Above Ground Forest Phytomass Assessment in Southern Gujarat

Research Article


Spectral modeling of above ground biomass (AGB) with field data collected in 48 field sites representing moist deciduous forest in Surat district is reported. Models were generated using LISS-III and MODIS data. The plot-wise field data was aggregated to MODIS pixel (250 m) using area weightages of forest/vegetation. The study reports that above ground phytomass varied from 6.13 t/ha to 389.166 t/ha while AGB phytomass estimated using area-weights for sites of 250×250 m, ranged from 5.534 t/ha to 134.082 t/ha. The contribution of bamboo in AGB has been found very high. The analysis indicated that the highest correlation between AGB phytomass and red band (R) of MODIS satellite data of October was (R2=0.7823) and R2=0.6998 with both NDVI of October data as well as NDVImax. High correlation (R2=0.402) with IR band of February month was also found. The phytomass range obtained by using MODIS data varies from 0.147 t/ha to 182.16 t/ha. The mean biomass is 40.50 t/ha. Total biomass is 31.44 Mt. The mean Carbon density is 19.44 tC/ha in forest areas. The study is validation of region-wise spectral modeling approach that will be adopted for mapping vegetation carbon pool of the India under National Carbon Project of ISRO-Geosphere Biosphere Programme.


Phytomass Spectral modeling Mean phytomass 


  1. Brown, S., Gillespie, A. J. R., & Lugo, A. E. (1991). Phytomass of tropical forests of south and Southeast Asia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 21, 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chaturvedi, O. P., & Singh, J. S. (1987). The structure and function of Pine forest in Central Himalaya. I. Dry matter dynamics. Annals of Botany 60, 237–252.Google Scholar
  3. Chhabra, A., & Dadhwal, V. K. (2004). Assessment of major pools and fluxes of carbon in Indian forests. Climate Change, 64, 341–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dadhwal, V. K., & Chhabra, A. (2000). Carbon cycle assessment for terrestrial biosphere of India. In R. Narasimha, I. P. Abrol, G. Joseph, S. W. A. Naqvi, D. C. Parashar, & P. B. Rao (Eds.), IGBP in India 2000: A status report on projects (pp. 358–370). New Delhi: Indian National Science Academy.Google Scholar
  5. Dadhwal, V. K., & Shah, A. (1997). Recent changes in forest phytomass carbon pool in India estimated using growing stock and remote sensing-based forest inventories. Journal of Tropical Forestry 13, 182–188.Google Scholar
  6. Dadhwal, V. K., Pandya, N., & Vora, A. B. (1998). Carbon cycle for Indian forest ecosystem: a preliminary estimate. In: Subbaraya B.H., Rao D.P., Desai P.S., Manikiam, Rajaratnam P. (Eds.). Global change studies: scienti6c results from ISRO-GBP, ISRO Bangalore, pp. 411–430.Google Scholar
  7. FAO (1990). Forest resource assessment. FAO Forestry Paper-112, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations Rome.Google Scholar
  8. Flint, E. P., & Richards, J. F. (1991). Historical analysis of changes in use and carbon stock of vegetation in South and Southeast Asia. Canadian Journal Forest Research, 21(1), 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foody, G. M., Boyd, D. S., & Cutler, M. E. J. (2003). Predictive relations of tropical forest phytomass from Landsat TM data and their transferability between regions. Remote Sensing of Environment, 85, 463–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. FRI. (1996). Volume equations for forester of INDIA, NEPAL and BHUTAN (pp. 1–249). Dehradun: Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.Google Scholar
  11. FSI (2003). State of forest report. 2003. Forest Survey of India, Ministry of Environment and Forests, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  12. Haripriya, G. S. (2002). Phytomass carbon of truncated diameter in Indian forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 168, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hingane, L. S. (1991). Some aspects of Carbon dioxide exchange between atmosphere and Indian plant biota. Climate Change 18, 425–35.Google Scholar
  14. Houghton, R. A. (1991). Tropical deforestation and atmospheric carbon dioxide. Climate Change, 19, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ICFRE (1996–2002). Indian woods their identification, properties and uses. Volumes I-VI, Revised Edition. Indian Council of Forestry Research & Education, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  16. IPCC. (2003). Good practice guidance for land use, land use change and forestry. (p. 295). Hayama, Japan: IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programe.Google Scholar
  17. Kale, M. P., Singh, S., & Roy, P. S. (2002). Biomass and productivity estimation using aerospace data and geographic Information System. Tropical Ecology, 43(1), 123–136. fig. 1–8.Google Scholar
  18. Kale, M., Singh, S., Roy, P. S., Deosthali, V., & Ghole, V. S. (2004). Biomass equations of dominant species of dry deciduous forest in Shivpuri district, Madhya Pradesh. Current Science, 87(5), 683–687. figs. 4.Google Scholar
  19. Kira, T., & Ogava, H. (1971). Assessment of primary production in tropical forests. Proceedings of Productivity of Forest Ecosystems, Brussels-1969, UNESCO Publication.Google Scholar
  20. Lodhiyal, N., & Lodhiyal, L. S. (2002). Phytomass and net primary productivity of Bhabar Shisham forests in central Himalaya, India. Forest Ecology and Management, 176, 217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lu, D. (2005). Aboveground phytomass estimation using Landsat TM data in the Brazilian Amazon. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(12), 2509–2525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Muukkonen, P., & Heiskanen, J. (2007). Phytomass estimation over a large area based on standwise forest inventory data and ASTER and MODIS satellite data: a possibility to verify carbon inventories. Remote Sensing of Environment, 107, 617–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ovington, J. D. (1968). Some factors affecting nutrient distribution within ecosystems. In: F.E. Eckardt (Ed.). Functioning of Terrestrial Ecosystems of the Primary Production Level Proc. Copen. Symp., UNESCO, Paris, pp. 95–105.Google Scholar
  24. Pande, P. K. (2005). Biomass and Productivity in some disturbed tropical dry deciduous teak forests of Satpura Plateau, Madhya Pradesh. Tropical Ecology 46(2), 229–239.Google Scholar
  25. Ranawat, M. P. S., & Vyas, L. N. (1975). Litter production in deciduous forests of Koriyat, Udaipur (South Rajasthan) India. Biologia, 30, 41–47.Google Scholar
  26. Ravindranath, N. H., Somashekhar, B. S., & Gadgil, M. (1995). Carbon flow in Indian forests. Carbon emissions and sequestration in forests: Case studies from India and China. Lawrence Berkley Laboratory, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  27. Rawat, L., Luna, R. K., Kholiya, D., & Kamboj, S. K. (2008). Biomass, productivity and nutrient retention in Acacia Catechu Willd. Plantations in Shiwalik Hills. Indian Forester, 134(2), 212–225.Google Scholar
  28. Rawat, Y. S., & Singh, J. S. (1988). Structure and function of Oak forests in central Himalaya. I. dry matter dynamics. Annals of Botany 62, 397–411.Google Scholar
  29. Roy, P. S., & Ravan, S. A. (1996). Biomass estimation using satellite remote sensing data—an investigation on possible approaches for natural forest. Journal of Biosciences, 21(4), 535–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sader, S. A., Waide, R. B., Lawrence, W. T., & Joyce, A. T. (1989). Tropical forest phytomass and successional age class relationships to a vegetation index derived from Landsat TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 28, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tiwari, A. K. (1992). Component-wise biomass models for trees. A non-harvest technique. Indian For., 118, 405–410.Google Scholar
  32. Tiwari, A. K. (1994). Mapping forest phytomass through digital processing of IRS-1A data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 15(9), 1849–1866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vasishth, A. M., JR, C. P. S., & Pandey, S. B. S. (2008). Bamboo—a vital resource for prudent utilization. Indian Forester, 134(3), 345–348.Google Scholar
  34. Whittaker, R. H. (1966). Forest dimensions and production in the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecology 47(1), 103–121.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society of Remote Sensing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (IIRS)DehradunIndia
  2. 2.National Remote Sensing CentreHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations