Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Landscape characterisation of the forests of Himalayan foothills

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Deforestation and degradation are important aspects of landscape dynamics and have global significance. Quantification of landscape pattern using landscape metrics help in characterisation of landscapes and thus overall health of the forest cover. Himalayan foothills are one of the most important and fragile landscapes. Developmental activities and depdendence on the forest resources have altered the spatial pattern of these natural landscapes to a great extent. These changes in the landscape were analysed using satellite data from 1990, 2001 and 2006. The vegetation type maps of Dehradun forest division were prepared by supervised classification technique in order to study the landscape dynamics. Patch density, edge density, shape index, cohesion index, interspersion and juxtaposition index, normalised entropy, and relative richness are some important landscape metrics used in the study for quantifying the characteristics of landscape. The landscape metrics analysis and transformation analysis show that the forested areas are getting degraded and physical connectedness between the patches have also decreased making them isolated. The study demonstrates the importance of geospatial tools for monitoring the impact of disturbances on the forest ecosystem health, which can further help in landscape management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apan AA, Raine SR and Paterson MS (2000) Image analysis techniques for assessing landscape structural change: a case study of the Lockyer Valley catchment, Queensland. Proceedings of the 10th Australasian Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry Conference, Adelaide, Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry Association, Australia, 21–25 August, pp. 438–455

  • Bogaert J, Ceulemans R and Eysenrode DS (2004) Decision tree algorithm for detection of spatial processes in landscape transformation. Environmental Management 33(1): 62–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broker W S (1987) Unpleasant surprise in greenhouse. Nature 328: 123–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castri Di and Hadley M (1988) Enhancing the credibility of ecology: Interacting along and across hierarchical scales. Geojournal 17:5–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Census of India (2001) Census data of Uttaranchal. [Online]. Available on: www.censusindia.net (accessed on 10.5.09)

  • Colwell R N (1983) Manual of Remote Sensing, 2nd ed. Falls Church, VA: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Datanet India Pvt Ltd, Statistical information. [Online] (Updated 20 December, 2008) Available on: http://www.indiastat.com/ (accessed on 2.5.09)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman JR (2006) IDRISI Andes: Guide to GIS and Image Processing. USA: Clark University, Worcester

    Google Scholar 

  • Flenley J R (1979) The Equatorial Rainforests: a Geological History, London: Butterworths

    Google Scholar 

  • Gairola S (2008) Geospatial Information Fusion for Analysing Resource Utilisation Pattern in Balkhila Sub-Watershed (Garhwal Himalayas — Gopeshwar). PhD Thesis, Forest Research Insitute, Dehradun India

    Google Scholar 

  • Goosem M (2007) Fragmentation impacts caused by roads through rainforests. Current Science 93(11): 1587–1595

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn SP and Sanford RL (1992) Holocene fires in Costa Rica. Biotropica 254: 354–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISFR (2009) India state of forest report 2009. Forest Survey of India, Dehradun

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiensat F (1993) Analysis of historic landscape patterns with a geographic information system — a methodological outline. Landscape Ecology 8: 103–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JT, Elton MJ and Thompson S (1999) The role of GIS in landscape assessment: using land use based criteria for an area of the Chiltern Hills Area of outstanding natural beauty. Land Use Policy 16: 23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lele N Joshi, PK and Agarwal SP (2008) Assessing forest fragmentation in north-eastern region (NER) of India using landscape metrics. Ecological indicators 8: 657–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW and Chipman JW (2007) Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. 5th ed. New Delhi: Wiley India Pvt Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayaux P, Holmgren P, Achard F, Eva H, Stibig H, and Branthomme A (2005) Tropical forest cover change in the 1990s and options for future monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360: 373–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra H, Munroe DK and Southworth J (2004) From pattern to process: landscape fragmentation and the analysis of land use/land cover change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 101:111–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narumalani S, Mishra DR and Rothwell RG (2004) Change detection and landscape metrics for inferring anthropogenic processes in the greater EFMO area. Remote Sensing of Enviroment 91:478–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Informatics Centre, Government of India, (2000–01) Dehradun district unit. [Online] Available on: http://home.nic.in/ (accessed on 1.1.09)

  • Peng J, Wu J, Yin H, Li Z, Chang Q and Mu T (2008) Rural land use change during 1986–2002 in Lijang, China, Based on Remote Sensing and GIS data. Sensors 8: 8201–8223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterjohn WT and Corell DL (1984) Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: Observations on the role of a riparian forest. Ecology 65: 1466–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rai SC, Sharma E and Sundriyal RC (1994) Conservation in the Sikkim Himalaya: traditional knowledge and land-use of the Mamlay watershed. Environmental Conservation 21: 30–34 and 56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rai SC (1995) Land-use options in Sikkim Himalaya: an analysis from the Mamlay watershed of south district. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 6(2/3): 63–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy CS, Rao KRM, Pattanaik C and Joshi PK (2008) Assessment of large scale deforestation of Nawarangpur district, Orissa, India: A remote sensing based study. Environmental Monitoring Assessment, DOI 10.1007/s10661-008-0400-9

  • Reeves RG, Anson A and Landen R (1975) Manual of Remote Sensing. Falls Church, VA: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, pp. 567

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah SL (1982) Ecological degradation and future of agriculture in the Himalaya. Indian Journal of Agriculture Economics 37: 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh JS, Pandey U and Tiwari AK (1984) Man and Forests: a Central Himalayan Case study. Ambio 13:80–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Skole D and Tucker C J (1993) Tropical deforestation and habitat fragmentation in the Amazon: satellite data from 1987 to 1988. Science 260: 1905–1910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thapa GB and Weber KE (1990) Actors and factors of deforestation in tropical Asia. Environmental Conservation 17: 19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker R and Richards JF (1983) Global Deforestation and the Nineteenth Century World Economy. Duke University Press, Durham, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner M G (1989) Landscape Ecology: The effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20: 171–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Massachusetts Amherst, Landscape Ecology Program, FRAGSTATS documentation. [Online]. Available on: http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/fragstats_documents.html (accessed on 27.06.2010)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. K. Joshi.

About this article

Cite this article

Munsi, M., Areendran, G., Ghosh, A. et al. Landscape characterisation of the forests of Himalayan foothills. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 38, 441–452 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-010-0046-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-010-0046-2

Keywords

Navigation