Advertisement

Impact of the Atatürk Dam Lake on Agro-Meteorological Aspects of the Southeastern Anatolia Region, Turkey

  • Orkan Özcan
  • Bodo Bookhagen
  • Nebiye Musaoğlu
Research Article
  • 239 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, the spatial and temporal impacts of the Atatürk Dam on agro-meteorological aspects of the Southeastern Anatolia region have been investigated. Change detection and environmental impacts due to water-reserve changes in Atatürk Dam Lake have been determined and evaluated using multi-temporal Landsat satellite imageries and meteorological datasets within a period of 1984–2011. These time series have been evaluated for three time periods. Dam construction period constitutes the first part of the study. Land cover/use changes especially on agricultural fields under the Atatürk Dam Lake and its vicinity have been identified between the periods of 1984–1992. The second period comprises the 10-year period after the completion of filling up the reservoir in 1992. At this period, Landsat and meteorological time-series analyses are examined to assess the impact of the Atatürk Dam Lake on selected irrigated agricultural areas. For the last 9-year period from 2002 to 2011, the relationships between seasonal water-reserve changes and irrigated plains under changing climatic factors primarily driving vegetation activity (monthly, seasonal, and annual fluctuations of rainfall rate, air temperature, humidity) on the watershed have been investigated using a 30-year meteorological time series. The results showed that approximately 368 km2 of agricultural fields have been affected because of inundation due to the Atatürk Dam Lake. However, irrigated agricultural fields have been increased by 56.3% of the total area (1552 of 2756 km2) on Harran Plain within the period of 1984–2011.

Keywords

Atatürk Dam Lake Harran Plain Landsat time-series Tasseled Cap transformation Disturbance index 

References

  1. Akyurek, G., (2005). Impact of Atatürk Dam on social and environmental aspects of the Southeastern Anatolia Project. M.Sc. METU Civil Engineering, 140 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Ali, A. M., & Saaed, Z. S. (2016). Analysis of recorded inflow data of Atatürk reservoir. Journal of Engineering, 3(22), 89–110.Google Scholar
  3. Aydogdu, M. H., & Bilgic, A. (2016). An evaluation of farmers’ willingness to pay for efficient irrigation for sustainable usage of resources: the Gap-Harran Plain case, Turkey. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 13(2–4), 175–186. doi: 10.1080/1943815X.2016.1241808.Google Scholar
  4. Aydogdu, M. H., Yenigun, K., & Aydogdu, M. (2015). Factors affecting farmers’ satisfaction from water user associations in the Harran Plain-GAP region, Turkey. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 17, 1669–1684.Google Scholar
  5. Chance, E. W., Cobourn, K. M., Thomas, V. A., Dawson, B. C., & Flores, A. N. (2017). Identifying irrigated areas in the Snake River Plain, Idaho: Evaluating performance across composting algorithms. Spectral Indices, and Sensors, Remote Sensing, 9(6), 546. doi: 10.3390/rs9060546.Google Scholar
  6. Cetin, H., Laman, M., Ertunc, A. (2000). Settlement and slaking problems in the world’s fourth largest rock-fill dam, the Ataturk Dam in Turkey. Engineering Geology 56, 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, W., & Goward, S. (2004). Landsat’s role in ecological applications of remote sensing. BioScience, 54, 535–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, W., Spies, T., Alig, R., Oetter, D., Maiersperger, T., & Fiorella, M. (2002). Characterizing 23 years (1972–95) of stand replacement disturbance in western Oregon forests with Landsat imagery. Ecosystems, 5, 122–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crist, E. P., & Cicone, R. C. (1984). A physically-based transformation of thematic mapper data—The Tm Tasseled Cap. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote sensing, 22, 256–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crist, E. P., & Kauth, R. J. (1986). The tasseled cap de-mystified. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 52(1), 81–86.Google Scholar
  11. DSI. (2013). Agriculture and irrigation. Ankara: DSİ Genel Müdürlüğü. (In Turkish).Google Scholar
  12. Dymond, C. C., Mladenoff, D. J., & Radeloff, V. C. (2002). Phenological differences in tasseled cap indices improve deciduous forest classification. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80(3), 460–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Franklin, S. E., Lavigne, M. B., Moskal, L. M., Wulder, M. A., & McCaffrey, T. M. (2001). Interpretation of forest harvest conditions in New Brunswick using Landsat TM enhanced wetness difference imagery (EWDI). Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 27, 118–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. GAP. (2012). GAP administration, recent status in GAP (p. 6). Sanliurfa: GAP Publishing Units.Google Scholar
  15. Gómez, C., White, J. C., & Wulder, M. A. (2016). Optical remotely sensed time series data for land cover classification: A review. Isprs Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 116, 55–72. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.03.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guo, Z., & Du, S. (2017). Mining parameter information for building extraction and change detection with very high-resolution imagery and GIS data. Giscience & Remote Sensing, 54(1), 38–63. doi: 10.1080/15481603.2016.1250328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hais, M., Jonasova, M., Langhammer, J., & Kucera, T. (2009). Comparison of two types of forest disturbance using multitemporal Landsat TM/ETM+ imagery and field vegetation data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, 835–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Healey, S. P., Cohen, W. B., Yang, Z. Q., & Krankina, O. N. (2005). Comparison of Tasseled Cap-based Landsat data structures for use in forest disturbance detection. Remote Sensing of Environment, 97, 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang, C., Wylie, B., Yang, L., Homer, C., & Zylstra, G. (2002). Derivation of a tasseled cap transformation based on Landsat 7 at-satellite reflectance. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23, 1741–1748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaisheng, L., & Fulu, T. (2017). Method for wetland type extraction using remote sensing combing object-oriented and tasseled cap transformation. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 33(3), 198–203.Google Scholar
  21. Kolars, J.F., Mitchell, W.A., (1991). The euphrates river and the southeast anatolia development project. USA: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kauth, R., & Thomas, G. (1976). The tasselled cap—A graphical description of the spectral– temporal development of agricultural crops as seen by Landsat.In Proceedings of the symposium on machine processing of remotely sensed data (pp. 4B-41–4B-51). Indiana: Purdue University of West Lafayette.Google Scholar
  23. Linke, J., Franklin, S. E., Hall-Beyer, M., & Stenhouse, G. (2008). Effects of cutline density and land-cover heterogeneity on landscape metrics in western Alberta. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 34(4), 390–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Masek, J. G., Huang, C. Q., Wolfe, R., Cohen, W., Hall, F., Kutler, J., Nelson, P. (2008). North American forest disturbance mapped from a decadal Landsat record. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112, 2914–2926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Masek, J. G., Vermote, E. F., Saleous, N. E., Wolfe, R., Hall, F. G., Huemmrich, K. F., Gao, F., Kutler, J., Lim, T. K. (2006). A Landsat surface reflectance dataset for North America, 1990–2000. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 3(1), 68–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moon, H., Choi, T., Kim, G., Park, N., Park, H., & Choi, J. (2017). Land cover classification of RapidEye satellite images using tasseled cap transformation (TCT). Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 33(1), 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ozcan, O., (2007). Evaluation of flood risk analysis in Sakarya river sub-basin by using remote sensing and GIS, M. sc. ITU Informatics Institute, Istanbul (in Turkish).Google Scholar
  28. Ozdogan, M., (2004). The hydroclimatologic effects of irrigation in Southeastern Turkey’, Ph.D. Dissertation, Geography Department, Boston University, 168 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Ozdogan, M., Woodcock, C. E., Salvucci, G. D., & Demir, H. (2006). Changes in Summer irrigated crop area and water use in southeastern Turkey from 1993 to 2002: Implications for current and future water resources. Water Resources Management, 20, 467–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ozdogan, M., Yang, Y., Allez, G., & Cervantes, C. (2010). Remote sensing of irrigated agriculture: Opportunities and challenges. Remote Sens., 2010(2), 2274–2304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pax-Lenney, M., & Woodcock, C. E. (1997). The effect of spatial resolution on the ability to monitor the status of agricultural lands. Remote Sensing of Environment, 61, 210–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Potter, C., Tan, P. N., Steinbach, M., Klooster, S., Kumar, V., Myneni, R., Genovese, V. (2003). Major disturbance events in terrestrial ecosystems detected using global satellite data sets. Global Change Biology, 9(7), 1005–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Qui, B., Zhang, K., Tang, Z., Chen, C., & Wang, Z. (2017). Developing soil indices based on brightness, darkness, and greenness to improve land surface mapping accuracy. GIScience and Remote Sensing. doi: 10.1080/15481603.2017.1328758.Google Scholar
  34. Senturk, S., Bagis, S., Ustundag, B. (2014). Application of remote sensing techniques in locating dry and irrigated farmland parcels. In The third international conference on agro-geoinformatics, Beijing, 2014, (pp. 1–4), doi: 10.1109/Agro-Geoinformatics.2014.6910630.Google Scholar
  35. Serra, P., & Pons, X. (2008). Monitoring farmers’ decisions on Mediterranean irrigated crops using satellite image time series. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(8), 2293–2316. doi: 10.1080/01431160701408444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Seto, K. C., Woodcock, C. E., Song, C., Huang, X., Lu, J., & Kaufmann, R. K. (2002). Monitoring land-use change in the Pearl River Delta using Landsat TM. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23, 1985–2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Song, C., Woodcock, C. E., Seto, K. C., Lenney, M. P., & Macomber, S. A. (2001). Classification and change detection using Landsat TM data: When and how to correct atmospheric effects? Remote Sensing of Environment, 75, 230–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tortajada, C. (2001). Environmental Sustainability of Water Projects Doctoral Thesis Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  39. Vogelmann, J. E., Howard, S. M., Yang, L., Larson, C. R., Wylie, B. K., & Van Driel, J. N. (2001). Completion of the 1990’s National land cover data set for the conterminous United States. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67, 650–662.Google Scholar
  40. Wulder, M. A., White, J. C., Goward, S. N., Masek, J. G., Irons, J. R., Herold, M., Cohen, W. B., Loveland, T. R., Woodcock, C. E. (2008). Landsat continuity: Issues and opportunities for land cover monitoring. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112, 955–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yapar, G., & Ağraz, M. (2012). Drought option contracts price for Harran region. Selcuk University the Journal of Social and Economic Research., 22, 119–140.Google Scholar
  42. Yesilnacar, M.I. (2003). Grouting applications in the Sanliurfa tunnels of GAP, Turkey. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 18(4), 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yesilnacar, M. I., & Cetin, H. (2005). Site Selection for hazardous wastes: A case study from the GAP area, Turkey. Engineering Geology, 81, 371–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhu, Z., & Woodcock, C. E. (2014). Automated cloud, cloud shadow, and snow detection in multitemporal Landsat data: an algorithm designed specifically for monitoring land cover change. Remote Sensing of Environment, 152, 217–234. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.06.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society of Remote Sensing 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Eurasia Institute of Earth SciencesIstanbul Technical UniversityMaslak, IstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Institute of Earth and Environmental ScienceUniversity of PotsdamPotsdam-GolmGermany
  3. 3.Geomatics Engineering DepartmentIstanbul Technical UniversityMaslak, IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations