Advertisement

Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences

, Volume 9, Issue 7, pp 1343–1348 | Cite as

Impact of modern cattle feeding practices on milk fatty acid stable carbon isotope compositions emphasise the need for caution in selecting reference animal tissues and products for archaeological investigations

  • Mélanie Roffet-Salque
  • Michael R. F. Lee
  • Adrian Timpson
  • Richard P. Evershed
Open Access
Original Paper
First Online:

Abstract

Degraded animal fats, characterised by the presence of palmitic (C16:0) and stearic (C18:0) fatty acids and related glycerolipids are the most common class of preserved lipids in organic residues trapped in the porous clay matrix of archaeological ceramic vessels. The ubiquitous presence of fatty acids in animal fats and plant oils precludes identification of fat types by the solely molecular composition of residues. Hence, animal fats are identified by determining their fatty acyl lipid distributions and stable carbon (δ13C) values allowing distinctions to be drawn between non-ruminant and ruminant, and dairy and adipose fats. The Δ13C proxy (= δ13C18:0 - δ13C16:0) originally proposed in the 1990s by Evershed and co-workers was based on modern reference fats sampled from animals raised in Britain on C3 plant diets. Further analyses on adipose and dairy fats from ruminants grazing in a wide range of isoscapes have shown that the Δ13C proxy can be applied in mixed C3/C4 environments, such as in Africa. Here we show, however, through the investigation of milk fats, how the Δ13C proxy can be perturbed when animals are reared on modern diets, specifically maize silage. It is thus shown that extreme care has to be taken when choosing modern reference fats for archaeological studies, and especially that insecurely sourced animal fats should be excluded from such databases.

Keywords

Modern reference materials Animal fats Lipid residue analyses Dairy fats Silage 

Introduction

The most common class of lipids extracted from archaeological potsherds are degraded animal fats, recognisable by the presence in high temperature-gas chromatography (HT-GC) profiles of triacylglycerols (TAGs) and their degradation products, namely: diacylglycreols (DAGs), monoacylglycerols (MAGs) and free fatty acids (Evershed et al., 1990, 2002a). The routine identification of the fat source based on comparison of the molecular distributions, e.g. TAG and fatty acid compositions, with modern reference fats is complicated due to changes in composition brought about by vessel use and burial (Evershed, 2008). Thus, in the 1990s, Evershed and co-workers began to explore the use of compound-specific stable isotopic techniques to provenance these degraded archaeological animal fats by determining the stable carbon isotopic composition (δ13C values) of the two major fatty acids C16:0 and C18:0, namely palmitic and stearic acids (Evershed et al., 1994, 1997).

The development of any biomolecular or stable isotope proxy for reconstructing past environments or processes requires measurements of reference collections of organisms from contemporary or past environments of known provenance. Hence, the determination of the origins of ancient fats based on their stable carbon isotope compositions required comparison of the compound-specific δ13C values of palmitic (C16:0) and stearic (C18:0) acids of archaeological fats with the same compounds in modern reference fats. The founding study highlighted differences in the δ13C values of C16:0 and C18:0 fatty acids from different sources of terrestrial animals (non-ruminant and ruminant) and different fat types (adipose and dairy fats; Dudd and Evershed, 1998; Copley et al., 2003). The δ13C values of the major saturated fatty acids in modern reference fats were interpreted as reflecting fundamental differences in the metabolism and physiology of ruminant and non-ruminant animals and in the biosynthesis of fats in different tissues, i.e. adipose versus mammary, suggesting that dairy and adipose fats could be distinguished based on the difference in their δ13C18:0 values (Copley et al., 2003; Mukherjee et al., 2005). However, this relationship is complicated by the fact that δ13C values of fatty acids reflect dietary δ13C values, which vary e.g. according to the photosynthetic pathway (C3 and C4) of plants. Therefore, the Δ13C (=δ13C18:0 - δ13C16:0) proxy was introduced to remove the environmental component of the δ13C variation common to both the C16:0 and C18:0 fatty acids, leaving only the variations attributable to the metabolic and physiological processes in the animals (Evershed et al., 2002b; Dunne et al., 2012).

The reference fats analysed in the studies of Copley et al. (2003) and Dunne et al. (2012) were carefully sampled from animals raised on diets isotopically similar to those that would have existed in prehistory, i.e. grass pastures and fodder. However, a number of recent studies have derived δ13C values of fatty acids from meat or dairy products sourced from markets, animals raised on unknown diets and potentially exposed to modern practices (e.g. Spangenberg et al., 2006; Gregg et al., 2009). Researchers have argued that these collections are required to account for regional variations; however, exposure of the modern diets, e.g. silages, where that natural balance of macronutrients are affected and their carbon isotopic relationships are lost, is likely to introduce confounding factors. Here, we present the results of molecular and isotopic analyses of fatty acids from milk obtained from cattle reared on three types of diet, ranging from a pure C3 natural diet (pastures and fodder) to pure silage (grass and maize).

Materials and methods

Samples

The study compares milk from either cattle raised on a strict C3 pasture diet (diet A; n = 8; reported in Dudd and Evershed, 1998; and Copley et al., 2003), with milk sampled on two occasions from the Langford Farm (University of Bristol, UK) herd: (i) in April 2009, when cattle were feeding on a mixed grass/maize silage (C3/C4) overnight, while grazing on grass swards (predominately Lolium perenne; C3) during the day (diet B; n = 10) and (ii) in January 2010, when cattle were housed and feeding entirely on the same mixed grass/maize silage (C3/C4; diet C; n = 10).

Lipid analyses

Lipid analyses were performed using established protocols described in detail in other publications (Dudd et al., 1998; Copley et al., 2003; Evershed et al., 2008). The animal fats were freeze-dried and a portion (few mg) extracted with a mixture of chloroform/methanol (2 × 3 mL, 2:1 v/v) by sonication (2 × 20 min). The solvent was evaporated to dryness under a gentle stream of nitrogen, and the total lipid extract (TLE) stored in a refrigerator until required for further analysis. The TLE was weighed, and a mixture of chloroform/methanol (2:1 v/v) added to give a 1 mg mL−1 solution. An aliquot (the equivalent of 1 mg of fat) was treated with NaOH/H2O (9:1 w/v) in methanol (5 % v/v; 70 °C, 1 h). Following neutralisation, lipids were extracted in dichloromethane (3 × 3 mL) and excess solvent evaporated under a gentle stream of nitrogen. Fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) were prepared by reaction with BF3-methanol (14 % w/v; 70 °C, 1 h). FAME derivatives were extracted with dichloromethane (3 × 2 mL), and the solvent removed with a gentle stream of nitrogen. FAME derivatives were then re-dissolved into hexane for analysis by gas chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography-combustion-isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-C-IRMS).

The δ13C values obtained for the modern reference fats were not adjusted for post-industrial revolution effects of fossil fuel burning (Friedli et al., 1986) and are thus not directly comparable to δ13C values from archaeological fats.

Results

Fatty acid composition of dairy fats

The major fatty acids in cattle milk are C16:0 and C18:1, with a lower proportion of C18:0, and characteristic short-chain fatty acids (C2 to C14; Jensen et al., 1962). The main fatty acid composition of dairy fats from cattle fed on diets B and C are presented in Table 1. The percentage of C14:0 and C18:0 fatty acids of the total fatty acids do not vary from diet B to diet C. However, the percentage of the C16:0 fatty acid of the total fatty acids increased (t test, p value = 0.02) while the abundance of the unsaturated C18:n fatty acids decreased (t test, p value = 0.02) significantly in dairy fats from cattle raised on diet B to diet C. Furthermore, a significant increase in the C16:0/C18:0 ratio (t test p value = 0.04) is observed between dairy fats from cattle raised on diet B and C. Several studies have shown previously an increase in the C16:0 fatty acid content of cattle milk when the diet is changed from grass to silage (e.g. Elgersma et al., 2004).
Table 1

Composition (% of the total fatty acids) of some individual fatty acids and ratios of fatty acids, for dairy fats from cattle raised on diet B (fresh grass (C3) and a mixed grass/maize (C3/C4) silage; n = 9, one sample was considered as outlier) and diet C (mixed grass/maize (C3/C4) silage; n = 10)

 

Diet B

Diet C

p value

Significance

%

s.d

%

s.d

C14:0

7.8

2.5

8.9

1.9

0.28

NS

C16:0

32.4

2.6

36.7

4.6

0.02

*

C18:0

15.3

2.3

14.2

2.0

0.29

NS

C18:n (total)

35.7

4.7

30.1

4.6

0.02

*

C18:n /C 18:0

2.40

0.60

2.16

0.46

0.46

NS

C16:0/C18:0

2.17

0.43

2.63

0.46

0.04

*

Note: datasets are compared using statistical tests that are currently usually used for this type of study, although it should be noted that the inferences are limited as the data is compositional

Significance of the measurements between means at NS not significant

*p value <0.05 (t tests for all but for C18:n/C18:0 ratio—Kruskall-Wallis test)

Isotopic composition of dairy fats

The mean δ13C16:0 values of dairy fats raised on a pure C3 grass diet A (Copley et al., 2003), diet B (~20 dry matter weight % of maize silage) and diet C (~30 % dry matter weight % of maize silage) are −30.2, −26.9 and −26.2 ‰, respectively, while the mean δ13C18:0 values are −35.2, −30.9 and −28.9 ‰, respectively (Figs. 1, 2). δ13C18:0 values become more enriched in 13C when the proportion of C4 plants in the diet is increased (Tukey HSD tests, p value <0.0001 for all three comparisons). δ13C16:0 values are more enriched in 13C when cattle are fed on diets B or C compared to diet A (Tukey HSD test, p value <0.0001 for the two comparisons). However, differences in the δ13C16:0 values are less significant when cattle are raised on diets B or C (Tukey HSD test, p value = 0.2458), probably because of small sample sizes.
Fig. 1

δ13C values for C16:0 and C18:0 fatty acids from milk of cattle raised in the UK on a C3 diet (black dots, diet A; Copley et al., 2003); fresh grass (C3) and a mixed grass/maize (C3/C4) silage (grey dots, diet B, this study) and a mixed grass/maize (C3/C4) silage (white dots, diet C, this study). For comparison, δ13C values for C16:0 and C18:0 fatty acids from ruminant adipose fats (cattle and sheep) and non-ruminant adipose fats (pigs) in grey (Copley et al., 2003). Confidence ellipses are 1 sigma CI. 

Fig. 2

δ13C values for C16:0 (black dots) and C18:0 (grey dots) fatty acids (in order of increasing δ13C16:0 values) from milk of cattle raised on (i) C3 UK: a C3 diet in the UK (Copley et al., 2003); (ii) C3/C4 Africa: mixed C3/C4 diets in Kenya (Dunne et al., 2012); (iii) diet B: fresh grass (C3) and mixed grass/maize (C3/C4) silage in the UK (this study) and (iv) diet C: mixed grass/maize (C3/C4) silage in the UK (this study)

The Δ13C values of dairy fats from cattle raised on diet B range between −5.5 and −3.0 ‰ (mean −4.1 ‰) show no significant difference to the Δ13C values of dairy fats from cattle raised on a pure C3 diet (Tukey HSD test, p value = 0.2146). In contrast, Δ13C values of dairy fats from cattle raised on diet C range between −3.4 and −1.6 ‰ (mean −2.7 ‰) and are significantly higher compared to those of cattle raised on C3 fresh pasture (Tukey HSD test, p value <0.0001; Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Δ13C (= δ13C18:0 - δ13C16:0) values (in order of increasing Δ13C values) from milk of cattle raised on (i) C3 UK: a C3 diet in the UK (Copley et al., 2003); (ii) C3/C4 Africa: mixed C3/C4 diets in Kenya (Dunne et al., 2012); (iii) diet B: fresh grass (C3) and mixed grass/maize (C3/C4) silage in the UK (this study) and (iv) diet C: mixed grass/maize (C3/C4) silage in the UK (this study). Ranges and mean values of C3 ruminant (cattle and sheep) adipose fats and C3 cattle dairy fats from the UK (Copley et al., 2003) for comparison

In order to assess the influence of C4 plant component of the silage on the Δ13C values of cattle milk, milk from cattle raised in the UK on diets ranging from C3 plants to C3/C4 silage (diets A, B and C) were compared to milk from cattle raised on natural pastures of mixed C3 and C4 plants in Kenya (n = 9). Dairy fats from cattle from Kenya exhibit δ13C16:0 values ranging from −26.4 to −15.3 ‰ (mean −20.5 ‰) and δ13C18:0 values ranged from −30.1 to −21.8 ‰ (mean −25.7 ‰; Dunne et al., 2012; Fig. 1a). They are thus on average ca. 10 ‰ more enriched in 13C than dairy fats from cattle raised on a C3 diet in the UK (Copley et al., 2003), confirming the influence of C4 plants in their diet (Fig. 2).

Dairy fats from cattle from Kenya exhibit Δ13C values ranging from −3.1 to −6.6 ‰ (mean −5.2 ‰; Dunne et al., 2012; Fig. 1b) show no evidence of differing (t test, p value = 0.6054) from the milk from cattle raised on a pure C3 diet in the UK (Fig. 3; Copley et al., 2003). No changes in the Δ13C values of milk fats from cattle raised on a diet comprising fresh C4 plants are thus observed, suggesting that the presence of fresh C4 plants in the animal’s diet does not affect Δ13C values. The increase in the Δ13C values of dairy fats from cattle raised on diet C (mixture of maize/grass silage) is thus likely to be linked to modern feeding practices.

Discussion

As expected, the δ13C values of C16:0 and C18:0 fatty acids extracted from cattle milk are more enriched in 13C when cattle are raised on diet containing increasing amounts of C4 plant matter (maize). While C3 plants fix atmospheric CO2 using the ribulose biphosphate carboxylase (RuBisCO) catalysed Calvin cycle (Calvin and Benson, 1948) and discriminate against 13CO2 (Boutton, 1991), C4 plants fix atmospheric CO2 with the Hatch-Slack pathway (Hatch and Slack, 1966) which discriminates less against 13CO2 (Boutton, 1991). Bulk δ13C values of C3 and C4 plants thus range from −34 to −24 ‰ and −19 to −6 ‰, respectively (Smith and Epstein, 1971). Hence, the δ13C values of the fatty acids and carbohydrates are more enriched in C4 plants compared to C3 plants. The carbohydrates and fatty acids are then incorporated into the body fats of the consumer animals, leading to enriched δ13C16:0 and δ13C18:0 values of synthesised milk.

The difference between the raw δ13C values of C18:0 and C16:0 fatty acids (namely Δ13C values) in milk from cattle raised on a pure C3 diet range between −5.9 and −3.6 ‰. Furthermore, milk from cattle raised traditionally on pastures comprising C3 and C4 plants in Africa display Δ13C (= δ13C18:0 - δ13C16:0) values similar to that observed in cattle raised on C3 diet in Britain (Fig. 3). This difference in the isotopic composition of the two main fatty acids reflects the different sources for the C16:0 and C18:0 fatty acids in milk. In fact, while C16:0 fatty acids are biosynthesised from carbohydrates and fatty acids from the diet, C18:0 fatty acid in milk has two distinct contributions. As the mammary gland is unable to biosynthesise the C18:0 fatty acid, it is sourced from: (i) the remobilisation of C18:0 fatty acids from the carcass depot fats and (ii) the direct incorporation of C18:0 from the diet, after rumen biohydrogenation of C18:n fatty acids from dietary plants (Fig. 4a; Copley et al., 2003). The difference in the isotopic composition of these two pools relates to the 8 ‰ difference between carbohydrates and fatty acids in plants when pyruvate is decarboxylated to acetylCoA (DeNiro and Epstein, 1977) with the mass balance leading to the difference of ca. 3 ‰ evident between the C18:0 fatty acids from carcass and dairy fats (Copley et al., 2003).
Fig. 4

Routing of dietary fatty acids and carbohydrates in the rumen, adipose tissue and mammary gland of the ruminant animal. a When fed on traditional diets, approximately 60 % of the C18:0 fatty acid in milk appears to be directly incorporated from the diet, after the biohydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids (e.g. C18:3) in the rumen (after Copley et al., 2003). b When fed on high starch/high free oil, <60 % of the C18:0 fatty acid in milk is directly incorporated from the diet, while >40 % is remobilized from the adipose fat, leading to δ13C18:0 values in milk similar to those observed in adipose fats

The consistent Δ13C values arise because the carbon isotopic difference between fatty acids and carbohydrates (ca. 8 ‰) is common to all plants, no matter what photosynthetic fixation mechanism is used. The difference is controlled by fractionation resulting from the pyruvate dehydrogenase enzyme complex involved in the decarboxylation of the pyruvate in forming acetyl CoA (DeNiro and Epstein, 1977). Given the latter and the fact metabolism of ruminant mammals is consistent no matter what region of the world the animal comes from, the arithmetic transformation from raw δ13C values to Δ13C values is valid in removing the influence of varying proportions of C3 and C4 plants in ruminant forages (Mukherjee et al., 2005; Dunne et al., 2012). While this model was devised on the basis of fresh C3 plant consumption, as discussed above, this difference of ca. 3 ‰ holds for cattle, or any other ruminant animal, raised on any combination of traditional C3 and C4 pastures. This is confirmed here by the similarity between Δ13C values of milk from cattle raised on a pure C3 diet (diet A) or the C3/C4 diets from Africa.

In contrast, however, milk from cattle raised on a mixture of grass/maize silage exhibits Δ13C higher values ranging from −3.4 to −1.6 ‰ (Fig. 3). The carbon isotopic compositions of the main saturated fatty acids (C16:0 and C18:0) are thus more similar by ca. 2 ‰, compared to the same fatty acids from cattle grazing pasture (C3 in the UK and C3/C4 in Kenya), suggesting that the C16:0 and C18:0 fatty acids have a more similar metabolic source than when cattle are grazing on herbage.

Changes in the biohydrogenation of polyunsaturated fatty acids in the rumen is known to happen when high starch and high free oil diets are fed to cattle, inducing milk fat depression through a downregulation of de novo synthesised fatty acids in the mammary gland. Remobilisation of C18:0 fatty acids from the adipose fats to milk fats is thus increased when diets fed to cattle are high in starch or free oil (Peterson et al., 2003), leading to the carbon isotopic composition of C18:0 fatty acids from milk fats being more comparable to that of C18:0 fatty acids from the adipose fats (Fig. 4b). The difference between the δ13C values of C18:0 and C16:0 fatty acids in milk is thus diminished, leading to less negative Δ13C values.

Conclusions

The results presented herein lead to the following conclusions and recommendations:
  1. (i)

    Feeding high starch and high concentrate/low forage diets to cattle alters the δ13C values of C18:0 fatty acids (and thus the Δ13C values) of their milk by affecting pathways of fatty acids biosynthesis. In prehistory, cattle were very unlikely to have been fed such diets as high starch or oil rich produce are likely to have been kept for human consumption. Furthermore, human food waste would likely have been fed to pigs.

     
  2. (ii)

    Any modern feeding practices, in which the biochemical and isotopic relationships that exist in natural plants are lost, may affect other species and other products (e.g. cattle and deer adipose fats). Hence, animals raised using modern manipulated or formulated feeds, i.e. silage and concentrates, must be avoided when building a reference dataset to compare with archaeological animal fats.

     
  3. (iii)

    In our experience, establishing the validity of reference fats requires explicit conversations with the actual farmers to establish the feeds they employ during the entire annual feeding cycle.

     
  4. (iv)

    The label ‘organic’ does not offer any guarantee in terms of comparability to prehistoric farming practices as a modern ‘organic’ cattle diet will still include silages and formulated feeds, which negate the use of animals raised on such diets for interpreting the origins of archaeological animal fat residues.

     

Notes

Acknowledgments

Michael Jones (previous address: School of Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, UK) thanked for providing the cattle milk samples. We thank J. Ridge and L. Ridge, Manor Farm, Somerset, for their help in providing reference fats from cattle raised on a pure C3 pasture. We thank Helen Grant of the NERC Life Sciences Mass Spectrometry Facility (Lancaster node) for stable isotopic characterisation of reference standards and derivatizing agents and NERC for partial funding of the mass spectrometry facilities at Bristol (contract no. R8/H10/63; www.lsmsf.co.uk). Research was funded by the ERC Advanced grant ‘NeoMilk’ (FP7-IDEAS-ERC/324202) to R.P.E.

References

  1. Boutton TW (1991) Tracer studies with 13C-enriched substrates: humans and large animals. In: Coleman DC, Fry B (eds) Carbon isotope techniques. Academia Press Inc., San Diego, California, pp. 219–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Calvin M, Benson AA (1948) The path of carbon in biosynthesis. Science 107:476–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Copley MS, Berstan R, Dudd SN, Docherty G, Mukherjee AJ, Straker V, Payne S, Evershed RP (2003) Direct chemical evidence for widespread dairying in prehistoric Britain. P Natl Acad Sci USA 100(4):1524–1529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DeNiro MJ, Epstein S (1977) Mechanism of carbon isotope fractionation associated with lipid synthesis. Science 197(4300):261–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dudd SN, Evershed RP (1998) Direct demonstration of milk as an element of archaeological economies. Science 282:1478–1481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dudd SN, Regert M, Evershed RP (1998) Assessing microbial lipid contributions during laboratory degradations of fats and oils and pure triacylglycerols absorbed in ceramic potsherds. Org Geochem 29(5–7):1345–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunne J, Evershed RP, Salque M, Cramp LJE, Bruni S, Ryan K, Biagetti S, di Lernia S (2012) First dairying in green Saharan Africa in the fifth millennium BC. Nature 486:390–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elgersma A, Ellen G, van der Horst H, Boer H, Dekker PR, Tamminga S (2004) Quick changes in milk fat composition from cows after transition from fresh grass to a silage diet. Anim Feed Sci Tech 117(1–2):13–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Evershed RP, Heron C, Goad LJ (1990) Analysis of organic residues of archaeological origin by high-temperature gas chromatography and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Analyst 115:1339–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evershed RP, Arnot KI, Collister J, Eglinton G, Charters S (1994) Application of isotope ratio monitoring gas chromatography–mass spectrometry to the analysis of organic residues of archaeological origin. Analyst 119:909–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evershed RP, Mottram HR, Dudd SN, Charters S, Stott AW, Lawrence GJ, Gibson AM, Conner A, Blinkhorn PW, Reeves V (1997) New criteria for the identification of animal fats preserved in archaeological pottery. Naturwissenschaften 84(9):402–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evershed RP, Dudd SN, Copley MS, Berstan R, Stott AW, Mottram H, Buckley SA, Crossman Z (2002a) Chemistry of archaeological animal fats. Accounts Chem Res 35:660–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Evershed RP, Dudd SN, Copley MS, Mukherjee AJ (2002b) Identification of animal fats via compound specific δ13C values of individual fatty acids: assessments of results for reference fats and lipid extracts of archaeological pottery vessels. Documenta Praehistorica 29:73–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evershed RP (2008) Experimental approaches to the interpretation of absorbed organic residues in archaeological ceramics. World Archaeol 40(1):26–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Evershed RP, Payne S, Sherratt AG, Copley MS, Coolidge J, Urem-Kotsu D, Kotsakis K, Özdoğan M, Özdoğan A, Nieuwenhuyse O, Akkermans PMMG, Bailey D, Andeescu R-R, Campbell S, Farid S, Hodder I, Yalman N, Özbaşaran M, Biçakci E, Garkinfel Y, Levy T, Burton MM (2008) Earliest date for milk use in the near east and southeastern Europe linked to cattle herding. Nature 455:528–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Friedli H, Lotscher H, Oeschger H, Siegenthaler U, Stauffer B (1986) Ice core record of the 13C/12C ratio of atmospheric CO2 in the past two centuries. Nature 324:237–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gregg MW, Banning EB, Gibbs K, Slater GF (2009) Subsistence practices and pottery use in Neolithic Jordan: molecular and isotopic evidence. J Archaeol Sci 36(4):937–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hatch MD, Slack CR (1966) Photosynthesis by sugar-cane leaves. A new carboxylation reaction and the pathway of sugar formation. J Biochem 101(1):103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jensen RG, Gander GW, Sampugna J (1962) Fatty acid composition of the lipids from pooled, raw milk. J Dairy Sci 45:129–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mukherjee, A. J., Copley, M. S., Berstan, R., Clark, K. A. and Evershed, R. P. (2005). Interpretation of δ13C values of fatty acids in relation to animal husbandry, food processing and consumption in prehistory. The Zooarchaeology of Fats, Oils, Milk and Dairying -9th ICAZ Conference. J. Mulville and A. K. Outram. Durham, Oxbow Books 77–93Google Scholar
  21. Peterson DG, Matitashvili EA, Bauman DE (2003) Diet-induced milk fat depression in dairy cows results in increased trans-10, cis-12 CLA in milk fat and coordinate suppression of mRNA abundance for mammary enzymes involved in milk fat synthesis. J Nutr 133(10):3098–3102Google Scholar
  22. Smith BN, Epstein S (1971) Two categories of 13C/12C ratios for higher plants. Plant Physiol 47(3):380–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Spangenberg JE, Jacomet S, Schibler J (2006) Chemical analyses of organic residues in archaeological pottery from Arbon Bleiche 3, Switzerland—evidence for dairying in the late Neolithic. J Archaeol Sci 33(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mélanie Roffet-Salque
    • 1
  • Michael R. F. Lee
    • 2
    • 3
  • Adrian Timpson
    • 4
  • Richard P. Evershed
    • 1
  1. 1.Organic Geochemistry Unit, School of ChemistryUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.School of Veterinary ScienceUniversity of BristolLangfordUK
  3. 3.Rothamsted ResearchOkehamptonUK
  4. 4.Department of Genetics, Evolution and EnvironmentUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations