, Harvard Business School.
Responsible editor: Hans-Dieter Zimmermann
About this article
Cite this article
Hou, J., Blodgett, J. Market structure and quality uncertainty: a theoretical framework for online auction research. Electron Markets 20, 21–32 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-010-0026-y
- Online auctions
- Auction price
- Quality uncertainty
- Market structure
- Thick market
- Thin market