Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial and Temporal Variability of Net Primary Productivity (NPP) over Terrestrial Biosphere of India Using NOAA-AVHRR Based GloPEM Model

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The monitoring of terrestrial carbon dynamics is important in studies related with global climate change. This paper presents results of the inter-annual variability of Net Primary Productivity (NPP) from 1981 to 2000 derived using observations from NOAA-AVHRR data using Global Production Efficiency Model (GloPEM). The GloPEM model is based on physiological principles and uses the production efficiency concept, in which the canopy absorption of photosynthetically active radiation (APAR) is used with a conversion “efficiency” to estimate Gross Primary Production (GPP). NPP derived from GloPEM model over India showed maximum NPP about 3,000 gCm−2year−1 in west Bengal and lowest up to 500 gCm−2year−1 in Rajasthan. The India averaged NPP varied from 1,084.7 gCm−2year−1 to 1,390.8 gCm−2year−1 in the corresponding years of 1983 and 1998 respectively. The regression analysis of the 20 year NPP variability showed significant increase in NPP over India (r = 0.7, F = 17.53, p < 0.001). The mean rate of increase was observed as 10.43 gCm−2year−1. Carbon fixation ability of terrestrial ecosystem of India is increasing with rate of 34.3 TgC annually (t = 4.18, p < 0.001). The estimated net carbon fixation over Indian landmass ranged from 3.56 PgC (in 1983) to 4.57 PgC (in 1998). Grid level temporal correlation analysis showed that agricultural regions are the source of increase in terrestrial NPP of India. Parts of forest regions (Himalayan in Nepal, north east India) are relatively less influenced over the study period and showed lower or negative correlation (trend). Finding of the study would provide valuable input in understanding the global change associated with vegetation activities as a sink for atmospheric carbon dioxide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bonan, G. B. (2008). Forest and climate change: Forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forest. Science, 320, 1444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chhabra, A., & Dadhwal, V. K. (2004). Estimating terrestrial net primary productivity over India using satellite data. Current Science, 86(2), 269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, S. J., Prince, S. P., Smell, J., & Gleason. (2000). Inter annual variability of global terrestrial primary production: Results of a model driven with global satellite observations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105(D15), 20077–20091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jingyun, F., Piao, S., Tang, Z., Peng, C., & Ji, W. (2001). Inter annual variability in net primary production and precipitation. Science, 293, 1723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, K., & Smith, M. D. (2001). Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production. Science, 291, 481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, M., & Monteith, J. L. (1981). Remote sensing of crop growth. In H. Smith (Ed.), Plants and the daylight spectrum (pp. 133–144). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemani, R. R., Keeling, C. D., Hashimoto, H., Jolly, W. M., Piper, S. C., & Tucker, C. J. (2003). Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999. Science, 300, 1560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemani, R., Running, S. W., Band, L. E., & Peterson, D. L. (1993). Regional hydroecological simulation system: an illustration of the integration of ecosystem models in a GIS. In M. F. Goodchild, B. O. Parks, & L. T. Steyaert (Eds.), Environmental modeling with GIS (pp. 296–304). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panigrahy, R. K., Panigrahy, S., Parihar, J. S. (2004). Spatio-temporal pattern of agro ecosystem net primary productivity of India: A preliminary analysis using spot Vgt data. Int. Symp. on Geospatial Databases for Sustainable Development, Goa 36(4): 724–729

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker R. T., Zhao, M., Wang, H., & Wood, E. F. (2010). Impact of satellite based PAR on estimates of terrestrial net primary productivity. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 31(19), 5221–5237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, S. D. (1991). A model of regional primary production to use with coarse resolution satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 12(6), 1313–1330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, S. D., & Goward, S. J. (1995). Global primary production: A remote sensing approach. Journal of Biogeography, 22, 316–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Running, S. W., & Coughlan, J. C. (1988). A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications. I. Hydrological balance, canopy gas exchange and primary production processes. Ecological Modelling, 42, 125–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Running, S. W., & Gower, S. T. (1991). FOREST BGC, A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications. II. Dynamic carbon allocation and nitrogen budgets. Tree Physiology, 9, 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabbe, H., & Veroustraete, F. (2000) Estimation of net primary and net ecosystem productivity of European terrestrial ecosystems by means of the C-Fix model and NOAA/AVHRR data VEGETATION 2000 conference, 2 years of operation to prepare the future, pp. 95–99. Space Application Institute, Joint Research Center, 21020 Ispra, Varese-Italy

  • Del Grosso, S., Parton, W., Stohlgren, T., Zheng, D., Bachelet, D., Prince, S., Hibbard, K., & Olson, R. (2008). Global potential net primary production predicted from vegetation class, precipitation and temperature. Ecology, 89(8), 2117–2126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. E. (1998). Description of a numerical simulation model for predicting the dynamics of energy, water, carbon, and nitrogen in a terrestrial ecosystem. Missoula, MT: University of Montana.

    Google Scholar 

  • VEMAP. (1995). Vegetation/Ecosystem Modelling and Analysis Project (VEMAP): Comparing biogeography and biogeochemistry models in a continental-scale study of terrestrial ecosystem responses to climate change and CO2 doubling. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 9, 407–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, M., & Running, S. W. (2010). Drought-induced reduction in global terrestrial net primary production from 2000 to 2009. Science, 329, 940–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZhiQiang, G., & JiYuan, L. (2008). Simulation study of China’s net primary production. Chinese Science Bulletin, 53(3), 434–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Ranganath R. Navalgund, Director, SAC, and Dr. S.S. Ray, Head, AED/SAC for the suggestions and encouragement. One of the Author (RPS) thankfully acknowledges Dr. Markand P. Oza for discussions and help in analysis. Authors thank University of Maryland (http://glcf.umiacs.umd.edu/data/glopem) for providing the NPP data for analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. P. Singh.

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, R.P., Rovshan, S., Goroshi, S.K. et al. Spatial and Temporal Variability of Net Primary Productivity (NPP) over Terrestrial Biosphere of India Using NOAA-AVHRR Based GloPEM Model. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 39, 345–353 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-011-0123-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-011-0123-1

Keywords

Navigation