Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 351–361 | Cite as

Automatic road extraction using high resolution satellite image based on texture progressive analysis and normalized cut method

Research Article

Abstract

In this paper the approach for automatic road extraction for an urban region using structural, spectral and geometric characteristics of roads has been presented. Roads have been extracted based on two levels: Pre-processing and road extraction methods. Initially, the image is pre-processed to improve the tolerance by reducing the clutter (that mostly represents the buildings, parking lots, vegetation regions and other open spaces). The road segments are then extracted using Texture Progressive Analysis (TPA) and Normalized cut algorithm. The TPA technique uses binary segmentation based on three levels of texture statistical evaluation to extract road segments where as, Normalized cut method for road extraction is a graph based method that generates optimal partition of road segments. The performance evaluation (quality measures) for road extraction using TPA and normalized cut method is compared. Thus the experimental result show that normalized cut method is efficient in extracting road segments in urban region from high resolution satellite image.

Keywords

Road extraction Texture progressive analysis Normalized cuts Quality measures 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baumgartner A, Steger C, Mayer H, Eckstein W and Ebner H (1999) Automatic road extraction based on multiscale, grouping and context. Photogrammetric Engineering Remote Sensing 65:777–785Google Scholar
  2. Bhagavathy S and Manjunath BS (2006) Modeling and Detection of Geospatial Objects Using Texture Motifs. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Remote Sensing 44(12): 3706–3715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen CH, Pau L F and Wang P SP (1998) The Handbook of Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision (2nd Edition), by World Scientific Publishing CoGoogle Scholar
  4. Comaniciu D and Meer P (2002) Mean shift: A robust approach toward feature space analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24(5): 603–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doucette P, Agouris P, Stefanidis A and Musavi M. (2001) Self-organized clustering for road extraction in classified imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry Remote Sensing 55(5):347–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grote A, Butenuth M, Gerke M and Heipke C (2007) Segmentation Based on Normalized Cuts for the Detection of Suburban Roads in Aerial Imagery. IEEE Proc. Urban Remote Sensing Joint Event 1–5Google Scholar
  7. Gruen A, Agouris P and Li H (1995) Linear feature extraction with dynamic programming and globally enforced least squares matching. Automatic Extraction of Man-Made Objects from Aerial and Space images. pp 83–94Google Scholar
  8. Gruen A and Li H (1997) Semi-automatic linear feature extraction by dynamic programming and LSB-snakes. Photogrammetric Engineering Remote Sensing 63(8):985–995Google Scholar
  9. Guindon B (2000) A framework for the development and assessment of object recognition modules from high-resolution satellite images. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 26(4):334–348Google Scholar
  10. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K and Dinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems. Man. and Cybernetics 3(6):610–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haverkamp D and Poulsen R (2002) Complementary methods for extracting road centrelines from IKONOS imagery. In Proceedings of Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing VIII SPIE. Vol. 4885. pp 501–511Google Scholar
  12. Hinz S, Baumgartner A, Steger C, Mayer H, Eckstein W, Ebner H and Radig B (1999) Road Extraction in Rural Areas and Urban Areas, Semantic Modeling for the Aquisition of Topographic Information from Images and Maps. pp 133–153Google Scholar
  13. Jin X and Davis CH (2003) Automatic road extraction from high-resolution multi-spectral IKONOS imagery. In Proceedings of International Geosciences and Remote Sensing Symposium. pp 1730–1732Google Scholar
  14. Kass M, Witkin A and Terzopoulos D (1988). Snakes: active contour models. International Journal on Computer Vision. 1(4):321–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McKeown D and Denlinger J (1988) Cooperative methods for road tracking in aerial imagery. IEEE Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 662–672Google Scholar
  16. Mena JB and Malpica JA (2005). An automatic method for road extraction in rural and semi-urban areas starting from high resolution satellite imagery. Pattern Recognition Letters 26(9):1201–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mumford D and Shah J (1989) Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions, and associated variational problems. Comm. Pure Math. XLII:577–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Neuenschwander W, Fua P, Szekely G and Kubler O (1995) From ziplock snakes to velcro surfaces. In Automatic Extraction of Man-Made Objects from Aerial and Space Images. pp 105–114Google Scholar
  19. Omkar SN, Manoj KM, Mudigere D and Muley D (2007) Urban Satellite Image Classification using Biologically Inspired Techniques. IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics 1767–1772Google Scholar
  20. Peteri R and Ranchin T (2004) Multiresolution snakes for urban road extraction from Ikonos and QuickBird images, 23rd EARSeL Annual Symposium — Remote Sensing in Transition. Ghent. BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  21. Shackelford AK and Davis CH (2003) A hierarchical fuzzy classiûcation approach for high-resolution multispectral data over urban areas. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 41(9):1920–1932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stathakis D and Vasilakos A (2006) Comparison of Computational Intelligence Based Classification Techniques for Remotely Sensed Optical Image Classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 44(8):2305–2318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shi J, Belongie S, Leung T and Malik J (1998) Image and Video Segmentation: The Normalized Cut Framework. Image Processing: ICIP 98 Proceedings. vol. 1:943–947Google Scholar
  24. Shi J and Malik J (2000) Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22(8): 888–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shi W and Zhu C (2002) The line segment match method for extracting road network from high-resolution satellite images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 40(2):511–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Trinder J and Li H (1995) Semi-automatic feature extraction by snakes, Automatic Extraction of Man-Made Objects from Aerial and Space Images. pp 95–104Google Scholar
  27. Vosselman G and Knecht J (1995) Road tracing by profile matching and Kalman filtering, Automatic Extraction of Man-Made Objects from Aerial and Space Images. pp 265–274Google Scholar
  28. Wiedemann, C., Heipke, C., Mayer, H. and Hinz, S. (1998). Automatic extraction and evaluation of road networks from MOMS-2P imagery. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 32(3): 485–489Google Scholar
  29. Wiedemann C, Heipke C, Mayer H and Jamet O (1998) Empirical evaluation of automatically extracted road axes. Empirical Evaluation Methods in Computer Vision. IEEE Computer Society Press 172–187Google Scholar
  30. Wu Z and Leahy R (1993). An optimal graph theoretic approach to data clustering: Theory and its application to image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 15(11): 1101–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xiaoying J and Davis CH (2005) An integrated system for automatic road mapping from high-resolution multi-spectral satellite imagery by information fusion. Information Fusion. pp 257–273Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society of Remote Sensing 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Aerospace EngineeringIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Telecommunication EngineeringBITBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations