Skip to main content
Log in

Optimising protocols for high-definition imaging of historic shipwrecks using multibeam echosounder

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 04 May 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Conservation of historic shipwrecks is prohibitively expensive and in situ preservation and recording are the preferred archaeological approaches. Non-destructive high-definition 3D imaging is therefore essential for recording and managing submerged historic shipwrecks. Multibeam echosounders (MBES), the standard tool for hydrographic survey, can produce point clouds to image complex 3D structures. However, wreck imaging is often done using MBES in traditional survey mode optimised for morphological characterisation of the seafloor. This does not necessarily provide high-definition imagery required by archaeologists. This study demonstrates key factors influencing high-definition MBES imaging of wrecks through a controlled field experiment. Results show that optimal high-definition 3D imaging is achieved through maximising the pulse rate, narrowing the angular sector, using the highest frequency and shortest pulse lengths, applied to at least 3 to 5 overlapping centreline-parallel and offset passes with additional perpendicular/oblique lines. Variations in survey design are demonstrated to exert strong controls on sounding density and distribution, with high-density on horizontal and vertical wreck surfaces enabled by a combination of overlapping passes and offset lines. Adoption of this method would result in more widespread high-definition 3D imaging of wrecks to benefit archaeological research and develop effective mitigation strategies to minimise loss of the fragile underwater resource.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 04 May 2019

    The original version of this article was revised: Additional correction in Table 1: please delete (‘) in the second column heading was incorrectly carried out. It should read “Acquisition settings test”; by this, the author meant only to delete the apostrophe symbol, not the entire second column heading.

References

  • Adams J (2001) Ships and boats as archaeological source material. World Archaeol 32:292–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astley A, Dix JK, Thompson C, Sturt F (2014) A seventeen year, near-annual, bathymetric time-series of a marine structure (SS Richard Montgomery). In: Cheng L, Draper S, An H (eds) Scour and erosion: proceedings of the 7th international conference on scour and erosion. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 715–724

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard R, Archbold R (1987) The discovery of the titanic. Hodder & Stoughton, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates CR, Dean M, Lawrence M, Robertson P, Tempera F, Laird S (2007) Innovative approaches to Rapid Archaeological Site Surveying and Evaluation (RASSE). Report prepared for English Heritage. University of St. Andrews, St Andrews

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates CR, Dean M, Lawrence M, Robertson P (2011) Geophysical methods for wreck-site monitoring: the Rapid Archaeological Site Surveying and Evaluation (RASSE) programme. Int J Naut Archaeol 40:404–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellec V, Bøe R, Rise L, Lepland A, Thorsnes T, Bjarnadóttir L (2017) Seabed sediments (grain size) of Nordland VI, offshore north Norway. J Maps 13:608–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady K, McKeown C, Lyttleton J, Lawler I (2012) Warships, U-boats & liners. A guide to shipwrecks in Irish waters. The Stationary Office, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder B, Forbes D, Mallace D (2007) Marine heritage monitoring with high-resolution survey tools: Scapa flow 2001-2006. Proceedings of U.S. Hydro Conference May 2007

  • Calvert J, Strong J, Service M, McGonigle C, Quinn R (2015) An evaluation of supervised and unsupervised classification techniques for marine benthic habitat mapping using multibeam echosounder data. ICES J Mar Sci 72:1498–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CloudCompare (version 2.8.1) [GPL software] (2017) Retrieved from http://www.cloudcompare.org

  • Dean M, Lawrence M, Rowland C (2007) Visualizing high-resolution multibeam shipwreck data. Proceedings of U.S. Hydro Conference May 2007

  • Eriksson N, Rönnby J (2012) ‘The ghost ship’. An intact Fluyt from c. 1650 in the middle of the Baltic Sea. Int J Naut Archaeol 41:350–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Montblanc T, Quinn R, Izquierdo A, Bethencourt M (2016) Evolution of a shallow water wave-dominated shipwreck site: Fougueux (1805), Gulf of Cadiz. Geoarchaeology 31:487–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flatman J (2003) Cultural biographies, cognitive landscapes and dirty old bits of boat: ‘theory’ in maritime archaeology. Int J Naut Archaeol 32:143–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbins D, Adams J (2001) Shipwrecks and maritime archaeology. World Archaeol 32:279–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes Clarke JE (2017) Multibeam echosounders. In: Micallef A, Krastel S, Savini A (eds) Submarine geomorphology. Springer, pp 25–42

  • Hughes Clarke JE, Lamplugh M, Czotter K (2006) Multibeam water column imaging: improved wreck least-depth determination. Proceedings of the Canadian Hydrographic Conference May 2006

  • IHO (2008) IHO standards for hydrographic surveys—standards and specifications publication S-44 (5th Edn). International Hydrographic Bureau. https://www.iho.int/iho_pubs/standard/S-44_5E.pdf. Accessed April 2018

  • IHO (2011) Manual on hydrography—capacity building publication C-13 (1st edn). International Hydrographic Bureau. https://www.iho.int/iho_pubs/CB/C13_Index.htm. Accessed April 2018

  • Kongsberg (2013). EM technical note. Detector modes is SIS for EM2040, EM2040C and EM3002. https://www.km.kongsberg.com/ks/web/nokbg0397.nsf/AllWeb/45B1BC0CF3EE4D06C1257C7E002DA3FA/$file/Kongsberg-EM-Technical-Note-EM-Detector-Modes-in-SIS.pdf?OpenElement. Accessed August 2017

  • Kongsberg (2016). EM2040 Multibeam Echosounder Specifications. https://www.km.kongsberg.com/ks/web/nokbg0240.nsf/AllWeb/C75143F8AA145B48C12575E500276CA4?OpenDocument. Accessed August 2017

  • Lecours V, Dolan M, Micaleff A, Lucieer V (2016) A review of marine geomorphometry, the quantitative study of the seafloor. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 20:3207–3244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lurton X (2010) An introduction to underwater acoustics. Principles and applications. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maarleveld T, Guérin U, Egger B (2013) Manual for activities directed at underwater cultural heritage. Guidelines to the Annex of the UNESCO 2001 Convention. UNESCO

  • Manders M (2009) Multibeam recording as a way to monitor shipwreck sites. In: MACHU final report NR. 3—managing cultural heritage underwater, pp 59–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer L (2006) Frontiers in seafloor mapping and visualization. Mar Geophys Res 27:7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MCA (2013) UK Civil Hydrography Programme. Survey specification. http://www.channelcoast.org/ccoresources/specificationsandbriefs/. Accessed August 2017

  • McCartney I (2016) Jutland 1916: the archaeology of a naval battlefield. Bloomsbury, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertes J, Zant C, Gulley J, Thomsen T (2017) Rapid, quantitative assessment of submerged cultural resource degradation using repeat video surveys and structure from motion. J Marit Archaeol 12:109–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ødegård Ø, Hansen R, Singh H, Maarleveld T (2018) Archaeological use of synthetic aperture sonar on deepwater wreck sites in Skagerrak. J Archaeol Sci 89:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plets R, Quinn R, Forsythe W, Westley K, Bell T, Benetti S, McGrath F, Robinson R (2011) Using multibeam echo-sounder data to identify shipwreck sites: archaeological assessment of the Joint Irish Bathymetric Survey data. Int J Naut Archaeol 40:87–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plets R, Clements A, Quinn R, Strong J (2012) Marine substratum map of the Causeway Coast, Northern Ireland. J Maps 8:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plets R, Dix J, Bates CR (2013) Marine geophysics data acquisition, processing and interpretation. Guidance notes. English Heritage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn R, Boland D (2010) The role of time-lapse bathymetric surveys in assessing morphological change at shipwreck sites. J Archaeol Sci 37:2938–2946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn R, Dean M, Lawrence M, Liscoe S, Boland D (2005) Backscatter responses and resolution considerations in archaeological side-scan sonar surveys: a control experiment. J Archaeol Sci 32:1252–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacchetti F, Benetti S, Georgiopoulou A, Dunlop P, Quinn R (2012) Geomorphology of the Irish Rockall Trough, North Atlantic Ocean, mapped from multibeam bathymetric and backscatter data. J Maps 7:60–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong J, Service M, Plets R, Clements A, Quinn R (2012) Marine substratum and biotope maps of the Maidens/Klondyke bedrock outcrops, Northern Ireland. J Maps 8:129–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2001) Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/underwater-cultural-heritage/2001-convention/official-text/. Accessed August 2017

  • USACE (2013) Hydrographic surveying engineer manual (EM 1110-2-1003). US Army Corp of Engineers. http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/USACE-Publications/Engineer-Manuals/?udt_43544_param_page=4. Accessed April 2018

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Marine Institute of Ireland’s ship-time programme (APP-CV15009: World War I shipwrecks in the Irish Sea: commemoration, visualization and heritage management). We thank the crew of the Celtic Voyager; without your patience and enthusiasm, we could not have achieved this. Thanks to Bob Kinnear (Maritime and Coastguard Agency) for provision of SS Neotsfield data and Karl Brady (Dept. of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht) for supporting work in the Republic of Ireland waters. Finally, we are indebted to the late Martin Dean. His support and guidance were essential in bringing this project to fruition.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kieran Westley.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Westley, K., Plets, R., Quinn, R. et al. Optimising protocols for high-definition imaging of historic shipwrecks using multibeam echosounder. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 11, 3629–3645 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-019-00831-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-019-00831-6

Keywords

Navigation