Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Innovative application of portable X-ray fluorescence (XRF) to identify Göktepe white marble artifacts

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An efficient and non-destructive method to classify white marble artifacts by using a hand-held, portable XRF analyzer (pXRF) is here reported. The identification is based on the uniquely high strontium content of this marble and has been verified by testing 32 artifacts, most of which had already been provenanced, using conventional micro-destructive analyses. Besides strontium, other potential provenance indicators, such as manganese and iron, were analyzed and their concentration values obtained after empirical calibration of the instrument by using 17 quarry samples of known composition. The results show that Göktepe/non-Göktepe discrimination is almost always possible (30 artifacts) and that additional analyses are required only when the Sr value is at the lower edge of the Göktepe field (2 artifacts). The success of the method, however, resides in the particular composition relative to trace elements of Göktepe and is not easily extended to other marble varieties. Main reasons are related to insufficient accuracy at low concentration values, intrinsic trace variability of marble artifacts, surface effects that may produce not representative results. Interest in the method therefore is tightly linked to the exceptional importance of Göktepe as a sculptural marble, in which case, detailed data, obtained with a fast and totally non-destructive method, may provide relevant information concerning chronology, workshops, and places of production of the artifacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Attanasio D, Platania R (2000) ESR spectroscopy as a tool for identifying joining marble fragments: the example of a pulpit by Donatello and Michelozzo. J of Magnetic Resonance 144:322–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attanasio D, Bruno M, Prochaska W, Yavuz AB (2013) The Asiatic marbles of the Hadrian’s Villa at Tivoli. J Archaeol Sci 40:4358–4368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attanasio D, Bruno M, Prochaska W, Yavuz AB (2015a) A multi-method database of the black and white marbles of Göktepe including isotopic. EPR, Trace and Petrographic Data, Archaeometry 57:217–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Attanasio D, Bruno M, Prochaska W, Yavuz AB (2015b) Re-evaluation of the marble provenance of the Esquiline group sculptures (Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, Copenhagen) following the discovery of the Aphrodisian marble quarries at Göktepe. Römische Mitteilungen 121:567–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Attanasio, D., Bruno, M., Prochaska, W., Yavuz, A.B., 2015c. The marble of Roman Imperial portraits, 11th ASMOSIA Conference, Split, 18–22 may 2015 (abstract)

  • Bruno M, Attanasio D, Prochaska W, Yavuz AB (2015) An update on the use and distribution of white and black Göktepe marble from the 1st century AD to late antiquity. In: Pensabene P, Gasparini E (eds) Proc. of the 10th ASMOSIA conference. L’Erma di Bretschneider, Rome, pp. 461–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Calligaro T, Coquinot Y, Guerra MF, Herrmann JJ, Laugier L, van den Hoek A (2013) Dolomitic marble from Thasos at the Louvre. Open Journal of Archaeometry 1:68–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake BL, Nazaroff AJ, Prufer KM (2009) Error assessment of portable X-ray flourescence spectrometry in geochemical sourcing. Society of Archaeological Science Bulletin 71:4856–4867

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert A, Gnos E, Ramseyer K, Spandler C, Fleitmann D, Bitzios D, Decrouez D (2010) Provenance of marbles from Naxos based on microstructural and geochemical characterization. Archaeometry 52:209–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frahm E (2013a) Validity of “off-the-shelf” handheld portable XRF for sourcing near eastern obsidian chip debris. J Archaeol Sci 40:1080–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frahm E (2013b) Is obsidian sourcing about geochemistry or archaeology ? A reply to Speakman and Shackley. J Archaeol Sci 40:1444–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frahm E (2014) Characterizing obsidian sources with portable XRF: accuracy, reproducibility, and field relationships in a case study from Armenia. J Archaeol Sci 49:105–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frahm E, Doonan CP (2013) The technological versus methodological revolution of portable XRF in archaeology. J Archaeol Sci 40:1425–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germann K, Holzmann G, Winkler FJ (1980) Determination of marble provenance: limits of isotopic analysis. Archaeometry 22:99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heginbotham, A., Bezur, A., Bouchard, M., Davis, J., Eremin, K., Frantz, J.H., Glinsman, L., Hayek, L., Hook, D., Kantarelou, V., Karydas, A., Lee, L., Mass, J., Matsen, C., McCarthy, B., McGath, B., Shugar, A., Sirois, J., Smith, D., Speakman, R., 2010. A round-robin study to evaluate the inter-laboratory reproducibility of quantitative X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy on historic copper alloys. In: Mardikian, P., Chemello, C., Watters, C., Hull, P. (Eds.), Metal 2010, Proceedings of the Interim Meeting of the ICOM-CC Metal Working Group, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, 11–15 October 2010, Clemson University, South Carolina, 178–188

  • Jenkins R (1999) X-ray spectrometry 2 ed, chemical analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Liritzis I, Zacharias N (2011) Portable XRF of archaeological artifacts: current research, potentials and limitations. In: Shackley MS (ed) X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) in geoarchaeology. Springer, New York, pp. 109–142

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mandi V, Vassiliou A, Maniatis Y, Grimanis AP (1995) An evaluation of the contribution of trace elements to the determination of marble provenance. In: Maniatis Y, Herz N, Basiakos Y (eds) The study of marble and other stones used in antiquity. Archetype, London, pp. 207–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantler M, Schreiner M (2000) X-ray fluorescence spectrometry in art and archaeology. X-Ray Spectrom 29:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews KJ (1997) The establishment of a data base of neutron activation analyses of white marble. Archaeometry 39:321–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newlander K, Goodale N, Jones GT, Bailey DG (2015) Empirical study of the effect of count time on the precision and accuracy of pXRF data. J Archaeol Sci Rep 3:534–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts PJ (2008) Introduction, analytical instrumentation and application overview. In: Pott PJ, West M (eds) Portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry: capabilities for in situ analysis. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp. 1–12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska W (2013) A sculptural marble of prime quality in antiquity—the dolomitic marble of the Sivec mountains in Macedonia. Archaeometry 55:179–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska W, Grillo SM (2010) A new method for the determination of the provenance of white marbles by chemical analysis of inclusion fluids: the marbles of the mausoleum of Belevi/Turkey. Archaeometry 52:59–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe H, Hughes N, Robinson K (2012) The quantification and application of hand-held energy-dispersive x-ray fluorescence (ED-XRF) in mudrock chemostratigraphy and geochemistry. Chem Geol 324–325:122–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackley MS (2010) Is there reliability and validity in portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (pXRF) ? The SAA Archaeological Record 10(5):17–20

  • Shackley MS (ed) (2011a) X-ray fluorescence spectrometry in geoarchaeology. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackley MS (2011b) An introduction to X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis in archaeology. In: Shackley MS (ed) X-ray fluorescence spectrometry in geoarchaeology. Springer, New York, pp. 7–44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shackley MS (2012) Portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (pXRF): The good, the bad and the ugly, Archaeology Southwest Magazine, 26, 2, online essay: www.archaeologysouthwest.org

  • Speakman RJ, Shackley MS (2013) Silo science and portable XRF in archaeology: a response to Frahm. J Archaeol Sci 40:1435–1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tykot RH (2016) Using nondestructive portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometers on stone, ceramics, metals and other materials in museums: advantages and limitations. Appl Spectrosc 70:42–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaggelli G, Serra M, Cossio R, Borghi A (2014) A new approach for provenance studies of archaeological finds: inferences from trace elements in carbonate minerals of alpine white marbles by a bench-to-top μ-XRF spectrometer. International Journal of Mineralogy. doi:10.1155/2014/217916

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenner DB, Havert S, Clark A (1988) Variations in stable isotopic composition of marble: an assessment of causes. In: Herz N, Waelkens M (eds) Classical marble: geochemistry, technology, trade. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 325–338

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yavuz AB, Attanasio D, Elci H, Brilli M, Bruno M (2009) Discovery and preliminary investigation of the Göktepe marble quarries (Muğla, Turkey): an alternative source of Aphrodisias marbles. In: Jockey P (ed) Marbres et autres roches de la Méditerranée antique: etudes interdisciplinaires. Maisonneuve & Larose, Paris, pp. 93–109

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. I.C.V.B.C.-C.N.R.–via Madonna Del Piano, 10–50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy

    Donata Magrini, Susanna Bracci & Emma Cantisani

  2. I.S.M.-C.N.R.–via Salaria, km 29,300–00016 Monterotondo Staz, Rome, Italy

    Donato Attanasio

  3. Appl. Geol. Sci, University of Leoben, 8700, Leoben, Austria

    Walter Prochaska

Authors
  1. Donata Magrini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Donato Attanasio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Susanna Bracci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Emma Cantisani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Walter Prochaska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donata Magrini.

Additional information

Highlights

• A totally non-invasive identification of Göktepe white marble is proposed.

• The semi-quantitative evaluation is validated by atomic absorption spectroscopy.

• The method turns out to be especially effective due to the very high Sr concentration of Göktepe marble.

• Mn and Fe concentrations were tested with the aim of exploring wider applicability of the method

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Magrini, D., Attanasio, D., Bracci, S. et al. Innovative application of portable X-ray fluorescence (XRF) to identify Göktepe white marble artifacts. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 10, 1141–1152 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-016-0444-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-016-0444-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation