Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Unification conditions of human civilization patterns: based on multi-agent modeling of early Chinese history (770 BC to 476 BC)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The series of unified empires or dynasties in the history of China (221 BC–1912 AD) have shaped the unification pattern of Chinese culture. Therefore, the eastern civilization (China) can be deemed as a unified culture. In the geographical scope of China in East Asia, there is a stable and continuous history process of one-by-one unified dynasties (empires). Between two old and new unified dynasties in the history of China, there are always chaotic (transitional) periods when several local regimes competed for the absolute power of China (the Mandate of Heaven). In these transitional periods, wars and annexations are always inevitable. Then, only one local regime will succeed in gaining that power, forming a new unified dynasty (empire). The cultural pattern is obviously different in the western world, and there are no stable unification patterns. In Europe, there were also chaotic periods, with wars and annexations. However, there is no stable pattern of unification, which means that no local regimes (countries) have unified mainland Europe. Hence, whether this process can be modeled and revealed? We believe that computational methods can reveal some laws and rules of historical dynamics. For this work, we need to solve the conditions of both the unity and disunity. To achieve this goal: first, we build an agent-based model of general history dynamics for the chaotic periods; second, we run the simulations to explore outcomes of the unity and disunity; last, we obtain valid solutions for both the unity of China and the disunity of the West world. It suggests that our valid solutions explain the disunity between China and Europe patterns. Moreover, we can calculate the conditional boundaries of both unity (China) and disunity (Europe). Thus, the unification process in human history may be universal, but the outcomes or patterns may be different under different conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Will be made available on reasonable request.

References

  • Abraham RH (1987) Complex dynamics and the social sciences. World Futures: J Gen Evol 23:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baaquie BE, Wang Q-H (2018) Chinese dynasties and modern China: unification and fragmentation. China and the World 1:1850003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudains P, Zamazalová S, Altaweel M, Wilson A (2015) Modeling strategic decisions in the formation of the early neo-Assyrian empire, Cliodynamics: the journal of quantitative history and cultural. Evolution 6:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Blay S (2012) Territorial integrity and political independence. The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law Volume IX

  • Brauns H, Schmitz B (1987) On some possibilities of quantitative historiography in psychology by means of time se ries analysis, in: Vortrag, VI. CHEIRON Conference, Brighton, Sussex

  • Buhaug H, Gates S (2002) The geography of civil war. J Peace Res 39:417–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ch’en KKS (2015) Chinese transformation of Buddhism. Princeton University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain T (2007) Systems dynamics model of al-Qa’ida and United States “competition”. J Homeland Securit Emerg Manag 4

  • Claessen HJ (2006) War and state formation: what is the connection. Warfare and society, Archaeological and social anthropological perspectives, pp 217–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne CJ, Mathers RL (2011) The handbook on the political economy of war. Edward Elgar Publishing

  • Dalong L (2008) “The central kingdom” and “the realm under heaven” coming to mean the same: the process of the formation of territory in ancient China. Front History China 3:323–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard W (2020) A history of China. Univ California Press

  • Eisenstadt SSN, Wittrock B (2005) Axial civilizations and world history. Brill

  • Fang H, Feinman GM, Nicholas LM (2015) Imperial expansion, public investment, and the long path of history: China’s initial political unification and its aftermath. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:9224–9229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Villaverde J, Koyama M, Lin Y, Sng T-H (2020) The fractured-land hypothesis, in. Nat Bureau Econ Res

  • Gagliardi G (2007) Sun Tzu’s the art of war: plus the ancient Chinese revealed. Science of Strategy

  • Geys B (2010) Wars, presidents, and popularity: the political cost (s) of war re-examined. Public Opinion Quarterly 74:357–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graff DA, Higham R (2012) A military history of China. University Press of Kentucky

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhouse CJ (2018) 4. Time and territory in Ancient China, in: A moment’s notice, Cornell University Press pp. 113-143

  • Grew R (1980) The case for comparing histories. Am Hist Rev:763–778

  • Griffin AF (2011) Emergence of fusion/fission cycling and self-organized criticality from a simulation model of early complex polities. J Archaeol Sci 38:873–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen MH (2000) A comparative study of thirty city-state cultures: an investigation. KGL, Danske Videnskabernes Selskab

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy G, Kinney AB (2005) The establishment of the Han empire and Imperial China. Greenwood Publishing Group

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoel EP, Albantakis L, Tononi G (2013) Quantifying causal emergence shows that macro can beat micro. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:19790–19795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann C (2012) A study of central Eurasian innovations in warring states China and their impact on war and domination, in, Uniwien

  • Huang C-C (2002) The Ch’in unification in Chinese historiography, turning points in historiography: a cross-cultural perspective. 35-44.

  • Hui VT-B (2005) War and state formation in ancient China and early modern Europe. Cambridge University Press

  • Johnson EAJ (2013) The organization of space in developing countries. Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kage R (2010) The effects of war on civil society: cross-national evidence from world war II. In war’s wake: international conflict and the fate of liberal democracy:97–120

  • Kanters H, Brughmans T, Romanowska I (2021) Sensitivity analysis in archaeological simulation: an application to the MERCURY model. J Archaeol Sci Rep 38:102974

    Google Scholar 

  • Korotayev A, Malkov A (2016) A compact mathematical model of the world system economic and demographic growth, 1 CE–1973 CE, international journal of. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 10:200–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeds BA (2003) Do alliances deter aggression? The influence of military alliances on the initiation of militarized interstate disputes. Am J Pol Sci 47:427–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LePoire D (2015) Interpreting “big history” as complex adaptive system dynamics with nested logistic transitions in energy flow and organization. Emergence: Complex Organ 17:1E

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis ME (2000) The city-state in spring-and-autumn China. Comp Study Thirty City-State Cultures:359–374

  • Li X, Zhang G (1985) Eastern Zhou and Qin civilizations. Yale University Press

  • Little S, Eichman S, Shipper K, Ebrey PB (2000) Taoism and the arts of China. Univ of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu X (2016) The archaeological study on the distribution and assemblage of the crops of the pre-Qin period and the Han dynasty. Acta Archaeologica Sinica (China) 4:465–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale DJ (2004) The nature of war in the information age: Clausewitzian future. Psychology Press

  • Lord C (1985) Americsomparative Strat 5:269–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu B, Su R (2020) Bronze metallurgy, in: Thirty great inventions of China, Springer. pp. 131-183

  • Lu P, Zhang Z, Li M, Chen D, Yang H (2020) Agent-based modeling and simulations of terrorist attacks combined with stampedes. Knowl-Based Syst 205:106291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu P, Li M, Lu J, Zhang Z (2022) History dynamics of unified empire in China (770 BC to 476 BC). CAAI Trans Intell Technol. https://doi.org/10.1049/cit2.12120

  • Mann M (2012a) The sources of social power: volume 2, the rise of classes and nation-states, 1760-1914. Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mann M (2012b) The sources of social power: volume 1, a history of power from the beginning to AD 1760. Cambridge university press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marhold H (2013) China, still an unknown giant? L’Europe en Formation:101–114

  • Morley N (2010) The Roman empire: roots of imperialism. Pluto Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris I (2010) Why the west rules-for now: the patterns of history and what they reveal about the future. Profile books

  • Paul TV, Wirtz JJ, Fortmann M (2004) Balance of power: theory and practice in the 21st century. Stanford University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peter T (2006) Population dynamics and internal warfare: a reconsideration. Social Evol History 5

  • Preiser-Kapeller J (2012) Complex historical dynamics of crisis: the case of Byzantium, Verlag der Österr. Akad der Wiss

  • Raudzens G (1990) War-winning weapons: the measurement of technological determinism in military history. J Mil Hist 54:403

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotberg RI (2003) Failed states, collapsed states, weak states: causes and indicators, state failure and state weakness in a time of terror 1:1–25

  • Rubio-Campillo X (2016) Model selection in historical research using approximate Bayesian computation. PLoS One 11:e0146491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrodt PA (2005) Historical dynamics: why states rise and fall, in. SAGE Publications Sage CA, Los Angeles, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan C, Shanahan T, Misischia C (2011) Analysis of expert readers in three disciplines: history, mathematics, and chemistry. J Lit Res 43:393–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith A (1995) Alliance formation and war. Int Stud Q 39:405–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spektor MS, Kellen D (2018) The relative merit of empirical priors in non-identifiable and sloppy models: applications to models of learning and decision-making. Psychon Bull Rev 25:2047–2068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Therneau TM, Atkinson EJ (1997) An introduction to recursive partitioning using the RPART routines, in. Technical Report Mayo Foundation

  • Tilly C (1991) War and state power. Middle East Report:38–40

  • Tisue S, Wilensky U (2004) Netlogo: a simple environment for modeling complexity, in: international conference on complex systems. MA, Boston, pp 16–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin P (2006) History & mathematics: historical dynamics and development of complex societies, Editorial URSS

  • Turchin P (2008) Arise ‘cliodynamics’. Nature 454:34–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turchin P (2018) Historical dynamics. Princeton University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vertzberger YY (1986) Foreign policy decisionmakers as practical-intuitive historians: applied history and its shortcomings. Int Stud Q 30:223–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh D (1979) Occam’s razor: a principle of intellectual elegance. Am Philos Q 16:241–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson JL (2018) 4. Rites or beliefs? The construction of a unified culture in late Imperial China. In: China’s quest for national identity. Cornell University Press, pp 80–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber E, Western civilization, in: Imagined histories, Princeton University Press, 2018, pp. 206-221.

  • Wilentz S (1999) Rites of power: symbolism, ritual. In: And politics since the middle ages. University of Pennsylvania Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao-sheng L (2012) On the state form and the political control at the periods of the Spring and Autumn and the Warring States, Journal of Fujian Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),05.

  • Yoon M, Lee K (2009) Agent-based and “history-friendly” models for explaining industrial evolution. Evol Institut Econ Rev 6:45–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang T (2002) Chinese strategic culture: traditional and present features. Comp Strateg 21:73–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao D (2015) The Confucian-legalist state: a new theory of Chinese history. Oxford University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao S (2008) Confucianism and other scholastic thoughts in the spring-autumn period and their impact on the Chinese traditional culture and values

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H (2020) Computational social simulation with E-CARGO: comparison between collectivism and individualism. IEEE Trans Comput Soc Syst 7:1345–1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H (2021) Social development paradox: an E-CARGO perspective on the formation of the Pareto 80/20 distribution. IEEE Trans Comp Soc Syst

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 20ASH005, 18VXK005 and 19ZDA143).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Central South University, Changsha, China

    Peng Lu, Zhuo Zhang, Can Liu & Mengdi Li

  2. School of Automation, Central South University, Changsha, China

    Peng Lu, Zhuo Zhang & Mengdi Li

Authors
  1. Peng Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhuo Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Can Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mengdi Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mengdi Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, P., Zhang, Z., Liu, C. et al. Unification conditions of human civilization patterns: based on multi-agent modeling of early Chinese history (770 BC to 476 BC). Archaeol Anthropol Sci 14, 205 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-022-01650-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-022-01650-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation