Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 251–263 | Cite as

What is on the craftsmen’s menu? Plant consumption at Datrana, a 5000-year-old lithic blade workshop in North Gujarat, India

  • Juan José García-GraneroEmail author
  • Charusmita Gadekar
  • Irene Esteban
  • Carla Lancelotti
  • Marco Madella
  • P. Ajithprasad
Original Paper


The exploitation of lithic resources was an important aspect of prehistoric resource exploitation strategies and adaptation. Research has mostly focused on technological and spatial aspects of lithic factory sites, often overlooking how these sites were integrated within local socioecological dynamics in terms of food acquisition and consumption. The aim of this paper is to study plant consumption at Datrana, a 5000-year-old lithic blade workshop in North Gujarat, India, in order to understand its occupants’ subsistence strategies. The results of archaeobotanical, mineralogical and soil pH analyses show that the occupants of this factory site were consuming local crops but not processing them, suggesting that either (a) food was being processed in other areas of the site or (b) it was acquired in a ‘ready-to-consume’ state from local food-producing communities. This study highlights the integration of a lithic factory site within its surrounding cultural and natural landscape, offering an example of how the inhabitants of a workshop interacted with local communities to acquire food resources.


Lithic workshop Craft specialisation Archaeobotany Mineralogy Subsistence strategies South Asia 



Fieldwork at Datrana IV was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport (Programa de Ayudas para Proyectos Arqueológicos en el Exterior 2010), and laboratory work was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Programa I+D, HAR2010-16052). We are grateful to the members of the NoGAP project for their help during fieldwork, to Débora Zurro and Jorge Caro-Saiz for the numerous discussions and to the Archaeological Survey of India for granting excavation permission. JJGG acknowledges funding from a JAE-PreDOC doctoral research grant (Spanish National Research Council and European Social Fund). CaSEs is a Grup de Recerca Emergent (SGR-e 1417) of the Generalitat de Catalunya.


  1. Ajithprasad P (2002) The pre-Harappan cultures of Gujarat, In: Settar S, Korisettar R (eds) Indian archaeology in retrospect, vol. II. Protohistory: archaeology of the Harappan Civilization. Manohar, New Delhi, pp. 129–158Google Scholar
  2. Ajithprasad P (2011) Chalcolithic cultural patterns and the Early Harappan interaction in Gujarat. In: Osada T, Witzel M (eds) Cultural relations between the Indus and the Iranian Plateau during the third millennium BCE. Harvard Oriental Series, Opera Minora vol. 7. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp. 11–40.Google Scholar
  3. Albert RM, Weiner S (2001) Study of phytoliths in prehistoric ash layers from Kebara and Tabun Caves using a quantitative approach. In: Meunier D, Colin F (eds) Phytoliths: applications in earth sciences and human history. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 251–266Google Scholar
  4. Acharya M (2008) Kunal excavation (new light on the origin of Harappan Civilization). Department of Archaeology and Museum. Haryana, Haryana Govt PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Balbo AL, Cabanes D, García-Granero JJ, Bonet A, Ajithprasad P, Terradas X (2014) A microarchaeological approach for the study of pits. Env Archaeol. doi: 10.1179/1749631414Y.0000000044 Google Scholar
  6. Beck C, Taylor AK, Jones GT, Fadem CM, Cook CR, Millward SA (2002) Rocks are heavy: transport costs and Paleoarchaic quarry behavior in the Great Basin. J Anthropol Archaeol 21:481–507. doi: 10.1016/S0278-4165(02)00.007-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berna F, Behar A, Shahack-Gross R, et al. (2007) Sediments exposed to high temperatures: reconstructing pyrotechnological processes in Late Bronze and Iron Age strata at Tel Dor (Israel). J Archaeol Sci 34:358–373. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2006.05.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biagi P, Cremaschi M (1991) The Harappan flint quarries of the Rohri Hills (Sindh-Pakistan). Antiq 65:97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bouby L, Fages G, Treffort JM (2005) Food storage in two Late Bronze Age caves of southern France: palaeoethnobotanical and social implications. Veget Hist Archaeobot 14:313–328. doi: 10.1007/s00334-005-0079-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Braadbaart F, Poole I, van Brussel AA (2009) Preservation potential of charcoal in alkaline environments: an experimental approach and implications for the archaeological record. J Archaeo Sci 36:1672–1679. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2009.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cabanes D, Weiner S, Shahack-Gross R (2011) Stability of phytoliths in the archaeological record: a dissolution study of modern and fossil phytoliths. J Archaeol Sci 38:2480–2490. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.05.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cappers RTJ, Bekker RM (2013) A manual for the identification of plant seeds and fruits. Groningen Archaeological Studies vol. 23. Barkhuis, Eelde.Google Scholar
  13. Cappers RTJ, Neef R, Bekker RM (2009) Digital atlas of economic plants. Groningen Archaeological Studies vol. 9. Barkhuis, Eelde.Google Scholar
  14. Chase B, Ajithprasad P, Rajesh SV, Patel A, Sharma B (2014) Materializing Harappan identities: unity and diversity in the borderlands of the Indus Civilization. J Anthropol Archaeol 35:63–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jaa.2014.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen-Ofri I, Weiner L, Boaretto E, Mintz G, Weiner S (2006) Modern and fossil charcoal: aspects of structure and diagenesis. J Archaeol Sci 33:428–439. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2005.08.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Conesa FC, Devanthéry N, Balbo AL, Madella M, Monserrat O (2014) Use of satellite SAR for understanding long-term human occupation dynamics in the monsoonal semi-arid plains of North Gujarat, India. Remote Sens 6:11,420–11,443. doi: 10.3390/rs61111420 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fraysse F, Pokrovsky OS, Schott J, Meunier JD (2006) Surface properties, solubility and dissolution kinetics of bamboo phytoliths. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 70:1939–1951. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2005.12.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fuller DQ, Madella M (2002) Issues in Harappan archaeobotany: retrospect and prospect. In: Settar S, Korisettar R (eds) Indian archaeology in retrospect, vol. II. Protohistory: archaeology of the Harappan Civilization. Manohar, New Delhi, pp. 317–390.Google Scholar
  19. Gadekar C, Ajithprasad P, Madella M (2013) Crested ridge technique and lithic assemblage from Datrana, Gujarat. Heritage: J Multidiscip Stud Archaeol 1:16–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. García-Granero JJ, Lancelotti C, Madella M (2015a) A tale of multi-proxies: integrating macro and microbotanical remains to understand subsistence strategies. Veget Hist Archaeobot 24:121–133. doi: 10.1007/s00334-014-0486-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. García-Granero JJ, Lancelotti C, Madella M, Ajithprasad P (2015b) Millets and herders: the origins of plant cultivation in semi-arid North Gujarat. India, Curr Anthropol. (in press)Google Scholar
  22. Haslam M (2004) The decomposition of starch grains in soils: implications for archaeological residue analyses. J Archaeol Sci 31:1715–1734. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2004.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harvey E, Fuller DQ (2005) Investigating crop processing using phytolith analysis: the example of rice and millets. J Archaeol Sci 32:739–752. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2004.12.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. IAR (1993–94) Indian archaeology 1993–94: a review. Archaeological Survey of India, New Delhi, pp. 25–31.Google Scholar
  25. IAR (1994–95) Indian archaeology 1994–95: a review. Archaeological Survey of India, New Delhi, pp. 11–16.Google Scholar
  26. ICSN (2011) The international code for starch nomenclature. Accessed 23/10/2014.
  27. Johnson JK (1984) Measuring prehistoric quarry site activity in northeastern Mississippi, In: Butler BM, May EE (eds) Prehistoric chert exploitation: studies from the Midcontinent. Center for Archaeological Investigations Occasional Paper No. 2. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, pp. 225–235.Google Scholar
  28. Kenoyer JM (1991a) The Indus Valley tradition of Pakistan and western India. J World Prehist 5:331–385. doi: 10.1007/BF00978474 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kenoyer JM (1991b) Ornament styles of the Indus Valley Tradition: evidence from recent excavations at Harappa, Pakistan. Paléorient 17:79–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kenoyer JM, Vidale M, Bhan KK (1991) Contemporary stone beadmaking in Khambhat, India: patterns of craft specialization and organization of production as reflected in the archaeological record. World Archaeol 23:44–63. doi: 10.1080/00,438,243.1991.9980158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lal BB, Joshi JP, Thapar BK, Bala M (2003) Excavations at Kalibangan, the Early Harappans (1960–1969). Archaeological Survey of India, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  32. Laughlin WS, Marsh GH (1951) The lamellar flake manufacturing site on Anangula Island in the Aleutians. Am Antiq 20:27–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Law RW (2011) Inter-regional interaction and urbanism in the Ancient Indus Valley: a geologic provenience study of Harappa’s rock and mineral assemblage. Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, KyotoGoogle Scholar
  34. Madella M, Lancelotti C (2012) Taphonomy and phytoliths: a user manual. Quat Int 275:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2011.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Madella M, Ajithprasad P, Balbo A et al. (2012) The 2010 excavation campaign of the North Gujarat Archaeological Project (NoGAP): interdisciplinary approach to the study socio-ecological contexts in the Holocene [In Spanish]. In: Secretaría General Técnica (ed) Informes y trabajos 7: excavaciones en el exterior 2010. Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte, Madrid, pp. 110–117Google Scholar
  36. Madella M, Ajithprasad P, Lancelotti C et al. (2010) Social and environmental transitions in arid zones: the North Gujarat Archaeological Project—NoGAP. Antiq Gallery 84.Google Scholar
  37. Madella M, Alexandre A, Ball T (2005) International code for phytolith nomenclature 1.0. Ann Bot 96:253–260. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci172 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Madella M, Lancelotti C, García-Granero JJ (2013) Millet microremains—an alternative approach to understand cultivation and use of critical crops in prehistory. Archaeol Anthropol Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12520-013-0130-y Google Scholar
  39. Neef R, Cappers RTJ, Bekker RM (2012) Digital atlas of economic plants in archaeology. Groningen Archaeological Studies vol. 17. Barkhuis, Eelde.Google Scholar
  40. Peregrine P (1991) Some political aspects of craft specialization. World Archaeol 23:1–11. doi: 10.1080/00,438,243.1991.9980155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Piperno DR (2006) Phytoliths: a comprehensive guide for archaeologists and paleoecologists. AltaMira Press, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  42. Poduska KM, Regev L, Boaretto E, Addadi L, Weiner S, Kronik L, Curtarolo S (2011) Decoupling local disorder and optical effects in infrared spectra: differentiating between calcites with different origins. Adv Mater 23:550–554. doi: 10.1002/adma.201003890 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Possehl GL (2002) The Indus Civilization: a contemporary perspective. AltaMira Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Rajesh SV, Krishnan K, Ajithprasad P, Madella M (2013) Pre-Prabhas assemblage from Gujarat, western India. Heritage: J Multidiscip Stud Archaeol 1:181–209Google Scholar
  45. Reddy SN (1997) If the threshing floor could talk: integration of agriculture and pastoralism during the Late Harappan in Gujarat, India. J Anthropol Archaeol 16:162–187. doi: 10.1006/jaar.1997.0308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Regev L, Poduska KM, Addadi L, Weiner S, Boaretto E (2010) Distinguishing between calcites formed by different mechanisms using infrared spectrometry: archaeological applications. J Archaeol Sci 37:3022–3029. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.06.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sanger D, Kelley AR, Berry IV HN (2001) Geoarchaeology at Gilman Falls: an Archaic quarry and manufacturing site in Central Maine, U.S.A. Geoarchaeol: An Int J 16:633–665. doi: 10.1002/gea.1014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sankalia HD (1967) The socio-economic significance of the lithic blade industry of Navdatoli, M.P, India. Curr Anthropol 3:262–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schiegl S, Goldberg P, Bar-Yosef O, Weiner S (1996) Ash deposits in Hayonim and Kebara Caves, Israel: macroscopic, microscopic and mineralogical observations, and their archaeological implications. J Archaeol Sci 23:763–781. doi: 10.1006/jasc.1996.0071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shafer HJ, Hester TR (1991) Lithic craft specialization and product distribution at the Maya site of Colha, Belize. World Archaeol 23:79–97. doi: 10.1080/00,438,243.1991.9980160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Snarskis MJ (1979) Turrialba: a Paleo-Indian quarry and workshop site in eastern Costa Rica. Am Antiq 44:125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sonawane VH, Ajithprasad P (1994) Harappa culture and Gujarat. Man and Environment XIX:129–139Google Scholar
  53. Stiles DN, Hay RL, O’Neil JR (1974) The MNK chert factory site, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. World Archaeol 5:285–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Subbarao B (1955) The chalcolithic blade industries of Maheshwar and a note on the history of the technique. Bull. Deccan Coll. Res. Inst. 17:126–149Google Scholar
  55. Torrence R (2006) Starch and archaeology. In: Torrence R, Barton H (eds) Ancient starch research. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, pp. 17–34Google Scholar
  56. Van der Veen M (2007) Formation processes of desiccated and carbonized plant remains—the identification of routine practice. J Archaeol Sci 34:968–990. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2006.09.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wright K (1992) A classification system for ground stone tools from the prehistoric Levant. Paléorient 18:53–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wright RP (2010) The Ancient Indus: urbanism, economy, and society. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  59. Yang X, Perry L (2013) Identification of ancient starch grains from the tribe Triticeae in the North China Plain. J Archaeol Sci 40:3170–3177. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan José García-Granero
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Charusmita Gadekar
    • 3
  • Irene Esteban
    • 4
  • Carla Lancelotti
    • 1
    • 5
  • Marco Madella
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
    • 6
  • P. Ajithprasad
    • 3
  1. 1.CaSEs—Complexity and Socio-Ecological Dynamics Research GroupBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Archaeology and AnthropologyInstitució Milà i Fontanals, Spanish National Research Council (IMF-CSIC)BarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Archaeology and Ancient HistoryThe M. S. University of BarodaVadodaraIndia
  4. 4.ERAAUB, Department of Prehistory, Ancient History and ArchaeologyUniversitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  5. 5.Department of HumanitiesUniversitat Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain
  6. 6.ICREA—Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis AvançatsBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations