Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identification of Groundwater Prospect in Bara Region of Allahabad District Based on Hydro-Geomorphological Analysis Using Satellite Imagery

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water scarcity is a major problem for villagers’ survival as it determines the population density and affects the migration pattern in Bara region. In the present study, groundwater resource endowment is studied and correlated with the distributional pattern of population, settlements and economic activity for analysing regional development in the study area. The study has been carried out using geospatial platforms, i.e. Erdas Imagine 2014 and ArcGis 10.2.2 software. Sentinel-2 satellite imagery and Cartosat-1 DEM data were the major data sources for extracting factor layers. Geomorphology and lineament maps of NRSC, District Resource Map of GSI, topographic maps and Google Earth images along with field surveys were ancillary database. Saaty’s 9-point rating scale of analytical hierarchy process was used to extract the GWPI by integrating factor layers of geomorphology, lineament density, slope, geology, rainfall, drainage density and land use land cover according to their relative influence. Final map shows different zones of groundwater prospects in the study region, which is validated from aquifer thickness data. Result shows that 39.19% (291.41 km2) of the total area (743.64 km2) is classified as high-to-excellent GWP, whereas 27.96% (207.89 km2) of the area is under very poor-to-poor GWP. Areas having poor-to-poorest groundwater storage impact on population distribution, as 14% of the total population is lying over these zones. The descriptive statistical analysis showed that CGWPI and built-up area are significantly correlated (F = 18.024 > 4.41*, t = − 4.245 > 2.101, R2 = 50.03%). CGWPI is also correlated significantly with population density (F = 18.855 > 4.41*, t = -4.342 > 2.101, R2 = 50.16%). However, the relationship is not very high on linear regression model as expected since only 50% variations in population distribution can be attributed to CGWPI, for example, the Shankargarh town having the highest population density and the second highest built-up percentage in the whole study area in spite of being endowed with the lowest groundwater potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, E., Agarwal, R., Garg, R. D., & Garg, P. K. (2013a). Delineation of groundwater potential zone: An AHP/ANP approach. Journal of Earth System Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-013-0309-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, E., et al. (2013b). Delineation of groundwater potential zone: An AHP/ANP approach. Journal of Earth System Science, 122(3), 887–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deepesh, M., Jha, M. K., & Mal, B. C. (2011). Assessment of groundwater potential in a semi-arid region of India using remote sensing, GIS and MCDM techniques. Water Resources Management, 25(5), 1359–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deepika, B., Avinash, K., & Jayappa, K. S. (2013). Integration of hydrological factors and demarcation of groundwater prospect zones: Insights from remote sensing and GIS techniques. Environmental Earth Sciences, 70, 1319–1338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinesh Kumar, P. K., Gopinath, G., & Seralathan, P. (2007). Application of remote sensing and GIS for the demarcation of groundwater potential zones of a river basin in Kerala, southwest coast of India. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(24), 5583–5601. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160601086050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • District Resources Map. (2001). Geological Survey of India, Lucknow.

  • Dunning, D. J., Ross, Q. E., & Merkhofer, M. W. (2000). Multiattribute utility analysis for addressing Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act. Environmental Science & Policy, 3, 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engman, E. T., & Gurney, R. J. (1991). Remote sensing in hydrology (p. 225). London: Chapman and Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hajkowicz, S., & Higgins, A. (2008). A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. European Journal of Operational Research, 184, 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha, M. K., Chowdary, V. M., & Chowdhury, A. (2010). Groundwater assessment in Salboni Block, West Bengal (India) using remote sensing, geographical information system and multi-criteria decision analysis techniques. Hydrogeology Journal, 18(7), 1713–1728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-010-0631-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha, M. K., Chowdhury, A., Chowdary, V. M., & Peiffer, S. (2007). Groundwater management and development by integrated remote sensing and geographic information systems: Prospects and constraints. Water Resources Management, 21, 427–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joubert, A., Stewart, T. J., & Eberhard, R. (2003). Evaluation of water supply augmentation and water demand management options for the City of Cape Town. Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis, 12, 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy, J., Venkatesa Kumar, N., Jayaraman, V., & Manivel, M. (1996). An approach to demarcate ground water potential zones through remote sensing and a geographical information system. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17, 1867–1884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., & Pandey, A. C. (2016). Geoinformatics based groundwater potential assessment in hard rock terrain of Ranchi urban environment, Jharkhand state (India) using MCDM-AHP techniques. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 2–3, 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2016.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machiwal, D., Jha, M. K., & Mal, B. C. (2011). Assessment of groundwater potential in a semi-arid region of India using remote sensing, GIS and MCDM techniques. Water Resources Management, 2011(25), 1359–1386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9749-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magesh, N. S., Chandrasekar, N., & Soundranayagam, J. P. (2012). Delineation of groundwater potential zones in Theni district, Tamil Nadu, using remote sensing, GIS and MIF techniques. Geoscience Frontiers, 3(2), 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, D., & Singh, B. N. (2017). Classification and assessment of land use land cover in Bara Tahsil of Allahabad district using Sentinel-2 satellite imagery. In Conference Paper, 38th Asian conference on remote sensing – space applications: Touching human lives, ACRS.

  • Mohanty, C., & Behera, S. C. (2010). Integrated remote sensing and GIS study for hydrogeomorphological mapping and delineation of groundwater potential zones in Khallikote Block, Ganjam District, Orissa. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 38(2), 345–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal, M. S., Pandey, A. C., & Garg, R. D. (2007). Groundwater prospects evaluation based on hydrogeomorphological mapping using high resolution satellite images: A case study in Uttarakhand. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 36, 69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu, E., & Pereyra-Rojas, M. (2017). Understanding the analytic hierarchy process. In: Practical decision making. Springer Briefs in operations research. Cham: Springer.

  • Musa, K. A., Akhir, J. M., & Abdullah, I. (2009). Groundwater prediction potential zone in Langat Basin using the integration of remote sensing and GIS. https://www.geospatialworld.net.

  • NRSA. (1999). National rural drinking water mission methodology manual for preparation of groundwater prospects maps. Hyderabad: National Remote Sensing Agency, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perzina, R., & Ramik, J. (2012). DAME-Microsoft Excel add-in for solving multicriteria decision problems with scenarios. In Proceedings of 30th international conference mathematical methods in economics.

  • Pinto, D., Shrestha, S., Babel, M. S., & Ninsawat, S. (2017). Delineation of groundwater potential zones in the Comoro watershed, Timor Leste using GIS, remote sensing and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) technique. Applied Water Science, 7(1), 503–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, B., Singh, R. P., & Buchroithner, M. F. (2006). Estimation of stress and its use in evaluation of landslide prone regions using remote sensing data. Advances in Space Research, 37, 698–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, B., & Youssef, A. M. (2010). Manifestation of remote sensing data and GIS for landslide hazard analysis using spatial-based statistical models. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 3(3), 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-009-0089-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahmati, O., Nazari Samani, A., Mahdavi, M., et al. (2015). Groundwater potential mapping at Kurdistan region of Iran using analytic hierarchy process and GIS. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 8, 7059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1668-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajvani, S. P., Brindha, K., et al. (2013). Spatial and temporal variation of groundwater level and its relation to drainage and intrusive rocks in a part of Nalgonda District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 42(4), 765–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation (p. 287). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1999). Fundamentals of the analytic network process. In International symposium of the analytic hierarchy process (ISAHP), Kobe, Japan.

  • Saaty, T. L. (2004). Fundamentals of the analytic network process—Multiple networks with benefits, costs, opportunities and risks. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 13(3), 348–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo, S., Jha, M. K., Kumar, N., et al. (2015). Evaluation of GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis and probabilistic modeling for exploring groundwater prospects. Environmental Earth Sciences, 74, 2223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4213-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samson, S., & Elangovan, K. (2015). Delineation of groundwater recharge potential zones in Namakkal District, Tamilnadu, India. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 43(2015), 769–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sander, P., Chesley, M. M., & Minor, T. B. (1996). Groundwater assessment using remote sensing and GIS in a rural groundwater project in Ghana: Lessons learned. Hydrogeology Journal, 4, 40–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saraf, A. K., Choudhury, P. R., Roy, B., Sarma, B., Vijay, S., & Choudhury, S. (2004). GIS based surface hydrological modelling in identification of ground water recharge zones. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25, 5759–5770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shekhar, S., & Panday, A. C. (2014). Delineation of groundwater potential zone in hard rock terrain of India using remote sensing, geographical information system (GIS) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) techniques. Geocarto International, 30, 402–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shekhar, S., & Pandey, A. C. (2014). Delineation of groundwater potential zone in hard rock terrain of India using remote sensing, geographical information system (GIS) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) techniques. Geocarto International. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2014.894584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, P. K., & Bhattacharya, A. K. (2006). Groundwater assessment through an integrated approach using remote sensing, GIS and resistivity techniques: A case study from a hard rock terrain. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(20), 4599–4620. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600554983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sujit, M. (2012). Remote sensing and GIS based ground water potential mapping of Kangshabati irrigation command area. Journal of Geography and Natural Disasters, 1(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakker, A. et al. (2014). Land use Land cover classification of Remote Sensing Data and their derived products in a Heterogeneous Landscape of a Khan-Kali Watershed, Gujarat. Asian Journal of Geoinformatics, 14(4). ISSN: 1513-6728.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Author Miss Deeksha Mishra is indepthly acknowledged University Grant Commission (UGC), New Delhi, for providing financial support through NET-JRF Fellowship scheme; Training Division, National Remote Sensing Centre (NRSC), ISRO, Hyderabad, for giving training opportunity in Geospatial Technologies and its applications; and Prof. B.N. Singh for their valuable time and useful and practical suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deeksha Mishra.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishra, D., Singh, B.N. Identification of Groundwater Prospect in Bara Region of Allahabad District Based on Hydro-Geomorphological Analysis Using Satellite Imagery. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 47, 1257–1273 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-019-00984-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-019-00984-w

Keywords

Navigation