Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mapping and Electronic Publishing of Shoreline Changes using UAV Remote Sensing and GIS

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The shoreline is one of the most important dynamic linear features on the earth’s surface, thus the shoreline detection and monitoring are an important task. The study of coastal system processes and coastal zone management (CZM) requires information about the shoreline and their changes. The reason for shoreline changes in the coastal zones mainly focuses on, various activities such as natural and anthropogenic activities. This study describes the utilization of satellite and an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing (R/S) to detect shoreline changes between 1989 and 2017 and identify the rate of change of shoreline for ~ 8.7 km of Cuddalore District, Tamil Nadu, India. UAV R/S is used to acquire the high resolution of aerial nadir image with low cost and short time periods for on-demand areas. Visual interpretation method has been employed to delineate the shoreline from different periods of satellite and UAV images with various resolutions. The vector overlay technique (VOT) assess the area of shoreline changes for different periods between 1989 and 2017. The tool named as digital shoreline analysis system (DSAS) was utilized to find the rate of shoreline changes. This study concludes changes of regression and transgression by using end point rate (EPR) is between − 5.3 m and + 5.99 m. The plus sign ( +) indicates regression (sea converted to land) and minus sign (–) represents the transgression (land converted to sea) of shoreline. Each and every period of shoreline change were arranged in a continuous frame to make a video and published in webGIS. In future coastal management studies, UAV and R/S can be effective alternative methods to the traditional aerial surveys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al Bakri, D. (1996). Natural hazards of shoreline bluff erosion: a case study of horizon view, Lake Huron. Geomorphology, 17, 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anfuso, G., & Martinez Del Pozo, J. A. (2009). Assessment of coastal vulnerability through the use of GIS tools in South Sicily (Italy). Environmental Management, 43, 533–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mujabar Sheik., & Chandrasekar. (2011). A shoreline change analysis along the coast between Kanyakumari and Tuticorin, India, using digital shoreline analysis system. Geo-spatial information science, 14, 282–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciavola, P., Mantovani, F., Simeoni, U., & Tessari, U. (1999). Relation between river dynamics and coastal changes in Albania: an assessment integrating satellite imagery with historical data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20, 561–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowell, M., Leatherman, S. P., & Buckley, M. (1993). Shoreline change rate analysis: long term versus short term data. Shore and Beach, 61, 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, R., Hayden, B. P., May, P., & May, S. K. (1980). The reliability of shoreline change measurements from aerial photographs. Shore and Beach, 48(4), 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drummond, C. D., Harley, M. D., Turner, I. L., Matheen, A. N. A. & Glamore, W. C. (2015) UAV applications to coastal engineering. In Australasian Coasts & Ports Conference 2015: 22nd Australasian Coastal and Ocean Engineering Conference and the 15th Australasian Port and Harbour Conference 2015 (p. 267). Engineers Australia and IPENZ.

  • Gonçalves, J. A., & Henriques, R. (2015). UAV photogrammetry for topographic monitoring of coastal areas. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing., 30(104), 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guariglia, A., Buonamassa, A., Losurdo, A., Saladino, R., Trivigno, M. L., Zaccagnino, A., & Colangelo, A. (2006). A multisource approach for coastline mapping and identification of shoreline changes. Annals of Geophysics, 49(1), 295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaamin, M., Daud, M. E., Sanik, M. E., Ahmad, N. F. A., Ngadiman, M. M. N., & Yahya, F. R. (2016). Mapping Shoreline Position Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Applied Science and Technology (ICAST’18), 2016, pp. 1–6.

  • Kaamin, M., Ngadiman, N., Razali, S. N. M., Ahmad, N. F. A., Bukari, S. M., Kadir, A. A., Hamid, N. B. (2017). The application of micro UAV in construction project. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 2017 (October), (Vol. 1891(1), p. 020070).

  • Li, R., Di, K., & Ma, R. (2001). A Comparative Study of Shoreline Mapping Techniques. In: The 4th International Symposium on Computer Mapping and GIS for Coastal Zone Management, Halifa, Nova Scotia, Canada, 2001, June 18–20.

  • Natesan, U., Parthasarathy, A., Vishnunath, R., Kumar, G. E. J., & Ferrer, V. A. (2015). Monitoring longterm shoreline changes along Tamil Nadu India using geospatial techniques. Aquatic Procedia, 4, 325–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, D. J., & Bauer, B. O. (1993). Coastal geomorphology through the looking glass. Geomorphology, 7, 225–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thieler, E. R., Himmelstoss, E. A., Zichichi, J. L., & Ergul, A. (2017). Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) version 4.0-An ArcGIS extension for calculating shoreline change (ver. 4.4, July 2017): U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1278.

  • Turner, I. L., Harley, M. D., & Drummond, C. D. (2016). UAVs for coastal surveying. Coastal Engineering., 31(114), 19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vittal Hegdea, A., Akshayab, B. J. (2015). International conference on Water Resources, Coastal and Ocean Engineering,. Aquatic Procedia 4, pp.151–156.

  • Yang, X., Damen, M. C. J., & Van Zuidam, R. A. (1999). Use of thematic mapper imagery with a geographic information system for geomorphologic mapping in a large deltaic lowland environment. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20, 659–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, C. I., & Oh, T. S. (2016). Beach Volume Change Using UAV Photogrammetry Songjung Beach, Korea. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences – ISPRS Archives, 41(July), (pp. 1201–1205).

  • Zuzek, P. J., Nairn, R. B., & Thieme, S. J. (2003). Spatial and temporal consideration for calculating shoreline change rates in the Great Lakes Basin. Journal of Coastal Research, 38, 125–146.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Shenbagaraj.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary file 1 (DOCX 6172 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shenbagaraj, N., Senthil kumar, K., Rasheed, A.M. et al. Mapping and Electronic Publishing of Shoreline Changes using UAV Remote Sensing and GIS. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 49, 1769–1777 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-020-01287-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-020-01287-1

Keywords

Navigation