Abstract
Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is a day and night, all weather satellite imaging technology. Inherent property of SAR image is speckle noise which produces granular patterns in the image. Speckle noise occurs due to the interference of backscattered echo from earth’s rough surface. There are various speckle reduction techniques in spatial domain and transform domain. Non local means filtering (NLMF) is the technique used for denoising which uses Gaussian weights. In NLMF algorithm, the filtering is performed by taking the weighted mean of all the pixels in a selected search area. The weight given to the pixel is based on the similarity measure calculated as the weighted Euclidean distance over the two windows. Non local means filtering smoothes out homogeneous areas but edges are not preserved. So a discontinuity adaptive weight is used in order to preserve heterogeneous areas like edges. This technique is called as discontinuity adaptive non local means filtering and is well-adapted and robust in the case of Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) model. But speckle is a multiplicative random noise and hence Euclidean distance is not a good choice. This paper presents evaluation results of using different distance measures for improving the accuracy of the Non local means filtering technique. The results are verified using real and synthetic images and from the results it can be concluded that the usage of Manhattan distance improves the accuracy of NLMF technique. Non local approach is used as a preprocessing or post processing technique for many denoising algorithms. So improving NLMF technique would help improving many of the existing denoising techniques.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anfinsen, S. N., Doulgeris, A. P., & Eltoft, T. (2008). Estimation of the equivalent number of looks in polarimetric SAR imagery. In IGARSS 2008, pp. 487–490.
Babu, Y. M. M., Subramanyam, M. V., & Prasad, M. N. G. (2014) A survey on Despeckling of SAR Images. IJECT, 5(4), 142–144.
Buades, A., Coll, B., & Morel, J. (2004). On image denoising methods. Technical Report 2004-15, CMLA.
Buades, A., Coll, B., & Morel, J. (2005). Neighborhood filters and pde’s. Technical Report 2005-04, CMLA.
Buades, A. NL-means pseudo-code. http://dmi.uib.es/~tomeucoll/toni/NL-means_code.html.
Cha, S. H. (2007). Comprehensive survey on distance/similarity measures between probability density functions. International Journal of Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 1(4), 300–307.
Dellepiane, S. G., & Maitre, E. (2014). Quality assesment of despeckled SAR images. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 7(2), 3803–3806.
Devapal, D., Kumar, S. S., & Jojy, C. (2015). Comprehensive survey on SAR image despeckling techniques. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(24), 1–4.
Doreswamy, M. M. G., & Hemanth, K. S. (2011). A study on similarity measure functions on engineering materials selection. Computer Science & Information Technology (CS & IT), AIAA 2011, CS & IT 03, pp. 157–168.
Gagnon, L., & Jouan, A. (1997). Speckle filtering of SAR images—A comparative study between a complex-wavelet-based and standard filters. In Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 80–91, 31–69.
Jojy, C., Nair, M. S., Subrahmaniyam, G. R. K. S., & Riji R. (2013). Discontinuity adaptive non-local means with importance sampling unsented Kalman filter for despeckling SAR images. IEEE Transaction on Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observation and Remote Sensing, 6(4), 1964–1970.
Kuan, D. T., Sawchuk, A. A., Strand, T. C., & Chavel, P. (1985). Adaptive noise smoothing filter for images wit h signal dependent noise. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-7(2), 165–177.
Lee, J. S. (1980). Digital image enhancement and noise filtering by use of local statistics. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-2(2), 165–168.
Lopes, A., Touzi, R., & Nezry, E. (1990). Adaptive speckle filters and scene heterogeneity. IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 28(6), 992–1000.
Maitre, H. (2010). Processing of synthetic aperature RADAR images. Print ISBN: 9781848210240.
Rajamani, A., & Krishnaveni, V. (2014). Performance analysis survey of various SAR image despeckling techniques. International Journal of Computer Applications, 90(7), 5–17.
Rukmini, V. Ch, Filter select ion for Speckle Noise Reduct ion. Thesis report, Thapar university. http://dspace.thapar.edu:8080/dspace/bitstream/10266/701/3/T701.pdf.
Subrahmanyam, G. R. K. S., Rajagopalan, A. N., & Aravind, R. (2008). A recursive filter for de-speckling SAR images. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 17(10), 1969–1974.
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004). Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(4), 600–612.
Yang, X., & Clausi, D. A. (2009). Structure preserving speckle reduct ion of SAR images using non local means filters. In ICIP. IEEE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Devapal, D., Kumar, S.S. & Jojy, C. A Novel Approach of Despeckling SAR Images Using Nonlocal Means Filtering. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 45, 443–450 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-016-0607-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-016-0607-0