Advertisement

Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing

, Volume 44, Issue 5, pp 759–774 | Cite as

Integration of Remote Sensing & GIS to Manage the Sustainable Development in the Nile Valley Desert Fringes of Assiut-Sohag Governorates, Upper Egypt

  • Mostafa kamelEmail author
  • El Sayed M. Abu El Ella
Research Article

Abstract

The growing population and the need for improving the living conditions of Egyptian community have resulted in the establishment of new urban areas, industrial zones, land reclamation, and different types of developmental projects. In the Nile Valley, the only available areas for carrying out such activities are the desert fringes surrounding the floodplain on both sides of the Nile Valley. This study examines the use of image processing mapping to landuse and land cover changes for the desert fringes along the Nile Valley between Assiut-Sohag area between 1984 and 2013 (satellite images). The layers of landuse map were digitized by heads-up digitization method in GIS environment. Similarly the layers of landuse map (2013) were generated by supervised classification of satellite imagery. The training site was created by referring landsat7 ETM+ and Landsat 8 satellite imagery with help of GPS (Global Positioning System) coordinates in GIS environment. Supervised classification technique was adopted to classify the satellite image in GIS (Geographic Information System) software environment. The classified image was converted into vector format and estimated the total area of each class by using geometry tools of GIS software. The landuse changes between 1984, 2000 and 2013 were compared and displayed in geographical or map format in 1:100000 scale. Also, this paper describes a study that was carried out to perform supervised and unsupervised techniques on remote sensing data for land cover classification and to evaluate the accuracy result of both classification techniques. The land cover classes for the study area were classified into 5 themes. Ground verification was carried out to check and assess the accuracy of classification based on Google Earth pro. A total of 72 sample points were collected using Systematic Random Sampling. The results showed that the overall accuracy for the supervised classification was 95.8 % where Kappa statistics was 0.78.

Keywords

Satellite image Landuse Supervised and unsupervised classifications Accuracy assessment RS & GIS Nile valley 

Reference

  1. Abdulaziz, A. M., Hurtado, J. M., & Al-Douri, R. (2009). Application of multi-temporal Landsat Data to Monitor Land Cover Changes in the Eastern Nile Delta Region, Egypt. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30(11), 2977–2996. doi: 10.1080/01431160802558675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. R., Hardy, E. E., Roach, J. T., & Witmer, R. E. (1976). A Land Use and land over Classification System for Use with Remote Sensor Data—No. Professional Pa- per 964,. Washington DC: US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  3. Eastman, J. R. (2003). Guide to GIS and image processing 14, 239–247. USA: Clark University manual.Google Scholar
  4. Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation-Conco Coral (1987): Geological map of Egypt scale 1:500,000.Google Scholar
  5. El Abd, E. A., Shabana, A. R., & El Sheikh, A. E. (2011). Hydrogeological Evaluation of West Deirout-Assuit Area, Egypt. Egyptian. Jornal of Geology. V, 55, 15–32.Google Scholar
  6. Esam, I., Abdalla, F., & Erich, N. (2012). Land Use and Land Cover Changes of West Tahta Region, Sohag Governorate, Upper Egypt. Journal of Geographic Nformation System, 2012(4), 483–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foody, G. M. (2001). Status of Land Cover Classification Accuracy Assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80, 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goudie, A. S. (1993). Land transformation. In R. J. Johnston (Ed.), The challenge for geography, a changing world, a changing discipline (pp. 17–137). Cambridge: Black Well.Google Scholar
  9. Gutman, G., Janetos, A. C., Justice, C., Moran, E., Mustard, J., Rindfuss, R., Skole, D., Turner, D. & Cochrane, M. (2004): Land change science. Observing, monitoring and understanding trajectories of change on the earth’s surface remote sensing and digital image processing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 459 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. HARSAC (1992): Integrated Resource Survey to Combat Drought on Sustainable basis through Space Applications, District Bhiwani (1992). HARSAC/TR/1/92.Google Scholar
  11. Issawi, B., & McCauley, J. F. (1992). The Cenozoic rivers of Egypt: the Nile problem. In R. Freidman, & B. Adams (Eds.), The Followers of Horus, Egypt: Studies Assoc.Public., no.2, Oxbow Monog. 20 (pp. 121–138). Oxford: Park End Place.Google Scholar
  12. Issawi, B. Hassan, M.W., & Osman, R. (1978): Geological studies in the area of Kom Ombo, Eastern Desert, Egypt. Ann. geol. survey, Egypt. v. VIII, p.187–235.Google Scholar
  13. Jensen, J. R. (1986). Introductory digital image processing, a remote sensing perspective. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Kamaruzaman, J., Mohd Hasmadi, I., & Nurul Hidayah, M. A. (2009). Spectral Separability of Tropical Forest Tree Species Using Airborne Hyperspectral Imager. Journal of Environmental Science & Engineering, 3(1), 37–41.Google Scholar
  15. Kapetsky James M., Llyod Mcgregor, & Herbert Nane, (1987): A Geographic Information System to Assess Opportunities for Aquaculture Development. A FAOUNEP/GRID study in Costa Rica: P. 519-533.Google Scholar
  16. Khalifa, M. A., Abu El Ghar, M. S., Helal, S., & Hussein, A. W. (2004). Depositional history of the lower eocene drowned carbonate platform (drunka formation), west of assiut-minia stretch, western desert, Egypt. In 7th international conference on the geology of the Arab world, Cairo university, Feb. 2004 (pp. 233–254).Google Scholar
  17. Latham Johm S., & Som H. (1991): Remote Sensing and Agriculture Statistics in Developing Countries, Conference on the Application of Remote Sensing to Sustainable Agriculture Development, The Egyptian International Center for Agriculture, Nov. 24–25, 1991, Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
  18. McIver, D. K., & Friedl, M. A. (2002). Using Prior Probabilities in Decision Tree Classification of Remotely Sensed Data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 81, 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Medrial A., Kazuhiko Takeuchi & Atsush Tsunekawa (2001): Greenery percentage prediction using RVI, NDVI and MRVI model from Landsat TM and Aerialphoto, in Jabotabek, Indonesia, IECI Japan workshop, Vol. 3, No. 1, PP:110–113Google Scholar
  20. Mengistu D. A. & Salami A. T., (2007): Application of remote sensing and GIS inland use/land cover mapping and change detection in a part of south western Nigeria. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 1, 99–109.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, J. D., & Yool, S. R. (2002). Mapping Forest Post-Fire Canopy Consumption in Several Overstory Types Using Multi-Temporal Landsat TM and ETM Data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 82(2–3), 481–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Msrintranet.Capmas.gov.eg, (2011) Central Agency for Popula- tion Mobilisation and Statistics—Population Clock.Google Scholar
  23. Nie Y, Kafatos M, & Wood K (2001) Estimating soil-type pattern from supervised and unsupervised classification: Case study in Cuprite, Nevada. Project Report, pp. 28. George Mason University.Google Scholar
  24. Omer, A. A. (1996): Geological, mineralogical and geochemical studies on the Neogene and Quaternary Nile basin deposits, Qena-Assiut stretch, Egypt. Ph.D. thesis, Geology Dept. Faculty of Science, Sohag, South Valley University, 320 p.Google Scholar
  25. Omer, A. A. & Issawi, B. (1998): Lithostratigraphical, mineralogical and geochemical studies on the Neogene and Quaternary Nile basin deposits, Qena-Assiut stretch, Egypt. The 4 th International conference on Geology of the Arab World, Cairo. (Abstract).Google Scholar
  26. Paulissen, M. & Vermeersch, P. M. (1987): Earth, man and climate in the Egyptian Nile Valley during the Pleistocene: In: A. Close (Ed.), Prehistory of North Africa. Southern Methodist University Press, Dallas, p. 29–67.Google Scholar
  27. Reis, S., 2008. Analyzing Land Use/Land Cover Changes Using Remote Sensing and GIS in Rize, North-East Turkey, Sensors, 8, 6188–6202.Google Scholar
  28. Rogan, J., Franklin, J., & Roberts, D. A. (2002). A Comparison of Methods for Monitoring Multitemporal Vegetation Change Using Thematic Mapper Imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Said, R. (1960): Planktonic Foraminifera from the Thebes Formation, Luxor, Egypt. Micropaleontology, V.16, pp. 227–286.Google Scholar
  30. Said, R. (1975): The geological evolution of the River Nile In: Problems in prehistory of Northern Africa and the Levant. Wendorf, F. & Marks, A.F. (eds). Southern Methodist University press. Dallas, Texas, pp. 1–44.Google Scholar
  31. Said, R., (1981): The geological evaluation of the River Nile: Springer Verlag, 151 p.Google Scholar
  32. Said, R. (1983). Proposed Classification of the Quaternary of Egypt. Jour. Of African Earth Sciences. V., 1, 41–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Said, R. (1990). The geology of Egypt (731p). Balkema, Rotterdam, Brookfield: S.A.Google Scholar
  34. Singh, R., Semwal, D. P., Rai, A., & Chhikara, R. S. (2002). Small area estimation of crop yield using remote sensing satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(1), 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Turner, R. M. (1990). Long-Term Vegetation Change at a Fully Protected Sonoran Desert Site. Ecology, 71(2), 464–477. doi: 10.2307/1940301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ustin, S. (2004). Manual of remote sensing: Remote sensing for natural resource management and environmental monitoring. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  37. Wendorf, F., & Said, R. (1967): Paleolithic Remains in Upper Egypt. Nature, v.215, p.244–247.Google Scholar
  38. Wendorf, F., & Schild, R. (1976). Prehistory of the Nile valley (404p). New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Wu W, & Shao G (2002): Optimal combinations of data, classi-fiers, and sampling methods for accurate characterizationsof deforestation. Can J Rem Sens, 28, 601–609.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society of Remote Sensing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geology Department, Faculty of ScienceAl Azhar UniversityAssiut BranchEgypt
  2. 2.Geology Department, Faculty of SciencesAssiut UniversityAssiutEgypt

Personalised recommendations