Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characterization of Landforms and Soils in Complex Geological Formations—A Remote Sensing and GIS Approach

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present investigation has been designed to analyze the landform and soil relationship in a geologically complex terrain of Tirora tahsil of Gondia district, Maharashtra using remotely sensed data and GIS technique. The geomorphologic units of the study area were delineated through visual interpretation of IRS–ID LISS-III data based on the spatial variation of the image characteristics. Thirteen landform units have been identified in the tahsil. The slope varied from level to nearly level with an area of about 63.76% of the tahsil. Rest of the area ranged from very gentle to moderately steep slopes. During soil survey, soil profiles were studied for morphological features. Horizon-wise soil samples were collected from the representative soil profiles on each landform unit. The depth of soil varied from 25 to 160 cm and colour from dark brown to very dark grayish brown. The texture ranged from clay loam to clayey in accordance with higher and lower topographic positions respectively. Higher available water holding capacity (AWC 285 mm) is found in low-lying area and low to medium AWC (140 mm) is noticed in the soils developed at higher elevation. The soils reaction (pH) is strongly acidic in nature (pH 5.2) on dissected hills, linear ridge and moderately weathered pediments, whereas, the soils are moderately to slightly acidic in nature (pH 5.5 to 6.5) on hills, shallow weathered pediments, moderately weathered pediments, deeply weathered pediments, narrow valleys, and broad valley floors. Slightly alkaline condition (pH 7.6) was observed on foot slopes and aggraded valley fills. The electrical conductivity of the soils is found almost same in all landforms. The cation exchange capacity of the area varies from 10.5 to 51.5 cmol(p+)kg−1. The base saturation increases with decreasing elevation and slope. The four major soil orders viz, Entisols, Alfisols, Inceptisols and Vertisols are found in the study areas which are further classified into suborder and great group levels. The landform and soil relationship was analyzed to appraise the land resources in the tahsil. The study shows that the application of remotely sensed data and GIS are immensely helpful in land resources appraisal for their management on sustainable basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. A., & Walker, T. W. (1975). Some properties of chrono-toposequence of soils from granite in New Zealand. Geoderma, 13, 41–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, P. A., Ojanuga, A. G., & Olsen, K. R. (1988). Soil-landscape relationship in the Sokota-Rima basin, on a small watershed. Journal of Hydrology, 99, 307–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, R. L., Manchanda, M. L., Sangwan, B. S., Goyal, V. P., & Agrawal, R. P. (1992). Utilization of remote sensing data for soil resource mapping and its interpretation of land use planning of Bhiwani district, Haryana. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 20(2), 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antony, P. C., Katre, R. K., & Varghese, T. (1981). Soil moisture depletion pattern in black soils (Chromusterts) with wheat and gram under dryland conditions. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 29, 423–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. U., & Doornkamp, J. C. (1974). Geomorphology in environmental management: An introduction (p. 413). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, K. J., McGarry, D., Smith, G. D. (1986). The physical and mechanical characterization of Vertisols. In First regional seminar on management of Vertisols under semi-arid conditions. IBSRAM Proceeding Number 6. Nairobi, Kenya, 89, 106.

  • Dalrymple, J. B., Blong, R. J., & Conacher, A. J. (1968). A hypothetical nine-unit landsurface model. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie, 2, 60–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demek, J. (1982). Geomorphological mapping: Progress and problems. In H. S. Sharma (Ed.), Perspectives in geomorphology, vol. IIIÑ applied geomorphology (pp. 221–235). New Delhi.

  • Fairbridge, R. W. (1968). The encyclopedia of geomorphology. Pulol naul. pp 388–403.

  • Gerrard, A. J. (1990). Soil variation in hill slopes in humid temperate climates. In P. L. K. Knuefer, Mc. Faddon (Eds.), Soils and landscape evaluation. Geomorphology. 3, 207.

  • GSI (1978). Geological quadrangle map of topographical sheet 550 (Nagpur): Madhya Pradesh–Maharashtra, Geological Survey of India, 1978.

  • GSI (2000). District resource map, Bhandara and Gondia Districts, geological survey of India. Central Region, 2000.

  • Jackson, M. L. (1958). Soil chemical analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasturirangan, K., Aravamundam, R., Deekshatulu, B. L., George, J., & Chandrashekhar, M. G. (1996). Indian remote sensing satellite IRS 1C. The beginning of New Era. Current Science, 70(7), 624–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maji, A. K., & Krishna, N. D. R. (1996). Application of geographical information system in soil resource management. Agropedology, 6(2), 75–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maji, A. K., Srinivas, C. V., Dubey, P. N., ObiReddy, G. P., Kamble, K., & Velayutham, M. (2002). Soil resource information system in GIS environment for land use planning in mountainous regions. Journal of the GIS India, 11(4), 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minhas, R. S., & Bora, N. C. (1982). Distribution of organic carbon and the forms of the nitrogen in topographic sequence. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 135–139.

  • Murthy, I. Y. L. N., Sastri, T. G., Datta, S. C., Narayanasamy, G., & Rattan, R. K. (1994). Characterization and classification of Vertislols derived from different parent materials. Agropedology, 4, 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, A., Chowdary, V. M., Mal, B. C., & Dabral, P. P. (2011). Remote Sensing and GIS for identification of suitable sites for soil and water conservation structures. Land Degradation and Development, 22, 359–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • PCI. (1997). SPANS, GIS software, Ver. 7.0. Ontario: PCI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, G. P. O., Maji, A. K., Srinivas, C. V., Thayalan, S., & Velayutham, M. (2001). Landscape ecological planning in a basaltic terrain, central India using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 29(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, L. A. (1954). Diagnosis and improvements of saline and alkaline soils. Agricultural handbook No. 60 (p. 160). Washington: USDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savigear, R. A. G. (1965). A technique of morphological mapping. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 55(33), 514–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, R. K., Verma, K. S., Chary, G. R., Srivastava, R., & Barthwal, A. K. (2000). IRS-1C data application in watershed characterization and management. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(17), 3197–3208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharada, D., Ravikumar, M. V., Venkataratnam, L., & Malleswara Rao, T. C. H. (1993). Watershed prioritization for soil conservation. Geo Carto International, 1, 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff (1995). Soil survey manual. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Handbook No. 18, Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur-342 001, India, 437p.

  • Soil Survey Staff (1999). Soil taxonomy, a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Handbook No. 436. U.S. Govt. Printing Office USDA, Washington, D.C.

  • Srivastava, R., & Saxena, R. K. (2004). Technique of large-scale soil mapping in basaltic terrain using satellite remote sensing data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(4), 679–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stach, N., Salvado, A., Petil, M., Faure, J. F., Durieux, L., Corbane, C., Jouber, P., Lasselin, D., & Deshayes, M. (2009). Land use monitoring by Remote Sensing in tropical forest areas in support of the Kyoto Protocol: the case of French Guiana. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30(19), 5133–5149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamgadge, D. B., Gaikawad, S. T., Gajbhiye, K. S., & Gaikawad, M. S. (1999). Soil-landform relationship on basaltic terrain in north Deccan plateau, Satpura range, Madhya Pradesh. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 47, 118–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. L. (1993). Some application of geomorphology in soil survey for land use planning. In D. K. Dent, S. B. Deshpande (Ed.), Land evaluation for land use planning (pp. 28–41). NBSS Publ. No.42. Nagpur, India.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vishakha T. Dongare.

About this article

Cite this article

Dongare, V.T., Reddy, G.P.O., Maji, A.K. et al. Characterization of Landforms and Soils in Complex Geological Formations—A Remote Sensing and GIS Approach. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 41, 91–104 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-011-0195-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-011-0195-y

Keywords

Navigation