Abstract
The estimation of the sex of the individual is a parameter of great value in forensic contexts and, above all, in archaeological contexts, where it is more difficult to apply genetic studies. In contrast with methods based on non-metric variables, we propose the use of a random generalized linear model for the determination of sex, starting from the Howells craniometric database and testing them on the dataset of known sex of the Forensic Data Bank, with 2524 and 1314 individuals respectively. After eliminating the individual’s considered outliers or with missing data, we proceeded to analyse which variables were more dimorphic between sexes (bizigomatic width, ZYB; bijugal width, JUB; mastoid height, MDH; glabela-occipital length, GOL; bifrontal width, FMB); these were used to build the statistical model. Subsequently, a comparison was made between the functions proposed by other authors and our model to determine their capacity in absolute terms, as well as by sex. The result is a random generalized linear model made up of 300 bags that, based on the five measures mentioned, reached 86.26% precision classifying the sex of individuals from the Forensic Data Bank (89.7% in the male sample and 82.82% in the female one). Although the method presented here should be taken with caution and not as the only way to estimate sex, it has proven to be statistically accurate in addition to having a non-regional vocation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acsadi G, Nemeskeri J (1970) History of human life span and mortality. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest
Agresti A (2002) Categorical data analysis. Wiley, New York
Altman N, Krzywinski M (2015) Simple linear regression. Nat Methods 12(11):999–1000. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3627
Auerbach BM (2014) The William W. Howells craniometric data set. Retrieved from https://web.utk.edu/~auerbach/HOWL.htm. Accessed 1 July 2020
Bidmos MA, Dayal MR (2004) Further evidence to show population specificity of discriminant function equations for sex determination using the talus of South African Blacks. J Forensic Sci 49(6):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs2003431
Buikstra J, Ubelaker DH (1994) Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Arkansas Archeological Survey, Arkansas
Dovoedo YH, Chakraborti S (2014) Boxplot-based outlier detection for the location-scale family. Commun Stat Simul Comput 44(6):1492–1513. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2013.813037
Ferembach D, Stloukal M, Schwidetzky I (1979) Recommendations pour déterminer l’âge et le sexe sur le squelette. Bull Mém Soc Anthropol Paris 6:7–45. https://doi.org/10.3406/bmsap.1979.1945
Franklin D, O’Higgins P, Oxnard CE, Dadour I (2008) Discriminant function sexing of the mandible of indigenous South Africans. Forensic Sci Int 179(1):84.e1–84.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.03.014
Giles E (1964) Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of the mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol 22(2):129–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330220212
Giles E, Elliot O (1963) Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of crania. Am J Phys Anthropol 21(1):53–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330210108
Henke W (1973) Zur Methode der diskriminanzanalytischen Geschlechtsbestimmung am Schädel. HOMO J Comp Hum Biol 24:99–117
Henke W (1977) On the method of discriminant function analysis for sex determination of the skull. J Hum Evol 6(2):95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0047-2484(77)80111-5
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471722146
Howells WW (1973) Cranial variation in man. A study by multivariate analysis of patterns of differences among recent human populations. United States: Peabody Museum, Cambridge
Hunt DR, Albanese J (2005) History and demographic composition of the Robert J. Terry anatomical collection. Am J Phys Anthropol 127(4):406–417. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20135
Jantz RL, Ousley SD (2005) FORDISC 3: computerized forensic discriminant functions, Version 3.0. University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Klales A, Ousley S, Vollner J (2019) Response to multivariate ordinal probit analysis in the skeletal assessment of sex (Konigsberg and Frankenberg). Am J Phys Anthropol 169:388–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23830
Lee UY, Han SH, Park DK, Kim YS, Kim DI, Chung IH, Chun MH (2011) Sex determination from the talus of Koreans by discriminant function analysis. J Forensic Sci 57(1):166–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01914.x
Martin R (1928) Lehrbuch der Anthropologie in Systematischer Darstellung. Gustav Fischer, Jena
McCoy MW, Bolker BM, Osenberg CW, Miner BG, Vonesh JR (2006) Size correction: comparing morphological traits among populations and environments. Oecologia 148(4):547–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0403-6
Murphy AMC (2005) The articular surfaces of the hindfoot: sex assessment of prehistoric New Zealand Polynesian skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int 151(1):19–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.06.040
Nikita E (2018) Quantitative sex estimation based on cranial traits using R functions. J Forensic Sci 64:175–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13833
Nikita E, Michopoulou E (2017) A quantitative approach for sex estimation based on cranial morphology. Am J Phys Anthropol 165(3):507–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23376
Ogedengbe OO, Ajayi SA, Komolafe OA, Zaw AK, Naidu ECS, Okpara Azu O (2017) Sex determination using humeral dimensions in a sample from KwaZulu-Natal: an osteometric study. Anat Cell Biol 50(3):180–186. https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.2017.50.3.180
Ousley SD, Jantz RL (1998) The Forensic Data Bank: Documenting Skeletal Trends in the United States. In: Reichs KJ, Bass WM (eds) Forensic osteology: Advances in the identification of human remains. Springfield, Ill: Charles C. Thomas, pp 441–458
R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 1 July 2020
Sierp I, Henneberg M (2015) The difficulty of sexing skeletons from unknown populations. J Anthropol 2015:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/908535
Skoglund P, Storå J, Götherström A, Jakobsson M (2013) Accurate sex identification of ancient human remains using DNA shotgun sequencing. J Archaeol Sci 40(12):4477–4482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.07.004
Soficaru A, Constantinescu M, Culea M, Ionică C (2014) Evaluation of discriminant functions for sexing skulls from visually assessed traits applied in the Rainer Osteological Collection (Bucharest, Romania). HOMO J Comp Hum Biol 65(6):464–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2014.08.004
Song L, Langfelder P (2013) randomGLM: random general linear model prediction. R package version 1.02–1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=randomGLM. Accessed 1 July 2020
Song L, Langfelder P, Horvath S (2013) Random generalized linear model: a highly accurate and interpretable ensemble predictor. BMC Bioinformatics 14(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-5
Waldron T (1987) The relative survival of the human skeleton: implication for palaeo-pathology. In: Boddindton A, Garland AN, Janaway RC (eds) Death, decay and reconstruction: approaches to archaeology and forensic science. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp 55–64
Acknowledgements
This work would not have been possible without the help of Dr. Richard Jantz, emeritus professor of the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, who facilitated us the data originating from the Forensic Data Bank, on which our model was tested.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lescure, J., Ardevines, C., Becerra, P. et al. New random generalized linear model for sex determination based on cranial measurements. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 12, 168 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-020-01145-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-020-01145-8