Analysis and Integration of Surface and Subsurface Information of Different Bridges

Abstract

Road transportation is one of the major sources of transportation. Bridges are one of the vital engineering structures which have a major impact on the road transportation system. Bridges provide connectivity between two sides of the river banks or untouched paths to ease the travel. The strength of the bridge can get deteriorated due to heavy traffic and aggressive weather conditions. Evaluation of the condition of the bridges traditionally can be more expensive and time-consuming. The other way is by using remote sensing techniques that are nondestructive and advantageous. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and close-range photogrammetry (CRP) are more suitable noninvasive techniques to generate a detailed 3D point cloud model of real objects. Point clouds obtained from TLS and CRP are merged together to produce point cloud dataset (PCD). The PCD can be georeferenced with the help of differential global positioning system points near the structure and total station points on the surface of the structure. The surface analysis for the features like corrosion, vegetation, biological crust, water presence, etc. can be extracted using the PCD and images obtained from digital single-lens reflex camera. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) can be utilized for generating subsurface 2D and 3D profile scans. Subsurface analysis features like the presence of pier/abutment, water, voids, rebars, crack, asphalt layer, deck layer, etc. can be extracted with the GPR scan profiles. The surface and subsurface information can be visualized together to understand the surface or subsurface features corresponding to each other’s location. Accuracy assessments of the classified images and the classified points of the PCD are done in this research, and the accuracies obtained were 79.69% and 92.494%, respectively. The ground-truth validations were done with the help of laser distometer and measuring tape to precisely compare the values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

References

  1. Altuntas, C., Karabork, H., & Tusat, E. (2014). Georeferencing of ground-based LIDAR data using continuously operating reference stations. Optical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.53.11.114110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arias, P., Armesto, J., Di-Capua, D., González-Drigo, R., Lorenzo, H., & Pérez-Gracia, V. (2007). Digital photogrammetry, GPR and computational analysis of structural damages in a mediaeval bridge. Engineering Failure Analysis,14(8), 1444–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2007.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ata, M., Abouhamad, M., Serror, H., Marzouk, M., & Abdelakder, E. (2018). On the use of ground penetrating radar for bridge deck assessment. DEStech Transactions on Computer Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.12783/dtcse/csae2017/17510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bubeck, A., Wilkinson, M., Roberts, G. P., Cowie, P. A., McCaffrey, K. J. W., Phillips, R., et al. (2014). The tectonic geomorphology of bedrock scarps on active normal faults in the Italian Apenninesmapped using combined ground penetrating radar and terrestrial laser scanning. Geomorphology Journal,44(April 2014), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.03.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Camilo, D., Duarte, D. O., Zanetti, J., & Junior, J. G. (2016). Comparison of supervised classification methods of Maximum Likelihood image, Minimum Distance, Parallelepiped and Neural network in images of Unmanned Air Vehicle (UAV) in Viçosa-MG. Proceeding. https://doi.org/10.14393/rbcv70n2-45377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. González-Jorge, H., Gonzalez-Aguilera, D., Rodriguez-Gonzalvez, P., & Arias, P. (2012). Monitoring biological crusts in civil engineering structures using intensity data from terrestrial laser scanners. Construction and Building Materials,31, 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guldur, B., Yan, Y., & Hajjar, J. (2015). Condition assessment of bridges using terrestrial laser scanners. Strcuture. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479117.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hasan, M. I., & Yazdani, N. (2014). Ground penetrating radar utilization in exploring inadequate concrete covers in a new bridge deck. Case Studies in Construction Materials,1, 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2014.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hugenschmidt, J. (2002). Concrete bridge inspection with a mobile GPR system. Construction and Building Materials,16(January), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(02)00015-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jahanshahi, M. R., Kelly, J. S., Masri, S. F., & Sukhatme, G. S. (2009). A survey and evaluation of promising approaches for automatic image-based defect detection of bridge structures. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470801945930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Krysinski, L., & Sudyka, J. (2016). Case Study of Step-frequency Radar Application in Evaluation of Complex Pavement Structure. Transportation Research Procedia,14, 2930–2935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kushwaha, S. K. P., Dayal, K. R., Raghavendra, S., Pande, H., Agrawal, S., Sachchidanand, et al. (2020). 3D digital documentation of a cultural heritage site using terrestrial laser scannerA case study.pdf. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7067-0_3.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kushwaha, S. K. P., Pande, H., & Raghavendra, S. (2018). Digital documentation, bridge deck linearity deformation and deck thickness measurement using terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) and close range photogrammetry (CRP) (pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-iv-5-47-2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lachowicz, J., & Rucka, M. (2015). Application of GPR method in diagnostics of reinforced concrete structures. Diagnostyka,16(2), 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lagüela, S., Solla, M., Puente, I., & Prego, F. J. (2018). Joint use of GPR, IRT and TLS techniques for the integral damage detection in paving. Construction and Building Materials,174, 749–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lorenzo, H., & Arias, P. (2005). A Methodology for Rapid Archaeological Site Documentation Using Ground- Penetrating Radar and Terrestrial Photogrammetry,20(5), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.20061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rabah, M., Elhattab, A., & Fayad, A. (2013). Automatic concrete cracks detection and mapping of terrestrial laser scan data. NRIAG Journal of Astronomy and Geophysics,2(2), 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrjag.2013.12.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rafezi, H., Novo, A., & Hassani, F. P. (2015). An Investigation Into Application of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) in Surface Mining. Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems,2015(March), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.4133/SAGEEP.28-006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schuhmacher, S., & Bohm, J. (2005). Georefferencing of terrestrial laserscanner data for applications in architectural modelling, In Procedings. https://www.isprs.org/proceedings/XXXVI/5-W17/.

  20. Szymczyk, M., & Szymczyk, P. (2013). Preprocessing of GPR data. Image Processing & Communications,18(2–3), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10248-012-0082-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Trela, C., Wstmann, J., & Kruschwitz, S. (2008). Contribution of radar measurements to the inspection and condition assessment of railway bridges—Case study at a historic masonry arch bridge in Olenica/Poland. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.2495/HPSM080541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yogender, R. S., & Kushwaha, S. K. P. (2020). Role of ground control points (GCP’s) in integration of terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) and close range photogrammetry(CRP).pdf. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7067-0_42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the PRSD (Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Department) and GSD (Geosciences Department) scientists of IIRS (Indian Institute of Remote Sensing), ISRO, Dehradun, for providing all the instrumental and infrastructural support during this research. The authors would like to convey special thanks to Arunima, Karun, Abhishek, Sachchidanand, Shashwat, Sana and Yogender, for helping during the field work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunni Kanta Prasad Kushwaha.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kushwaha, S.K.P., Raghavendra, S., Pande, H. et al. Analysis and Integration of Surface and Subsurface Information of Different Bridges. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 48, 315–331 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-019-01087-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS)
  • Close-range photogrammetry (CRP)
  • Differential global positioning system (DGPS)
  • Georeferencing
  • Ground-penetrating radar (GPR)
  • Image classification
  • Surface and subsurface analysis
  • Point cloud classification