Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mapping and Change Detection Study of Nepal-2015 Earthquake Induced Landslides

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The devastating earthquake that struck Nepal in 25 April (Mw7.8) and 12 May (Mw7.3) 2015 have triggered numerous landslides and reactivated existing landslides extending over large areas. These two shocks mostly affected the northwest and northeast region of Kathmandu which accelerated large region along with southward up thrusting in the region. To detect the event of the landslides in time and space satellite images have been analysed using space remote sensing techniques like pseudo colour transformation technique and was employed to pre and post-earthquake images of the event to bring out only landslide affected areas from the image by masking the remaining part, where field based survey of the landslides provided information on real nature of it, slope and rock type. Surprisingly the observed mass movements are mostly belong to debris flow and rock fall types beginning from the top part of the ridge slope with south-westerly faces i.e. sun facing. Further, satellite images of different dates could be gathered which facilitated analysis on development of landslide with time. This study also revealed that the NE–SW trending geological faults have controlled the landslide occurrence especially in Ramche area and along the Bagmati river valley near Shital-chowk village on Kathmandu-Hetauda road.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • CESMD (Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data). Accessed on August 26, 2015, from http://www.strongmotioncenter.org/.

  • Coppin, P., Jonckheere, I., Nackaerts, K., Muys, B., & Lambin, E. (2004). Review article digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: A review. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25, 1565–1596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deer, P. (1995). Digital change detection techniques in remote sensing. Technical Report, DSTOTR-0169. Department of Defence, Australia (p. 52).

  • Desclée, B., Bogaert, P., & Defourny, P. (2006). Forest change detection by statistical object-based method. Remote Sensing of Environment, 102, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GSI. (2000). Seismotectonic atlas of India and its environs. Published by Geological Survey of India (2000), P. L. Narula, S. K. Acharyya, & J. Banerjee (Eds.), 43 sheets.

  • GSI (Geospatial Information Authority of Japan). Accessed on August 26, 2015, from http://www.gsi.go.jp/cais/topic150429-index-e.html.

  • Hall, O., & Hay, G. J. (2003). A multiscale object-specific approach to digital change detection. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 4, 311–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilsever, M., & Ünsalan, C. (2012). Two-dimensional change detection methods remote sensing applications. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, A., Corpetti, T., & Hubert-Moy, L. (2008). Object-oriented approach and texture analysis for change detection in very high resolution images. In Geoscience and remote sensing symposium, 2008. IGARSS 2008. IEEE international (pp. IV-663–IV-666).

  • Lillesand, T. M., Kiefer, R. W., & Chipman, J. W. (2008). Remote sensing and image interpretation (6th ed., p. 736). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, D., Mausel, P., Brondízio, E., & Moran, E. (2004). Change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25, 2365–2401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunetta, R. S., Johnson, D. M., Lyon, J. G., & Crotwell, J. (2004). Impacts of imagery temporal frequency on land-cover change detection monitoring. Remote Sensing of Environment, 89, 444–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malila, W. A. (1980). Change vector analysis: An approach for detecting forest changes with Landsat. In 6th Annual Symposium on Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana (pp. 326–335).

  • Martha, T. R., Kerle, N., Jetten, V., Western, C. J., & Kumar, K. V. (2010). Characterising spectral, spatial and morphometric properties of landslides for semi-automatic detection using object-oriented methods. Geomorphology, 116, 24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martha, T. R., Kerle, N., Western, C. J., Jetten, V., & Kumar, K. V. (2012). Object-oriented analysis of multi-temporal panchromatic images for creation of historical landslide inventories. Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 67, 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martha, T. R., Roy, P., Mazumdar, R., Govindharaj, K. B., & Kumar, K. V. (2017). Spatial characteristics of landslides triggered by the 2015 Mw 7.8 (Gorkha) and Mw 7.3 (Dolakha) earthquakes in Nepal. Landslides, 14, 697–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. F. (1983). Detecting forest canopy change due to insect activity using Landsat MSS. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 49, 1303–1314.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSC (National Seismological Center), Nepal. Accessed on August 25, 2015, from http://www.seismonepal.gov.np/.

  • Rignot, E. J. M., & van Zyl, J. J. (1993). Change detection techniques for ERS-1 SAR data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 31, 896–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saraf, A. K. (1998a). Jabalpur earthquake of 22 May 1997: Assessing the causes and damages using remote sensing and GIS techniques. GIS@Development, January–February (pp. 24–28).

  • Saraf, A. K. (1998b). Jabalpur earthquake of 22 May 1997: Assessing the damage using remote sensing and GIS techniques. In Proceedings of the 11th symposium on earthquake engineering (Vol. I, pp. 103–116), University of Roorkee, Roorkee, 17–19 December 1998.

  • Saraf, A. K. (2000). IRS-1C-PAN depicts Chamoli earthquake induced landslides in Garhwal Himalayas, India. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21, 2345–2352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saraf, A. K., Das, J., & Rawat, V. (2009). Satellite based detection of early occurring of co-seismic landslides. Journal of South Asia Disaster Study (Journal of SAARC Disaster Management Centre), 2(1), 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, I., & Saraf, A. K. (1999). Some observations of the Chamoli earthquake-induced damage using ground and satellite data. Current Science, 78, 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. (1989). Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 6, 989–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USGS. (2015). Earthquake hazards program. Accessed on June 15, 2015, from http://earthquake.usgs.gov/.

  • USGS Earth Explores. Accessed on August 11, 2015, from http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are greatly indebted to Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES), New Delhi for financial assistance and International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Kathmandu, Nepal for valuable interaction during our field visit to Nepal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suman S. Baral.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, K., Saraf, A.K., Das, J. et al. Mapping and Change Detection Study of Nepal-2015 Earthquake Induced Landslides. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 46, 605–615 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-017-0720-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-017-0720-8

Keywords