Insight to Ecosystem Based Approach (EBA) at Landscape Level Using a Geospatial Medium


Ecosystem based approach (EBA) for resource management is a concerted, environmentally tuned and an integrated framework that holistically addresses the ecological character of the natural resource, its societal benefit spectrum and its environmental functions. In this paper, the EBA concept is closely linked with the emerging concept of multiple use systems (MUS) while taking account of environmental, economic, and social factors that govern the ecosystems services and benefits. We elucidate a multi-scalar approach and multiple case studies to understand EBA particularly in context of a wetlandscape. At the global scale, Ramsar sites of international importance are geospatially analyzed with reference to their agro-ecology and biodiversity. At regional scale, the agrarian use of inland wetlands in India was re-evaluated taking account of database from a recent inland wetland inventory. At the local scale, drawing on the landscape characterization and the ecological economics for fresh water Lake Kolleru in India and the Muthurajawela Marsh-Negombo Lagoon coastal marsh in Sri Lanka, we illustrate some of the practical challenges in balancing wetland conservation, development needs and the overall well-being of local people. We also discuss how variability in the scale, geophysical characteristics of the site and the data availability confines the ability to simplify a single complete approach to address issues in complex ecosystem such as wetlands. All levels of the study are supported by a variety of earth observation data and the geographical information system (GIS) tools. The site level analysis also draws on socio-economic assessment tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8


  1. ADB. (2001). Water for all. The water policy of ADB.

  2. ADB-Asian Development Bank. (2008). Managing conflict of interest. Frameworks, tools, and instruments for preventing, detecting, and managing conflict of interest;ISBN: 978-971-561-688-1.

  3. African Development Bank. (2000). Policy for integrated water resource management.

  4. Barbier, E. B., & Cox, M. (2002). Economic and demographic factors affecting mangrove loss in the coastal provinces of Thailand—1979 to1996. Ambio, 31(4), 351–357.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brodziak, J., & Link, J. (2002). Ecosystem-based fishery management: what is it and how can we do it? Bulletin of Marine Science, 70, 589–611.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brouwer, R., Georgiou, S., & Turner, R. K. (2003). Integrated assessment and sustainable water and wetland management—a review of concepts and methods. Integrated Assessment, 4(3), 72–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chowdhury, A. K. (2005). Statement at the opening session of the 13th session of the UN Commission on sustainable development. New York, 11 April, 2005.

  8. Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. (2007). Water for food, water for life: a comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture, London: Earthscan and Colombo: International Water Management Institute, 1–35.

  9. Constanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., et al. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6230), 255.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Daniels, S. E., Lawrence, R. L., & Ralph, J. A. (1996). Decision-making and ecosystem-based management: applying the Vroom-Yetton model to public participation strategy. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16(1), 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davidson, N. C., & Finlayson, C. M. (2007). Earth observation for wetland inventory, assessment and monitoring. Aquatic Conservation, 17(3), 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dayaratne, P., Linden, O., & De Silva, M. W. R. N. (Eds.). (1997). The Puttalam/Mundal estuarine system and associated coastal waters: environmental degradation, Resource management issues and options for their solutions. National Aquatic Resources Research and Development Agency, Colombo, Sri Lanka: 98–105.

  13. De Fraiture, C. (2007). Biofuel crops could drain developing world dry. SciDev: 10 May 2007

  14. Dixon, A. B. (2003). Indigenous management of wetlands: experiences in Ethiopia (p. 243). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dugan, P. J. (Ed.). (1990). Wetland conservation: a review of current issues and required action. 96-, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. p. 100.

  16. Eliot, I., Waterman, P., & Finlayson, C. M. (1999). Monitoring and assessment of coastal change in Australia’s wet-dry tropics. Wetland Ecology, 7, 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Falkenmark, M., Finlayson, M., Gordon, L., Bennett, J., Elena, M., & Chiuta, T. M. (2007). Agriculture, water, and ecosystems: Avoiding the costs of going too far. In D. Molden (Ed.), Water for food, water for life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture (pp. 233–277). London, UK: Earthscan. Colombo, Sri Lanka: IWMI.

    Google Scholar 

  18. FAO. (2002). Wetland development and management in SADC countries. Proceedings of a subregional workshop, 19–23 November, 2001, Harare, Zimbabwe. In K. Frenken & I. Mharapara (Eds.), Harare, FAO Subregional Office for East and Southern Africa (available at

  19. FAO. (2003). Fisheries management—The ecosystem approach to fisheries. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries.4Suppl.Food and Agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome.

  20. FAO. (2007). The state of Food and Agriculture. Rome: Food and Agriculture organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Finlayson, C. M., & D’Cruz, R. (2005). Inland water systems. In Millennium ecosystems assessment, (1) (pp. 50–73). Washington DC: Island.

  22. Finlayson, C. M., & Spiers, A. G. (Ed). (1999). Global review of wetland resources and priorities for wetland inventory. Supervising Scientist Report 144, Australia.

  23. Foster-Turley, P. A. (1992). Conservation aspects of the ecology of Asian small-clawed and smooth otters on the Malay peninsulas. IUCN Otter Spec Group Bull, 7, 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gopal, B. (1995). Handbook of wetland management. New Delhi: Wetlands Division, WWF-India.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gopal, B. (2003). Future of wetlands In Asia at Environmental Future of Aquatic Ecosystems-5th International Conference on Environmental Future (5th ICEF) (pp. 23–27). March 2003 ETH, Switzerland

  26. GWP. (2003). Toolbox: Integrated water resources management.

  27. Holland, M. M., Blood, E. R., & Shaffer, L. R. (Eds.) (2003). Achieving sustainable freshwater systems: A web of connections (pp. 351–360). Island.

  28. Iftekhar, M. S., & Takeshi, T. (2007). Perceptions of biodiversity, environmental services, and conservation of planted mangroves: a case study on Nijhum Dwip Island, Bangladesh. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 16(2), 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. IRRI-International Rice Research Institute. (1989). IRRI towards 2000 and beyond. Manila: IRRI.

    Google Scholar 

  30. IUCN. (2008). Asia needs urgent action to conserve its wetlands: 04 July 2008 | News—News story.

  31. Janssen, W., & Goldsworthy, P. (1996). Multidisciplinary research for natural resource management: conceptual and practical implications. Agricultural Systems, 51, 259–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jonker, L. (2002). Integrated water resources management: theory, practice, cases. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 27(11–22), 719–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kannan, V., & Manakadan, R. (2005). Status and distribution of the spot-billed Pelican Pelecanus philippensis in southern India. Forktail, 21, 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kaul, S. (1995). The conservation of Indian freshwater resources. Lakes & Reservoirs: Research and Management, 1(1), 49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kazmi, S. J. H., Qureshi, S., & Siddiqui, M. U. (2006). Depleting wetlands of lower Sindh, Pakistan: A spatio-temporal study through satellite remote sensing. In Advances in space technologies (pp. 1–5), International Conference-2–3 Sept, 2006.

  36. King, A. W. (1993). Consideration of scale and hierarchy. In J. Woodley, S. J. Kay, & G. Francis (Eds.), Ecological integrity and the management of ecosystems (pp. 19–46). Ottawa-Canada: St. Lucie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kreuter, U. P., Harris, H. G., Matlock, M. D., & Lacey, R. E. (2001). Change in ecosystem services values in the San Antonio area, Texas. Ecological Economics, 39, 333–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Larkin, P. A. (1996). Concepts and issues in marine ecosystem management. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 6, 39–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. McLeod, K. L., & Leslie, H. M. (Eds.). (2009). Ecosystem-based management for the oceans. Washington: Island.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystem services and human well-being: Wetlands and water synthesis. Synthesis Report. Island Press (, pp. 75–79.

  41. Mittal, R. (1993). Management plan for Coringa Wildlife Sanctuary. Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh Forest Department. Government of India. India.

  42. Nagabhatla, N. (2008). Questioning the geoscience community—are we on the right track? Current Science, 94(7), 839–840.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nagabhatla, N., & Sellamuttu, S. S. (2008). Political Ecology of Wetland Management: the post aquaculture demolition case of Lake Kolleru in India. Revista Geográfica Acadêmica, 2(1), 10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nagabhatla, N., Finlayson, C. M., Selamuttu, S. S., Zomer, R., & Diphoorn, L. (2006). Wetland dynamics-links with spatial, ecological, livelihoods and gender related issues in the western coastal belt of Sri Lanka; Proceedings of the Ninth Biennial Conference [15–18 December, 2006] India.

  45. Nagabhatla, N., Finlayson, C. M., Sellamuttu, S. S., Wickramasuriya, R., Pattnaik, C., & Prasad S. N. (2007). Using geospatial tools to overcoming sustainability concerns for wetland ecosystem; Proceeding of the 28th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing (ACRS 2007) Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

  46. Nagabhatla, N., Wickramasuriya, R., & Prasad, N. (2009). From global to local: testing the potential of cross-scaling in global data sets. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing-(Springer-Earth Science-ISI)., 37, 443–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Neue, H. U. (1993). Methane emission from rice fields. Bioscience, 43, 466–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ortiz-Zayas, J. R., & Scatena, F. N. (2004). Integrated water resources management in the Luquillo Mountains, Puerto Rico: an evolving process. Water Resources Development, 20(3), 387–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Parikh, J., & Parikh, K. (1999). Sustainable wetlands, environmental governance. Mumbai: Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Pradhananga, T. B. (2002). Topographical survey branch with remote sensing. GIS-Development.ACRS-2002.

  51. Prasad, S. N., Ramchandra, T. V., Ahalya, N., Sengupta, T., Kumar, A., & Tiwari, A. K. (2002). Conservation of wetlands of India—a review. Tropical Ecology, 43(1), 173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Prigent, C., Matthews, E., Aires, F., & Rossow, W. B. (2001). Remote sensing of global wetland dynamics with multiple satellite data sets. Geophysical Research Letters, 28(24), 4631–4634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Radif, A. A. (1999). Integrated water resources management (IWRM): an approach to face the challenges of the next century and to avert future crises. Desalination, 124, 145–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ralph, E., Heimlich, K. D., Wiebe, R. C., Dwight, G., & Robert, M. (1998). Wetlands and agriculture: Private interests and public benefits. Agricultural Economics Report No. (AER765). 104–110.

  55. Rao, S. T. (2003). Conflict between development and environment of Kolleru lake area. In Y. Anajaneyulu, & K. Durga Prasad (Eds.), Lake Kolleru-Environmental status (past and present) (pp. 168–184).

  56. Rijsberman, F., & De Silva, S. (2006). Sustainable agriculture and wetlands. Wetlands and Natural Resource Management, Ecological Studies, Springer Publication: 1–12.

  57. Rotmans, J., & Van Asselt, M. (1996). Integrated assessment: a growing child on its way to maturity. Climate Change, 34, 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Sally, H. (2003). Advances in integrated water resources management research in agriculture. In P. G. McCor-nick, A. B. Kamara, & G. Tadasse (Eds.), Integrated water and land management research and capacity building priorities for Ethiopia. Proceedings of a MWR/EARO/IWMI/ILRI international workshop, 2–4 December 2002. ILRI: Addis Ababa.

  59. Sanchirico, J. N., Malvadkar, U., Hastings, A., & Wilen, J. E. (2006). When no-take is zones an economically optimal fishery management strategy? Ecological Applications, 16, 1643–1659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Schot, P., & Winter, T. (2006). Groundwater–surface water interactions in wetlands for integrated water resources management. Journal of Hydrology, 320(3–4), 261–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Thenkabail, P. S., Biradar, C. M., Turral, H., Noojipady, P., Li, Y. J., Vithanage, J., & Dheeravath, V. (2006). An Irrigated Area Map of the World (1999) Derived from Remote Sensing. Research Report (105). International Water Management Institute, Sri Lanka: 74–100

  62. UNEP. (2006). Facing the Facts-Assessing the Vulnerability of Africa’s Resources to Environmental Change: 20–35.

  63. Vijayan, V. S., Prasad, S. N., Vijayan, L., Muralidharan, S. (2004). Inland wetlands of India-conservation priorities. Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Coimbatore, India.p 25

  64. Westbrook, S. J., Rayner, J. L., Davis, G. B., Clement, T. P., Bjerg, P. L., & Fisher, S. J. (2005). Interaction between shallow groundwater, saline surface water and contaminant discharge at a seasonally and tidally forced estuarine boundary. Journal of Hydrology, 302(1–4), 255–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Worldwatch Institute. (2004). State of the world. New York and London: WW Norton and Company. p13.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Yamagata, Y. (1997). Advanced Remote Sensing Techniques For Monitoring Complex Ecosystems: Spectral Indices, Unmixing, And Classification Of Wetlands. PhD Dissertation-University of Tokyo-http://wwwCger.Nies.Go.Jp/Wetland/Kushiro/Remote/Index.Html

  67. Yan, X., Ohara, T., & Akimoto, H. (2003). Development of region-specific emission factors and estimation of methane emission from rice fields in the East, Southeast and South Asian countries. Global Change Biology, 9(2), 237–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank Dr Prasad Thenakbail for the information on GIAM data. The data support from Dr Obi Reddy at the National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning India is duly acknowledged. The support of the local partners and the social communities in both wetland regions is rightly accredited. The usual disclaimer applies.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nidhi Nagabhatla.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Annex 1

Ecosystems Benefit analysis based on Constanza et al, 1997 for MMNL and KWS (DOC 61 kb)

About this article

Cite this article

Nagabhatla, N., Sellamuttu, S.S., Bobba, A.G. et al. Insight to Ecosystem Based Approach (EBA) at Landscape Level Using a Geospatial Medium. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 40, 47–64 (2012).

Download citation


  • Ecosystem
  • Management
  • Landscape
  • Geospatial
  • Global
  • Regional
  • Local